On Sunday, July 24, 2005, 12:54:49 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Now that would be real fun. I have a filter moving a message to
folder X, and I forgot about that filter. Just decided that I don't
need that folder any more, so I delete it. A minute later, the
folder is recreated automatically -
Hello 9Val,
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 21:28:49 +0700 GMT (28/06/2005, 21:28 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
[Not being able to assign hotkeys to encodings any more]
9 It is limitation of new UI, we have not yet found workaround.
TF Thanks for your reply, it's very honest. I'll be looking forward
Hello everyone,
on 21-Jul-2005 at 16:14 Maxim Masiutin wrote:
[-] 0004900: [HTML Editor] HTML message format loss when reply or forward a
message
Has anybody already tried to play with this?
[I ended up replying to an HTML message with a complete wrong front in a
plaintext MicroEd the other
Hello all,
Sunday, July 24, 2005, Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
[-] 0004900: [HTML Editor] HTML message format loss when reply or forward a
message
Has anybody already tried to play with this?
[I ended up replying to an HTML message with a complete wrong front in a
plaintext MicroEd the other
Hello Marek Mikus everyone else,
on 24-Jul-2005 at 16:09 you (Marek Mikus) wrote:
[I ended up replying to an HTML message with a complete wrong front in a
plaintext MicroEd the other day]
You muste select HTML editor first, if You want to forward/redirect
HTML message withou loosing its
Hello, I'm answering myself...
on 24-Jul-2005 at 16:20 I (Alexander S. Kunz) wrote:
Thats not my point. I have MicroEd configured to use... well, I can't
remember which font, Lucida Console or something, but when I replying to
an HTML message (I didn't care about the formatting), I ended up
Hello Curtis,
This means that as large threads expand, they would make your subject
column nearly or completely take up the entire message list view area.
The limit expansion option prevents this and I have it enabled. It's
this option that's causing it. It's an old option that became buggy
Hello MAU,
What is TB doing during this extra minute or so? Does anyone know?
Never had this on my Windows XP notebook, 3-4 seconds max., no matter
how long or how I used TB!.
BUT:
On my Windows 2000 Desktop, that accesses the mailbase on my Notebook
via 100MBit-network, shutting down takes
Hello All,
Have I got this wrong, or did it change.
A message can get caught by a number of filters.
Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a spam folder.
Filter 2 catches list and moves it to a list folder.
Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?
--
Best regards,
On 2005-07-24 at 20:32:54 David Elliott wrote:
Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a spam folder.
Filter 2 catches list and moves it to a list folder.
Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?
Normally the first one, unless you check the option Continue
Hello David Elliott everyone else,
on 24-Jul-2005 at 20:32 you (David Elliott) wrote:
Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?
The one that comes first in your list of filters, I assume.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
I am
Hi David,
on Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:32:54 +0100GMT (24.07.2005, 20:32 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
DE Have I got this wrong, or did it change.
DE A message can get caught by a number of filters.
DE Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a spam folder.
DE Filter 2 catches list and moves it to a list
Hello Peter and All,
Sunday, July 24, 2005, 7:44:21 PM, you wrote:
on Sun, 24 Jul 2005 19:32:54 +0100GMT (24.07.2005, 20:32 +0200GMT here),
you wrote:
DE Have I got this wrong, or did it change.
DE A message can get caught by a number of filters.
DE Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a
Hello David,
Sunday, July 24, 2005, 2:01:23 PM, you wrote:
Yep that is checked. (Don't ask it gets complicated)
So the message can get caught by both filters.
So I ask again which one should move it when it gets caught by both.
Other examples.
I have a filter for friends and one for
Hello David Elliott everyone else,
on 24-Jul-2005 at 21:01 you (David Elliott) wrote:
DE Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?
The one that is topmost, if Continue with other filters is not
checked.
Yep that is checked. (Don't ask it gets complicated)
So the
viernes, 22 jul 2005 at 17:12, it seems you wrote:
the tbuser.def bug (see
msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) is still
present in this version!
Can it be fixed before you release it?
Same problem here.
Working with 3.51.7 because 3.51.8 and 3.51.9 not uses my
customization.
--
/\
Hoi All
I have a QT containing ABFromFName and a couple of other AB macros. A couple of
versions ago, these started appearing as blanks. Then in 3.51.8 this was fixed.
Now I'm back to being served blanks by my AB macros.
Anyone else confirm?
--
Groetjes
Natasha
The Bat! 3.51.9 Pro on
Hello Martin,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 18:08:39 +0200 GMT (24/07/2005, 23:08 +0700 GMT),
Martin Schuster wrote:
MS I don't know if I understand you right, but I can't imagine how this
MS should work: on one hand you want to limit the width of the threaded
MS column, but on the other hand you don't
Hello Alexander,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2005 21:19:01 +0200 GMT (25/07/2005, 02:19 +0700 GMT),
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
DE Filter 1 catches spam and moves it to a spam folder.
DE Filter 2 catches list and moves it to a list folder.
DE Which one should take preference if the message get caught by both ?
On Sunday, July 24, 2005 at 11:08:39 AM [GMT -0500], Martin Schuster
wrote:
I don't know if I understand you right,
You don't.
but I can't imagine how this should work: on one hand you want to
limit the width of the threaded column, but on the other hand you
don't want the view on that
Hello Michael,
DAC Did I miss the report, or has it not been remarked upon that there is
DAC no longer a mystery stop when tabbing backward from message auto view
DAC window to message list.
I know I just noticed it also. And I never saw a note on it. But it is
working again like it used to.
Hello Dwight,
TF No. the filter might set a colour group at the same time or
TF vperform other actions. Setting the destination folder to a
TF move/copy action to the default is more sensible, so that the
TF other actions can still be run.
I agree with Vili. It shouldn't
Hello Alexander,
I suspect preview pane, as if you use that, TB! does not use that much
memory. Memory leak is associated with messages opened full window.
You mean I should open every message in a separate window?
Yes.
--
Vili
The Bat 3.51.7 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 1
Hello Dwight,
On Saturday, July 23, 2005, 2:22:32 AM, Vili wrote:
-boot TB! -UNCHECK View, Message Auto-view - use TB! for a while as
you used to use
Can't close auto view and still read my mail. Never go anywhere else.
What??? Double click on a mail, and it opens in a full window.
--
Vili
24 matches
Mail list logo
