On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:28:15 +0100, Jurgen Haug wrote:
we forgot about that!
there's no corner to put anyone in!!!
If anyone really must do such a thing, then they can try using the
corners of their own minds. I must admit that I have been sorely
tempted to apply such treatment in respect to a
Hello Avi,
A reminder of what Avi Yashar on TBBETA typed on:
15 February 2005 at 06:23:24 GMT +0100
AY That looks brilliant, Miguel. Didn't know PP could do that. :-)
Powerpro can do just about anything. I used to use it and had a few uses for it
at the time that I didn't think possible,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TB Powerpro can do just about anything.
It certainly seems that way, doesn't it.
TBH I simply use it for menus and shortcuts. I'm sure that there are a
million and one things I /could/ do with it if I was prepared to spend
the time reading the docs.
Hello,
since I use the on the fly encryption with TB! Beta 10,
I can't change any setting in the network
administration menu.
I always get an error message like
Access violation at address 00442D2A in module
'thebat.exe'. Read of address 0008.
So I'm not able to change the settings to LAN
Hello all,
Tuesday, February 15, 2005, Maik Lehmberg wrote:
I always get an error message like
Access violation at address 00442D2A in module
'thebat.exe'. Read of address 0008.
So I'm not able to change the settings to LAN to use my
new DSL-account with The Bat.
Is there any
Hello Maik,
A reminder of what Maik Lehmberg on TBBETA typed on:
15 February 2005 at 11:15:32 GMT +0100
ML Is there any workaround?
Create a backup using the Tools menu, delete the registry entries and reinstall
TB! without OTFE and restore from the backup.
--
Best regards,Tony.
Hello,
since I use the on the fly encryption with TB! Beta 10,
I can't change any setting in the network
administration menu.
I always get an error message like
Access violation at address 00442D2A in module
'thebat.exe'. Read of address 0008.
So I'm not able to change the settings to LAN
Hello,
since I use the on the fly encryption with TB! Beta 10,
I can't change any setting in the network
administration menu.
I always get an error message like
Access violation at address 00442D2A in module
'thebat.exe'. Read of address 0008.
So I'm not able to change the settings to LAN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Having a spot of bother, aren't you Maik.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.12 Pre-release, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2,
SpamPal v1.70, MyMacros 1.11a and Universal Macro
Having a spot of bother, aren't you Maik.
Excuse me for several posts. It must have been something
wrong with the server.
--
Best regards,
Maik
Beati possidentes.
[cf. Corpus Iuris Civilis, Digesta 50. 16,49]
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 (on-the-fly-encryption by
eToken) on
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:06:32 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
TB Powerpro can do just about anything.
It certainly seems that way, doesn't it.
TBH I simply use it for menus and shortcuts. I'm sure that there are a
million and one things I /could/ do with it if I was prepared to spend
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY I notice that it contains a
AY whopping 29 lines below the sig delimiter and only 10 lines (or about
AY 1/3 of the message content) above the sig delimiter.
Be thankful that Allie's server is doing as good a job as it is; it
filters out most of a
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 Marek Mikus wrote:
close TB, open Regedit and find Value InetConnectMode in tree
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT\The Bat!\. Then open this value and
change number 0 to 1. Close Regedit and check setting in TB.
Connect to the Internet using has changed to Local
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 11:53:24 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY I notice that it contains a
AY whopping 29 lines below the sig delimiter and only 10 lines (or about
AY 1/3 of the message content) above the sig delimiter.
Be thankful that Allie's server is doing as good a job as it is; it
Het was op maandag 14 februari 2005 om 21:31 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'the
bat! new wishes !!!' :
Hallo Claude,
apparently not a man of many words :-)))
--
groeten,
Rubeo, who was just listening to: Sladest | Slade - One way hotel
There cannot be a crisis today; my schedule
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 5:53 AM, you wrote:
Be thankful that Allie's server is doing as good a job as it is; it
filters out most of a /very/ pointless disclaimer that my firm insists
must appear on each email sent out.
Stuart, didn't you mean Marck's server here?
Allie
Dear Mary,
@15-Feb-2005, 06:31 -0600 (15-Feb 12:31 UK time) Mary Bull [MB] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Stuart:
Be thankful that Allie's server is doing as good a job as it is; it
filters out most of a /very/ pointless disclaimer that my firm insists
must appear on each email sent out.
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:08:43 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar
wrote:
Whoa Nelly! I didn't realize that I was only seeing the tip of the
iceberg. I guess that gives me another thing to be thankful to Allie
for.
I have this sneaky feeling that Stuart's company sysadmins know about
me
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:31:29 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull
wrote:
Stuart, didn't you mean Marck's server here?
Stuart still sends his list messages through me. :) I've been using my
server to remove the lines of his sig disclaimer. I may just take this
queue to adjust the filters again.
Hello Allie!
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 6:45 AM, you wrote:
Stuart, didn't you mean Marck's server here?
Stuart still sends his list messages through me. :) I've been using my
server to remove the lines of his sig disclaimer. I may just take this
queue to adjust the filters again.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:43:42 -0500, Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's therefore a small project to revise the matching process again.
If MDaemon could do a multi-line match, then it would be great.
Just throwing this out there, but I have 50 gmail invites if anyone
(maybe Stuart?)
Hello Marck!
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 6:40 AM, you wrote:
Be thankful that Allie's server is doing as good a job as it is; it
filters out most of a /very/ pointless disclaimer that my firm insists
must appear on each email sent out.
MB Stuart, didn't you mean Marck's server here?
:-)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:45:24 -0500, Allie Martin wrote:
I may just take this queue to adjust the filters again.
Sorry if I have given you any extra work, Allie. But happy to see that
I cue once in a while. :-)
--
Avi Yashar
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.0.2.10
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:49:42 AM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull
wrote:
Thanks, Allie. I'm glad to get my confused head straightened out once
more.
I just adjusted the filters. What happened is that they have actually
*added* more to the disclaimer. Incredible!! It's now 20 lines of text
to
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 7:56:50 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar
wrote:
Sorry if I have given you any extra work, Allie. But happy to see that
I cue once in a while.
Good catch. :) Let's hope the filter works better, now that I've
adjusted it.
--
... . | IMAP Client: The
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:52:57 -0500, Kevin J. Menard, Jr. wrote:
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 07:43:42 -0500, Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's therefore a small project to revise the matching process again.
If MDaemon could do a multi-line match, then it would be great.
Just throwing this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MB Allie is one of my many loves among TB! and TBOT posters, but some
MB time ago he resigned from his position as a TB! lists moderator.
I know this but, yes, I do mean Allie. Unlike te rest of you, I don't
post directly to the list. I send my mail
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AM Good catch. :) Let's hope the filter works better, now that I've
AM adjusted it.
Let's see, shall we...
Testing, testing. One, two, three. Can you hear me at the back?
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MDP That's not correct. The list is *moderated* by Leif (the founder)
MDP myself and Roelof Otten. The servers on which the lists run are owned
MDP and maintained by Johannes Posel, a great friend of the lists and a
MDP good fellow indeed.
Everyday's
Hello Stuart!
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 7:13 AM, you wrote:
MB Allie is one of my many loves among TB! and TBOT posters, but some
MB time ago he resigned from his position as a TB! lists moderator.
I know this but, yes, I do mean Allie. ...
I put my apologies to you in a post to Marck,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 13:32:37 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH Hash: SHA1
AY Not a bad point, Kevin. Stuart, you could probably use the Gmail SMTP
SH SMTP is blocked by the firewall.
Gmail SMTP uses SSL ports, not standard ones. Do you know if that is
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 8:14:54 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart
Hemming wrote:
Let's see, shall we...
Testing, testing. One, two, three. Can you hear me at the back?
There goes my theory that I wouldn't need to restart MDaemon to use
the updated cfilters.dat. I have to manually edit it for
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 8:17:18 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart
Hemming wrote:
AM I have this sneaky feeling that Stuart's company sysadmins know about
AM me and what I've been doing with his messages to the list.
Do you think they're watching us now? Spooky!
I do wonder. They're snickering.
I
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 13:17:18 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH Hash: SHA1
AM I have this sneaky feeling that Stuart's company sysadmins know about
AM me and what I've been doing with his messages to the list.
SH Do you think they're watching us now? Spooky!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AM I have this sneaky feeling that Stuart's company sysadmins know about
AM me and what I've been doing with his messages to the list.
Do you think they're watching us now? Spooky!
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY Not a bad point, Kevin. Stuart, you could probably use the Gmail SMTP
SMTP is blocked by the firewall.
AY Alternatively, though you might not want to do this,
AY you could access the tbbeta messages via your Web browser at either
You're right; I
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:32:37 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY Not a bad point, Kevin. Stuart, you could probably use the Gmail SMTP
SMTP is blocked by the firewall.
AY Alternatively, though you might not want to do this,
AY you could access the tbbeta messages via your Web browser at either
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DC In Gmail's case, SMTP is on port 465 and POP is
DC on 995, but dedicated SSL ports.
I tried those settings on a new TB! account with no luck.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AM I wouldn't be surprised if you're like me at work, in that you don't
AM have access to ports that would allow you to use an alternative SMTP.
Exactly right. If I did have direct access I could get away with using
GMail or the like.
- --
Stuart
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:55:29 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
DC In Gmail's case, SMTP is on port 465 and POP is
DC on 995, but dedicated SSL ports.
I tried those settings on a new TB! account with no luck.
Well, thanks for trying anyway, Stuart.
I see that Allie's filter is now doing a better
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 8:56:59 AM [GMT -0500], Stuart
Hemming wrote:
Exactly right. If I did have direct access I could get away with using
GMail or the like.
I'm sure that few employees would be fans of such a disclaimer being
tagged to all messages they sent. They'd naturally wish
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:56:59 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AM I wouldn't be surprised if you're like me at work, in that you don't
AM have access to ports that would allow you to use an alternative SMTP.
Exactly right. If I did have direct access I could get away with using
GMail or the like.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 13:55:29 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH Hash: SHA1
DC In Gmail's case, SMTP is on port 465 and POP is
DC on 995, but dedicated SSL ports.
SH I tried those settings on a new TB! account with no luck.
Ah well, it was worth a shot
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005 at 9:07:59 AM [GMT -0500], Avi Yashar
wrote:
I see that Allie's filter is now doing a better job of trimming your
sig. So, finally, what do you think of my suggestion about forgoing
the PGP when sending messages to the list? If that is possible, then
your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DC Ah well, it was worth a shot anyway. Be sure you have 'Secure to
DC Dedicated Port (TLS)' selected.
Done that. It occurs to me that I've guessed the name of the SMTP/POP
servers as gmail.com. Is this right?
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AM :) I can't recall what happens if Stuart were to use PGP/MIME. Maybe
AM the sysadmins have nothing in place for that.
Because they tag the disclaimer on /after/ the message is signed the
signature is always invalid 'cos message has been changed.
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY Stuart, I'll bet you can still use Gmail. Just not via the Gmail SMTP
AY server. It seems that you can access the Gmail Web site, because you
AY signed up for a Gmail account.
I could, but I don't want to. I've taken some time and trouble to get
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY So, finally, what do you think of my suggestion about forgoing
AY the PGP when sending messages to the list?
Not a chance. How would you know I was me.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:22:14 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
DC Ah well, it was worth a shot anyway. Be sure you have 'Secure to
DC Dedicated Port (TLS)' selected.
Done that. It occurs to me that I've guessed the name of the SMTP/POP
servers as gmail.com. Is this right?
No, it's pop.gmail.com
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 14:22:14 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH Hash: SHA1
DC Ah well, it was worth a shot anyway. Be sure you have 'Secure to
DC Dedicated Port (TLS)' selected.
SH Done that. It occurs to me that I've guessed the name of the SMTP/POP
SH
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:26:52 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY So, finally, what do you think of my suggestion about forgoing
AY the PGP when sending messages to the list?
Not a chance. How would you know I was me.
I'd take it on faith. Quite frankly, I am replying to what you are
saying much
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:31:36 -0500, David Calvarese wrote:
Also, you have to log into the website and enable POP access in your
settings.
Good point, David.
--
Avi Yashar
Windows XP Pro SP2 and The Bat! Pro 3.0.2.10
Current beta is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY No, it's pop.gmail.com and smtp.gmail.com.
sighTried that. Cannot connect to server/sigh
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.12 Pre-release, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 14:35:48 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY No, it's pop.gmail.com and smtp.gmail.com.
SH sighTried that. Cannot connect to server/sigh
Well, it was worth a shot... Did you enable pop access via the gmail
website like I mentioned?
Any possibility of running a local smtp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY Believe it or not, who we are is not always of paramount
AY importance to others.
I have a very low sense of self. I'm taking tablets for it, but there
you go. For now I'll keep on signing.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:35:48 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY No, it's pop.gmail.com and smtp.gmail.com.
sighTried that. Cannot connect to server/sigh
Okay, but did you first do what David said? Before you can connect to
the server, you must log in to Gmail and go to SettingsFowarding and
Pop,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 09:42:11 -0500, David Calvarese wrote:
Any possibility of running a local smtp server on your PC? I think I
recall seeing a few free ones around someplace.
If I am not mistaken, just about every lousy worm and spyware in
circulation these days has its own SMTP server. :-(
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY Okay, but did you first do what David said?
I hadn't then but I have now with the same (null) effect. I'm guessing
that the problem is the firewall.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DC Any possibility of running a local smtp server on your PC? I think I
DC recall seeing a few free ones around someplace.
I'd still have to get the mail out, wouldn't I?
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 16:47:29 +0200, Avi Yashar wrote:
Any possibility of running a local smtp server on your PC? I think I
recall seeing a few free ones around someplace.
AY If I am not mistaken, just about every lousy worm and spyware in
AY circulation these days has its own SMTP server.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:48:18 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY Okay, but did you first do what David said?
I hadn't then but I have now with the same (null) effect. I'm guessing
that the problem is the firewall.
Could be. Anyway, thanks for trying.
FWIW, I use TB for almost all my email except
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 14:48:55 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
DC Any possibility of running a local smtp server on your PC? I think I
DC recall seeing a few free ones around someplace.
SH I'd still have to get the mail out, wouldn't I?
Well, I know when I've worked places that blocked you from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY FWIW, I use TB for almost all my email except receiving and sending
AY messages to the tbbeta list.
I haven't given up yet. I'm trying bribery on one of the sysadmins. If
that doesn't work then I'll stick with what I've got.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Hello Avi,
One other thought - maybe you could skip the PGP and the cute
quotation when sending messages to this list. I can't see how they add
much - other than maybe 12-13 lines of largely useless signature and
2-3 lines of text above your sig.
Well, at least Stuart is trying to save some
Hello Allie,
I just adjusted the filters. What happened is that they have actually
*added* more to the disclaimer. Incredible!! It's now 20 lines of text
to remove.
I assume you are familiar with this link, aren't you?
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
--
Best regards,
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 15:08:50 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY FWIW, I use TB for almost all my email except receiving and sending
AY messages to the tbbeta list.
I haven't given up yet. I'm trying bribery on one of the sysadmins. If
that doesn't work then I'll stick with what I've got.
Though
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 15:08:50 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
AY FWIW, I use TB for almost all my email except receiving and sending
AY messages to the tbbeta list.
SH I haven't given up yet. I'm trying bribery on one of the sysadmins. If
SH that doesn't work then I'll stick with what I've got.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:13:10 +0100, MAU wrote:
One other thought - maybe you could skip the PGP and the cute
quotation when sending messages to this list. I can't see how they add
much - other than maybe 12-13 lines of largely useless signature and
2-3 lines of text above your sig.
Hello Stuart,
AM Good catch. :) Let's hope the filter works better, now that I've
AM adjusted it.
Let's see, shall we...
Like others have said, please take no offence in what I am going to say.
I have been following this sub-thread about your excessively long
signature, disclaimer, etc., and I
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:45:49 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
attached screenshot. Can you think of anything else I might be missing
Well, there is one mistake. You must add @gmail.com after your user name.
Also, to send mail, you must perform SMTP authentication with the same
settings as mail
Hello Avi,
Good point, Miguel... but a dangerous one. Who knows what will come
next in the mad rush to conserve bandwidth. Omitting line breaks
between paragraphs or spaces between words? Justtrytoimagineit.
You are right. I'll change my argument from bandwidth conservation to
readability ;-)
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 14:45:49 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
DC pop.gmail.com and smtp.gmail.com
SH OK. I've done that. The transport settings in TB! can be seen in the
SH attached screenshot. Can you think of anything else I might be missing
SH (I still can't connect although I can ping the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As I'm going through a firewall here I'm not sure how I'd set this up
to find a DNS to point this software at.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.12 Pre-release, MyGate
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DC Well, I know when I've worked places that blocked you from using an
DC SMTP server other than theirs that using a local SMTP on my machine
DC worked. Some ISPs even do that to you.
Well I've tried that here to no avail.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using
Hello Stuart,
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005, at 16:45, you wrote:
SH OK. I've done that. The transport settings in TB! can be seen in the
SH attached screenshot. Can you think of anything else I might be missing
SH (I still can't connect although I can ping the server).
A couple of weeks ago I
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 16:32:46 +0100, MAU wrote:
AM Good catch. :) Let's hope the filter works better, now that I've
AM adjusted it.
Let's see, shall we...
M Like others have said, please take no offence in what I am going to say.
M I have been following this sub-thread about your excessively
Hello Avi,
On Tuesday, February 15, 2005, at 17:39, you wrote:
AY Well, there is one mistake. You must add @gmail.com after your user name.
Currently they also accept usernames without @gmail.com. I've noticed that
@gmail.com stuff in Stuart's screenshot and checked that, after removing
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 15:54:24 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
DC Well, I know when I've worked places that blocked you from using an
DC SMTP server other than theirs that using a local SMTP on my machine
DC worked. Some ISPs even do that to you.
SH Well I've tried that here to no avail.
Looks
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AY Well, there is one mistake. You must add @gmail.com after your user name.
Now done.
AY Also, to send mail, you must perform SMTP authentication with the same
AY settings as mail retrieval?
Set.
No joy. The God of Email is not smiling on me today.
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 15:53:44 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
SH As I'm going through a firewall here I'm not sure how I'd set this up
SH to find a DNS to point this software at.
You should be able to find your DNS server by looking at the
information for your network connection.
--
Best
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:01:29 +0200, Edvinas Matiuðaitis wrote:
AY Well, there is one mistake. You must add @gmail.com after your user
name.
Currently they also accept usernames without @gmail.com. I've noticed that
@gmail.com stuff in Stuart's screenshot and checked that, after removing
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:00:51 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
No joy. The God of Email is not smiling on me today.
Well, I can only think of one other thing that you can try, but it's a
long shot. You can experiment with using the alternative SMTP port of
587 instead of 465.
--
Avi Yashar
Windows
Het was op dinsdag 15 februari 2005 om 17:21 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'the
next beta ? when ?' :
Hallo Avi,
No joy. The God of Email is not smiling on me today.
AY Well, I can only think of one other thing that you can try,
I think he's laughing his ass off... have you seen the amount
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
EM Can't it be the same case with you?
Possibly. But I can't even be sure my request is reaching the gmail
server ATM.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.12 Pre-release,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DC You should be able to find your DNS server by looking at the
DC information for your network connection.
Can you say DHCP? 8-)
Nothing set up here at all. It's all managed by those fiendishly
clever bods upstairs.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DC Looks like bribery is the way to go then in this case.
I'm breaking out the Mars bars as I type.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.12 Pre-release, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 17:25:59 +0100, Cees wrote:
Hallo Avi,
No joy. The God of Email is not smiling on me today.
AY Well, I can only think of one other thing that you can try,
I think he's laughing his ass off... have you seen the amount of e-mails on
this list today? ;-)
Quite
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 16:22:46 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
DC You should be able to find your DNS server by looking at the
DC information for your network connection.
SH Can you say DHCP? 8-)
SH Nothing set up here at all. It's all managed by those fiendishly
SH clever bods upstairs.
But the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DC rss2pop3 and UMX in
Good, aren't they.
DC Our Yellow Sun yields to the dark as I begin my web based lark
snip/
grin/
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.7.12 Pre-release,
Hi MAU,
On 15/02/2005 10:20 AM, you wrote:
I assume you are familiar with this link, aren't you?
http://www.goldmark.org/jeff/stupid-disclaimers/
No, I'm not.
--
.__.... .
[__]||* _ |\/|
| (/,| |
Keyboard? How quaint! - Scotty
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 15-Feb-2005 at 14:44 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Gmail SMTP uses SSL ports, not standard ones. Do you know if that is
blocked as well? Lots of places block the normal ones but don't think
to block the others. In Gmail's case, SMTP is on port 465
Hello David,
Tuesday, February 15, 2005, 9:28:27 AM, you wrote:
D But the DHCP server should be telling your machine what the DNS is...
Correct.
From a command line:
ipconfig /all
on Win2K and higher.
I think it's winipconfig for older version of windows IIRC.
--
__
Hello Stuart,
A reminder of what Stuart Hemming on TBBETA typed on:
15 February 2005 at 17:26:55 GMT +0100
SH Possibly. But I can't even be sure my request is reaching the gmail
SH server ATM.
I've not been following this thread, because I thought it was about the new
beta that's due on
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 15-Feb-2005 at 15:42 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Any possibility of running a local smtp server on your PC? I think I
recall seeing a few free ones around someplace.
What difference would it make? SMTP talks to another SMTP on port 25, just
like TB
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:36:41 +, Tony Boom wrote:
I take it your having trouble with gmail and pop access? What exactly is the
problem?
Well, here we go again... how about another round? :-) Tony, in
absolute good humor, wasn't there some sort of rule about checking the
archive of messages
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 16:27:18 +, Stuart Hemming wrote:
DC rss2pop3 and UMX in
SH Good, aren't they.
The jury is still out on RSS2pop3... I think maybe firefox does a
better job with it's 'live bookmarks' feature. I'm not sure what to
make of UMX though.
--
Best regards,
David
Using
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Got the details, set 'em up. Tried to send myself a message both at
work and on GMail and both times the free smtp server told me I was
trying to send to an invalid recipient.
- --
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.0.2.10 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
TB I take it your having trouble with gmail and pop access? What exactly is
the
TB problem?
TBH I think the problem is that my attempts to connect to either
GMail's SMTP or POP server is being blocked by the firewall here.
- --
Stuart Hemming
On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 at 17:39:04 +0100, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
ASK on 15-Feb-2005 at 15:42 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
Any possibility of running a local smtp server on your PC? I think I
recall seeing a few free ones around someplace.
ASK What difference would it make? SMTP talks to
Hello David Calvarese everyone else,
on 15-Feb-2005 at 17:28 you (David Calvarese) wrote:
But the DHCP server should be telling your machine what the DNS is...
In a LAN with a Domain Controller (or something) the DNS server will be
local machine.
--
Best regards,
Alexander
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
