Re: Voyager

2009-06-16 Thread Mackley
Downloaded and update fine here on HP Pavilion ze4900 with MS WinXP Home SP2

-- 

Mackley
Italy


 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread mse
Hello all,

is anyone experiencing problems with built-in picture viewer? 

My settings: Attachments are shown in a column, not minimized as a 
symbol in message header preview. When I double-click on a 
picture-attachment the built-in picture viewer opens and CPU-usage 
increases dramatically from less than 5 to over 50 percent.
The amount of CPU consumption seems to correlate with the file size. 
My system: XP SP3, Centrino Duo 2 x 2,4 GHz, 1 GB RAM

-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3




 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo mse,

On Tue, 16 Jun 2009 14:57:56 +0200GMT (16-6-2009, 14:57 +0200, where
I live), you wrote:

M is anyone experiencing problems with built-in picture viewer? 

No problems, no.

M My settings: Attachments are shown in a column, not minimized as a 
M symbol in message header preview. When I double-click on a 
M picture-attachment the built-in picture viewer opens and CPU-usage 
M increases dramatically from less than 5 to over 50 percent.
M The amount of CPU consumption seems to correlate with the file size. 
M My system: XP SP3, Centrino Duo 2 x 2,4 GHz, 1 GB RAM

Over here the PC has a slightly different config.
But  depending  on  the settings of the viewer I'm getting this with a
1.47MB picture of 4288x2848 pixels:
200% viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 15% peak to a steady 1%
150% viewer: the same
1:1  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 15% peak to a steady 0%
50%  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 22% peak to a steady 8%
20%  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 21% peak to a steady 13%
10%  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 25% peak to a steady 11%
Fit image  : CPU usage from 0% via a short 25% peak to a steady 15%
Fit heigth, fit width: the same

As my default setting is to view pictures 1:1 I didn't encounter any
problems, most attached pictures I get are of a size that makes 1:1 a
good choice for me.



-- 
Groetjes, Roelof

In spite of the cost of living, it's still popular.
http://www.voormijalleen.nl/
The Bat! 4.2.6
Windows Vista 6.0 Build 6001 Service Pack 1
6 pop3 accounts, 1 imap account
OTFE enabled
Quad Core 2.4GHz
4 GB RAM

pgpC8RV1R6Cf9.pgp
Description: PGP signature

 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread mse
Hello Roelof, hello Volker,

indeed, it's the zoom level. I understand that it consumes CPU-power
to resize a picture but from my point of view, resizing a picture is
not an endless process and CPU-workload should go back to a normal
level once resizing has finished. 
But I'll switch zoom factor to 1:1 too. Guess that will be enough.

 Over here the PC has a slightly different config.
 But  depending  on  the settings of the viewer I'm getting this with a
 1.47MB picture of 4288x2848 pixels:
 200% viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 15% peak to a steady 1%
 150% viewer: the same
 1:1  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 15% peak to a steady 0%
 50%  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 22% peak to a steady 8%
 20%  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 21% peak to a steady 13%
 10%  viewer: CPU usage from 0% via a short 25% peak to a steady 11%
 Fit image  : CPU usage from 0% via a short 25% peak to a steady 15%
 Fit heigth, fit width: the same

Yous system has More power! than mine ...

-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3






 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »mse« · 2009-06-16 · 16:44 h (CET)]

Moin, Mse!

 But I'll switch zoom factor to 1:1 too. Guess that will be enough.

Nevertheless you should file a BT report. – I would confirm it. ;-)

Cheers!
VA

- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»You live and learn. At any rate, you live.«

Douglas Adams (* March 11, 1952; † May 11, 2001)



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread mse
Hello mse,

 Hello Roelof, hello Volker,

 indeed, it's the zoom level. I understand that it consumes CPU-power
 to resize a picture but from my point of view, resizing a picture is
 not an endless process and CPU-workload should go back to a normal
 level once resizing has finished. 
 But I'll switch zoom factor to 1:1 too. Guess that will be enough.

Further testing:
It's not the zoom level. It's the selected stretch filter.
The attached screen shot shows the CPU-load with different stretch 
filters used to resize a 1,35MB JPG-file to 150 %.

Baseline: Filter: Nearest
1st plateau: Filter Linear
2nd plateau: Filter Spline
3rd plateau: Filter Lanczos
4th plateau: Filter Mitchell

-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3


attachment: 2009-06-09_16-51_CPU-Usage.png
 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »mse« · 2009-06-16 · 16:58 h (CET)]

Moin, Mse!

 It's not the zoom level. It's the selected stretch filter.

Yep, confirmed: Stretch Filter Nearest is the best one followed by
Linear on my computer.

Cheers!
VA

- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»There is a theory which states that if ever anyone discovers exactly
what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly vanish
and be replaced by something even more bizarre and incomprehensible.
There is another theory which states that this has already happened …«

Douglas Adams ('52 - '01), »The Restaurant at the End of the Universe«



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Empty messages

2009-06-16 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Rick,

Saturday, June 13, 2009, 8:33:41 PM, you wrote:

R I DID post to the list on 6/11 about delayed sending and got no replies. I
R thought it was because everyone was still in tar and feather Ritlabs over 
IMAP mode. Perhaps not.

I received another one today in which your email-address is mentioned as well as

(envelope-from tbbeta-boun...@thebat.dutaint.com)...

So if you think no-one wants to reply to your message...  :-)

-- 
Best Wishes,
Mark 
   
using 
The Bat! Version 4.2.6 
MyMacros 1.11a

zOmbie's Macros Version 0.7 
Windows XP Professional/5.1 build 2600 Service Pack 3 (0 days 9:39:30) on Dual
Intel Pentium III





 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread mse
Hello Volker,

 Nevertheless you should file a BT report. – I would confirm it.  

Here it is:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7632

Thanks for your comments. :yes:


-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3






 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »mse« · 2009-06-16 · 17:33 h (CET)]

Moin, Mse!

 Nevertheless you should file a BT report. – I would confirm it.

 Here it is:
 https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7632

 Thanks for your comments. :yes:

Done.

Cheers!
VA

- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»The knack of flying is learning how to throw yourself at the ground
and miss.«

Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy«



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Empty messages

2009-06-16 Thread Rick
 Hello Rick,

 Saturday, June 13, 2009, 8:33:41 PM, you wrote:

R I DID post to the list on 6/11 about delayed sending and got no replies. I
R thought it was because everyone was still in tar and feather Ritlabs over 
IMAP mode. Perhaps not.

 I received another one today in which your email-address is mentioned as well 
 as

 (envelope-from tbbeta-boun...@thebat.dutaint.com)...

 So if you think no-one wants to reply to your message...  :-)

I WAS feeling kind of neglected and rejected ... :)

-- 
Rick
Rogues are preferable to imbeciles because they sometimes take a rest. - 
Alexandre Dumas

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: Big CPU-consumption of picture viewer

2009-06-16 Thread Rick
 Hello all,

 is anyone experiencing problems with built-in picture viewer? 

 My settings: Attachments are shown in a column, not minimized as a 
 symbol in message header preview. When I double-click on a 
 picture-attachment the built-in picture viewer opens and CPU-usage 
 increases dramatically from less than 5 to over 50 percent.
 The amount of CPU consumption seems to correlate with the file size. 
 My system: XP SP3, Centrino Duo 2 x 2,4 GHz, 1 GB RAM

I couldn't help on this one. On JPGs and GIFs in the 1 MB range it would 
momentarily increase to 10% or 12% and immediately drop.

I am not experiencing the problem.

-- 
Rick
You're only young once; you can be immature forever

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


4.2.6 Norman Virus Altert!

2009-06-16 Thread Axel Finger
Hello Tbbeta,
again Norman Antivirus detects a Trojan in thebat.exe 4.2.6.0

Norman Scanner Engine from 16.6.09 Version 6.01.09

-- 
Mit freundlichen Grüßen aus Bielefeld
Axel Finger
mailto:a...@die-fingers.de



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


[The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries Western European (ISO)

2009-06-16 Thread Volker Ahrendt
Moin, folks!

View|Character set contains two entries Western European (ISO). I
think one entry should be more than enough … ;-)

BT report filed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7633

Cheers!
VA

- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn
from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent
disinclination to do so.«

Douglas Adams (1952 - 2001), »Last Chance to See«



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries Western European (ISO)

2009-06-16 Thread mse
Hello Volker,

 View|Character set contains two entries Western European (ISO). I
 think one entry should be more than enough …  

 BT report filed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7633

I only have one entry.

-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3






 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries Western European (ISO)

2009-06-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 View|Character set contains two entries Western European (ISO). I
 think one entry should be more than enough … ;-)

 BT report filed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7633

yes, this is known, us-ascii is displayed as western european (ISO-8859-1)
because seems they are both same.
there was one BT report, but was closed already, even this was not fixed
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4837

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.2.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries Western European (ISO)

2009-06-16 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Marek Mikus« · 2009-06-16 · 23:03 h (CET)]

Moin, Marek!

 View|Character set contains two entries Western European (ISO). I
 think one entry should be more than enough … ;-)

 BT report filed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7633

 yes, this is known, us-ascii is displayed as western european
 (ISO-8859-1) because seems they are both same.

Yep, disabling US-ASCII removes the second entry.

 there was one BT report, but was closed already, even this was not
 fixed https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4837

Um, why am I *not* surprised …?

Cheers!
VA

- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»Smart alecks always want to have the last word.« – Mike M. Skura



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries Western European (ISO)

2009-06-16 Thread mse
Hello mse,

 Hello Volker,

 View|Character set contains two entries Western European (ISO). I
 think one entry should be more than enough …  

 BT report filed: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7633

 I only have one entry.

Sorry. Found the reason.


-- 
Best regards,
mse

Using The Bat! v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600 Service Pack 3






 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: [The Bat! 4.2.6] Redundant Entries Western European (ISO)

2009-06-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 there was one BT report, but was closed already, even this was not
 fixed https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4837

 Um, why am I *not* surprised …?

to be honest, as I am remember, Stef told something about there is not
possible to have two entries with different name and ID but with same
xlat table definition...

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.2.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Volker Ahrendt
[Reply to: »Rick« · 2009-06-15 · 19:18 h (CET)]

Moin, Rick!

[Trouble with delayed sending]

 I am getting so frustrated with this. In some beta releases it has
 worked perfectly, and the next release of an EXE will totally break
 it (form me at least) and I have no idea of why.

Tonight I did a test:

- Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
- Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
   message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

Cheers!
VA

- --
Volker Ahrendt | q...@ahrendt.net
Direct eMail without [tbb] in subject line will end in Nirvana!
Using /\^o^/\! 4.2.6 [Pro] on Windows XP [Pro] Service Pack 3.

»The story so far: In the beginning the Universe was created. This
has made a lot of people very angry and has been widely regarded as a
bad move.«

Douglas Adams ('52 - '01), »The Restaurant at the End of the Universe«



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
 - Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

I have set +5min and message was sent correctly

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.2.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all,
Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
 - Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

check Scheduller if there is a task for send that message and what are its
properties.

-- 

Bye

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.2.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM


 




 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Wish : Ignoring header when is empty like Reply-To:

2009-06-16 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello,
I have received message, where is following header included:

Reply-To: 

TB use this header when replying, what is technically correct, but logic
could be implemented to not use non-working address, so message can not be
sent.

reported here:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=7634

-- 

Thanks and Bye,

Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz

Using the best The Bat! 4.2.6
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3
with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6
Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM







 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Strange quoting (Wa: Re: delayed sending)

2009-06-16 Thread Arjan de Groot
On dinsdag 16 juni 2009, 11:41:31 PM Marek Mikus wrote,

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

 I have set +5min and message was sent correctly

Strange. Volker put = in his message, but your quote made = of
it, while my quote made it =. Shouldn't that have been = and
= respectively?

Arjan
-- 
[Delaying this message untill 01:00]



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html


Re: delayed sending

2009-06-16 Thread Rick
 Hello all,
 Tuesday, June 16, 2009, Volker Ahrendt wrote:

 - Creation date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 22:12:05 +0200
 - Delay time:plus 1 hour

= Message should have been sent 23:12:05 +0200. – Now (23:27) the
message is still in the outbox, i.e. TEST FAILED.

 check Scheduller if there is a task for send that message and what are its
 properties.

I have a similar one that was supposed to go out 3 hours ago. What would you 
like to know about it?
PROPERTIES/ GENERAL Has Start: Tuesday June 4:33:51 PM
Duration 1 Seconds Priority= Normal, enabled is checked
Notify about up to 1 missed events on startup 
Execute actions for missed event is checked

The delayed sending is completely broken for me


-- 
Rick
Never deprive someone of hope; it might be all they have. - H. Jackson Brown Jr.

v4.2.6 on Windows XP 5.1 Build  2600
Service Pack 3

 



 Current beta is 4.2.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html