Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 19 Mar 2022 08:51:16 +0700 GMT (19/03/2022, 08:51 +0700 GMT),
Thomas ML wrote:
>>> This is not a new bug in v10. I have had this since the new HTML editor was
>>> introduced.
>> And yet from the lack of interest in acknowledging or trying to fix the
>> problem it would
Hello Ira,
Saturday, March 19, 2022, 12:48:20 AM, you wrote:
>> This is not a new bug in v10. I have had this since the new HTML editor was
>> introduced.
> And yet from the lack of interest in acknowledging or trying to fix the
> problem it would seem they forgot about it. So as it's the only
Hello Thomas,
Friday, March 18, 2022, 4:23:24 AM, you wrote:
> This is not a new bug in v10. I have had this since the new HTML editor was
> introduced.
And yet from the lack of interest in acknowledging or trying to fix the problem
it would seem they forgot about it. So as it's the only bug
Dear Ira,
Friday, March 18, 2022, 2:36:33 PM, you wrote:
>> The Bat! v10 beta 5 is now available from https://beta.thebat.net/version/8
> It's installed and working .
>
> But the Reply editor and Properties/Templates is still REALLY BADLY messed
> up. Here are some of the issues.
>
> There
Hello David,
On Fri, 12 Feb 2021 16:57:52 -0500 GMT (13-Feb-21, 4:57 +0700 GMT),
david kirk wrote:
> Hello,
> I saw your post on the beta list about changing fonts in html. If I may
> offer a suggestion,
> 1. first, type your message in desired font.
> 2. then, go back and insert space to
On Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 3:30:02, Ian A. White wrote:
There are some weird things happening with fonts. Things that worked before
now don't.
My guess is that TB is now more strict about Unicode with fonts, and
since Webdings doesn't contain an Unicode table (because it's abusing
the
On Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 10:38:47, Ian A. White wrote:
But if it was a Unicode rendering issue, then would not the webding
never display correctly? It displays correctly when composing the
message, however gets converted when the message is moved to the Sent
Mail folder or queued in
Hello Jernej,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 09:10:53 +0100 GMT (22/Dec/09, 15:10 PM +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
There are some weird things happening with fonts. Things that worked before
now don't.
JS My guess is
I'd prefer a word from the developers rather than a guessing game.
JS that TB
Hello Ian,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 14:40:16 +1100 GMT (22/Dec/09, 10:40 AM +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
R It's Arial 36 followed by Arial 12 which are MY defaults
IAW If viewed as HTML, then it should Webdings 36 followed by Courier New
IAW 12.
I view as HTML. How can I tell whether the large
On Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 15:58:28, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Improperly assumed, you mean. If it's changed, it's wrong.
No. If the font doesn't have an Unicode table, it's assumed to be
CP1252 (I previously wrote ASCII, which was wrong). Nobody should be
using such fonts with the assumption
Hello Jernej,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 17:07:50 +0100 GMT (22/Dec/09, 23:07 PM +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
Improperly assumed, you mean. If it's changed, it's wrong.
JS No. If the font doesn't have an Unicode table, it's assumed to be
JS CP1252
Why? I'm sure you can point me to something.
G'day Rick,
On Tuesday, December 22, 2009, at 2:01:02 PM, you (Rick) wrote:
R It's Arial 36 followed by Arial 12 which are MY defaults
If viewed as HTML, then it should Webdings 36 followed by Courier New
12.
So, it looks like the latest betas are changing this even on the
sending
On Tuesday, December 22, 2009, 17:22:59, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
No. If the font doesn't have an Unicode table, it's assumed to be
CP1252
Why? I'm sure you can point me to something.
Historical reasons (read: fonts from the Windows 3.x era).
JS (I previously wrote ASCII, which was wrong).
Hello Ian,
On Wed, 23 Dec 2009 07:45:13 +1100 GMT (23/Dec/09, 3:45 AM +0700 GMT),
Ian A. White wrote:
TF I view as HTML. How can I tell whether the large P is Webdings 36 or
TF Arial 36?
IAW The first is that it is a graphic character and not a P as in a text
IAW character.
IAW The other way
Hello Jernej,
On Tue, 22 Dec 2009 18:36:05 +0100 GMT (23/Dec/09, 0:36 AM +0700 GMT),
Jernej Simončič wrote:
No. If the font doesn't have an Unicode table, it's assumed to be
CP1252
Why? I'm sure you can point me to something.
JS Historical reasons (read: fonts from the Windows 3.x era).
JS
G'day Rick,
On Tuesday, December 22, 2009, at 1:41:11 PM, you (Rick) wrote:
R It was a large capital P.
As one Professor Julius Sumner-Miller would have said, Why is it so?
It looks like all text gets changed to the default font.
I couldn't verify that as it was below the cut line
--
G'day Rick,
On Tuesday, December 22, 2009, at 1:50:03 PM, you (Rick) wrote:
As one Professor Julius Sumner-Miller would have said, Why is it so?
It looks like all text gets changed to the default font.
R
R I couldn't verify that as it was below the cut line
Here's one with it above the
17 matches
Mail list logo
