Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I downloaded: http://www.andric.com/gnupg/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.0a-cpfix.zip And after replacing gpg.exe and placing iconv.dll back it works!!! Thanks very much Dimitry! - -- cheers, Henk

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:34:34 +0100GMT (20-12-2004, 11:34 +0100, where I live), I wrote: HdB I downloaded: HdB http://www.andric.com/gnupg/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.0a-cpfix.zip HdB And after replacing gpg.exe and placing iconv.dll back it works!!! HdB

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello JakeLM, On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:54:52 +0100GMT (20-12-2004, 11:54 +0100, where I live), you wrote: J Just downloaded the gpg.exe with fixes and now it works fine ! J Thanks Dimitry!! J Ok, now i can start to learn GPG ... :)) You signed your

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Dimitry, @20-Dec-2004, 08:27 +0100 (20-Dec 07:27 UK time) Dimitry Andric [DA] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: But the GIMP won't run without it. So I have to put it back and still downgrade GPG. DA Please try this version of gpg.exe that I built, which contains fixes DA (or

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Mon 20-Dec-04 5:15am -0600, Henk de Bruijn wrote: On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 11:54:52 +0100GMT (20-12-2004, 11:54 +0100, where I live), you wrote: J Just downloaded the gpg.exe with fixes and now it works fine ! J Thanks Dimitry!! J Ok, now i can start to learn GPG ... :)) You signed your

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2004-12-20 at 14:56:49 JakeLM wrote: I have send my public key to those servers: hkp://keyserver.kjsl.com hkp://pks.gpg.cz ldap://horowitz.surfnet.nl:11370 hkp://blackhole.pca.dfn.de . You only have to send your public key to the nearest server in the key server network. These servers

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dimitry, On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 17:34:30 +0100GMT (20-12-2004, 17:34 +0100, where I live), you wrote: DA Note to The Bat developers: can you PLEASE add Content-Disposition DA MIME headers for GPG/PGP signed messages! Thanks! I dunno if they

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-20 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Mon 20-Dec-04 10:57am -0600, Diego Ducatenzeiler wrote: Or a ldaps server at europe.keys.pgp.com:11370 Thanks for responding. I changed my gpg.conf file, replacing my keyserver line with: keyserver ldap://europe.keys.pgp.com:11370 No joy with your key: gpg: error loading `iconv.dll':

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Sean, @19-Dec-2004, 09:53 Sean Rima [SR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: SR ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.0a.zip Yes - I thought the same. And downloaded that. And it still has the same error. :-( . At that point, I created the BugTraq entry. SR I can use

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello Marck, On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 11:51:03 +GMT (19-12-2004, 12:51 +0100, where I live), you wrote: I don't have iconv.dll anywhere in my system and it still won't work for me. Oh well. Back to the previous version sigh. Pity, moving iconv.dll works for me. But like Dimitri wrote.

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henk, @19-Dec-2004, 14:04 +0100 (19-Dec 13:04 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: I don't have iconv.dll anywhere in my system and it still won't work for me. Oh well. Back to the previous version sigh. HDB Pity, moving iconv.dll works for me. HDB But

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Bill, on Sat, 18 Dec 2004 13:52:49 -0600GMT, you wrote: BM On Sat 18-Dec-04 1:40pm -0600, Bill McCarthy wrote: gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available Hmm, while trying to sign this note, I received the same message :-( BM

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Allie Martin
On Sunday, December 19, 2004 at 8:19:25 AM [GMT -0500], Marck D Pearlstone wrote: Okay - I fibbed. I found one in the GTK subsystem, installed for The GIMP. Will this now work? Yes, it did. :) -- Cheers, -= Allie =- . 43rd Law of Computing: Anything that can go wr...

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:19:25 +GMT (19-12-2004, 14:19 +0100, where I live), you wrote: @19-Dec-2004, 14:04 +0100 (19-Dec 13:04 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: HDB Pity, moving iconv.dll works

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henk, @19-Dec-2004, 14:46 +0100 (19-Dec 13:46 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: HDB But like Dimitri wrote. Everytime I get a message that the program HDB can't find `iconv.dll' but I can verify and sign. HDB I cab finally look into trustsigning... Okay

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Marck, On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:48:18 +GMT (19-12-2004, 14:48 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ...snip HDB Hope so! But the GIMP won't run without it. So I have to put it back and still downgrade GPG. I see, I hope there will be a fix

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Jernej Simoncic
On Sunday, December 19, 2004, 14:48:18, Marck D Pearlstone wrote: But the GIMP won't run without it. So I have to put it back and still downgrade GPG. You can remove the GTK+ bin\ folder from your system PATH - Gimp should still run, since there's another PATH that it also uses, which should

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Kevin Coates
Hi Marck, On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 13:19:25 + (8:19 AM here), Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: HDB Everytime I get a message that the program can't find HDB `iconv.dll' but I can verify and sign. I cab finally look into HDB trustsigning... MDP Okay - I fibbed. I found one

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 12/18/04 at 20:06:24 Werner Koch wrote: For GPG it might be a workaround to additionally use GetOEMCP(), if GetConsoleOutputCP() returns 0. A simple patch for this is attached. Add the charset option to the gpg.conf. This doesn't work, since gpg's main() calls set_native_charset(NULL)

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-19 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2004-12-19 at 14:48:18 Marck D Pearlstone wrote: But the GIMP won't run without it. So I have to put it back and still downgrade GPG. Please try this version of gpg.exe that I built, which contains fixes (or workarounds, if you like :) for the codepage error messages:

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Sean, @18-Dec-2004, 12:34 Sean Rima [SR] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Greg: It is a pity that all my good sigs come from Thunderbird and not from the Bat! :-( This one is good and I belive it came via TB! Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hi Marck, On Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:52:35 +GMT (18-12-2004, 13:52 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SR ftp://ftp.gnupg.org/gcrypt/binary/gnupg-w32cli-1.4.0a.zip Yes - I thought the same. And downloaded that. And it still has the same error. :-( . At that point, I created the BugTraq entry. I

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 12/17/04 at 7:09:35 Henk de Bruijn wrote: Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I think they were up to release candidate for 1.4.0. I haven't seen any notice on the release of GnuPG 1.4.0 from GnuPG.org.

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 12/18/04 at 14:58:47 Dimitry Andric wrote: Hm, a temp workaround I found is to delete (or move away) any instances of iconv.dll in your PATH. It turns out the new GPG tries to load this if available, and something goes wrong with it, but I'm not sure what. Now I think I've found out what

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, December 18, 2004 at 8:58:47 AM [GMT -0500], Dimitry Andric wrote: Hm, a temp workaround I found is to delete (or move away) any instances of iconv.dll in your PATH. But that's a DLL that we're told we should install when installing these new builds of GnuPG. Are we breaking

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 12/18/04 at 17:28:04 Allie Martin wrote: Hm, a temp workaround I found is to delete (or move away) any instances of iconv.dll in your PATH. But that's a DLL that we're told we should install when installing these new builds of GnuPG. Are we breaking something else by deleting this dll?

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Allie Martin
On Saturday, December 18, 2004 at 12:25:45 PM [GMT -0500], Dimitry Andric wrote: Sure, you're probably breaking proper character conversion, which might be particularly important if you're are non-US codepage user. :) ... and that I'm not. The previous version of GPG didn't use iconv.dll at

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Bill McCarthy
On Thu 16-Dec-04 2:07pm -0600, Henk de Bruijn wrote: Bad sig? I get the following message when I try to check your sig - I'm using 1.4.0a and have downloaded iconv.dll. gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available Hmm, while trying to sign this note, I received the same message :-(

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-18 Thread Bill McCarthy
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sat 18-Dec-04 1:40pm -0600, Bill McCarthy wrote: gpg: conversion from `utf-8' to `CP0' not available Hmm, while trying to sign this note, I received the same message :-( OK, I've gotten rid of iconv.dll. I'll now try to sign. I get an

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-17 Thread Tony Boom
Hello Henk, A reminder of what Henk de Bruijn on TBBETA typed on: 17 December 2004 at 05:35:53 GMT +0100 HdB Yeah but I had switched back to 1.2.5 HdB I'll try to sign this message with GPGshell. You encrypted it, you didn't just sign it. -- Best regards,Tony.

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-17 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hi all, AFAIK it has not been placed on/at BT? -- Henk __ :beta: The Bat!™ Natural Email System v3.0.2.10 Professional on Windows XP SP2 PGP Key Request: See Headers or send email with subj.: send HenksKeyID Gossamer Spider

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-17 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henk, @17-Dec-2004, 12:50 +0100 (17-Dec 11:50 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: HDB AFAIK it has not been placed on/at BT? And who's gonna do that? -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1.2600

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-17 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Henk, @17-Dec-2004, 12:50 +0100 (17-Dec 11:50 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: HDB AFAIK it has not been placed on/at BT? https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4173 -- Cheers -- //.arck D Pearlstone -- List moderator and fellow end user TB! v3.0.2.10 on

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-17 Thread Kevin Coates
Hi Marck, On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:54:23 + (8:54 AM here), Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: HDB AFAIK it has not been placed on/at BT? MDP https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4173 Thanks, I added a note. As this problem has been occurring since the GPG v1.9.2 beta

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-17 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello Marck, Hi Marck, On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 13:54:23 +GMT (17-12-2004, 14:54 +0100, where I live), you wrote: @17-Dec-2004, 12:50 +0100 (17-Dec 11:50 UK time) Henk de Bruijn [HDB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: HDB AFAIK it has not been placed on/at BT?

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-16 Thread Peter Meyns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Henk, on Thu, 16 Dec 2004 21:07:06 +0100GMT, you wrote: HdB Bad sig? Nope. :-)) gpg: Signature made 12/16/04 21:07:06 Westeuropäische Normalzeit using DSA key ID DBE6E678 gpg: Good signature from Henk M. de Bruijn gpg: aka ...

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-16 Thread Sean Rima
Hello Henk, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 8:07:06 PM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bad sig? Good sig :) Sean -- ICQ: 679813 YAHOO: thecivvie Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM: tcobone O2 +353863868343 Vodafone +353872628431 i think i'd rather be a cat... sleep

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-16 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Sean, Thursday, December 16, 2004, 4:45:15 PM, Sean Rima wrote: It is a pity that all my good sigs come from Thunderbird and not from the Bat! :-( This one is good and I belive it came via TB! Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I think they were up

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-16 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30 owGtkrFu01AUhkMLDFY9FF7g79QiEsd2myJZJYiqKAmoJWqCChISuk5O4kttX+N7 0+AFiY0RiamCAYSAia1SB8TCA/QF6NyJhQdA4jgVb8Dd7j33/85/fp3X9nxlbvHK 5bdvfp6dPb/wde5juPBinI1NLgpnEGe3f4RX2xTHCj0SadW2bOt+in40qcJbxxYN

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-16 Thread Henk de Bruijn
On Fri, 17 Dec 2004 05:35:40 +0100GMT (17-12-2004, 5:35 +0100, where I live), I wrote: HdB -BEGIN PGP MESSAGE- HdB Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) - GPGshell v3.30 HdB -END PGP MESSAGE- Sorry, I tried to sign a message with GPGshell but it did not sign but encrypted the message

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-16 Thread Henk de Bruijn
Hello Greg, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 22:19:39 -0600GMT (17-12-2004, 5:19 +0100, where I live), you wrote: ...snip Where did you download GnuPG 1.4.0? I looked for it the other day, and I think they were up to release candidate for 1.4.0. I haven't seen any notice on the release of GnuPG 1.4.0

Re: GnuPG 1.4.0

2004-12-16 Thread Henk de Bruijn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Sean, On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 20:51:03 +GMT (16-12-2004, 21:51 +0100, where I live), you wrote: SR Thursday, December 16, 2004, 8:07:06 PM, you wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bad sig? SR Good sig :) SR Sean It is