Re: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml

2002-07-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Gareth, @11 July 2002, 05:36 +0100 Gareth Campling [GC] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Nick Andriash: GC Why do u say that ? if done correctly this would be a fine option GC and secure if it uses the internal viewer and will not accept any GC

Re: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml

2002-07-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Eddie, @11 July 2002, 11:50 +0200 (10:50 UK time) Eddie Castelli [EC] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: It has been stated that V2 will have an option to download images. There is something you need to understand a bit

Re: TSL error?

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Krzysztof, On Thursday, July 11, 2002 at 9:44:39 AM you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): and run: openssl.exe s_client -tls1 -host your mail server -port 995 KK OK. I did it. See attachment. As you did not mentioned your exact 'openssl' calling string: Are

Re: TSL error?

2002-07-11 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 02-07-11, 14:33, you wrote: Are contacting 'neo.pl' directly? Yes - it is 'neo.pl' only. If you are connecting to 'neo.pl' please copy the following lines (_INCLUDING_ '-BEGIN CERTIFICATE-' '-END CERTIFICATE-') and save them in a text file. [...] OK - I did it - no

Re: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml

2002-07-11 Thread Gene Gough
If this worked it would be fine. It does not. See bug report 835. This problem (835) seems to be present in the context that you mention below. I don't mind that the message is not displayed by BAT properly every time but I do want BAT to leave the attachment names alone so that when I

Re: TSL error?

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Alexander, On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 at 9:01:07 PM you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): AL I think - weak cipher Could you define this more precisely? I know I've read something about it on list already, but I can't find it anymore and AFAIR it wasn't very detailed.

Re[2]: TSL error?

2002-07-11 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Krzysztof, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:44:39 +0200 (11.07.02 13:44 my local time) you wrote about TSL error?, at least in part: KK OK. I did it. See attachment. Cipher: EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA ~ h If, than it would

Re: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml

2002-07-11 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Gene, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:07:09 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 20:07 +0700 GMT), Gene Gough wrote: GG If this worked it would be fine. It does not. See bug report 835. GG This problem (835) seems to be present in the context that you mention GG below. I don't mind that the message is not

address

2002-07-11 Thread Peter Kerekes
Hello, Lately, (I am not sure since which version) when I write a new mail and type in the handle in the To line I get only the E-mail address. In the past the whole name showed up as xxx xxxvv@zz. I searched where can I change this back but could not find a place. Would appreciate an

Re: address

2002-07-11 Thread Joseph N.
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, Peter Kerekes wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: PK Lately, (I am not sure since which version) when I write a new mail and PK type in the handle in the To line I get only the E-mail address. In the PK past the whole name showed up as xxx

Re: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml

2002-07-11 Thread Gene Gough
I think that is the same problem as I am seeing. I didn't spell it out very well. The biggest problem that I am seeing is when an image is referenced as src=cid:007b01c222d5$2c596630$485be8cf@mompop; and when you save the message or attempt to forward or resend it, the actual file is fetched

Objects in HTML mails (was: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml)

2002-07-11 Thread Thomas F.
Hello Gene, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:29:27 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 23:29 +0700 GMT), Gene Gough wrote: GG Perhaps this is not the same problem but it looks like it to me. Actually, no, it isn't. Technically these are two different things. GG Perhaps I have it totally confused and if so, I am sorry

The Bat! - bug report

2002-07-11 Thread SyP
Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.60q/Post5/newhtml Serial Number EEE032B5 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 2 and would like to report a bug The bug description: If I get a plain text message bigger than a certain size, TB! shows an

Re: Objects in HTML mails (was: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml)

2002-07-11 Thread Gene Gough
Thanks. You did a great job of explaining it. Now if the developers would just fix the bug part. Thursday, July 11, 2002, 1:00:57 PM, Thomas wrote: Hello Gene, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:29:27 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 23:29 +0700 GMT), Gene Gough wrote: GG Perhaps this is not the same

Re[2]: TSL error?

2002-07-11 Thread Alexander Leschinsky
Hello Peter, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 15:27:36 +0200 (11.07.02 19:27 my local time) you wrote about TSL error?, at least in part: PP On Wednesday, July 10, 2002 at 9:01:07 PM you wrote in PP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part): AL I think - weak cipher PP Could you define this more