On Friday, October 29, 2004, at 1:23:18 AM, Michael L. Wilson threw
back his cloak, climbed the podium, loudly cleared his throat and
spoke:
I love the bat! I love 3.0.2.2. It is fast, stable and wonderful. I
have tested it on three machines, all different brands, with no
problems.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M and perhaps find the goddamn bug, instead of engaging in a pointless
M I love it I hate it kindergarten war?
Breathe in. Breathe out. Now, think calm thoughts and breathe in ...
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.2 Rush on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Stuart,
M and perhaps find the goddamn bug, instead of engaging in a pointless
M I love it I hate it kindergarten war?
SH Breathe in. Breathe out. Now, think calm thoughts and breathe in ...
Pranayama? :)
--
9Val
Hallo MaXxX,
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 10:42:10 +0200GMT (29-10-2004, 10:42 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:
M What are you trying to say? That the problems are non-existent, even
M if SOME users report them?
Don't know why Micheal wrote what he did, but the reason that I
confirmed it was that I
Hello MaXxX,
A reminder of what MaXxX typed on:
29 October 2004 at 11:13:59 GMT +0200
M instead of engaging in a pointless
M I love it I hate it kindergarten war?
So only the people it *doesn't* work for are allowed to report their
findings?
M That is completely counter-productive.
Hello Michael,
A reminder of what Michael L. Wilson typed on:
29 October 2004 at 01:23:36 GMT +0200
MLW I love the bat! I love 3.0.2.2. It is fast, stable and wonderful. I
MLW have tested it on three machines, all different brands, with no
MLW problems. Wonderful release.
Glad someone
On Friday, October 29, 2004, at 11:48:17 AM, the world was changed
forever by what Tony Boom wrote:
M instead of engaging in a pointless
M I love it I hate it kindergarten war?
So only the people it *doesn't* work for are allowed to report their
findings?
Reporting bugs is about reporting
Hello MaXxX,
A reminder of what MaXxX typed on:
29 October 2004 at 14:51:11 GMT +0200
M See, a bug either IS there or ISN'T there. A bug that appears even for
M 1% of the people IS there. Claiming otherwise is concealing it.
And if the other 99% didn't report that said bug doesn't affect
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:00:43 +0200, MaXxX bared his fanged teeth,
mounted his soapbox, cussed us all, and arrogantly proclaimed:
loud labelling betas as wonderful, great, superb serves no purpose
when there ARE bugs still, apparently.
Max, I must respectfully disagree. Due to this thread, I
Hello Avi,
A reminder of what Avi Yashar typed on:
29 October 2004 at 15:33:50 GMT +0200
AY Being a peace-loving man and conscience-stricken by such
AY unaccustomed violence, I have reverted to the more docile 3.0.1.33.
Can you tell us if you was using VF's during your violent ordeal
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 14:38:31 +0100, Tony Boom wrote:
Can you tell us if you was using VF's during your violent ordeal please?
Tony, all that I did - as an initial test - was overwrite the TB
executable, launch TB, start to compose a new message (with my default
microed), tested the new ability
Dear Avi,
@29-Oct-2004, 15:55 +0200 (29-Oct 14:55 UK time) Avi Yashar [AY] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
AY So I guess the answer is No. I never looked at or used any VFs
AY during that brief encounter with a most unfortunate end.
The question might be better asked as do you have any virtual
Friday, October 29, 2004, 8:38:31 AM, (Internet Time - @610) you wrote:
TB Can you tell us if you was using VF's during your violent ordeal please?
Tony, I just tired the latest version and I only have one VF (*Junk
Mail*). When I used the 3.2.2.2, I locked up.
Went back to Ver 3.1.33 and
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 15:01:49 +0100, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
The question might be better asked as do you have any virtual folders
in your folder tree? (at all - whatever version. The current theory
is that the presence of these is causing the lock up on exit).
Yes I do: *Recent* and
Hello Michael,
A reminder of what Michael Acklin typed on:
29 October 2004 at 16:02:55 GMT +0200
MA Went back to Ver 3.1.33 and deleted the VF and reran 3.2.2.2.
MA Exited with no problem.
Well it continues to look as if it's VF's that are causing it then.
Still leaves the problem of
On Friday, October 29, 2004, 16:10, Tony Boom wrote:
Still leaves the problem of 9val never having used VF's and his still
locks up...
It's the opposite: He uses VFs but still can exit TB! normally.
On the other hand, we have Mary who have never used VFs but did
experience the hang on close
Hello MaXxX,
Friday, October 29, 2004, 2:42:10 AM, you wrote:
M What are you trying to say? That the problems are non-existent,
M even if SOME users report them?
For certain users, systems and configurations.
M That is completely counter-productive. The goal of beta-testing is
M not voting who
Hello Marck,
The question might be better asked as do you have any virtual folders
in your folder tree? (at all - whatever version. The current theory
is that the presence of these is causing the lock up on exit).
As I have said in some other message, I use quite a number of VFs and I
haven't
Hello MaXxX!
On Friday, October 29, 2004 at 2:00:43 PM you wrote:
No. It would make them look for the reasons behind such behaviour,
though it might lead them the wrong way.
Anyone remember that the awesome post was triggered by the awful
thread?
Neither praising TB nor bashing it are that
Hello Avi,
A reminder of what Avi Yashar typed on:
29 October 2004 at 16:17:32 GMT +0200
AY Yes I do: *Recent* and *Flagged*.
Then try 3022 without them and see if that cures it.
--
Best regards,Tony.
_
The
Hallo Michael,
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 16:23:18 -0700GMT (29-10-2004, 1:23 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MLW I love the bat! I love 3.0.2.2. It is fast, stable and wonderful.
Confirmed.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
sorry, I don't date outside my species
The Bat! 3.0.2.2 Rush
Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hello Roelof!
On Thursday, October 28, 2004, 6:29 PM, you wrote:
MLW I love the bat! I love 3.0.2.2. It is fast, stable and wonderful.
RO Confirmed.
Confirmed.
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.0.2.2 Rush on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Hi Michael,
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, at 16:23:18 [GMT -0700] (which was 5:23 PM where
I live) you wrote:
MLW I love the bat! I love 3.0.2.2. It is fast, stable and wonderful.
MLW I have tested it on three machines, all different brands, with no
MLW problems. Wonderful release.
Confirmed.
--
Leif
Hæ!
Friday, October 29, 2004, 01:23, Michael L. Wilson wrote:
I love the bat! I love 3.0.2.2. It is fast, stable and wonderful.
Confirmed, too. :)
--
Kveðja, Thorvald Neumann | http://www.aesir.de/
| The Bat! v3.0.2.2 Rush Professional PopFile v0.22.0
| Windows 2000 SP4 (v5.0.2195)
24 matches
Mail list logo
