Re: The Bat! v2.11 Beta/5 is now available
THIS IS REALLY GETTING FRUSTRATING! Thursday, May 13, 2004, 4:02:49 PM, Stefan wrote: Hello All, The Bat! v2.11 Beta/5 is now available from http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/ Here is a short list of changes: [+] Automatic filtering on IMAP (works when a folder is selected on-line, doesn't work during synchronisation yet) - please check it out thoroughly [+] Possibility to insert a line divider in HTML editor [+] (In works) New|Chat folder command to create Watchers for threads. I.e. you should be able to add message to that folder and all new messages referring to any message in that folder should also appear in that folder [-] (#0002951) Access Violation error when selecting folders for search in message reminder [-] (#0002955) Generic view mode setting is not saved, previous setting is used after restart [-] Various bugs in Virtual Folders and HTML editor I have been unable to get the last three betas because of ACCESS DENIED! What has changed? This is the third message asking for help with this problem. One tester did respond last time saying that the login process is broken. No kidding! They suggested that I bypass that and go direct to the module rather than trying the directory method. Unfortunately they did not provide the required linkage and the one I had did not work. I do appreciate their attempt to help but it is time that someone fixed the advertised method or provided an alternative. Help, please. Thanks. P.S. I have reset the password, etc... Even started over with a different user name but NOTHING works. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 2.10.03 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 2.11 Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: The Bat! v2.11 Beta/5 is now available
Marck, THANKS! It is working again. Thursday, May 13, 2004, 5:23:17 PM, Marck wrote: Dear Gene, @13-May-2004, 17:02 -0400 (13-May 22:02 UK time) Gene Gough [GG] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: GG P.S. I have reset the password, etc... Even started over with a GG different user name but NOTHING works. Nothing works. You're quite right. --UNLESS-- You forget both the user names you've created so far. Then. Follow the instructions on how to become a beta tester *to the letter*! To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/ Once you have done that, you /will/ be able to login to the beta page and download the current beta versions from: http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com. --OR-- Alexander Leschinsky spots your post and takes pity on you and corrects your account settings for you. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 2.11 Beta/5 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 2.11 Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Exception attempting to create NEW Folder
Attempts to create a new sub folder cause an exception at location 00880B34. Caused by READ of address 2404. Always repeatable. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 2.03 Beta/59 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 2.03 Beta/59 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: 1.63 Beta/9
Hmmm, this looks proper to me. Friday, June 6, 2003, 7:11:54 AM, Ron wrote: ST A special note about Blockqoute macro (my hat off for the author): ST ST Since it is not possible to set values with CR/LF to headers ST since ST Beta/8, a variable should be used instead. The simples ST way is to ST insert the underscore character after the % and This is something that I never noticed before now. If I highlight a paragragh as I did above and hit F4 you can see the additional initials and quote marks that shouldn't be there. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/9 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b8 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: beta9 - Dragging to nested folders no longer leads to anautocollapse
Not confirmed. I assume you meant to say the folder tree expands so that you can see the sub folders? In any case, it works as expected here and I am able to drop into the sub folder. Friday, June 6, 2003, 4:18:58 PM, Allie wrote: Hi all, I just tried dragging a message to one of my folders that's a subfolder of another. Normally, if I pause over the parent folder during the drag and drop operation, the folder tree collapses so that I can see the sub-folders. This no longer happens. Can anyone confirm? -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/9 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b9 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Opinions needed
CONFIRMED! :-) Tuesday, February 25, 2003, 8:00:02 PM, Thomas wrote: I believe you have a list of other known bugs. You are very creative at the moment, and I will also play with the scheduler and so, but I think bug-fixing is more imporant. I agree that you have to implement new features, but I think it is at least equally important (more important IMHO) to dtrive for a bug-free application. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/7 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: mailto: bug
Agreed. Also, for most of the users, that last thing you want is to have them playing with the registry. Sunday, February 23, 2003, 3:49:43 AM, Paddy wrote: Hello Jonathan, On Saturday, February 22, 2003 at 23:05:18, you wrote: Actually you're partially correct. Yes, outlook is accepting the breaking of the RFCs, but with a slight change to the registry entry for mailto: handling, TB also handles it just right too. But why should each user have to tweak the registry? Correct markup would eliminate the problem. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/7 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: REQUEST: Iconify ThBat! with cloose (X)
I would be violently against that. Just move the cursor to the left to the minimize block. Sunday, February 23, 2003, 8:49:11 AM, Jerry wrote: Is there any way authors would put an option in preferences thatclicking on the X at the top right would minimize The Bat! instead of exiting it? I have it open all the times and remembering not to close it is very hard. Some other programs that are usually allways loaded have the possibility to put the to tray instead of exiting. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/7 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: REQUEST: Iconify ThBat! with cloose (X)
Perhaps I reacted to strongly but the more we change the documented and generally understood function of an object, the harder it is to know what to expect. To me, the X block at upper right means to close, not to minimize. The close button should mean close, not close sometimes. IMHO Sunday, February 23, 2003, 12:16:27 PM, Jerry wrote: I would be violently against that. Just move the cursor to the left to the minimize block. Why would you be againt it? Many programs that are meant to be used most of the time, offer such possibility, including competing product6 like Becky mail. I frequently close the program instead of iconifying it. I asked this question on The Bat! mailing list and many people agree this option would be welcomed. If you would not want this option, you would not have to use it. Yours Jernej -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/7 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b6 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.63 Beta/6
Read problem 835 at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view_all_bug_page.php?f_page_number=1 and in addition to that, messages that reference off site images are in the category of some work, some don't. Messages I get from several vendors, new services do not properly display either. Friday, February 7, 2003, 4:19:56 PM, Dave wrote: Friday, February 7, 2003, 9:40:30 AM, Gene wrote: The majority of the mail I receive is HTML and not having the ability to properly handle it in BAT is a real problem In what way doesn't TB! properly handle it? I've never had a problem reading an HTML email in TB!. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/6 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b4 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.63 Beta/6
Yes, that is one of the more annoying problems. Confirmed. Friday, February 7, 2003, 4:51:03 PM, John wrote: DG In what way doesn't TB! properly handle it? I've never had a DG problem reading an HTML email in TB!. I have had a problem with hidden text in HTML messages before. This might be a poor example, but you can generate the problem yourself by forwarding an HTML message to yourself and not removing the message.htm attachment. Type some text at the top. Send it. Now go back and look at the message in HTML format and your text will not be seen. If you switch over to text mode you can see your text. I have received mail with this invisible text before and switched over to the default txt view for a while because of the problem. The problem with this bug is it requires checking both the text and HTML version on every message to be sure nothing is missed. -- Gene Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/6 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b4 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with losing text
Why in the world would you put private company business on a public forum? Friday, January 24, 2003, 12:15:44 PM, Timothy wrote: I just spent 2 hours typing a email update to some people where I work only to have half of it disappear after I hit the send button. No its all gone and i guess there is now way to get it back. :( It also seemed to reformate the first part of the message and deleted the rest. Why did this happen? Here is what is left of the message and how it changed the formatting. Hi, I want to go over a few items that relate to Area 5. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/5 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b4 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: Problem with losing text
Did not offend me, just that many companies really get up tight about that stuff. No problem :-) Friday, January 24, 2003, 1:55:35 PM, Timothy wrote: Sorry, Its not that private and I wanted to show how my message was reformatted and some of it was deleted. In hopes that one of the Bat Guru's would be able to identify the problem. Didnt know any other way of showing the problem. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/5 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.63b4 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: separate options for autocomplete of addresses and subjects
Yes! Also the ability to search the nickname or handle only for auto complete of address. This has been long requested both formally and in this forum. Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 10:07:51 PM, Oleg wrote: I would like to suggest to have 2 separate options for autocomplete of e-mail addresses and subject lines. Currently, in Options|Preferences|System we have in Autocomplete a joint option for both address and subject. Personally I do like address autocomplete and do not a subject autocomplete. With 2 check bo -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows XP [version 5.1.2600] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.63 Beta/3 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.62b17 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: outlook attachments?
I have written a problem on this. In addition to what you note below, even those documents that BAT displays properly can not be forwarded or saved and then displayed as BAT is destroying an associate with tag or some such and then the HTML document is destroyed for a practical intents. See problem 835 in the bug reports at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view_all_bug_page.php?f_page_number=1 Sunday, December 22, 2002, 7:22:52 PM, Toby wrote: Hi, not sure if this is the best place to ask this but is there any possibility of getting the ability to recognise outlook attachments in TB! ? I keep getting mails from outlook users whose attachments show up as these dreadful .att files (in message attachment) which I can't do anything with. It would be nice if TB! was able to understand those and just display the attachment as a normal file... cheers, Toby -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.62 Christmas Edition IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.62b17 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: feature request -- maybe
I fully agree with Yuki on this. We already have too much of this we do it to protect you stuff in government and business, we don't need it in software WHEN it gets in the way for ease of use or function. Monday, December 23, 2002, 6:39:46 AM, Yuki wrote: I'm afraid you are the one who is utterly wrong. When I receive mail, it belongs to me. The sender may have a copyright, but that copyright only applies if I do something publicly with the mail. But the mail itself belongs to me. That I can do as I please with it privately has been decided by 100s of years of common law. It's mine. Period. Just like a printed letter is. It's not the sender's any loner, -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.62 Christmas Edition IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.62b17 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: outlook attachments?
What is so discouraging to me is that there seems to be no interest in fixing anything that has to do with support of html type mail. I sure hope that BAT does not get stuck in the dark ages as it is really a great e-mail client in just about all other areas. Monday, December 23, 2002, 11:52:43 AM, Paul wrote: GG I have written a problem on this. In addition to what you note below, GG even those documents that BAT displays properly can not be forwarded GG or saved and then displayed as BAT is destroying an associate with GG tag or some such and then the HTML document is destroyed for a GG practical intents. winmail.dat is a real problem. my boss sent me something and all I got was the winmail.dat, no message. He said 10 other people I sent it to got it just fine... I was able to open most winmails with fentun.exe but it IS A PAIN... -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 1.62 Christmas Edition IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html Current beta is 1.62b17 | Using TBBETA information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Re: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml
If this worked it would be fine. It does not. See bug report 835. This problem (835) seems to be present in the context that you mention below. I don't mind that the message is not displayed by BAT properly every time but I do want BAT to leave the attachment names alone so that when I attempt to open using the HTML icon the page will open as it was intended. Thursday, July 11, 2002, 3:10:34 AM, Thomas wrote: Hello Gareth, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 05:36:28 +0100 GMT (11/07/02, 11:36 +0700 GMT), Gareth Campling wrote: GC Why do u say that ? if done correctly this would be a fine option GC and secure if it uses the internal viewer and will not accept any GC other files. ? You are contradicting yourself. If external links are being downloaded, other files are being accepted. This is intrinsically insecure. Double-click on the HTML-icon, this will open your browser with all its security settings (we do not want TB to have a complete browser built in) and will do everything you ask for. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.61 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml
I think that is the same problem as I am seeing. I didn't spell it out very well. The biggest problem that I am seeing is when an image is referenced as src=cid:007b01c222d5$2c596630$485be8cf@mompop; and when you save the message or attempt to forward or resend it, the actual file is fetched and saved/forwarded but with a different name such as file001.jpg but the reference in the HTML remains as shown above. Perhaps this is not the same problem but it looks like it to me. Perhaps I have it totally confused and if so, I am sorry but the only way we work these things out is to discuss them. Thanks. Thursday, July 11, 2002, 11:03:19 AM, Thomas wrote: Hello Gene, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:07:09 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 20:07 +0700 GMT), Gene Gough wrote: GG If this worked it would be fine. It does not. See bug report 835. GG This problem (835) seems to be present in the context that you mention GG below. I don't mind that the message is not displayed by BAT properly GG every time but I do want BAT to leave the attachment names alone so GG that when I attempt to open using the HTML icon the page will open as GG it was intended. You are talking about another thing, namely renaming of attachments that are sent with the message. I have never commented on that bug, as I have never experienced a problem (which doesn't mean that the problem doesn't exist, but only that I cannot contribute to the thread, each message to which adds knowledge to the thread and the combined minds of the list members. A message on a beta list that doesn't add knowledge is a waste of bandwidth IMHO). Gary was talking about objects that are not sent with the message but referenced as external links in a HTML message. Please read the thread again. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.61 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Re: Objects in HTML mails (was: 1.60q/Post5/newhtml)
Thanks. You did a great job of explaining it. Now if the developers would just fix the bug part. Thursday, July 11, 2002, 1:00:57 PM, Thomas wrote: Hello Gene, On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:29:27 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 23:29 +0700 GMT), Gene Gough wrote: GG Perhaps this is not the same problem but it looks like it to me. Actually, no, it isn't. Technically these are two different things. GG Perhaps I have it totally confused and if so, I am sorry but the only GG way we work these things out is to discuss them. Thanks. I agree and will try to explain: What you are referring to are attachments (imbedded objects in an HTML mail) that were actually sent with the email. They are referenced locally, of you look at the source code. Therefore, when you receive the email, TB will show them. Once you forward these attachments, the names are being changed but the reference within the HTML code is not. Therefore, they are not being shown when you open the forwarded mail. This has been critisised as a bug, and I am inclined to agree to that assessment. The other problem is when the object is not sent with the email. It is not referenced locally, but the reference points to a URL somewhere in the www. TB will not GET (this is the technical term for downloading in this case) the object; this is not a bug but by design. If you look at the source code of the email, you see that the address of that object is not on your computer. If this is still not clear, I cannot explain it any better, and maybe someone else needs to chip in. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.61 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Failure in 160q
I have noticed that 160q fails to use the bong to announce a failure to connect to the server on send or when the server breaks the connection on a receive. -- Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60q _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: 1.60q
Confirmed failing on 160q. Thursday, June 6, 2002, 10:33:34 AM, Marcus wrote: On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 16:09, Maxim Masiutin wrote: I was to quick. The log panel is empty, in fact, nothing is written to the log file at all. Did you by any chance build on the no logging version compiled for Tony? -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60q IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: 1.60n
actually that ULR should have been http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb60n.zip and not http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb60n.rar Friday, May 31, 2002, 3:06:48 PM, Maxim wrote: Hello Tbbeta! The Bat! 1.60n is available at http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb60n.rar We were working hard to find the GDI leak bug and we've finally fixed it. [-] Fixed the GDI leak. [-] Fixed CSR generation for internal S/MIME implementation. [-] It was impossible to use a suitable cryptographic provider other than specifyng Default. Now, even if you select a provider, a suitable provider for a particular algorithm can be automatically selected. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60n IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: 1.60n
Ah sighh... When it didn't work for me I just wiped out the file name and went to the index and selected it. I then posted my message using the URL from the original message and changed the rah to zip. I never looked to see if there was any other errors in the given URL. Sorry. Friday, May 31, 2002, 3:25:30 PM, Allie wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Gene Gough [GG] wrote (in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]): ... GG actually that ULR should have been GG http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb60n.zip Yet another correction. :-) http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb160n.zip - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60n | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE8984rV8nrYCsHF+IRAoy6AKDBh4qratHKsuP0TYO0zO6VQ1isuACgynmD N7JX4OiR0pDwQGHEh+dZYDo= =ECD7 -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/ -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60n IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: 1.60n
I don't know what you did but this file will not extract anything. Friday, May 31, 2002, 4:57:00 PM, Maxim wrote: Hi Thomas, On Fri, 31 May 2002, at 21:45:35 [GMT +0200] (which was 22:45 where I live) you wrote: Changed from internal S/MIME to MS CryptoAPI and got an 'List-index-out-of-bounds(0)'-error. First when I select the radiobutton and later I can't even access the S/MIME options. Thanks! I've re-uploaded the file to the same location http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb160n.zip The size of the fixed file should be 2078599 for tb160n.zip The version number will be the same. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60n IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re:
It is not here. All I see is the Re: Friday, May 24, 2002, 11:34:03 AM, Allie wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote: ... DH What happens to the subject line when messages are replied by you DH (see above). Are you saying the subject disappears for you. I see it here just fine: Re: VOT: GetRight Question (Was: Re: OT: F-Secure automatic update (was: IncrediMail Xe and The Bat! - lack of compability)) - -- -=Allie C Martin=- List Moderator | TB! v1.60m | Windows XP Pro PGP/GPG Public Key: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?Subject=2B0717E2 _ -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iD8DBQE87l1sV8nrYCsHF+IRAiCvAKD2UYT+V2bK1JyK5RRcaebIQHHTMwCg2QJp iX0WCvvw26wRRkvWFv2va0c= =WeNy -END PGP SIGNATURE- _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/ -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60m IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: 1.60m
Thanks. Sunday, May 19, 2002, 10:49:12 AM, David wrote: It's still in beta fase. We'll just have to wait some time longer. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60m IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: IncrediMail Xe and The Bat! - lack of compability
Why is it that some people want to control what others use or do? Why would you leave bat just because it had sound support. Would there be someone twisting your arm to use it? :-) Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:59:22 AM, Andreas wrote: Who needs all this nonsense? If the Bat ever came up with sound support, I'd be thinking about switching to some other mail client instead. Stick to the essentials, boy! -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60h IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: IncrediMail Xe and The Bat! - lack of compability
AMEN! Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:29:26 AM, Ray wrote: I can see the date of the mail written in the collumns of the index. The time also. Who it wrote too. And i can read a subjectline too! So why these 3 extra lines of information i don't need because i can already see it elsewhere ??? -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60h IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Hghlights only fails?
Confirmed. Thursday, April 25, 2002, 6:50:44 AM, Graham wrote: Hello tbbeta 1.60g.. selecting Highlights only in the Account log, give me an empty list. Just me.. or anyone else able to reproduce this? regards, Graham -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60g IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Hghlights only fails?
I checked it in 1.60g and confirmed Graham's claim. I just backed off to 1.60c because of hangs when trying to sendmail. That turned out to perhaps be a server problem but in any case, 1.60C works properly when Highlights only is selected. Thursday, April 25, 2002, 7:35:11 AM, Tony wrote: This message: 25/04/2002 12:34 GMT. Hello Graham, A reminder of what Graham ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on: 25 April 2002 at 11:50:44 GMT +0100 GF 1.60g.. selecting Highlights only in the Account log, give me an GF empty list. Just me.. or anyone else able to reproduce this? No, works fine here, exactly as expected. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: TB 1.60g
Thanks. Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 1:04:27 PM, Marek wrote: On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, mlist_2001 wrote: I am from INDIA. I still do not understand How to download 1.60g from that german site. When i downloaded it i got the Ver 1.60c instead of 1.60g. Can you tell me how to get 1.60g..??? You can download it from my FTP: ftp://ftp.gin.cz/pub/mswindows/the_bat/exe/tb160g.rar -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60g IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Lack of scroll
I think that this is a bug. Not always but enough to be very frustrating you can cause the top of your typing when composing a note to scroll off the top. NO SCROLL handles appear and the only way to get it back is to use the up arrow key to move back to the top of the screen and then it scrolls the screen down so that you can what you just typed. -- Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Pick e-mail address window and autocompletion problems
Yes and it is MOST FRUSTRATING! Sunday, March 31, 2002, 7:09:50 AM, Allie wrote: However, when the auto-completion kicks in I'm taken back to the beginning of the address list and I cannot manipulate the auto-completion. Anyone else note this? -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Mail To URL's don't fill in To: Line
See below: Sunday, March 31, 2002, 3:18:25 PM, Chris wrote: Not sure how to explain this, but on web based BBS's if i click on a mail to URL The Bat! opens as before, but no longer with the To: Line filled in. I hope this will work, try the last offending message, the post from a Mark Ayling (but PLEASE don't actually send him mails) :-) It's at: http://www.rolec.co.uk/cgi-bin/ikonboard/topic.cgi?forum=2topic=673 Thanks. using TB! 1.60 Confirmed. Empty TO field. Strange as when I click on a MailTo in a web page it works correctly. This is not a mailto that your looking at but an address that was typed into the text. I should say that is what it appears to be. Another thing, recent betas have worked sluggishly whenever IE has been invoked, slow screen refreshes et cetera. IE is old and unchanged, it's as if something in TB! has changed. NOT Confirmed. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Bug Report
In edit or compose message, change the queue in OUTBOX key to F5. No conflicts with any other editor key assignments. Close shortcut edit by pressing OK. Use new key assignment to move message to OUTBOX. Works. Compose new message. Key assignment above has been lost. What good is changing the editor key assignment if it only lasts for one message? Background: I am attempting to change as many key assignments as possible to be like I had them in PMMAIL since I have used it for years and am very comfortable with them. In PMMAIL if you are in edit, F5 put the message in the output queue. If you are not in edit on a message or if any message your are in edit on does NOT have focus, F5 will then send any message currently in the Queue. I am attempting to make the same assignments here and it does work for one time but then BAT forgets the assignment. -- Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Reply numbering in the subject
Yeah, it does tend to clutter up things a bit. Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 9:36:21 PM, you wrote: NA Hello Gene Gough, NA On Wednesday, March 27 2002 at 03:49 PM PDT, you wrote: OK, thanks. NA Gene, you really should limit use of Reply numbering to these Lists only, NA or better still remove it altogether. RITLabs should 'not' be allowing NA that to be the default behaviour of TB. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60c IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re[2]: Autocomplete subject
YES. And in addition, the ability to auto search on the nicknames only. Current implementation is that it searches everything else first and that seems backwards to me. Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 9:37:56 AM, you wrote: M I wish the autocomplete function worked like in MSIE: it presents just a M dropdown list of matching entries, choose one yourself. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60 IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Bug with Mailticker?
NOT confirmed. I have no problems with this at all. Friday, March 22, 2002, 12:31:43 PM, you wrote: CGS Whenever a new message arrives and the mailticker is displayed, I have to CGS double-click very hard on this ticker to open the message. hard means I CGS have to doubleclick several times and it takes long until the message CGS opens. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195] Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60 RC/2 _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Broken Macros?
Has anyone else noted macros similar to below seem to be broken in this beta? 1.54/50 The name of the attachments no longer show up. %IF:%ATTACHMENTS!=none:Attached file(s): %ATTACHMENTS. -- Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re: Scroll problem in editor window
Confirmed on WIN 2K SP2. Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 11:47:21 PM, you wrote: MS Steps to reproduce the bug: Open a new message, write some lines. Go MS then to the end of the text and hit cursor down so that the cursor MS goes down where is no text. You can go down with the cursor until MS you can't see any text in the window. BUT on the right side there is MS _no_ scroll bar which tells you that threre _is_ text is above... MS This gives you the impression that the mail window is empty. -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
Re[2]: 1.54 RC/1
You only see it when your are composing a note. On that frame. Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 4:21:42 AM, you wrote: JP Hello Dierk JP You wrote On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, at 09:32:08 [GMT +0100] (19:32 Wednesday where I live):- Utilities/Evaluate JP Sorry, must be going blind - can't see Utilities any where in drop down menus. JP Can you be more specific at all? JP -- JP Regards JP John Phillips Sydney, Australia [EMAIL PROTECTED] JP HTML mail spam not welcome. JP Bat! 1.54 RC/1 Windows 98 4.10 Build ASony Vaio Notebook PCG-505TS Pentium 300 64meg ram -- Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428 Home Page:http://www.goughfamily.com/home/albums.htm Family Tree: http://www.goughfamily.com/familytree/goughtree.html Professional: http://www.goughfamily.com/resume/software_expert.html _ Archives : http://tbbeta.thebat.dutaint.com Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Bugs/Wishes: https://bt.ritlabs.com/
