Re: delayed sending

> Hello all, > Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote: >> - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200 >> - Delay time:plus 1 hour =>>> Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the >>message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED. > check Scheduller if ther

Strange quoting (Wa: Re: delayed sending)

On dinsdag 16 juni 2009, 11:41:31 PM Marek Mikus wrote, =>>> Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the >>message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED. > I have set +5min and message was sent correctly Strange. Volker put "=>" in his message, but your quote made "=>>

Wish : Ignoring header when is empty like "Reply-To: <>"

Hello, I have received message, where is following header included: Reply-To: <> TB use this header when replying, what is technically correct, but logic could be implemented to not use non-working address, so message can not be sent. reported here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7634 -

Re: delayed sending

Hello all, Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote: > - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200 > - Delay time:plus 1 hour =>> Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the >message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED. check Scheduller if there is a tas

Re: delayed sending

Hello all, Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote: > - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200 > - Delay time:plus 1 hour =>> Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the >message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED. I have set +5min and message was s

Re: delayed sending

[Reply to: »Rick« · 2009-06-15 · 19:18 h (CET)] Moin, Rick! [Trouble with delayed sending] > I am getting so frustrated with this. In some beta releases it has > worked perfectly, and the next release of an EXE will totally break > it (form me at least) and I have no idea of why. Tonight I did

Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries "Western European (ISO)"

Hello all, Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote: >> there was one BT report, but was closed already, even this was not >> fixed https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4837 > Um, why am I *not* surprised …? to be honest, as I am remember, Stef told something about there is not possibl

Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries "Western European (ISO)"

Hello mse, > Hello Volker, >> "View|Character set" contains two entries "Western European (ISO)". I >> think one entry should be more than enough … >> BT report filed: > I only have one entry. Sorry. Found the reason. -- Best regards, mse Usi

Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries "Western European (ISO)"

[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-16 · 23:03 h (CET)] Moin, Marek! >> "View|Character set" contains two entries "Western European (ISO)". I >> think one entry should be more than enough … ;-) >> BT report filed: > yes, this is known, us-ascii is di

Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries "Western European (ISO)"

Hello all, Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote: > "View|Character set" contains two entries "Western European (ISO)". I > think one entry should be more than enough … ;-) > BT report filed: yes, this is known, us-ascii is displayed as wester

Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries "Western European (ISO)"

Hello Volker, > "View|Character set" contains two entries "Western European (ISO)". I > think one entry should be more than enough … > BT report filed: I only have one entry. -- Best regards, mse Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 26

[The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries "Western European (ISO)"

Moin, folks! "View|Character set" contains two entries "Western European (ISO)". I think one entry should be more than enough … ;-) BT report filed: Cheers! VA - -- Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will en

4.2.6 Norman Virus Altert!

Hello Tbbeta, again Norman Antivirus detects a Trojan in thebat.exe 4.2.6.0 Norman Scanner Engine from 16.6.09 Version 6.01.09 -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus Bielefeld Axel Finger mailto:a...@die-fingers.de Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Usin

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

> Hello all, > is anyone experiencing problems with built-in picture viewer? > My settings: Attachments are shown in a column, not minimized as a > symbol in message header preview. When I double-click on a > picture-attachment the built-in picture viewer opens and CPU-usage > increases drama

Re: "Empty" messages

> Hello Rick, > Saturday, June 13, 2009, 8:33:41 PM, you wrote: R>> I DID post to the list on 6/11 about delayed sending and got no replies. I R>> thought it was because everyone was still in "tar and feather Ritlabs over IMAP" mode. Perhaps not. > I received another one today in which your ema

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

[Reply to: »mse« · 2009-06-16 · 17:33 h (CET)] Moin, Mse! >> Nevertheless you should file a BT report. – I would confirm it. > Here it is: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7632 > Thanks for your comments. :yes: Done. Cheers! VA - -- Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net Direct eMail with

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

Hello Volker, > Nevertheless you should file a BT report. – I would confirm it. Here it is: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7632 Thanks for your comments. :yes: -- Best regards, mse Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 _

Re: "Empty" messages

Hello Rick, Saturday, June 13, 2009, 8:33:41 PM, you wrote: R> I DID post to the list on 6/11 about delayed sending and got no replies. I R> thought it was because everyone was still in "tar and feather Ritlabs over IMAP" mode. Perhaps not. I received another one today in which your email-addre

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

[Reply to: »mse« · 2009-06-16 · 16:58 h (CET)] Moin, Mse! > It's not the zoom level. It's the selected stretch filter. Yep, confirmed: Stretch Filter "Nearest" is the best one followed by "Linear" on my computer. Cheers! VA - -- Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net Direct eMail without [tbb] in s

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

Hello mse, > Hello Roelof, hello Volker, > indeed, it's the zoom level. I understand that it consumes CPU-power > to resize a picture but from my point of view, resizing a picture is > not an endless process and CPU-workload should go back to a normal > level once resizing has finished. > But I'

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

[Reply to: »mse« · 2009-06-16 · 16:44 h (CET)] Moin, Mse! > But I'll switch zoom factor to 1:1 too. Guess that will be enough. Nevertheless you should file a BT report. – I would confirm it. ;-) Cheers! VA - -- Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will e

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

Hello Roelof, hello Volker, indeed, it's the zoom level. I understand that it consumes CPU-power to resize a picture but from my point of view, resizing a picture is not an endless process and CPU-workload should go back to a normal level once resizing has finished. But I'll switch zoom factor to

Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

Hallo mse, On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:57:56 +0200GMT (16-6-2009, 14:57 +0200, where I live), you wrote: M> is anyone experiencing problems with built-in picture viewer? No problems, no. M> My settings: Attachments are shown in a column, not minimized as a M> symbol in message header preview. When

Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

Hello all, is anyone experiencing problems with built-in picture viewer? My settings: Attachments are shown in a column, not minimized as a symbol in message header preview. When I double-click on a picture-attachment the built-in picture viewer opens and CPU-usage increases dramatically from

Re: Voyager

Downloaded and update fine here on HP Pavilion ze4900 with MS WinXP Home SP2 -- Mackley Italy Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html