-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Screwyluie
On 17 May 2001 at 20:40:41 -0700 (which was 04:40 where I live) Screwyluie
wrote and made these points
was playing with some features of the bat when I noticed this one. when I
paste as quoted from a text file (the one I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Screwyluie!
On Thursday, May 17, 2001 at 5:40:41 AM you wrote:
but when I hit undo, the cursor just move back to where it was
before I inserted the text from the file... I then have to click
undo again for the text to actually be gone. now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DE Tested with your line and some different files. I can not reproduce it.
that line wasn't supposed to be in 2 lines... it was one line when I
pasted it... when it sent it musta wrapped it or something, dunno
dunno but I can reproduce this cursor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Nick!
On Thursday, May 17, 2001 at 2:58:47 AM you wrote:
In fact, if memory serves, you can under some direct criticism for that
stance and your relentless pursuit of, yet now you seem to be heading in
the opposite direction.
Maybe he
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Mike!
On Thursday, May 17, 2001 at 6:07:24 AM you wrote:
I found RootCA.ABD and Addrbook.ini in C:\data\batch, as well as
in g:\bat. The ones in c:\data\batch were newer. I believe that
one of the recent betas was found to place these
At Thursday, May 17, 2001, 4:38:38 AM, Alexander mashed together the following text:
M Then tell me, how did it happen that I'm getting a much fairer
M distribution than TB ?
More complex code... If you want good result - use own tools and don't
use black-boxes
All right, now either this is
At Thursday, May 17, 2001, 2:53:28 AM, Nick has said the following text:
MaXxX, were you not the one who was demanding bug fixes *before*
introducing new features? What on earth would move Developer's to try and
come up with such an outlandish macro as you describe without first fixing
some
Hello tbbeta
I doubt if this will be repeatable with anyone else - but I'll
report it anyway..
a) I have a personal address book group of the department managers
(called managers)
b) I had 5 entries in it.. but now I'm on beta6 I noticed that 2 had
disappeared. (Could be due to
At Thursday, May 17, 2001, 2:58:47 AM, Nick mashed together the following text:
Echoing your very words MaXxX... No More New Features until the bugs get
fixed!! Why now... all of a sudden... are you clamouring for new features
when only days before you were going on about Stef and Max working
At Thursday, May 17, 2001, 4:35:11 AM, Alexander has created the following text:
It can't be, even RFC-unrelated. On any connect you use maximum
bandwidth on POP-session (if you POP isn't on the Moon)
Bat! RETR 1
Bat! RETR 2
Bat! DELE 1
Bat! RETR 3
Bat! DELE 2
Bat! RETR 4
Bat! DELE 3
Hello Graham Foster
(Talking to myself now..)
Completely reproducible in this group for these people... Anyone
else able to get this problem?
I've tested it further.. I created a new group for TBBeta people and
went through and added 6 of you to the address book group.
None of you stayed
Hi,
I don't get this to work (it should create a gender specific formal
address):
%IF:%ABtoGENDER=1:Sehr geehrter Herr:Sehr geehre Frau
The result is (address book entry is female):
:2=1:Sehr geehrter Herr:Sehr geehre Frau
What am I doing wrong?
Regards,
Markus
--
Using The Bat! 1.53
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
GF I've tested it further.. I created a new group for TBBeta people and
GF went through and added 6 of you to the address book group.
GF None of you stayed ..
GF Looks like this add to address book functionality is not working...
I concur! I just
Hello Markus
X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.53 Beta/5)
I don't get this to work (it should create a gender specific formal
address):
%IF:%ABtoGENDER=1:Sehr geehrter Herr:Sehr geehre Frau
The result is (address book entry is female):
:2=1:Sehr geehrter Herr:Sehr geehre Frau
What am I doing wrong?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 16 May 2001 20:40:41 -0700, Screwyluie contributed this to our
collective wisdom:
S that's the annoyance, here's the bug. if you paste from file not
S paste as quotation, the cursor isn't moved to the end of the file like
S it should be, so
At Wednesday, May 16, 2001, 8:32:48 PM, Stefan has created the following:
1.53 Beta/6 is available for download from
http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb153b06.rar
... and I see that the %- macro is now working in included files. Great!
--
Parker Pen Company's slogan, 'It
Greetings.
Try this one now: get a %cookie=file file, and several cookies to it and
at the end add a 5kB cookie to it.
Yes, I mean it, a 5000-character multi-line \n cookie.
Now create a message which has this cookie in it. If nothing strange
happens, try it again. And again.
On one of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On May 17, 2001, at 3:53:18 PM, SyP wrote:
IIRC when I changed a folder's name through the folder's properties, TB!
used to automatically modify the filters which acts upon this folder, so
that I needn't go to Sorting Office and make the changes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello All,
I know you can't shut down TB while the connection centre is open,
which makes sense, but I've noticed that if I delete the last
remaining task in the CC or abort it entirely, I still can't shut down
TB immediately. I have one account
Hello Stefan Tanurkov,
On Thu, 17 May 2001 at 16:36:01 GMT +0300 (which was 17/05/2001 20:36
GMT +0700 my Local Time) Stefan Tanurkov=[ST] wrote to Syafril
Hermansyah :
1. Most POP currently implement asynchronous mode, means if message
successfully download by POPClient, it
Hello Andrew,
Thursday, May 17, 2001, you wrote to me:
GE | [-] Bug with hanging when a template contained a %LANGUAGE=
GE No further comment.
AKL It was really fixed then. I do remember. Can't check at the moment: do
AKL not have the latest TB beta, don't have enough time, sorry.
Yes, it
Hello Philippe Gouillou,
On Thu, 17 May 2001 at 15:02:57 GMT +0200 (which was 17/05/2001 20:02
GMT +0700 my Local Time) Philippe Gouillou=[PG] wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
SH More than that, it would be nice if TB! can do download messages
SH base on message size (less size first)
Hello MaXxX,
On Thu, 17 May 2001 at 15:15:43 GMT +0200 (which was 17/05/2001 20:15
GMT +0700 my Local Time) MaXxX=[M] wrote to Syafril Hermansyah :
My reason as follow :
1. Most POP currently implement asynchronous mode, means if message
successfully download by POPClient, it will
Hello Alexander Leschinsky,
On Fri, 18 May 2001 at 01:47:52 GMT +0600 (which was 18/05/2001 2:47
GMT +0700 my Local Time) Alexander Leschinsky=[AL] wrote to Syafril
Hermansyah :
SH My reason as follow :
SH 1. Most POP currently implement asynchronous mode, means if message
SH
Hello Stefan,
Thursday, May 17, 2001, you wrote to me:
1. Most POP currently implement asynchronous mode, means if message
successfully download by POPClient, it will delete by POPServer
without waiting QUIT command.
ST Keeping messages on the server for at least one day always
25 matches
Mail list logo
