THIS IS REALLY GETTING FRUSTRATING!
Thursday, May 13, 2004, 4:02:49 PM, Stefan wrote:
Hello All,
The Bat! v2.11 Beta/5 is now available from
http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/
Here is a short list of changes:
[+] Automatic filtering on IMAP (works when a folder is selected
Marck,
THANKS! It is working again.
Thursday, May 13, 2004, 5:23:17 PM, Marck wrote:
Dear Gene,
@13-May-2004, 17:02 -0400 (13-May 22:02 UK time) Gene Gough [GG] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
GG P.S. I have reset the password, etc... Even started over with a
GG different user name
Attempts to create a new sub folder cause an exception at location
00880B34. Caused by READ of address 2404.
Always repeatable.
--
Gene
Windows XP [version 5.1.2600]
Mail Client: Ritlabs THE BAT 2.03 Beta/59
IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428
Home
Hmmm, this looks proper to me.
Friday, June 6, 2003, 7:11:54 AM, Ron wrote:
ST A special note about Blockqoute macro (my hat off for the author):
ST ST Since it is not possible to set values with CR/LF to headers
ST since ST Beta/8, a variable should be used instead. The simples
ST way is
Not confirmed. I assume you meant to say the folder tree expands so
that you can see the sub folders? In any case, it works as expected
here and I am able to drop into the sub folder.
Friday, June 6, 2003, 4:18:58 PM, Allie wrote:
Hi all,
I just tried dragging a message to one of my
CONFIRMED! :-)
Tuesday, February 25, 2003, 8:00:02 PM, Thomas wrote:
I believe you have a list of other known bugs. You are very creative
at the moment, and I will also play with the scheduler and so, but I
think bug-fixing is more imporant. I agree that you have to implement
new
Agreed. Also, for most of the users, that last thing you want is to
have them playing with the registry.
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 3:49:43 AM, Paddy wrote:
Hello Jonathan,
On Saturday, February 22, 2003 at 23:05:18, you wrote:
Actually you're partially correct. Yes, outlook is
I would be violently against that. Just move the cursor to the left
to the minimize block.
Sunday, February 23, 2003, 8:49:11 AM, Jerry wrote:
Is there any way authors would put an option in preferences
thatclicking on the X at the top right would minimize The Bat! instead
of exiting
Perhaps I reacted to strongly but the more we change the documented
and generally understood function of an object, the harder it is to
know what to expect. To me, the X block at upper right means to
close, not to minimize. The close button should mean close, not close
sometimes. IMHO
Read problem 835 at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view_all_bug_page.php?f_page_number=1
and in addition to that, messages that reference off site images are
in the category of some work, some don't. Messages I get from several
vendors, new services do not properly display either.
Friday,
Yes, that is one of the more annoying problems.
Confirmed.
Friday, February 7, 2003, 4:51:03 PM, John wrote:
DG In what way doesn't TB! properly handle it? I've never had a
DG problem reading an HTML email in TB!.
I have had a problem with hidden text in HTML messages before. This
Why in the world would you put private company business on a public
forum?
Friday, January 24, 2003, 12:15:44 PM, Timothy wrote:
I just spent 2 hours typing a email update to some people where I
work only to have half of it disappear after I hit the send button.
No its all gone and
Did not offend me, just that many companies really get up tight about
that stuff. No problem :-)
Friday, January 24, 2003, 1:55:35 PM, Timothy wrote:
Sorry,
Its not that private and I wanted to show how my message was
reformatted and some of it was deleted. In hopes that one of the Bat
Yes! Also the ability to search the nickname or handle only for auto
complete of address. This has been long requested both formally and
in this forum.
Tuesday, January 14, 2003, 10:07:51 PM, Oleg wrote:
I would like to suggest to have 2 separate options for autocomplete
of e-mail
I have written a problem on this. In addition to what you note below,
even those documents that BAT displays properly can not be forwarded
or saved and then displayed as BAT is destroying an associate with
tag or some such and then the HTML document is destroyed for a
practical intents.
See
I fully agree with Yuki on this. We already have too much of this we
do it to protect you stuff in government and business, we don't need
it in software WHEN it gets in the way for ease of use or function.
Monday, December 23, 2002, 6:39:46 AM, Yuki wrote:
I'm afraid you are the one who
What is so discouraging to me is that there seems to be no interest in
fixing anything that has to do with support of html type mail. I sure
hope that BAT does not get stuck in the dark ages as it is really a
great e-mail client in just about all other areas.
Monday, December 23, 2002,
If this worked it would be fine. It does not. See bug report 835.
This problem (835) seems to be present in the context that you mention
below. I don't mind that the message is not displayed by BAT properly
every time but I do want BAT to leave the attachment names alone so
that when I
them. Thanks.
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 11:03:19 AM, Thomas wrote:
Hello Gene,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 09:07:09 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 20:07 +0700 GMT),
Gene Gough wrote:
GG If this worked it would be fine. It does not. See bug report 835.
GG This problem (835) seems to be present in the context
Thanks. You did a great job of explaining it. Now if the developers
would just fix the bug part.
Thursday, July 11, 2002, 1:00:57 PM, Thomas wrote:
Hello Gene,
On Thu, 11 Jul 2002 12:29:27 -0400 GMT (11/07/02, 23:29 +0700 GMT),
Gene Gough wrote:
GG Perhaps this is not the same
I have noticed that 160q fails to use the bong to announce a
failure to connect to the server on send or when the server breaks
the connection on a receive.
--
Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60q
Confirmed failing on 160q.
Thursday, June 6, 2002, 10:33:34 AM, Marcus wrote:
On Thursday, June 6, 2002, 16:09, Maxim Masiutin wrote:
I was to quick. The log panel is empty, in fact, nothing is written to
the log file at all. Did you by any chance build on the no logging
version
actually that ULR should have been
http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb60n.zip
and not
http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb60n.rar
Friday, May 31, 2002, 3:06:48 PM, Maxim wrote:
Hello Tbbeta!
The Bat! 1.60n is available at
, May 31, 2002, 3:25:30 PM, Allie wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Gene Gough [GG] wrote
(in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]):
...
GG actually that ULR should have been
GG http://www.ritlabs.com/ftp/pub/the_bat/beta/tb60n.zip
Yet another correction. :-
I don't know what you did but this file will not extract anything.
Friday, May 31, 2002, 4:57:00 PM, Maxim wrote:
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 31 May 2002, at 21:45:35 [GMT +0200] (which was 22:45 where I
live) you wrote:
Changed from internal S/MIME to MS CryptoAPI and got an
It is not here. All I see is the Re:
Friday, May 24, 2002, 11:34:03 AM, Allie wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dierk Haasis [DH] wrote:
...
DH What happens to the subject line when messages are replied by you
DH (see above).
Are you saying the subject disappears
Thanks.
Sunday, May 19, 2002, 10:49:12 AM, David wrote:
It's still in beta fase. We'll just have to wait some time longer.
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Windows 2000 [version 5.0.2195]
Mail Client: THE BAT 1.60m
IBM Retired Marietta, GA 30064-5428
Why is it that some people want to control what others use or do? Why
would you leave bat just because it had sound support. Would there be
someone twisting your arm to use it? :-)
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:59:22 AM, Andreas wrote:
Who needs all this nonsense? If the Bat ever came up
AMEN!
Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 8:29:26 AM, Ray wrote:
I can see the date of the mail written in the collumns of the index.
The time also.
Who it wrote too.
And i can read a subjectline too!
So why these 3 extra lines of information i don't need because i can already
see it elsewhere
Confirmed.
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 6:50:44 AM, Graham wrote:
Hello tbbeta
1.60g.. selecting Highlights only in the Account log, give me an
empty list. Just me.. or anyone else able to reproduce this?
regards,
Graham
--
Genemailto:[EMAIL
I checked it in 1.60g and confirmed Graham's claim. I just backed off
to 1.60c because of hangs when trying to sendmail. That turned out to
perhaps be a server problem but in any case, 1.60C works properly when
Highlights only is selected.
Thursday, April 25, 2002, 7:35:11 AM, Tony wrote:
Thanks.
Tuesday, April 23, 2002, 1:04:27 PM, Marek wrote:
On Tue, 23 Apr 2002, mlist_2001 wrote:
I am from INDIA. I still do not understand How to download 1.60g from
that german site. When i downloaded it i got the Ver 1.60c instead of
1.60g.
Can you tell me how to get 1.60g..???
I think that this is a bug. Not always but enough to be very
frustrating you can cause the top of your typing when composing a
note to scroll off the top. NO SCROLL handles appear and the only
way to get it back is to use the up arrow key to move back to the
top of the screen and then
Yes and it is MOST FRUSTRATING!
Sunday, March 31, 2002, 7:09:50 AM, Allie wrote:
However, when the auto-completion kicks
in I'm taken back to the beginning of the address list and I cannot
manipulate the auto-completion. Anyone else note this?
--
Gene
See below:
Sunday, March 31, 2002, 3:18:25 PM, Chris wrote:
Not sure how to explain this, but on web based BBS's if i click on a
mail to URL The Bat! opens as before, but no longer with the To: Line
filled in. I hope this will work, try the last offending message, the
post from a Mark
In edit or compose message, change the queue in OUTBOX key to F5.
No conflicts with any other editor key assignments. Close shortcut
edit by pressing OK. Use new key assignment to move message to
OUTBOX. Works.
Compose new message. Key assignment above has been lost. What
good
Yeah, it does tend to clutter up things a bit.
Wednesday, March 27, 2002, 9:36:21 PM, you wrote:
NA Hello Gene Gough,
NA On Wednesday, March 27 2002 at 03:49 PM PDT, you wrote:
OK, thanks.
NA Gene, you really should limit use of Reply numbering to these Lists only,
NA or better still
YES. And in addition, the ability to auto search on the nicknames
only. Current implementation is that it searches everything else first
and that seems backwards to me.
Tuesday, March 26, 2002, 9:37:56 AM, you wrote:
M I wish the autocomplete function worked like in MSIE: it presents
NOT confirmed. I have no problems with this at all.
Friday, March 22, 2002, 12:31:43 PM, you wrote:
CGS Whenever a new message arrives and the mailticker is displayed, I have to
CGS double-click very hard on this ticker to open the message. hard means I
CGS have to doubleclick
Has anyone else noted macros similar to below seem to be broken in
this beta? 1.54/50 The name of the attachments no longer show up.
%IF:%ATTACHMENTS!=none:Attached file(s): %ATTACHMENTS.
--
Gene mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
IBM Retired Marietta, GA
Confirmed on WIN 2K SP2.
Tuesday, March 19, 2002, 11:47:21 PM, you wrote:
MS Steps to reproduce the bug: Open a new message, write some lines. Go
MS then to the end of the text and hit cursor down so that the cursor
MS goes down where is no text. You can go down with the cursor until
You only see it when your are composing a note. On that frame.
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 4:21:42 AM, you wrote:
JP Hello Dierk
JP You wrote On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, at 09:32:08 [GMT +0100] (19:32 Wednesday where I
live):-
Utilities/Evaluate
JP Sorry, must be going blind - can't see
42 matches
Mail list logo
