Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread John Sullivan
On Thursday 14 September 2000 A . Curtis Martin wrote: I don't think there's anyone really actively in favour of using the registry I am! It provides better data-type support, structured data storage, per-user settings, access-control and more. Using the registry also encourages good

Re: beta/6

2000-09-14 Thread John Sullivan
On Thursday 14 September 2000 Steve Lamb wrote: On Thu, Sep 14, 2000 at 08:18:52PM +0100, John Sullivan wrote: It provides better data-type support How? It is just key/value pairs. The values can be ints, strings, strings with environment variables, string lists, binary data

BUG: Advanced filtering fails

2000-09-09 Thread John Sullivan
Using TB 1.46 Beta/5 I'm currently viewing my Bat Lists folder. The selection just happens to be at the end of the list, which just happens to be a message from: Date: Fri, 8 Sep 2000 18:31:01 -0700 From: Januk Aggarwal [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: [EMAIL

Re: BUG: Advanced filtering fails

2000-09-09 Thread John Sullivan
On Saturday 9 September 2000 A . Curtis Martin wrote: IOW's, if a message is from Stefan Tanurkov [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Stefan Tanurkov will be displayed in the message list and this is all that you'll be able to use in the advanced filtering. It seems to filter the message list and not the

Re: BUG: Advanced filtering fails

2000-09-09 Thread John Sullivan
On Saturday 9 September 2000 A . Curtis Martin wrote: You mentioned that it fails to work. I'm clearing this up by indicating that it *does* work once you know what it really does. How it is implemented to work is a different matter. Ah well, as we both seem to agree, even when you know what

Re: Macro/Quick template/Filter problem and suggestion

2000-09-08 Thread John Sullivan
On Friday 8 September 2000 Januk Aggarwal wrote: A quick question, do you filter all these subscriptions to individual folders? If you do, have you considered using folder level templates? Yes and no. I filter to different folders based on the subject of the list, but many lists usually

Re: URLs in square brackets: [www.something.com]

2000-08-03 Thread John Sullivan
On Wednesday 2 August 2000 Steve Lamb wrote: On Wed, Aug 02, 2000 at 02:08:01PM +0200, Christopher J. Trybowski wrote: You may type www.something.com as well as (www.something.com), but between [] it doesn't work... Generally because the accepted way of doing it doesn't include []'s.

Re: Certs and future stuff

2000-07-18 Thread John Sullivan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 18 July 2000 Curtis wrote: Would you care to explain that. I use version 6.5.3 of PGP and I use S/MIME. I don't doubt. As I said, I *could* have the wrong end of the stick completely. (I am using 6.0, not 6.5, though. I don't know what

Re: ZIP vs. RAR was - Re: Classic Glyphs

1999-12-03 Thread John Sullivan
On Thursday 2 December 1999 Leif Gregory wrote: I agree with you Claudius about people preferring (although naively) ZIP over RAR. It's the same point I've made about people preferring Outlook or OE over TB. They want what they know, not what is the best. Well, I have a couple of problems