In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
CT --On 4/07/2005 21:33 +0100 Goncalo wrote:
You must agree that it has improved over B30, right?
CT I see no improvements whatsoever in IMAP performance over 3.5.30's
CT performance. It is still unusable day-to-day for all the reasons
CT discussed in
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
CT --On 4/07/2005 21:30 +0100 Goncalo wrote:
I'm saying the b36 is better than b30 though
still having annoying bugs.
CT I'm not so concerned about unresolved minor bugs (although others
CT may not agree) but in the programme's core performance with
Hallo Maurice,
hiermit antworte ich auf die Nachricht vom 05.07.2005 (07:27 Uhr):
MS [...], but I have noticed that there is something weird about the
MS way TB! handles 'go to next unread' when the currently selected
MS 'folder' is an account name itself.
MS For instance, I have at the top of
--On 5 July 2005 07:16:58 +0100 Goncalo Farias [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
But this beta isn't just IMAP fixes, is it?
It was supposed to be yes, at least that was the promise made by RL at
the end of the last beta cycle.
--
Tony.
i.
I tried to take my chances with view folders again. I had a large folder
(contains 23482) messages. I created three views, one for 2002 mails, one for
2003 mails and one for 2004 mails. The views created and work like a charm, as
long as TB is running.
I had set 'auto-refresh' for each of this
Hetisdinsdag5juli2005en13:30:03uur:
Hallotbbeta,
Ihaveastrangeproblem,apparently
I'monthisYahoo-e-maillistFZ20(Panasonicdigitalphotocamera)andone of the listrules is that you put your image INSIDE the e-mail through the paperclip option. "Of course" most of the listmembers
Battyfolk,
I haven't been following the list so may he repeating a bug report:
ctrlenter doesn't seem to include the original msg in the reply.
--
Jan Rifkinson
Ridgefield, CT USA
TB!3.5.36, BayesIt! 0.8.1, Windows 2000, Service Pack 4
ICQ 41116329
Hi Tony,
TB Tried 36 and very first message... No Message Loaded. Went for a bath,
TB made a cup of tea, cooked spaghetti bolognese, cut the grass, washed and
TB polished the car, repointed the chimney stack and when I came back the very
TB same message wasn't loaded still?
And were there
Hello Tony!
On Monday, July 04, 2005, 3:29 AM, you wrote:
So, wait for a response from 9Val,
I have enough trouble scraping dead fly's off my windscreen, can you
imagine the mess a pig would make?
Do you mean that you expect to hear from 9Val only when pigs fly?
Get your camera ready then,
Hello Manuel,
An error occurred while reading the message base ...\Fastmail
(IMAP)\55DBCDFF.TBB. Do you want to repair the message base now?
This error message is a bit silly, perhaps we need to discuss these messages
in IMAP accounts in general with the developers. Everything is on the
Hello Bill,
(2) Refreshing a virtual Watched folder causes the Sent
Mail folder to be checked. This may be WAD but it
is annoying.
If you mean chat folder (or watch replies) - it is WAD
Simple virtual folder shouldn't have such behaviour
--
Hello Tony,
[-] IMAP: probably fixes of AVs
[-] IMAP: folder counters re-work
Probably? You mean you don't know if you've fixed it?
Yes, probably. I never had that AV's so fixes are *supposed* to fix
them, but I couldn't check and say for sure.
The Message delete process?
?
Hello Allie,
TB!'s parking and flagging are not standard.
It is wrong suggestion - TB! uses standard flags both for flagging and
parking.
I haven't tried to do this, but I think when you delete the HTML
component, you're deleting the HTML component from the cached copy of
the message and
Hello Tony!
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, 3:13 AM, you wrote:
But this beta isn't just IMAP fixes, is it?
It was supposed to be yes, at least that was the promise made by RL at
the end of the last beta cycle.
Note Goncalo's wording in the above quote: isn't just IMAP fixes.
I think that here
--On 5 July 2005 15:58:24 +0300 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And were there requests in connection centre?
I have no idea. I installed 36, booted it up and it just sits there
inanimate as it has done ever since I started using IMAP. For me nothing
has improved. I have a very small mail
--On 5 July 2005 08:11:15 -0500 Mary Bull [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you mean that you expect to hear from 9Val only when pigs fly?
The speed at which you Americans catch on never ceases to amaze me :)
And he has!
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I know, what a shock! You should see the mess
--On 5 July 2005 16:19:22 +0300 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, probably. I never had that AV's so fixes are *supposed* to fix
them, but I couldn't check and say for sure.
And in all sincerity I can say I have never had them either. I had one or
two once but can't remember what for
Hello Tony,
Allie explained to me the way TB's IMAP works compared to other IMAP
clients and it seems to me it works the complete opposite to
everything else. I'm not a programmer but that seems a bit suss to
me.
The word you were looking for is: invention :) So, if it is
Can you access the site now?
I cannot...
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first -
--On 5 July 2005 10:09:00 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The word you were looking for is: invention :) So, if it is
different, it can be good or bad...
I've read and reread what I wrote and nowhere can I substitute any word I
wrote for the word invention so you've either lost me
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 09:04 AM, Tony Boom wrote:
Are there requests in queue when it occurs? How do you view messages
(main window, ticker)?
I never look at the Connection Centre and I only ever read the preview
pane, never use the ticker.
Well then, are you going to assist by
--On 5 July 2005 16:19:22 +0300 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are there requests in queue when it occurs? How do you view messages
(main window, ticker)?
Maybe a picture might be worth a thousand words. As you can see from the
screen shot my TBBETA folder has 101 messages in it. I
Hello Tony!
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, 8:59 AM, you wrote:
Do you mean that you expect to hear from 9Val only when pigs fly?
The speed at which you Americans catch on never ceases to amaze me :)
Oh, I'm unusually quick! lol I did read your meaning immediately, but
I was just lying in wait for
Hi Tony,
On 05/07/2005 03:29 PM +0100, you wrote:
Maybe a picture might be worth a thousand words. As you can see from
the screen shot my TBBETA folder has 101 messages in it. I
highlighted one and got the expected result... No Message Loaded.
Displayed the CC for you to see for yourself
Hi Tony,
On 05/07/2005 02:55 PM +0100, you wrote:
Allie explained to me the way TB's IMAP works compared to other IMAP
clients and it seems to me it works the complete opposite to
everything else. I'm not a programmer but that seems a bit suss to me.
It doesn't work the complete opposite
Hi 9Val,
On 05/07/2005 04:19 PM +0300, you wrote:
TB!'s parking and flagging are not standard.
It is wrong suggestion - TB! uses standard flags both for flagging and
parking.
Which one does it use for parking?
I see that the standard 'flag' for marking a message as 'important' is
what
Hello tbbeta,
I setup an IMAP account. Could someone collect me the problems with
IMAP, so I can test them? So far, it seems to be ok... I am using
IMAPing from easymail.hu.
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
On 5 Jul 2005, at 15:29, Allie Martin wrote:
Create a text file called protocol.ini and save it to the directory
for your IMAP account.
I already did that a month ago when he asked for it. If you remember
at first he denied all knowledge of me ever sending it so I sent it
again... All 7
On 5 Jul 2005, at 15:35, Mary Bull wrote:
Oh, oh! I'm invited for dinner, when you cook what they find? :)
Couldn't catch them quick enough before they swallowed them. I tried
putting a very tight leather strap around their neck so they couldn't
swallow them but they kept turning blue
On 5 Jul 2005, at 15:39, Allie Martin wrote:
I guess the next thing to do would be to enable the debug logging and
sending it to 9Val.
Like I said before, how many copies of my logs will he need?
--
Tony.
M2
Current beta is
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 10:28:39 AM, Vili wrote:
I setup an IMAP account. Could someone collect me the problems with
IMAP, so I can test them?
It would be interesting to take a survey. There are some people who
report constant and intolerable problems with their IMAP, and others
who find it
On 5 Jul 2005, at 15:43, Allie Martin wrote:
It doesn't work the complete opposite to everything else. This is
simply not true.
Mulberry collects headers and displays email instantly here without
*any* noticeable delays. The Bat doesn't display them at all here,
all I get is no message
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 10:46 AM, Tony Boom wrote:
Mulberry collects headers and displays email instantly here without
*any* noticeable delays. The Bat doesn't display them at all here,
all I get is no message loaded for hours at a time. I'd say that was
pretty much the complete
On 5 Jul 2005, at 16:28, Vili wrote:
I setup an IMAP account. Could someone collect me the problems with
IMAP, so I can test them? So far, it seems to be ok... I am using
IMAPing from easymail.hu.
A few things you can test for me.
Do you ever get No message loaded and then it just sits
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 10:41 AM, Tony Boom wrote:
Like I said before, how many copies of my logs will he need?
I'd send a 'short one' again.
After deleting the debug log file if you currently have one already:
Start TB! with debug logging enabled. Wait for 10 seconds, then select
an
On 5 Jul 2005, at 16:54, Allie Martin wrote:
Ah. I mistook you for being serious. My apologies.
I was being serious. You told me TB caches all it's IMAP mail and
needs the cache constantly clearing whereas Berry and Mail for
example don't use a cache.
Or words to that effect?
--
Hello Tony,
I have this No message loaded screen also. But it is because I am
not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your
problem, too?
I have to admit, that I didnt manage to figure out yet, how this
automatic connecting and disconnecting to the server is
Hello Tony,
I setup an IMAP account. Could someone collect me the problems with
IMAP, so I can test them? So far, it seems to be ok... I am using
IMAPing from easymail.hu.
A few things you can test for me.
I will
Do you ever get No message loaded and then it just sits there. See
my
--On 5 July 2005 12:17:47 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have this No message loaded screen also. But it is because I am
not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your
problem, too?
And therein lies the problem, mine should be permanently connected or at
least
--On 5 July 2005 12:20:45 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This last half sentence was unnecessary. Be positive: I am on this, so
it will be solved :)
Be careful of those pigs, they're putting jet engines in them now :)
--
Tony.
i.
Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 11:30:36 AM, (Internet Time - @729) you wrote:
Hello Tony,
TB And therein lies the problem, mine should be permanently connected or at
TB least it should connect whenever needed. Mulberry does, Mail 2.0 does, The
TB bat doesn't. It doesn't seem to be aggressive enough and
Hello Vili,
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:10:06 -0400 GMT(7/5/2005, 9:10 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vili wrote:
Can you access the site now?
I cannot...
http://www.ritlabs.com/ works fine for me.
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello Tony, (and 9Val: the mail contains some reproducible error
descriptions to locate the problem, see below)
I have this No message loaded screen also. But it is because I am
not connected to the server. If I connect, no problem. Isnt it your
problem, too?
And therein lies the problem,
Hello Greg,
On Tue, 5 Jul 2005 10:10:06 -0400 GMT(7/5/2005, 9:10 AM -0600 GMT),
per mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Vili wrote:
Can you access the site now?
I cannot...
http://www.ritlabs.com/ works fine for me.
Thanks, it was down for some hours, when I tried to reach it.
--
Vili
Hello 9Val,
On Tuesday, 05 Juli 2005 at 03:19 PM you (9Val) wrote:
An error occurred while reading the message base ...\Fastmail
(IMAP)\55DBCDFF.TBB. Do you want to repair the message base now?
This error message is a bit silly, perhaps we need to discuss these
messages in IMAP
Hello tbbeta,
I should be ashamed of it :), but at least i caught an AV.
I thought, I recreate my IMAP account. I was still connected (rookie
mistake :) and maybe an email also was opened from that account...
Account, Delete, Wipe message base. AV, AV...
Yes, normally you dont do that,
Hello tbbeta,
So, I reset my IMAP account, and did this:
Manage IMAP folders, Reset list, and I checked Subscribed and
Synchronize (Headers only) for all of my mailbox, which are:
Inbox.Test (now I have only one from it :)
Drafts
Sent Mail
Spam (my provider makes a spam filtering too)
Trash
I
--On 5 July 2005 11:41:25 -0500 Michael Acklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I did try Alie's suggestion with adding the commands Connect to Server
and Disconnect to Server on my menu bar. And that helps with correcting
the number of messages read and unread and deleting them.
But they're just
--On 5 July 2005 13:39:45 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, try this:
Yes, it is all very useful info but it's the hoops and gyrations that one
shouldn't need to go through just to read an email. I may have been to the
odd circus or two when I was young but the Flying Wilberries I'm
Hello Tony,
Maybe a picture might be worth a thousand words. As you can see from the
screen shot my TBBETA folder has 101 messages in it. I highlighted one and
got the expected result... No Message Loaded. Displayed the CC for you to
see for yourself and it will sit like that doing nothing
--On 5 July 2005 11:28:39 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I setup an IMAP account.
So, I reset my IMAP account, and did this:
BUT I COULD NOT OPEN IT AGAIN...
So, summary: IMAP is unuseful, really, as far as I see...
Having fun? :)
--
Tony.
i.
--On 5 July 2005 20:16:36 +0300 9Val [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK. Next step is to see if something changes after message selecting.
I.e. does anything appear or flash in CC after another message
selection?
I'll have a look and get back to you.
BTW, there is no selected message on
Hello tbbeta,
Sorry, if I am boring you guys...
So: I logged in to my IMAP account on the web. It shows 100 mails, all
read in my inbox. This is exactly what I see in my IMAP log. BUT: 96
messages show up in my Inbox, only, in TB!
What is wrong, my syncronization? I selected Headers only
Hello Tony,
I setup an IMAP account.
So, I reset my IMAP account, and did this:
BUT I COULD NOT OPEN IT AGAIN...
So, summary: IMAP is unuseful, really, as far as I see...
Having fun? :)
:)) I will solve the problems, and then you HAVE TO USE TB!. That is
my motivation :)))
--
--On 5/07/2005 14:03 -0400 Vili wrote:
So, summary: IMAP is unuseful, really, as far as I see... The logic is
ok, but it is unreliable
Welcome to the dark side! You will now be told by a number of users that
there is no problem with TB's IMAP and that it's your fault/your
computer/your
Hello Tony,
--On 5 July 2005 13:39:45 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, try this:
Yes, it is all very useful info but it's the hoops and gyrations that one
shouldn't need to go through just to read an email. I may have been to the
odd circus or two when I was young but the Flying
Hello Clive,
--On 5/07/2005 14:03 -0400 Vili wrote:
So, summary: IMAP is unuseful, really, as far as I see... The logic is
ok, but it is unreliable
Welcome to the dark side! You will now be told by a number of users that
there is no problem with TB's IMAP and that it's your fault/your
Hello Clive,
Welcome to the dark side!
One more sentence: I dont mind to be there, if we are CONSTRUCTIVE.
--
Vili
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
IMPORTANT: To
Hello tbbeta,
I wrote: My online Drafts folder shows 2 mails. My local, that is
assigned to Inbox.Drafts on the IMAP server, shows nothing...
My log shows:
IMAP - 1: The folder INBOX.Drafts selected. 0 recent, 0 unread out
of 2 total messages
So, where is that 2 mails? It seems, that the server
--On 5 July 2005 15:08:00 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the It does not work does not help too much...
Neither does Why don't it work answers from RL. They're the programmers,
not me, I don't know why it don't work... Or rather I do know why it don't
work but people wouldn't like it
Hello tbbeta,
I wrote:
My online Drafts folder shows 2 mails. My local, that is
assigned to Inbox.Drafts on the IMAP server, shows nothing...
My log shows:
IMAP - 1: The folder INBOX.Drafts selected. 0 recent, 0 unread out
of 2 total messages
So, where is that 2 mails? It seems, that the
Hello Tony,
the It does not work does not help too much...
Neither does Why don't it work answers from RL. They're the programmers,
not me, I don't know why it don't work... Or rather I do know why it don't
work but people wouldn't like it if I said it on here.
Next time write something like
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 2:05:38 PM, Clive Taylor wrote:
it's your fault/your computer/your mail server etc. Well... we
know better don't we.
No, I don't think we know anything one way or the other. Debugging is
about considering all the possibilities. Not about oneupspersonship.
--
--On 5 July 2005 15:32:04 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next time write something like this:
I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
write to this list?
It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did this:
1..
2..
3..
..
X.
1.. I loaded up The Bat.
2.. It
--On 5 July 2005 14:54:51 -0500 Dwight A Corrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not about oneupspersonship.
I'm so glad I got a Mac, it looks like PC has really gone mad :)
--
Tony.
i.
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hello Tony,
Next time write something like this:
I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
write to this list?
Tony, give me a rest :). I am not an Englishman, so if I dont choose
the right words, dont jump on me! It was a SUGGESTION, I dont want to
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 2:55:53 PM, Tony Boom wrote:
Next time write something like this:
I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
write to this list?
It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did this:
1..
2..
3..
..
X.
I don't want to speak for Vili, but I think the
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 2:57:43 PM, Tony Boom wrote:
Not about oneupspersonship.
I'm so glad I got a Mac, it looks like PC has really gone mad
Just thought it was about the right time of day to try coining a new
word. Guess it needed a smiley?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita
In reply to mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
TB --On 5 July 2005 10:09:00 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The word you were looking for is: invention :) So, if it is
different, it can be good or bad...
TB I've read and reread what I wrote and nowhere can I substitute any
TB word I wrote for
Hello Clive,
Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 9:05:38 PM, you wrote:
CT Welcome to the dark side! You will now be told by a number of users that
CT there is no problem with TB's IMAP and that it's your fault/your
CT computer/your mail server etc. Well... we know better don't we.
It even gets worse.
--On 5 July 2005 15:14:39 -0500 Dwight A Corrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
.. I loaded up The Bat.
2.. It displayed No Message Loaded and
then sat there all day doing nothing.
3.. I closed The Bat down, Loaded up Mulberry and then sat reading
my email within seconds.
is not going to
--On 5 July 2005 15:17:15 -0500 Dwight A Corrin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just thought it was about the right time of day to try coining a new
word. Guess it needed a smiley?
It needed something, punctuation or hyphenation, it took me two minutes to
work out what it said...
Good stuff
Next time write something like this:
I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
write to this list?
It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did this:
1..
2..
3..
..
X.
I don't want to speak for Vili, but I think the desire is for
specific enough information that
Hello Tony,
But I don't know any way to make the above events sound more technical.
Nine times out of ten the above sequence is **exactly** what happens. Four
mause clicks, that's all it takes for me to reproduce the above...
Click 1. Fires up The Bat!
Click 2. Selects a message I want to
--On 5/07/2005 14:54 -0500 Dwight wrote:
Debugging is
about considering all the possibilities. Not about oneupspersonship.
Sorry, that doesn't make any sense at all to me.
--
Clive Taylor
Current beta is 3.5.36 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hello Vili,
On Tuesday, 05 Juli 2005 at 11:10 PM you (Vili) wrote:
the IMAP server (which I think is unreliable, as I see so far...)
The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable. To be fair,
it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover, it's the fastest
also.
On Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 4:29:40 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable.
To be fair, it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover,
it's the fastest also.
Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the
--On 5/07/2005 22:36 +0200 Mark wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if more and more providers
will take a similar decision leaving only specialised companies offering
it (for an extra charge).
I don't know where you're based Mark (Belgium?) but here in the UK I'm not
aware of any mainstream ISP
Hello Dwight,
The service Fastmail, which uses a Cyrus Server, isn't unreliable.
To be fair, it's the most reliable server I've had so far. Moreover,
it's the fastest also.
Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the
CONNECTION not of the server. I would add that
Hello Clive,
--On 5/07/2005 22:36 +0200 Mark wrote:
I wouldn't be surprised if more and more providers
will take a similar decision leaving only specialised companies offering
it (for an extra charge).
I don't know where you're based Mark (Belgium?) but here in the UK I'm not
aware of any
7/5/2005 5:57 PM
Hi Tony,
On 7/5/2005 Tony Boom wrote:
TB --On 5 July 2005 15:32:04 -0400 Vili [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Next time write something like this:
TB I sincerely hope your joking and not telling me what I can and what I can't
TB write to this list?
It is REPRODUCIBLE, I did
Hello Clive,
Tuesday, July 5, 2005, 11:37:20 PM, you wrote:
CT I don't know where you're based Mark (Belgium?)
Yes
CT but here in the UK I'm not aware of any mainstream ISP
CT offering IMAP mail services.
Tiscali did offer it, but their belgian division has been sold to Scarlet
that does not
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 02:10 PM, Vili wrote:
My goal is to UNDERSTAND the differences between my system and their
system. This is how a bug can be caught
For me, it's one of not using the Inbox.draft as my Outbox. While
using TB! in its current state of development, a server side
On Tuesday, July 05, 2005, at 02:17 PM, Vili wrote:
My log shows:
IMAP - 1: The folder INBOX.Drafts selected. 0 recent, 0 unread out
of 2 total messages
So, where is that 2 mails? It seems, that the server send the info,
that this mailbox has 2 mails, I have seen 2 for a sec beside the
Dear Beta folk,
I have started to see a number of messages from this particular source
coming through with unlisted headers. They're not filtering right
either.
Is it the newfangled DomainKeys headers causing confusion?
Or is it to do with Unicode format?
The source clearly shows From, To and
Hi Marck,
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005 02:08:02 +0100 UTC (7/5/2005, 8:08 PM -0500 UTC my
time), Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
M I have started to see a number of messages from this particular source
M coming through with unlisted headers. They're not filtering right
M either.
very strange
M Is it the
Dear Gary,
@5-Jul-2005, 20:20 -0500 (06-Jul 02:20 UK time) Gary [G] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... snip
M Is it the newfangled DomainKeys headers causing confusion?
G I don't think so, as both you and I are running DK without
G problems.
Well, sort of ... except I lost those mails
Hi Marck,
--On Wednesday, July 06, 2005 2:35 AM +0100 you wrote in part:
... snip
M Is it the newfangled DomainKeys headers causing confusion?
G I don't think so, as both you and I are running DK without
G problems.
Well, sort of ... except I lost those mails you sent me with the how
to on
Hi Tony
Delete a few messages from an IMAP folder then move to another IMAP folder and
back again and then browse deleted messages to see if they actually are
deleted.
They're not. Purge+Compress removes them if selected from the Folder menu, but
they're not removed automatically
Hey Vili,
yesterday (on 07/05/2005 at 23:53) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Take another look at Vili's message. It says he is suspicious of the
CONNECTION not of the server. I would add that yes, the fastmail
server seems very reliable and works very well here with TB!.
Dwight is right, I
90 matches
Mail list logo
