5.0.36.2 : Invalid HTML !

Hello, Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00404BEE in module 'thebat.exe'. Read of address 259A287CTCssViewer.GetDate -- Thanks and Bye, Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using th

Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks.

Hello, well, after months or maybe year, I have got this instead HTML page: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. Maybe it is because Out of memory errors in thebat_exceptions.log, but I did not had such problems before, it started in latest builds 5.0.12.x and

Re: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers.

Hi Dwight, > no address, so not sure where it should go, so figured here was the > place to start. I guess so. The HTML is really invalid :-) -- Best regards Raymund Using 5.0.0.140 BETA on Windows 7 (64 Bit) Current beta is 5.0.

Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers.

This message just displayed large blue letters saying invalid htmp. please forward to developers. no address, so not sure where it should go, so figured here was the place to start. This is a forwarded message From: Henry Heerschap To: canon5dmar...@yahoogroups.com Date: Frid

Re: Invalid HTML

On Saturday, September 9, 2006, 18:26:46, Roelof Otten wrote: > Cannot confirm. Hmm, weird, I could when the message came to the list, but now it displays fine for me, too... -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ > [The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows 2003 5.2.3790.Service Pack 1

Re: Invalid HTML

Hallo Jernej, On Sat, 9 Sep 2006 17:07:13 +0200GMT (9-9-2006, 17:07 , where I live), you wrote: JS> The attached (plaintext) message causes the Invalid HTML message to appear JS> in TB when using the Rich Text viewer. Cannot confirm. -- Groetjes, Roelof I have seen the future and it

Invalid HTML

The attached (plaintext) message causes the Invalid HTML message to appear in TB when using the Rich Text viewer. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://deepthought.ena.si/ > [The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows 2003 5.2.3790.Service Pack 1] The more food y

doing as i'm told invalid html

Howdy Flying Rodent fans, html. invalid. forward to html. i did. -- Have Fun, |> |> |>en is |\ohop [EMAIL PROTECTED] crashing The Bat! v3.5.33 falling out of mid air with Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.70GHz 598 MHz 1.00GB RAM NIAGARA FALLS

Re: Invalid HTML is back

Hello all, Saturday, May 28, 2005, Tim Casten wrote: > ugggh > its back! > Invalid HTML ! > Please forward this message to developers. > Thanks. > EInvalidPointer Invalid pointer operation on same message allways? Send this message then to check it. -- Bye Marek Miku

Invalid HTML is back

Hello TBBETA, ugggh its back! Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EInvalidPointer Invalid pointer operation -- Best regards, Tim Current beta is 3.5.21 | 'Using TBBETA' informa

Re: Invalid HTML Back

Hello all, Thursday, May 26, 2005, Tim Casten wrote: >   ugggh > its back! check 3.5.0.17 and not .11. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3.5.0.17 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Notebook Acer, Pentium4-M 2.2 GHz, 512 M

Mod: HTML use (was: Invalid HTML Back)

Hallo Tim, On Wed, 25 May 2005 19:29:06 -0400GMT (26-5-2005, 1:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: TC> Hello TBBETA, Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not just to the person being replied to, even if their post may have instigated this reply. Please don't feel si

Invalid HTML Back

Hello TBBETA,   ugggh its back! Invalid HTML !  Please forward this message to developers.  Thanks.  EInvalidPointer Invalid pointer operation --  Best regards,  Tim    Current beta is 3.5.0.17 | 'Using TBBETA' informa

invalid HTML - anyone tracking ?

I'm getting invalid HTML on 2 types of HTML messages since moving up from 3.0.2.x. Is anyone interested in debugging via the source ? One is from Yahoo! Calendar and the other from an IT news bulleting from news.com.au Used to work beautifully. davidp. -- David Pascoe, mailto:[EMAIL PROT

Re: invalid html with 3.0.0.18

uot; the new beta, I'm now seeing this problem: Centered on my email on big bold blue: Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. Following by, in smaller font in red: EAccessViolation Access violatio

invalid html with 3.0.0.18

same thing with beta 18 I have tried in beta files but I have not found this error... Livio ... previous message ... this is the message that i see... Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address

invalid html with 3.0.0.17

this is the message that i see... Invalid HTML ! Please forward this message to developers. Thanks. EAccessViolation Access violation at address 005BB634 in module 'THEBAT.EXE'. Read of address and this is the HTML code of page.. A:link { text-decoration: none; colo

Re: Bug: 3.0.0.8 - Still invalid HTML

Hello Peter Fjelsten, on Tuesday, September 7, 2004 at you wrote: > Hello beta testers. > It's still there. > ,- [ ] > | Invalid HTML ! > | Please forward this message to developers. > | Thanks. > | EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00403EEF in m

Re: Invalid HTML continued

Hello Paul! On Wednesday, September 8, 2004 at 10:18:23 PM you wrote: > and I haven't seen an HTML error in a LONG time !! > and I do have view HTML messages as using HTML only. > and normally I use RTV so I can view smileys :) I doubt, ever did, that this infamous error has anything to do with

Invalid HTML continued

Hello TBBETA Members! Just for the record - so I am not the odd one out: I got one! Right now with Paul Cartwrights message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 3.0.0.8 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber

Re: Invalid HTML [WAS Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.8 Post Release is now available]

Hello Allie! On Wednesday, September 08, 2004, 7:19 AM, you wrote: MB>> Could the coincidence of opening a message to read in TB!, at the MB>> same time as Backweb is being used, trigger the "Invalid HTML" MB>> error display? AM> 'Coincidence' is the key

Re: Invalid HTML [WAS Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.8 Post Release is now available]

#x27;s especially bad in a folder that contains HTML as well as plain text messages. Just to provoke it into happening, I'll rapidly switch from message to message and soon the 'Invalid HTML' errors appear. However, while actually reading mail and moving from message to message to at le

Re[2]: Invalid HTML error -- Again and again and again

Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab. Hello Mary, Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 4:25:41 PM, you wrote: > I have had this error 4 times, but not so far in v. 3.0.0.8. > However, a simple fix worked each time for me. I switched to PTV and > then immediately back to RTV. At that point

Invalid HTML [WAS Re: The Bat! 3.0.0.8 Post Release is now available]

Hello Allie! On Tuesday, September 07, 2004, 8:06 PM, you wrote: 9Val>> So purpose of today's beta is to figure reason of 'Invalid HTML' 9Val>> error. ... AM> I just went through about 150 messages and haven't encountered this AM> error. AM> I se

Re: Invalid Html after folder maintenance

Hello John, Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 8:34:31 PM, you wrote: mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] This is very random, but clicking around on the message list, most are now Invalid html, but some are not. I switched to plain text, could not see a pattern in the messages. Switched back to RTV and invalid

Invalid Html after folder maintenance

Hello TBBETA First I ran kill Duplicates, then Purge, Lastly Compress. The currently selected message changed to the invalid html error. See attached. -- Thanks John Seymour [EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! 3.0.0.8, Under Windows XP 51 2600 Service Pack 2

Re: invalid html

Hi Luigi and list, On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 at 12:45:13 GMT +0200 (which was 12:45 where I live) Luigi Rosa wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "invalid html": > EAccessViolation Access violation at address 00403EEF in module > '

Invalid HTML error -- Again and again and again

Crafted from The Desk on location in the Quality Lab. Hello Keith, Tuesday, September 7, 2004, 12:23:59 PM, you wrote: This is really frustrating. Right in the middle of working, all of the messages reveal some version of the error below. --- | Invalid HTML ! | Please forward

Re[2]: Invalid HTML error

Hello Michael, Monday, September 6, 2004, 11:18:57 PM, you wrote: MLW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- MLW> Hash: SHA1 MLW> Hello Tim, MLW> On Mon, 6 Sep 2004, Tim mused about "Invalid HTML error (was: The Bat! MLW> 3.0.0.7 is now available)" (at least in part): ML

Re: invalid html

Johannes, On 07-09-2004 14:29, you [JP] wrote in : JP> But it didn't crash or something, it just showed inside the message JP> pane, like in the attachment. Is that the usual behaviour? Yes. -- Peter Fjelsten (using 3.0 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1) IMAP/Ex

Re: invalid html

On Tuesday, September 7, 2004 @ 8:29:44 PM, Johannes Posel wrote: [snips] >> I am very sorry to inform that I just got an Invalid HTML error. :( Johannes> Hey, I got my first too :) But it didn't crash or something, it just Johannes> showed inside the message pane, like in t

Re: Invalid HTML error

Hi Dierk and list, On Monday, September 6, 2004 at 21:31:00 GMT +0200 (which was 21:31 where I live) Dierk Haasis wrote (at least in parts) and made these valuable points on the subject of "Invalid HTML error": >> No - had a lot of such "HTML errors" on Win2k :-| &g

Re[3]: Invalid HTML error

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salve Allen, DH>> On Monday, September 6, 2004 at 9:10:13 PM you wrote: >>> No - had a lot of such "HTML errors" on Win2k :-| DH>> And none here, yet. AD> Nor here. I had *one* only on 3.0.0.6, none on 3.0.0.0 and none on 3.0.0.7. Mike - -- As

Invalid HTML error (was: The Bat! 3.0.0.7 is now available)

Hi Peter, on Mon, 6 Sep 2004 19:27:56 +0200GMT, you wrote: 9>> Here is a short list of changes: PF> I wonder why you make a new version before you fix the mother of all PF> bugs - the HTML-error? That must be bugging all users with the RTV PF> several times each day. PF> It is not there in 3.0

Re: Invalid HTML error again (was: Re: TheBat! 3.0.0.6 Post Release is now available)

Richard Wakeford, [RW] wrote: > Not here unfortunately. One time every folder I tried gave me the > same message so the only option was to close TB! and start again. > I've never had it happen so violently as that before. Your use of the word 'violently' is very telling. Seeing the error come ou

Re: Invalid HTML error again (was: Re: TheBat! 3.0.0.6 Post Release is now available)

Zeynel A. Öztürk, [ZA] wrote: > I received several invalid HTML errors with this version :(. These > weren't exist on 3.0. Yeah. It took some doing to get back to the previous version. A repair msi installation didn't work. I eventually opened the .msi file in WinRAR, saw the ex

2.13 Beta/6 Invalid HTML Printing

Hi List, just for info: A member of our board has printed out some _text_mails. And know see screenshot of our scan from the printed message: http://www.batworld.net/privat/forenbilder/invalid_html.png Strange, or? -- Adios, Carsten www.batworld.de www.batboard.de __

Re: Invalid HTML in 2.13 Beta/4

Hello Dierk! On Friday, August 13, 2004 at 7:10:20 PM you wrote: > So, misread, sorry. ;-) Arrgh, that should have been: :-) -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 2.13 "Lucky" Beta/4 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN, Yahoo, Jabber upon request

Re: Invalid HTML in 2.13 Beta/4

Hello Prezes! On Thursday, August 12, 2004 at 10:49:08 AM you wrote: > Now I'm on vacations so no :-) Lucky you! > Yes, but I wanted to said that this bug was introduced in 2.12 series, > not in 2.13 series like most of people wrote at this list :-) So, misread, sorry. ;-) -- Dierk Haasis

Re: "Invalid HTML"

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Dierk, On Thu, 5 Aug 2004 you wrote in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> DH> With the current beta I get this "Invalid HTML" message very often DH> with no discernible pattern. Thank goodness it's not just me. - -- Reg

Re: "Invalid HTML"

Dear Dierk, @5-Aug-2004, 21:56 +0200 (05-Aug 20:56 UK time) Dierk Haasis said to Peter: >> So do I here. But it usually goes away when I select it the second >> time... hmm > Not here, I have to at least choose another folder, then go back and > hope for luck. I get stuck on it here and usually

Re: "Invalid HTML"

Hello Peter! On Thursday, August 5, 2004 at 9:45:03 PM you wrote: > So do I here. But it usually goes away when I select it the second > time... hmm Not here, I have to at least choose another folder, then go back and hope for luck. -- Dierk Haasis :Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept The Bat 2.13 "

Re: "Invalid HTML"

Hi Dierk, on Thu, 5 Aug 2004 21:28:09 +0200GMT, you wrote: DH> Just being back, the infamous message from Hell.* DH> With the current beta I get this "Invalid HTML" message very often DH> with no discernible pattern. So do I here. But it usually goes away when I select

"Invalid HTML"

Hello TBBETA Members! Just being back, the infamous message from Hell.* With the current beta I get this "Invalid HTML" message very often with no discernible pattern. BTW, the problem with sent messages residing in the Outbox instead of going to the Sent Mail folder shoul

Re: Smiley madness as was foretold (was: Re: Invalid HTML)

Hello MaXxX! On Wednesday, July 28, 2004 at 9:35:51 AM you wrote: > Note that you and Mary are power users, not some net kiddies. You will > not use smileys when the reader might fail to see them, Mary uses them > fully aware that most people won't see them - but an average user will > use them a

Re: Smiley madness as was foretold (was: Re: Invalid HTML)

Hello MaXxX, Wednesday, July 28, 2004, 1:35:51 AM, you wrote: MaXxX> Note that you and Mary are power users, not some net kiddies. MaXxX> You will not use smileys when the reader might fail to see MaXxX> them, Mary uses them fully aware that most people won't see MaXxX> them - but an average user

Re: Smiley madness as was foretold (was: Re: Invalid HTML)

On Wednesday, July 28, 2004, at 1:18:41 AM, Allie Martin sculpted a piece of raw silicon into the thoughts below: > I can agree with that. I automatically don't use the PCW-Smiley > handles when writing to a general audience where I'm not sure what > clients are being used and even if they're usin

Re: Smiley madness as was foretold (was: Re: Invalid HTML)

Hæ! I support your point, MaXxX. ;) I am also using *only* the plain text viewer and these "colonicons" are getting on my nerves, too. Is it possible to create a filter which deletes anything between two colons from messages? -- Kveðja! Thorvald Neumann | aesir media [Th

Re: OT Change in Subject Line (was Invalid HTML)

On Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:09:07 -0500, Mary Bull wrote: > I'm an MBA graduate! :graduate: :-) > That's :grad: rofl > :rofl2: >>> Is that like a NBA graduate >> I don't know, you'll have to ask Thomas. ;-) > SCNR > :gdr: :42: ;trillstm: My TB! setup doesn't recognize MBA, :graduate:,

Re: OT Change in Subject Line (was Invalid HTML)

Howdy Kevin, Tuesday, July 27, 2004, 6:02:04 PM, Kevin wrotened: >> I'm an MBA graduate! :graduate: :-) KA> ROFL Is that like a NBA graduate -- Have Fun, |> |> |>en is |\ohop [EMAIL PROTECTED] crashing The Bat! v2.12.03 falling out of mid air with Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Servic

Change in Subject Line (was Invalid HTML)

s, and that is my point. An example: Here is a subject a few posts up: "Invalid HTML (was: Beta cycle suggestion)." Ok, I want to do a search on "Beta cycle." What I get are all the posts with "beta cycle" in the post (including the subject). So, I also get this spec

Re: Invalid HTML

Hello Kevin, On Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:27:04 -0700 GMT (27/07/2004, 01:27 +0700 GMT), Kevin Amazon wrote: >> You'd better know what you are doing. KA> I'm sure I will be admonished and rightly so. Just responding to your KA> message makes me a contributing factor in the problem I would like to KA>

Re: Replys & Subjects in TB lists (was: Re: Invalid HTML)

Hello Greg! On Tuesday, July 27, 2004 at 3:07:10 AM you wrote: > I agree with your opinion with the possible exception of a complete new > subject for a new thread because when someone sees quotes in a new > thread they wonder where they came from. What wonders me is the grand discussion ensuing

Replys & Subjects in TB lists (was: Re: Invalid HTML)

Hello Kevin, Monday, July 26, 2004, 1:27:04 PM, Kevin Amazon wrote: KA> If it were my board (which it isn't), I would not allow the changing KA> of subject lines. New topics should have new subjects in a new thread. ^ ^ ^ ^ KA> Minor d

Re: Strange Invalid HTML message

Hello all, Friday, December 6, 2002, Allie C Martin wrote: > In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > Marek Mikus [MM] wrote:' MM>> I have never seen this, nor on Win98, nor on Win2000 SP3. And no MM>> Czech/Slovak user reported me this. But You are not the first, MM>> who reported this p