Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:35 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
The others are the majority, that fact alone says enough.
ASK Killer argument. Thousands of lemmings can't be wrong! :-)
How many computers are running Windows, how many OS/2?
Just as I said...
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
We can like it or not like it at our own personal disretion, but there
are facts.
ASK Ah, the facts, yes. :-)
ASK You have to agree that an assumption, based on the fact that 1000
ASK users prefer/use system A and 10 users prefer/use system B,
ASK
Hello Goncalo Farias,
on 26-Jun-2005 at 14:16 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote:
De facto standards
I am quite sure that I am totally wrong when I assume that, seeing your
reply in a thread where you haven't participated at all yet (while it would
be a topic that would offer you tremendous
Hello Maxim,
On Thu, 23 Jun 2005 14:20:18 +0300 GMT (23/06/2005, 18:20 +0700 GMT),
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MM MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you
Hi Alex,
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
ASK Hello Goncalo Farias,
ASK on 26-Jun-2005 at 14:16 you (Goncalo Farias) wrote:
De facto standards
ASK I am quite sure that I am totally wrong when I assume that,
ASK seeing your reply in a thread where you haven't participated at
ASK all
Hello Michael,
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:36:04 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
BTW, is there any way to invoke MicroEd for just text formatting?
SmartBat (Tools Menu or F6) is what you're looking for, I guess.
--
Martin
TB! 3.5.0.31 on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2
Sunday, June 26, 2005, 5:35:41 PM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Martin,
MS SmartBat (Tools Menu or F6) is what you're looking for, I guess.
Yes it is Martin. I just found out on the TB Tech list. Nick Danger
brought up the same short cut/menu item. And thanks for your reply.
:)
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 12:43 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
I don't keep a complete archive either, but the starting message was
posted by me on the 3rd of June at 2144 bearing the subject of
Deficiencies in v3.5.
Hmmm, so its nothing new. One personal
Hi,
ASK Please point me to the starting message on gmane or mailarchive,
ASK I haven't seen the topic in the past 1 1/2 weeks and I've been
ASK away was unsubscribed before.
I don't keep a complete archive either, but the starting message was
posted by me on the 3rd of June at 2144 bearing the
Hi Alex,
ASK Hmmm, so its nothing new.
Yes, TheBat behaves like this since the earliest version I have seen -
1.53, I believe.
ASK One personal preference against the
ASK other, and the proclamation of partly self-raised standards
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 16:00 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
ASK One personal preference against the other, and the proclamation of
ASK partly self-raised standards
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of editors
were doing it all wrong and
6/25/2005 10:28 AM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of editors
AS were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
bold enough to go outside
Hi Alex,
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
ASK No, thats not what I meant.
I understood you perfectly well. However, in this case precocious
remarks are not going to change anything: Thousands of
Hello once more,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 16:16 I (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
What you're saying would mean that the majority of TB users backs up your
wish. Is that the case? :-)
Uh... the Windows editor *removes* the LFs (that autoformat inserted)
before sending? Is that WOD? In the editor prefs
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 16:50 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
Are you seriously suggesting that the thousands are wrong and everyone
speaking up against the weird system the lone one is using are intolerant
boneheads?
No, but TB isn't wrong either, and there is
Hi Paul,
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
AS editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
PVN Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing
PVN to be bold enough to go outside the box. There is nothing to say
PVN the other
Hello Alto!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:50 AM, you wrote:
ASK What you're saying would mean that the majority of TB users
ASK backs up your wish. Is that the case? :-)
Apparently it is. On this list are very few people who have reported
that they explicitly like RIT's way, many who don't
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:05 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
The others are the majority, that fact alone says enough.
Killer argument. Thousands of lemmings can't be wrong! :-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Success is
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 10:03 AM, you wrote:
Are you seriously suggesting that the thousands are wrong and
everyone speaking up against the weird system the lone one is using
are intolerant boneheads?
No, but TB isn't wrong either, and there is NO such thing as an
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 9:54:33 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Uh... the Windows editor *removes* the LFs (that autoformat inserted)
before sending? Is that WOD? In the editor prefs wrapping at column 75 is
set, and it appears on-screen, but is gone when I send... ?!? puzzled
Hello Mary Bull everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:12 you (Mary Bull) wrote:
I prefer MicroEd for writing e-mails, and I would very much like to
see it remain as my easy choice for using it.
Thanks for the support, Mary.
I'm not against adding _optional_ functionality to MicroEd for those
Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:36:04 AM, (Internet Time - ) you wrote:
Hello Paul,
PVN Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
PVN bold enough to go outside the box. There is nothing to say the other
PVN editors are correct and the TB is wrong. The reverse is also true.
Hello Allie Martin everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:25 you (Allie Martin) wrote:
Uh... the Windows editor *removes* the LFs (that autoformat inserted)
before sending? Is that WOD? In the editor prefs wrapping at column 75 is
set, and it appears on-screen, but is gone when I send... ?!?
Hello Paul!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 9:36 AM, you wrote:
AS Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
AS editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
Change and improvement doesn't happen unless someone is willing to be
bold enough to go outside the
Hi,
The others are the majority, that fact alone says enough.
ASK Killer argument. Thousands of lemmings can't be wrong! :-)
How many computers are running Windows, how many OS/2?
We can like it or not like it at our own personal disretion, but there
are facts.
--
MfG,
Alto
Hello Alexander!
On Saturday, June 25, 2005, 10:27 AM, you wrote:
I prefer MicroEd for writing e-mails, and I would very much like to
see it remain as my easy choice for using it.
Thanks for the support, Mary.
My pleasure. Nice to be on the same page with you, here.
I'm not against adding
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 10:05:31 AM [GMT -0500], Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
The others are the majority, that fact alone says enough.
Windows is the standard. It's the standard against with other OS's
should be judged. Afterall, it's what the majority uses so it's
architecture and approach
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 10:33:00 AM [GMT -0500], Alexander S. Kunz
wrote:
Really?
I thought if I set TB to wrap at column 75, it would do that on sending,
and not only on-screen, and remove the formatting when sending. It means I
compose a message on-screen and it will not look the way
Windows is the standard. It's the standard against with other OS's
should be judged. Afterall, it's what the majority uses so it's
architecture and approach must be right and any lone deviation should be
considered wrong and not in the interest of the user.
Alto was talking about the GUI of
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 11:25:39 AM [GMT -0500], Lars Sölter
wrote:
Alto was talking about the GUI of what ever operating system.
That's what *you're* talking about and not what Alto's talking about.
He's saying that once the majority uses a particular approach, then that
must say
Hello Allie Martin everyone else,
on 25-Jun-2005 at 17:52 you (Allie Martin) wrote:
But TB removes linefeeds from messages created with the Windows editor.
Look at the source of the message I sent with Windows editor. It does not
contain LFs but only very long lines. Thats not what I had on
6/25/2005 1:27 PM
Hi Alto,
On 6/25/2005 Alto Speckhardt wrote:
AS Hi Alex,
Indeed. RIT aparently thought that thousands and thousands of
editors were doing it all wrong and invented their own system.
ASK No, thats not what I meant.
AS I understood you perfectly well. However, in this case
Hi Lars,
LS Alto was talking about the GUI of what ever operating system.
LS And the fact that a GUI only makes sense when every application on
LS that system is handled similar in it's basic functions (shortcuts,
LS menu entries, dialog and window structure ...).
LS That is the fundamental
Hi Allie,
Alto was talking about the GUI of what ever operating system.
AM That's what *you're* talking about and not what Alto's talking about.
Hm, maybe I've been to subtle again.
AM He's saying that once the majority uses a particular approach, then that
AM must say something for the fact
On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 3:46:42 PM [GMT -0500], Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
No, that I did not say for sure. What I said is that everybody is used
to a certain way, be it sensible or not. Every departure from this
trained behaviour is new territory for the user, and new territory is
I do appreciate compromise and so far that's been in the form of the
Windows editor.
But the windows editor is no compromis, it is only a cheep excuse (actually it
is more a technical demonstration of the windows api edit fields ;). It is not
close beeing able to perform the range of
Bonjour Alexander,
ASK And when I quote it and reflow your quotes with ALT-L, everything
ASK is gone.
ASK Get my point now? :-)
Nope! Why would you want to reflow manually your text while using
auto-format which does this for you? Once again, I'm just talking
about a feature (hard vs
Hi Mark,
MP They all start answering without asking why these questions are important!
:-)
Actually, answer is very simple - as you can see in just-posted
roadmap, Unicode support is one of our goals, and it surely will cause
editor changes.
--
Hi all,
FS I only miss the possibility to start a new line in the same
FS paragraph with the auto-format mode switched on, like many
FS word-processors do with Shift+Return.
CM Agreed. And in addition to this a possibility to visually distinguish
CM between new line (Shift+Return) and new
Hi,
ASK How do you keep line feed and line feed apart once the message is sent?
ASK You can't do that. A linefeed is a linefeed, especially in a plain text
ASK message.
Yes - it says go to next line. It does not say insert empty line
here.
So once more, I don't get what the problem is supposed
On 6/24/05, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
Why all the trouble? One-Enter is end-paragraph-and-goto-next-line,
two-Enter is end-paragraph-and-insert-new-empty-line. The way it's
done since WordStar. Why fumble around with two different key
combinations that just confuse everything all over again?
Not
Hi Avi,
(BTW, is this correct? Is Avi your first name?)
Why all the trouble? One-Enter is
end-paragraph-and-goto-next-line, two-Enter is
end-paragraph-and-insert-new-empty-line. The way it's done since
WordStar. Why fumble around with two different key combinations
that just confuse
Why all the trouble? One-Enter is end-paragraph-and-goto-next-line,
two-Enter is end-paragraph-and-insert-new-empty-line. The way it's
done since WordStar.
Because some people never bothered them selves with inferior Disk Operating
Systems and suspect word processors. Either because they
Hello Maxim,
On Thursday, June 23, 2005 you wrote:
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really using,
you are missing in Windows Editor?
2. What are the disadvantages of MicroEd comparing to Windows
Editor, and what
On 6/24/05, Alto Speckhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Avi,
(BTW, is this correct? Is Avi your first name?)
Avi is currently my first name in Israel, but it's very common. So
some people in the computer-related industries call me Jay. Take
your pick... or choose another name, if you like.
Bonjour Avi, (I'll call you Jay next time :-)
Yes, I'm with you absolutly. This in fact is my basic complaint with
MicroEd, not being able to handle a single Enter as an end this
paragraph and start a new line as in every other editor I know of.
AY Well, perhaps then the other solution would
Hello Hendrik Oesterlin everyone else,
on 24-Jun-2005 at 01:13 you (Hendrik Oesterlin) wrote:
You could also just highlighting the lines you will re-flow and press
Alt+L This will work even if there is no empty line between the
paragraphs.
Too much work. ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 24-Jun-2005 at 12:06 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
ASK How do you keep line feed and line feed apart once the message is
sent?
ASK You can't do that. A linefeed is a linefeed, especially in a plain text
ASK message.
Yes - it says go to next line. It
Hello Francis Segond everyone else,
on 24-Jun-2005 at 08:52 you (Francis Segond) wrote:
Nope! Why would you want to reflow manually your text while using
auto-format which does this for you? Once again, I'm just talking about a
feature (hard vs soft-return) encountered in most editors.
But
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 24-Jun-2005 at 12:44 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
Yes, I'm with you absolutly. This in fact is my basic complaint with
MicroEd, not being able to handle a single Enter as an end this
paragraph and start a new line as in every other editor I know of.
Hi Alex,
Yes, I'm with you absolutly. This in fact is my basic complaint with
MicroEd, not being able to handle a single Enter as an end this
paragraph and start a new line as in every other editor I know of.
ASK Nonsense! Turn off auto-formatting and you have what you want.
May I suggest you
On Friday, June 24, 2005, at 03:11 PM, Alto Speckhardt
wrote:
ASK Nonsense! Turn off auto-formatting and you have what you want.
May I suggest you read up on the discussion on this subject that
already took place right here in the past few weeks. If anything is
unclear to you then, I'll
Hello you schmuck, answering yourself again?
on 24-Jun-2005 at 20:56 you (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
...and the next reflow of *your* message (when it is included as
quotation) will kill your single LF in a paragraph.
Like this.
While I sent it like this:
...and the next reflow of *your*
Hello Alto Speckhardt everyone else,
on 24-Jun-2005 at 22:11 you (Alto Speckhardt) wrote:
May I suggest you read up on the discussion on this subject that
already took place right here in the past few weeks. If anything is
unclear to you then, I'll gladly answer your remaining questions.
Hello ,
Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to MicroEd, and
what features of MicroEd that you are really using, you are missing in
Windows Editor?
2. What are the disadvantages of MicroEd comparing
Maxim,
On 23-06-2005 13:20, you [MM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MM MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really using,
MM you are missing in Windows Editor?
I cannot talk about the Windows Editor as I never use it
--On Thursday, June 23, 2005 2:20 pm +0300 Maxim Masiutin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to MicroEd,
and what features of MicroEd that you are really using, you are missing
in Windows Editor?
Free Carret , ALT+L and the spell checker.
On Thursday, June 23, 2005 at 6:20:18 AM [GMT -0500], Maxim Masiutin
wrote:
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really using,
you are missing in Windows Editor?
I'd miss the following if using the Windows Editor:
-
Allie,
Well put. You said it all better than me... :-)
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.5.30 Pro /thebat version
env. ~12 POP3, 4 IMAP (MailMax 5.5) 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5), 175K msgs.
/env.
os Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 /os
Hello Maxim!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 6:20 AM, you wrote:
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really using,
you are missing in Windows Editor?
1) The way MicroEd reflows text: I use Utilities/Format Block.
I
Bonjour Maxim,
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing
MM to MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really
MM using, you are missing in Windows Editor?
I can't remember to have ever used the Windows Editor!
MM 2. What are the disadvantages of MicroEd comparing
I can't remember to have ever used the Windows Editor!
You're not on you own; I don't think I ever have either.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.1, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70,
MyMacros 1.11a.
She said,
Free Caret
What is this? Veggies supplied Free of Charge?
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.1, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70,
MyMacros 1.11a.
Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else.
On Thu 23-Jun-05 6:20am -0500, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Could you please aswer very important questions
about editors in The Bat!
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor
comparing to MicroEd, and what features of
MicroEd that you are really using, you are missing
in Windows Editor?
Hello Stuart!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 8:03 AM, you wrote:
Free Caret
What is this? Veggies supplied Free of Charge?
LOL At a complete loss for words, I googled free caret and one of
the many listings offered me was:
The Bat! FAQ
Get Your Free The Bat! Tileables/Wallpaper! ... It's also a
Hello Francis,
hiermit antworte ich auf die Nachricht vom 23.06.2005 (14:54 Uhr):
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MM MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really
MM using, you are missing in Windows Editor?
FS I can't remember to have ever used the
It's also a free caret editor which means that wherever you click in
the message is where you'll start ...
So now I know. Every day's a school day.
Can't you think of anything that you like about MicroEd to tell
Maxim?
Many thing probably, but not in the context of a comparison with the
Hi Maxim
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to MicroEd,
MM and what features of MicroEd that you are really using, you are missing in
MM Windows Editor?
I've never really used Windows Editor, but I just gave it a whirl to refresh my
memory about why not. Here's what
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 9:02:02 AM, Stuart Hemming wrote:
I can't remember to have ever used the Windows Editor!
SH You're not on you own; I don't think I ever have either.
I don't think I've ever used it either.
--
Mike
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service
Carsten,
On 23-06-2005 15:26, you [CM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
FS I only miss the possibility to start a new line in the same
FS paragraph with the auto-format mode switched on, like many
FS word-processors do with Shift+Return.
CM Agreed. And in addition to this a possibility to
Hello Stuart!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 8:28 AM, you wrote:
It's also a free caret editor which means that wherever you click in
the message is where you'll start ...
So now I know. Every day's a school day.
I can't imagine that I knew something you didn't! So, glad I googled,
because I
I don't think that most people here in the list will use the windows editor. As
it is nowehre comming close to what most expect from an email editor. As there
would be quote reformating, handling indents, beeing able to tell what text is
send send formated or as one long line, and so on.
I
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, at 08:51 AM, Lars Sölter wrote:
I for my self decided to use the windows editor, because I never
got used to the weird MircoEd behaviour for Cursorplacement, double
LF for marking new paragraphs,
So why are you double line feeding for new paragraphs with the
So why are you double line feeding for new paragraphs with the Windows
Editor?
Yes, it is some kind of convetion for paragraphs in lager text bodies. But then
how to handle tables or lists or ...
--
With best regards
Lars Sölter
The Bat! Version 3.5.28
Windows 2000 / Service Pack 4 (Build
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 1:20:18 PM, you wrote:
MM Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
That's a bunch of very dedicated followers RitLabs has.
They all start answering without asking why these questions are important! :-)
--
Best Wishes,
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, at 09:22 AM, Lars Sölter wrote:
Yes, it is some kind of convetion for paragraphs in lager text
bodies. But then how to handle tables or lists or ...
Indeed. However, but you were double line feeding for your paragraphs
using the Windows Editor while at the same time
You just
have to switch to a different mode.
Yes, but I consider switching mode for such basic tasks annoying.
--
With best regards
Lars Sölter
The Bat! Version 3.5.28
Windows 2000 / Service Pack 4 (Build 2195)
Current beta is
Hello Mark!
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 9:25 AM, you wrote:
MM Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in
MM The Bat!
That's a bunch of very dedicated followers RitLabs has.
They all start answering without asking why these questions are
important! :-)
Well, hey,
Hello Maxim,
Thursday, June 23, 2005, 5:20:18 AM, you wrote:
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really using,
you are missing in Windows Editor?
Never used it. I always have used MicroEd because of the free caret.
6/23/2005 10:52 AM
Hi Maxim,
On 6/23/2005 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
MM Hello ,
MM Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing
MM to MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really
MM using, you
Hello Allie Martin everyone else,
on 23-Jun-2005 at 16:02 you (Allie Martin) wrote:
Double line feeds between paragraphs is highly popular now.
Its so popular that its the norm (I think). At least when I learned to type
with 10 fingers on a typewriter at school... back then... gawd, how long
Hello Francis Segond everyone else,
on 23-Jun-2005 at 14:54 you (Francis Segond) wrote:
I only miss the possibility to start a new line in the same paragraph
with the auto-format mode switched on, like many word-processors do
with Shift+Return.
How do you keep line feed and line feed apart
Hello Maxim Masiutin everyone else,
on 23-Jun-2005 at 13:20 you (Maxim Masiutin) wrote:
Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
...can someone please tell me what the differences between Windows editor
and MicroEd are except usage of proportional fonts? I
Its so popular that its the norm (I think). At least when I learned to type
with 10 fingers on a typewriter at school... back then... gawd, how long ago
was that?!
But that is a formating convetion, an no technical reason. And this convention
is only applied unformated text parts.
--
With
Bonjour Alexander,
ASK How do you keep line feed and line feed apart once the message is sent?
ASK You can't do that. A linefeed is a linefeed, especially in a plain text
ASK message.
I don't get your point there. I'm talking about hard linefeed
(return) and soft linefeed (shift+return) *while*
Maxim Masiutin wrotes on 23/06/2005 at 22:20:18 +1100
subject Very Important Question :
Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing to
MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really using,
you
Hello Lars Sölter everyone else,
on 23-Jun-2005 at 19:25 you (Lars Sölter) wrote:
Its so popular that its the norm (I think). At least when I learned to
type with 10 fingers on a typewriter at school... back then... gawd, how
long ago was that?!
But that is a formating convetion, an no
I think it is important to remember that the majority of us wants email as
plain text, if I want formatted text in a serious way, I'd go for a word
processor or HTML.
I'm only talking about plain text formating. Nothing else.
--
With best regards
Lars Sölter
The Bat! Version 3.5.28
Hello Lars Sölter everyone else,
on 23-Jun-2005 at 23:21 you (Lars Sölter) wrote:
I think it is important to remember that the majority of us wants email as
plain text, if I want formatted text in a serious way, I'd go for a word
processor or HTML.
I'm only talking about plain text
Hello Maxim,
On Thursday, June 23, 2005 at 1:20:18 PM Maxim [MM] wrote:
MM 1. What are the disadvantages of Windows Editor comparing
MM to MicroEd, and what features of MicroEd that you are really
MM using, you are missing in Windows Editor?
Additional to these many things already said:
-
Alexander S. Kunz wrotes on 24/06/2005 at 08:38:56 +1100
subject Very Important Question :
I'm only talking about plain text formating. Nothing else.
If you re-flow a quoted paragraph, you can't keep the linefeeds at the
autowrap border and the manually inserted ones apart with the simple
On Thursday, June 23, 2005, 6:20:18 AM, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Could you please aswer very important questions about editors in The Bat!
One feature I really care about is the Windows as-you-type spell
checker, which (last I checked) only works in one of the editors.
This determined which one
92 matches
Mail list logo
