selected also has a viewmode
assigned, that threads messages and expands these threads.
However, expanding all threads works correctly when switching to a third
folder with no viewmode
or a non-threading viewmode in between.
I can confirm this.
See steps to reproduce here:
https
is enabled. This non-expanding always
happens when the folder that was previously selected also has a viewmode
assigned, that threads messages and expands these threads.
However, expanding all threads works correctly when switching to a third folder
with no viewmode
or a non-threading viewmode
Hello,
is it really so hard to fix this? Why is empty place used for [+] icon
displayed in mode without threading?
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 5.0.4 RC/4
under Windows 7 6.1 Build 7601 Service Pack 1
with MyMacros
Hello,
seems like first column in non-threading uses same column width like threading
mode, but this is wrong. Please fix before final version.
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 5.0.0.142 BETA
under Windows 7 6.1 Build
Hello,
when is threading by Subject/Sender/Recipient enabled for particular
folder, I expand all groups and select all messages in folder by Ctrl+A,
counter Selected messages in Status bar includes groups too.
reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8473
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek
Hello,
when I enable Browse deleted messages, deleted messages are crossed in
message list. When is threading mode disabled, everything including Subject
is crossed, but in Threading mode, Subject is not crossed.
reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8266
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek
Hello,
I am playing with view modes and as I discovered, group Thread is
included in context menu of Message list pane, even I have no threading
mode enabled.
reported in https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=8268
--
Thanks and Bye,
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
there even
if I deleted the new message
Now, if you delete the new message it jumps back to it's former place
in the message list.
I am threading by references, expanding all threads, grouping by date, and new
thread sorting. This is the way it was before and after upgrading to .11 -
nothing else changed
to it's former place
in the message list.
I am threading by references, expanding all threads, grouping by date, and new
thread sorting. This is the way it was before and after upgrading to .11 -
nothing else changed
Confirm anyone?
--
Rick
Considering McCain? You're not doing the math
On Thursday, February 28, 2008, 5:57:57 PM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
Your answer is in the word attachment. It is not a part of the
message and bears no identity of the message. They are as different
as apples and cucumbers.
it sure is. just look at the size of the message. it just gets added
2/29/2008 12:30 PM
Hi Dwight,
On 2/29/2008 Dwight Corrin wrote:
Your answer is in the word attachment. It is not a part of the
message and bears no identity of the message. They are as different
as apples and cucumbers.
DC it sure is. just look at the size of the message. it just gets
On Thursday, February 28, 2008, 5:57:57 PM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
Your answer is in the word attachment. It is not a part of the
message and bears no identity of the message. They are as different
as apples and cucumbers.
it sure is. just look at the size of the message. it just gets added
On Thursday, February 28, 2008, 6:20:59 PM, MAU wrote:
Seems to me that 'supplementary' is the key.
If you are trying to maintain integrity of what was sent/received,
then the attachment has to be considered part of that package. If we
are worrying about evidentiary matters, then we have to
On Friday, February 29, 2008, 11:31:29 AM, Paul Van Noord wrote:
It can also be stored apart from the message.
For the sanctity of what was dispatched, this too should be
eliminated.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at
Hello Dwight,
How you can restrict the sanctity of all this to one portion and
still pretend that there is some moral imperative for the whole is
beyond me.
In my mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], a reply to Rick
Grunwald about editing Subject or nor, I wrote:
,- [ ]
| It is and has been a long
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008, 8:01:32 PM, MAU wrote:
This, to me, has the advantage that full integrity of received
message is maintained, including all the headers.
What is with this obsession with the full integrity of received
message? Maybe that is the least important aspect of the
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008, 8:01:32 PM, MAU wrote:
This, to me, has the advantage that full integrity of received
message is maintained, including all the headers.
What is with this obsession with the full integrity of received
message? Maybe that is the least important aspect of the
Hello Dwight,
This, to me, has the advantage that full integrity of received
message is maintained, including all the headers.
What is with this obsession with the full integrity of received
message? Maybe that is the least important aspect of the messages
someone wants to edit.
Yes,
2/28/2008 6:55 PM
Hi Dwight,
On 2/28/2008 Dwight Corrin wrote:
DC If integrity is so important, why are we allowed to separate
DC attachments from the rest of the message, or to delete an attachment?
Your answer is in the word attachment. It is not a part of the
message and bears no identity
the Memo field, which is not
M readily visible and that is kept separately in the Index file and not as
M part of the message itself.
M And if the received message is part of a thread (for example a reply to
M a previous one in a mailing list), and you'd like to maintain threading,
M do a Reply
I have a message that incorrectly threaded with another from last
August. I cannot break the threading
Can someone post the directions once again to make sure I am doing it
correctly? I [shift] drag it to the left and get the message OK to
remove the threading to which I answer OK but nothing
Hello Rick,
I have a message that incorrectly threaded with another from last
August. I cannot break the threading
Are you threading just by Reference, by Subject or by Reference plus
Subject?
Why do you think is it incorrectly Threaded?
What is the Message-ID of the message it is threaded
Hello Rick,
I have a message that incorrectly threaded with another from last
August. I cannot break the threading
Are you threading just by Reference, by Subject or by Reference plus
Subject?
Why do you think is it incorrectly Threaded?
What is the Message-ID of the message
Hello Rick,
That folder is threaded by Reference + Subject
Change it to just by Reference.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.14.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Current beta is 4.0.14.7 |
You don't seem to be doing anything wrong but, the fact that threading
is not removed may depend on your answer to above questions.
I just discovered that I CAN thread it to a different message. If I
do that the one from August disappears back down the list. However if
I remove the NEW
Hello Rick,
That folder is threaded by Reference + Subject
Change it to just by Reference.
Thanks - that fixed it but I remember when I first started using the
Bat, an experienced user advised me to set it up reference + subject
--
Rick
Republican tax breaks for large corporations:
Hello Rick,
I just discovered that I CAN thread it to a different message. If I
do that the one from August disappears back down the list. However if
I remove the NEW threading, it is again threaded to the original from
August
Yes, that is the 'stupid' way threading by Subject works
Hello Rick,
I just discovered that I CAN thread it to a different message. If I
do that the one from August disappears back down the list. However if
I remove the NEW threading, it is again threaded to the original from
August
Yes, that is the 'stupid' way threading by Subject works
Hello Rick,
That folder is threaded by Reference + Subject
Change it to just by Reference.
Thanks - that fixed it but I remember when I first started using the
Bat, an experienced user advised me to set it up reference + subject
I am sure it wasn't me, I would have never suggested that
that and now you
know why :)
The thing is it wouldn't let me BREAK the threading unless I threaded
it to something else - they the original with the same subject would
disappear
--
Rick
The American Republican Party: Supporting Big Business - serfdom for the people
v4.0.14.7 on Windows XP 5.1
Hello Rick,
BTW your last paragraph gave yet another EXCELLENT REASON to implement
Subject editing in received emails :))
Yes, and why not be able to also edit the Created date and time?
Haven't you ver received a message with a 'wrong date' and that
doesn't show properly if you are sorting
Hello Rick,
BTW your last paragraph gave yet another EXCELLENT REASON to implement
Subject editing in received emails :))
Yes, and why not be able to also edit the Created date and time?
Haven't you ver received a message with a 'wrong date' and that
doesn't show properly if you are
Hello Rick,
All good points! However supporting editing the subject line is
sufficient for this version
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6700
:))
It is and has been a long and endless discussion and it is not the first
time I say I will not support it. But I will not go wild either if
Guten Tag Rick Grunwald,
am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 um 17:56 schrieben Sie:
Hello Rick,
I have a message that incorrectly threaded with another from last
August. I cannot break the threading
Are you threading just by Reference, by Subject or by Reference plus
Subject?
Why do you
2/26/2008 1:57 PM
Hi MAU,
On 2/26/2008 MAU wrote:
BTW your last paragraph gave yet another EXCELLENT REASON to implement
Subject editing in received emails :))
M Yes, and why not be able to also edit the Created date and time?
M Haven't you ver received a message with a 'wrong date' and
2/26/2008 1:57 PM
Hi MAU,
On 2/26/2008 MAU wrote:
BTW your last paragraph gave yet another EXCELLENT REASON to implement
Subject editing in received emails :))
M Yes, and why not be able to also edit the Created date and time?
M Haven't you ver received a message with a 'wrong date' and
Hi MAU,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 1:21:22 PM you wrote:
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My eyes thank you! Such a good idea. I'll support if you wish.
--
Regards,
Maggie
Hello Maggie,
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My eyes thank you! Such a good idea. I'll support if you wish.
Sorry my dear, but I don't wish :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
Hi MAU,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 1:21:22 PM you wrote:
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My eyes thank you! Such a good idea. I'll support if you wish.
SUPPORTED!
--
Rick
Guten Tag Rick Grunwald,
am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 um 21:04 schrieben Sie:
Hi MAU,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 1:21:22 PM you wrote:
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My
Guten Tag Rick Grunwald,
am Dienstag, 26. Februar 2008 um 21:04 schrieben Sie:
Hi MAU,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 1:21:22 PM you wrote:
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My
Hello Jens,
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My eyes thank you! Such a good idea. I'll support if you wish.
SUPPORTED!
Absolutely supported!
Oh my goodness! You guys can't be
Hi MAU,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 2:35:06 PM you wrote:
M Hello Maggie,
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My eyes thank you! Such a good idea. I'll support if you wish.
M Sorry
I really can't believe you are being serious.
We were just following your lead! :'(
--
Rick
The Mideast Oil Crusade did more for militant Islam than Osama EVER could have.
v4.0.14.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Hello Rick,
MAU - it was your idea - do you want to open the whish item? :))
Certainly NOT! See my reply to Jens :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.14.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Hello Rick,
I really can't believe you are being serious.
We were just following your lead! :'(
My 'lead', as you call it, and please don't anyone feel offended, was
just to illustrate how 'ridiculous' I find the request to edit the
Subject of received messages.
--
Best regards,
Hello Rick,
I really can't believe you are being serious.
We were just following your lead! :'(
My 'lead', as you call it, and please don't anyone feel offended, was
just to illustrate how 'ridiculous' I find the request to edit the
Subject of received messages.
... and you were
2/26/2008 4:31 PM
Hi MAU,
On 2/26/2008 MAU wrote:
M I really can't believe you are being serious.
Me either.
- --
Take Care,
Paul
Voyager v.3.99.4 on Win2k SP4-Rollup1 5.0.2195
No IMAP OTFE
Current beta is 4.0.14.7 | 'Using
2/26/2008 4:32 PM
Hi MAU,
On 2/26/2008 MAU wrote:
I really can't believe you are being serious.
We were just following your lead! :'(
M My 'lead', as you call it, and please don't anyone feel offended, was
M just to illustrate how 'ridiculous' I find the request to edit the
M Subject
M just to illustrate how 'ridiculous' I find the request to edit the
M Subject of received messages.
Actually Poco mail allows that and I found it to occasionally be VERY
handy
--
Rick
If all life is sacred ...
How can Republicans be pro life AND for capital punishment?
v4.0.14.7 on Windows XP
2/26/2008 5:27 PM
Hi Rick,
On 2/26/2008 Rick Grunwald wrote:
RG Actually Poco mail allows that and I found it to occasionally be VERY
RG handy
Too many other challenges with Poco. I admit there are times I want to
change the subject is a received message so I just redirect it to me
with the
Hi MAU,
On Tuesday, February 26, 2008 at 4:08:32 PM you wrote:
M Hello Jens,
M why not be able to edit the 'Content-Type:' header to change
M the charset so it will match the one of our preferred Viewer Profile?
Yes! My eyes thank you! Such a good idea. I'll support if you wish.
Hello Maggie,
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 18:34:59 -0500 GMT (27/02/2008, 06:34 +0700 GMT),
Maggie Meister wrote:
SUPPORTED!
Absolutely supported!
M Oh my goodness! You guys can't be serious! I leave you alone for a
M couple of hours and look what you have started! ;-)
MM It's not our fault -
to
a previous one in a mailing list), and you'd like to maintain threading,
do a Reply to the the same 'previous' message and attach it. Again, this
will maintain full integrity of the originally received message.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v4.0.14.7
On Thursday, February 14, 2008, at 18:07:11 [UTC-0500] (Thursday,
February 14, 2008 00:07 my local time) Rick Grunwald wrote:
Thanks for the quick reply. I had the sort on CREATED. I sorted by
Received and there was no change in the order. The thread with the
newest message was still in the
Thanks for the quick reply. I had the sort on CREATED. I sorted by
Received and there was no change in the order. The thread with the
newest message was still in the same place
has always been like this afair
--
Best regards,
Carsten
Thanks for the quick reply. I had the sort on CREATED. I sorted by
Received and there was no change in the order. The thread with the
newest message was still in the same place
has always been like this afair
I don't think so. A new message used to drive the thread to the
thread to the top
I have threading set up to thread by references+subject and sort by
date descending, sort new threads check.
I BELIEVE that when a new message arrived and was threaded with
another, it drove the thread to the top (I sort mail descending). That
no longer seems to be the case. Is this changed
On Tuesday, February 12, 2008, at 16:34:04 [UTC-0500] (Tuesday,
February 12, 2008 22:34 my local time) Rick Grunwald wrote:
I have threading set up to thread by references+subject and sort by
date descending, sort new threads check.
I BELIEVE that when a new message arrived and was threaded
Hello Rick,
RG I have threading set up to thread by references+subject and sort by
RG date descending, sort new threads check.
I don't see the arrow on the Received column, so sorting criteria
is something unknown...
--
Best regards,
Stefan
Hello Rick,
RG I have threading set up to thread by references+subject and sort by
RG date descending, sort new threads check.
I don't see the arrow on the Received column, so sorting criteria
is something unknown...
Thanks for the quick reply. I had the sort on CREATED. I sorted by
Received
Hello Ethan,
I use the TB for my replies.
...
...
So, at this time I have to cut and past a new message to participate
in the conversation.
OK, no problem. I was just curious about what was the reason for not
threading.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using
Hello Ethan,
Sorry. Closing TB, removing the reg-key, restarting TB did not bring
the Languages menu option back. TB still complains about selecting
languages.
Confirmed.
Your last 3 replies will not thread. That is, they do not include an
In-Reply-To or References header. Have you used TB
Hello ,
Your last 3 replies will not thread. That is, they do not include an
In-Reply-To or References header. Have you used TB for these replies?
Miguel:
I use the TB for my replies. However, the digest has been blacklisted
given the use of images and html files.
Example:
Content-Type:
Hello all,
I have a couple of folders where I thread by Subject. In previous
versions (up to 3.99.29) I could select the 'group' and when hitting
Delete (or selecting it from menu) I would get a confirmation dialog
saying:
---
Delete messages
---
Hello MAU,
In current version, when selecting the 'group' the Delete key doesn't do
anything and the Delete option is disabled (greyed out) in menu.
If this a bug or a new intended behaviour? If not a bug, why the change?
I think that getting the confirmation dialog was safe enough, more
Hello MAU,
M In current version, when selecting the 'group' the Delete key doesn't do
M anything and the Delete option is disabled (greyed out) in menu.
M If this a bug or a new intended behaviour? If not a bug, why the change?
It's a bug, definitely.
--
Cheers!
Stefan
...The fault lies
Hello all,
Sunday, December 23, 2007, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
M In current version, when selecting the 'group' the Delete key doesn't do
M anything and the Delete option is disabled (greyed out) in menu.
M If this a bug or a new intended behaviour? If not a bug, why the change?
It's a bug,
Hello Marek,
MM seems other confirmations dialogs are not working too, TB stopped
MM displaying confirmation before saving message with empty subject,
MM I have it enabled.
Here, all confirmations are working... I wonder whether it has
something to do with Maxim's compilation...
--
Cheers!
Hello Stefan,
M In current version, when selecting the 'group' the Delete key doesn't do
M anything and the Delete option is disabled (greyed out) in menu.
M If this a bug or a new intended behaviour? If not a bug, why the change?
It's a bug, definitely.
And it has a BT number now:
On Sunday, December 23, 2007, 8:48:27 AM, Peter Hampf wrote:
here it also prompts me when I try to save a message without a
subject.
I didn't get a prompt, but I can't find the spot to be sure it's set
to do so.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
1201 W River Blvd Apt B108
Wichita KS 67203
316.303.9385
Hello all,
Sunday, December 23, 2007, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
MM seems other confirmations dialogs are not working too, TB stopped
MM displaying confirmation before saving message with empty subject,
MM I have it enabled.
Here, all confirmations are working... I wonder whether it has
something
Hello all,
Sunday, December 23, 2007, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
MM seems other confirmations dialogs are not working too, TB stopped
MM displaying confirmation before saving message with empty subject,
MM I have it enabled.
Here, all confirmations are working... I wonder whether it has
something
Alexander,
Wednesday, September 27, 2006, 12:26:29 PM, you wrote:
ASK Try to use threading by reference and subject (combined).
ASK Press ALT+5 in the messagelist to activate it, or by
ASK reference alone (ALT+1). Its not a cure-all, but usually
ASK better than threading by subject alone
]:
) threaded views a rarely correctly organized (except in
groups like this one where everyone is using the same email
program).
I'd like to suggest/request an option for the threading model
to either do whatever it is doing now (for those who like it)
*OR* to have it skip over all known forms
Hello Steven,
A reminder of what Steven P Vallière typed on:
Wednesday, September 27, 2006 at 07:46:10 GMT -0400
SPV I'd like to suggest/request an option for the threading model
SPV to either do whatever it is doing now (for those who like it)
SPV *OR* to have it skip over all known forms
Hello Steven P Vallière everyone else,
on 27-Sep-2006 at 13:46 you (Steven P Vallière) wrote:
threaded views a rarely correctly organized (except in groups like
this one where everyone is using the same email program).
Try to use threading by reference and subject (combined). Press ALT+5
Hallo Stuart,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:10:35 +0100GMT (10-8-2006, 15:10 , where I
live), you wrote:
SH It's also true that the mechanism it uses is different from the
SH brain-dead client that most other people use, ie Outlook.
SH WIBNI there was a use Outlook Threading Model option, ideally
It's true that the threading in TB! works nicely.
It's also true that the mechanism it uses is different from the
brain-dead client that most other people use, ie Outlook.
WIBNI there was a use Outlook Threading Model option, ideally on a
folder-by-folder basis?
Or are you all going to tell me
Hallo Stuart,
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006 14:10:35 +0100GMT (10-8-2006, 15:10 , where I
live), you wrote:
SH It's also true that the mechanism it uses is different from the
SH brain-dead client that most other people use, ie Outlook.
SH WIBNI there was a use Outlook Threading Model option, ideally
Hello Stuart Hemming everyone else,
you waved the red flag for me, Stuart... :-)
on 10-Aug-2006 at 15:10 you (Stuart Hemming) wrote:
It's true that the threading in TB! works nicely.
I don't think so. The mixed threading by reference and subject often
fails and sorts messages wrong
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 17-Dez-2005 at 04:35 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
And they fixed my nickname/address book problem. A feature that I may be
the only one here using. But I had missed it fiercely.
Oh no, you're not. I'm also making use of this.
I'm also still on .08 for obvious
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, December 17, 2005, 5:21 AM, you wrote:
And they fixed my nickname/address book problem. A feature that I
may be the only one here using. But I had missed it fiercely.
Oh no, you're not. I'm also making use of this.
Oh, great! If you or anyone spoke on-list
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 8:09:34 PM, Dwight A Corrin wrote:
[-] (#0005456) %CURSOR=BODY macro was not functional
Well, there is a little good news. This seems to actually be fixed.
going back to .08 now.
threading is also obviously broken, because I replied to 9val's
announcement
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 8:20:27 PM, Peter Ouwehand wrote:
V3.63.13 is not fit for beta testing.
fully concur. used it only long enough to confirm that they did fix
the %cursor problem
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at
Hello Dwight!
On Friday, December 16, 2005, 9:03 PM, you wrote:
V3.63.13 is not fit for beta testing.
fully concur. used it only long enough to confirm that they did fix
the %cursor problem
And they fixed my nickname/address book problem. A feature that I may
be the only one here using. But
Hello,
this is a pretty old thread but I stumbled across the problem just now
again...
on 24-Sep-2005 at 11:46 I wrote:
has anyone else occasional problems with the re-threading? I seem to be
unable to attach a reply to a message that has no message ID. Maybe other
factors apply, I don't
-to header (thats what Outlook 2003 does, can you
believe it?).
As it is now, TB's picks the in-reply-to header and adds the content to
the references header list - but it can't set a new in-reply-to header,
because there's no msg-id to refer to. So, the threading information of the
references list
Hallo Alexander,
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005 12:46:52 +0200GMT (24-9-2005, 12:46 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK has anyone else occasional problems with the re-threading? I seem to be
ASK unable to attach a reply to a message that has no message ID. Maybe other
ASK factors apply, I don't know
Hello Roelof Otten everyone else,
on 24-Sep-2005 at 23:46 you (Roelof Otten) wrote:
Then I copied the same message, but with msg-id to tbbeta
and the threading went just fine,
so I guess the problem is the msg-id.
Thank you for your tests.
IIRC correct the message-ID isn't absolutely
. That's rather mandatory, isn't it?
ASK but on the other hand, it is of course vital for threading. But
ASK then again, the re-threading was implemented for messages that
ASK fail normal threading. I wonder what to do now :-) ...
That's easy.
ASK report it as a bug, or curse at Microsoft?
Both
Hello Roelof Otten everyone else,
on 25-Sep-2005 at 00:29 you (Roelof Otten) wrote:
ASK IIRC correct the message-ID isn't absolutely mandatory,
RFC2822 says that it should be inserted by the mta when the mua
doesn't do so. That's rather mandatory, isn't it?
OK, I see.
ASK report it as a
On Wednesday, August 31, 2005 at 2:16:27 PM [GMT -0500], Martin Webster
wrote:
Messages aren't threaded when receiving messages into local cache
Threading only occurs after switching between folders. See attached
images. Possibly won't notice this if you keep TB! open all day long.
Can
Hello Curtis Michael,
On 01 September 2005, 10:47 you wrote:
Messages aren't threaded when receiving messages into local cache
Threading only occurs after switching between folders. See attached
images. Possibly won't notice this if you keep TB! open all day long.
Can anyone confirm
Hello tbbeta,
Messages aren't threaded when receiving messages into local cache
Threading only occurs after switching between folders. See attached
images. Possibly won't notice this if you keep TB! open all day long.
Can anyone confirm?
--
As ever,
.\\artin | ICQ 15893823
No snowflake
Hi Martin,
Am Wednesday, August 31, 2005, 9:16:27 PM, schreibst du:
Messages aren't threaded when receiving messages into local cache
Threading only occurs after switching between folders. See attached
images. Possibly won't notice this if you keep TB! open all day long.
Can anyone confirm
Just let you know, I have changed to gmail :)
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
Hello Vili,
Vili wrote (in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Just let you know, I have changed to gmail :)
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Boris Anders, http://www.batboard.de
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Howdy Vili,
Friday, July 1, 2005, 12:55:58 PM, Vili wrotened:
V Just let you know, I have changed to gmail :)
ok i'll try and remember
--
Have Fun,
| |
|en is |\ohop
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
crashing The Bat! v3.5.36
falling out of mid air with Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Hello MAU.
--On 15 June 2005 01:33 +0200 you wrote about Wrong threading (Was: Re:
Distributed AS IS):
Can you or anybody explain what happened here?
Don't look at me, it's nothing to do with me this time. I have to admit to
sporting a wry, almost smug smile though when I see you quote
1 - 100 of 321 matches
Mail list logo
