Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread MAU
Hello Alto, > today I received a message with an attachment winmail.dat. Isn't > TheBat supposed to be able to decode this file by itself? I don't > remember having seen one of those for ages. > > The message was a reading confirmation generated by Outlook 2010. Exactly the same happened to me

Mod: (was: winmail.dat)

2012-03-19 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Franz, On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 18:24:25 +0100GMT (19-3-2012, 18:24, where I live), you wrote: FS> Best regards, FS> Franz Please use a proper quote sign: '>' when quoting somebody else. In your message it's impossible to figure out what was written by you and what by the previous post

Re: 5.0.36.3

2012-03-19 Thread Tony Hoare
Hello Dwight, Thursday, March 15, 2012, 4:33:02 PM, you wrote: > On Thursday, March 15, 2012, 6:48:06 AM, Tony Hoare wrote: >   >> I have a similar but different problem. For nearly every email I send, >> I get "SEND - The message to xxx is sent but could not be moved from >> Outbox to the S

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Monday, March 19, 2012, 18:24:25, Franz Schoeler wrote: > I never saw anything worthwhile in winmail.dat attachments. Can you please quote the messages you're replying to properly? It's hard to read your e-mails. -- < Jernej Simončič ><><><><>< http://eternallybored.org/ > [ The Bat! 5.0.34

Re: including online images

2012-03-19 Thread Rick
RG>> Roelof - I have all the graphics turned on and am working in graphics RG>> all day long. I have yet to find either a way to link to web graphics RG>> nor a way to forward something WITH web linked graphics successfully > I was afraid of that, but I wondered whether it was something I

Re: Events.CFG growing in size

2012-03-19 Thread Rick
> I have noticed (when I do my backups) that the Events.CFG file has > been growing over the past few betas > I have not added any scheduled items for over a week and about 90 > have been executed and passed.( I have it set to remove at 2 days after > execution) > I have 2 "Events.~CFG" files th

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Franz Schoeler
> Hello Franz, > Anyone (in fact any stupid person or newcomer to all matters computer > Especially if it's a person you trust send him an email telling him he > should enter "winmail.dat" in Google and search how he can program/change > Outlook so he won't ever attach winmail.dat again. that is

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Franz Schoeler
> Hello Franz, > Anyone (in fact any stupid person or newcomer to all matters > computer and software) who does this didn't configure his Microsoft Outlook > program correctly. Are you sure? A MS technet post I read explains how to prevent sending winmail.dat, but only to specific addressees.

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Viktor Kabelac
Hello Franz, > Anyone (in fact any stupid person or newcomer to all matters computer > Especially if it's a person you trust send him an email telling him he > should enter "winmail.dat" in Google and search how he can program/change > Outlook so he won't ever attach winmail.dat again. that is ra

Re[2]: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, March 19, 2012, Dierk Haasis wrote: >> yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any >> body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF. > In that case I sit enlightened. but I was wrong, it was implemented in 4.0 already :-) -- Bye Marek M

Re[2]: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, March 19, 2012, Alto Speckhardt wrote: >> yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any >> body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF. > Oh yes, I forgot: The message body was empty, no text at all. So the > winmail.dat was in fact not dec

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Marek! On Monday, March 19, 2012 at 4:38:02 PM you wrote: > yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any > body or attachment, they were decoded from TS-TNEF. In that case I sit enlightened. -- Dierk Haasis [DH² Publishing] The Bat 5.0.36.3 (BETA) on Win

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hello Franz, > Anyone (in fact any stupid person or newcomer to all matters > computer and software) who does this didn't configure his Microsoft Outlook > program correctly. Are you sure? A MS technet post I read explains how to prevent sending winmail.dat, but only to specific addressees. Th

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi Marek, >> today I received a message with an attachment winmail.dat. Isn't >> TheBat supposed to be able to decode this file by itself? >> The message was a reading confirmation generated by Outlook 2010. > yes, v5 decodes winmail.dat and it is done automatically, so if You see any > body or

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Dierk Haasis
Hello Alto! On Monday, March 19, 2012 at 4:21:20 PM you wrote: > today I received a message with an attachment winmail.dat. Isn't > TheBat supposed to be able to decode this file by itself? I don't > remember having seen one of those for ages. I doubt TB or any e-mail cient not based upon OL c

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, March 19, 2012, Alto Speckhardt wrote: > today I received a message with an attachment winmail.dat. Isn't > TheBat supposed to be able to decode this file by itself? I don't > remember having seen one of those for ages. > The message was a reading confirmation generated by Out

Re: winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Franz Schoeler
> Hi, today I received a message with an attachment winmail.dat. Isn't TheBat supposed to be able to decode this file by itself? I don't remember having seen one of those for ages. The message was a reading confirmation generated by Outlook 2010. Regards, Alto Hello - no one should ever

winmail.dat

2012-03-19 Thread Alto Speckhardt
Hi, today I received a message with an attachment winmail.dat. Isn't TheBat supposed to be able to decode this file by itself? I don't remember having seen one of those for ages. The message was a reading confirmation generated by Outlook 2010. Regards, Alto pgpsO1TbNOUkv.pgp Description: P

Re: Embedded images setting for HTML not sticking!

2012-03-19 Thread Steve Harris
Hmm it's sticking now It definitely wasn't but now it is? Puzzled.. Steve Harris Current beta is 5.0.36.3 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html

Embedded images setting for HTML not sticking!

2012-03-19 Thread Steve Harris
Hi all, The HTML Viewer image download setting option:- Download embedded images from external sites Configured (reject unknown) ...does not remember it's setting if you choose "Allow" it defaults back to Configured (reject unknown) when you restart TB Confirmations? Steve Harris

Re: Message Base Maintenance Hangs

2012-03-19 Thread Francis Dhumes
Hello, Friday, March 16, 2012 at 13:08:56, GwenDragon wrote : >> If IMAP accounts are included in the Message Base Maintenace Centre Scan, >> the program >> hangs and I have to do a restart to escape the problem. G> Yes, i can confirm this problem. I can confirm, +1 (and I not auto compact/purge