Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
MM [!] Preview in quick templates
This actually should be read as template output preview in QT editor
:-)
see pre-revprop-change.tmpl
rulez forever
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current
Vilius Šumskas wrote:
That explains everything.
not really.
from how i remember the guys in older times, they were the team that
doesn't quite need management.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is 4.0.24.9
Rick wrote:
They are constantly fixing things but in one area of the program at a
time, which isn't always MY personal choice for fixes and wishes but
they ARE working and making progress.
sure they are fixing.
but this IMAP counters topic comes up again and again.
sort of like people want
Rick wrote:
I am a bit curious. What's the point of this?
i think, point is, to make clear once and for good who exactly need
management at Ritlabs.
it ain't ritlabs that needs it. rather, the users need it.
and, management being a SERVICE, question is - who is ready to pay for it?
--
Bob Riley wrote:
I don't think that quick, smart-a__ criticisms of Rit Labs help
anyone.
absolutely!
out of all these people that are constantly nagging to one deficiency or
another, who is really ready to work for ritlabs and provide a fix?
not as a permanent job, cuz the software is not sold
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
This thread is moving into the Off-Topic realm. Please continue this
on TBOT (this message has been CC'd to the TBOT list to maintain
threading.)
it'll die there without raising the desired awareness.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Goncalo Farias wrote:
The programmers at RitLabs are very sensitive people and could reply
something like this (mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) to you.
being sensitive is totally different from being selfish.
and the tagline of that mid explains it pretty well.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Rimvydas Zilinskas wrote:
I think that Ritlab guys know very well where are the problems. Even
their support admitted this.
their support has absolutely no word over development.
their programmers completely ignore what support says (you need it, you
do it), then leave the company for a better
vitalie vrabie wrote:
I think that Ritlab guys know very well where are the problems. Even
their support admitted this.
their support has absolutely no word over development.
their programmers completely ignore what support says (you need it,
you do it), then leave the company for a better
Rimvydas Zilinskas wrote:
Do not understand this as a complaint. Its only strong wish:) I want to
move completely from thunderbird. And I'm The Bat! user since 1.xx times
so I know this client very well and like it so much. But this inaccuracy
drives me mad:(
that means you guys deserve
Vilius Šumskas wrote:
I'm wondering where their management is looking?
yikes! what's that?
Do they even have any?
i concur to this question.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is 4.0.24.8 | 'Using TBBETA'
hi.
заходит как-то Стефан Танурков в класс тббета:
- дети, уот из зе бест емеил клаент?
дети (хором):
- зее бееет!
Стефан (зычным голосом, из тундерберда):
- авотх%й.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is
hi.
test. please ignore.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is 4.0.24.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Indie_Dev wrote:
Attached is what my views dialog looks like. Notice the gaps? Is that
normal?
wow! nice tits! thanks for the shot!
and what's wrong with the gap between them?
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current
Rick Grunwald wrote:
Vitalie - if the mods won't tell you I will.
We were all asked to quit the bickering
You seem to want to keep it going
PLEASE STOP - the rest of us have
okay, okay. was just having some fun.
as of the problem, if taken seriously - looks like data corruption.
--
MAU wrote:
Thank you Marek, I wasn't aware of that. I thought that selecting
'Monitor Issue' was always needed, even if I was reporter or I had
added a note.
depends on your profile settings.
also please take into account that different versions of mantis did have
different defaults.
--
Jim Brown wrote:
His concern after being direct mailed anonymously offlist by
someone presenting info that would make the most sense to be from
someone privy to this list is warranted... and that type of
behavior, in my opinion is just wrong, and there's nothing wrong
with
Rick Grunwald wrote:
Well, crime is here whethever or not we like it, global warming is
here whethever not we like it, kids die in africa whethever or not
we like it. Should we all stop caring about? Yes, these are bigger
problems than HTML in every email, but think how many $ and energy
you
Rick Grunwald wrote:
Can't argue with logic like that
very easily arguable. but pointless.
It is not logic at all. That is why I can't argue with it. I respect
your opinion but your points are only that; opinion not facts nor even
a logical statement. If you can't separate the
Rick Grunwald wrote:
The original author although frankly I am so sick of the fighting ...
Vitalie, if I misquoted you or answered you in error, I apologize.
like russians say - doesn't worth it; i've already spitted on your
back. :)
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Indie_Dev wrote:
OK, I've files reports for every issue and quirk I've encountered and
which need looking at if the devs choose to do so.
0006451...0006444
don't see that one about your tits compared to your wife's.
please add.
and don't forget the screenshots!
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Rick Grunwald wrote:
enemies everyehere! shoot 'em all!!!
That's right. WHen reason and logic escape you, resort to name calling
then, what makes you different from your opponent?
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Goncalo Farias wrote:
I have opened BT bug report https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6442
regarding this issue!
fine. you've filed it. now fire it up (ask for some gasoline from some
people around here).
nya-nya-nya, thebutt goes titsup when i start it... hence seems to be a
female...
Indie_Dev wrote:
you just deaf or what?
Here we go again with the personal attacks. You pack guys must really
have fun in your group hug sessions.
you said you don't take personally any of this fly attractant.
make sure they're compliant, then fire up a bugreport with a couple of
Rick Grunwald wrote:
If you still disagree reformat your drive and install OS/2. After all
Bill Gates himself said it was the best operating system.
...the message we have here is the strong belief that OS/2 is the
platform for the 90s.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Rick Grunwald wrote:
If you still disagree reformat your drive and
install OS/2. After all
Bill Gates himself said it was the best
operating system.
...the message we have here is the strong belief
that OS/2 is the
platform for the 90s.
I think he said that in the late 80s
Paul Van Noord wrote:
Honey attracts more flies than vinegar.
and shit attracts even more than honey. cuz it smells stronger. lol.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Roelof Otten wrote:
For me it's quite logical. When my aunt goes on holiday to Germany and
sends me postcard (she did), I don't care when the card has been sent,
because I haven't seen it. I don't care when it's been delivered into
my mailbox, as I haven't seen it yet. I do care when I collect
Hendrik Oesterlin wrote:
OK, I think I got your point of view
in fact, there are some other considerations, which none of you two
seems to figure out.
the Date: field, as per the respective RFC, has a well-defined format.
however, a lot of mail senders (mostly those web-based, which are
Rick Grunwald wrote:
I am going to have to paddle ALL your a**es
Moderator, what I meant was DONKEYS! I was going to beat their DONKEYS
as it is illegal in some countries to beat children. That is a proper
use of the word (ROTFLMAO) :-D
not as long as he/she/it stubbornly thinks
Indie_Dev wrote:
Life's too short.
huh? too short to figure out that Date: has its STRICT formatting rules?!
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is 3.99.21 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Indie_Dev wrote:
Every email program has the subject, sender, recipient, data, size and
then you have additional stuff like attachments and whatnot.
datA? geez, man, your life is WAY too short! LOL.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Indie_Dev wrote:
the Date: field, as per the respective RFC, has a well-defined format.
..and that is what I've been saying all along. If TB! stuck to the RFC
standards - like _all_ other email programs, I won't have to be
looking emails from 1996 in a default filter for yesterday. Its
Indie_Dev wrote:
To me, $35 is nothing. I can't even fill up my vehicle's gas tank on that.
$35 doesn't worth enough gasoline to fill up a tank, so you've decided
to fill your stomach instead? :)
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Indie_Dev wrote:
So, by your submission, because TV was invented way before I was born,
I can't complain about not getting channel 2 on the UHF band as
opposed to VHF? Right.
wrong. as opposed to UHF and VHF, back in 1996 there was no other
standard except RFC822 that would allow Date: be
Indie_Dev wrote:
I know you know that I meant 'date'
is that all you know that i know?
You know, that I know, that you know that I meant 'date'
you don't know that i didn't know that you didn't know how to properly
use a keyboard.
I'm quite certain that once you knew that I knew that
Indie_Dev wrote:
LMAO *splutter* *gag* *choke* *splutter*
OK, I didn't see that coming. Thats the last time I read email on this
list with liquid in my mouth.
yeah... liquid... i toldya to not drink gasoline, didn't i?
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Indie_Dev wrote:
OK, lets try this again.
i knew you'll like it.
Those _same_ emails imported into the following WORK JUST FINE and
with NONE of this silliness that we're so hotly debating.
Outlook
Outlook Express
Windows Mail
Windows Live Mail
Windows Live Mail Desktop
Eudora
Richard Wakeford wrote:
Easy enough to do. Make a filter getting rid of all messages from or to
Indie_Dev and it works a treat. I did it for a while but then there
were no messages to read so scrubbed it and was enjoying sitting here
reading the banter!
my suspicion is that's Vili. he
Richard Wakeford wrote:
Then maybe you should stop using TB!, go use one of the other oh so
perfect mail programmes that you use and stop winding so many people up.
It seems that you haven't started to even scratch the endless
possibilities of this programme to make it do what you want.
Feli Wilcke wrote:
If TB is your main or only MUA, you should allow this association.
like if MUAs are the only ones that need VCF. how naive! ;)
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is 3.99.16 | 'Using
9Val wrote:
SC And let us know if you need beta testers.
Hehe, I hope I will have no need in beta testers since want to leave
programming :)
have you really lost the hope that there are software companies where
not only bosses can afford a personal life?
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
9Val wrote:
Hello All,
I'm not working on TB! for a long time and now I'm leaving RitLabs
at all.
right today? on 13th? geez, at least ain't friday... :)
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Current beta is
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
I confirm this, with particular settings, I will fix this. Until now, I will
delete the RAR file.
just the same ass you did with https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id= ?
have a look a the comments' dates.
the bug reported jan 6.
two not confirmed come on jan 8.
Rick Grunwald wrote:
For the first time I had to go back a version as 10 was so buggy as to
be unusable. I do not say that lightly. From .10 to .11 was a short
cycle but most are considerably longer. Should we in effect go without
mail? I don't think so :)
LOL. just as when i was in
Vili wrote:
- login to your GMail account
- got to Settings, select the Accounts tab
- add all of your email address here
- for each added account GMail will send a verification number to that
address, that you have to type in the next screen, this is how they
verify that address is yours
vitalie vrabie wrote:
Vili wrote:
- login to your GMail account
- got to Settings, select the Accounts tab
- add all of your email address here
- for each added account GMail will send a verification number to that
address, that you have to type in the next screen, this is how
Vili wrote:
adding addresses of another SPF-aware email service to gmail won't
help you with sending those messages via gmail: it just cannot
magically add its SMTP srv addrs to the SPF-related DNS records of
somebody else's domain, no matter how powerful their web iface is.
I
Vili wrote:
So when you use GMail's SMTP, it replaces the From address, that's
what you are saying, right? I dont think, it should do that...
oh yes it should. cuz yer mail goes FROM that account.
want replies to a different place? good. e-mail has a nice REPLY-TO
feature for you to
Vili wrote:
Your move.
you want something as 'flexible' as a whore and as trustworthy as a wife
...at the same time.
LOL.
i think SPF is another e-mail feature for you to discover, my dear
hungarian buddy...
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
http://vv.labordei.com
Vili wrote:
I use a secure Hungarian SMTP server
to send ALL of my emails, except the GMail. And that does not replace
the From field, it just does what it has to do: auth tells it that I
am a legitimate user of their SMTP service, and send my email with the
FROM field I specified. This
Vili wrote:
I use a secure Hungarian SMTP server
to send ALL of my emails, except the GMail. And that does not replace
the From field, it just does what it has to do: auth tells it that I
am a legitimate user of their SMTP service, and send my email with the
FROM field I specified. This
vitalie vrabie wrote:
What is SPF?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sender_Policy_Framework
and, since you're so lazy at doing the homework, here's one more:
http://www.openspf.org/FAQ
particularly,
what is SPF and why is it complicating the life to some hungarian
supposed
vitalie vrabie wrote:
particularly,
what is SPF and why is it complicating the life to some hungarian
supposed-to-be-secure servers ;)
and to resume it quickly and get back to your initial point (life ain't
chess and i don't quite have time to wait for your understanding of each
and every
Richard Wakeford wrote:
Yes, I even wrote a message in that discussion too but this time it's
too random to be view problem (I think!). I'll keep an eye on it and see
if I can find a reason for it happening.
exceuse my intervention, but...
if a program has some unique feature, but very few
Richard Wakeford wrote:
vv exceuse my intervention, but...
vv if a program has some unique feature, but very few people really use it,
vv is it a selling point or not?
Sorry but you've completely lost me there.
not at all.
We were talking about the
sorting office and not being able to copy
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
so, be a RealMan™ when this FemaleLogic® animal tells ya you CANNOT
do any transfers with an expired certificate. :)
Those who say cannot do should step aside for those who just do: You
can indeed do transfers with an expired cert, unless the email software
says
Rick Grunwald wrote:
In my house *** I *** am the captain of the ship
sure. and it's YOUR duty to navigate around expired certificates and
other sort of underwater rocks.
... but I know who the admiral is :))
mmm... Ritlabs?
or Mother Nature, that 'stated' that rocks could deadly
George M. Menegakis wrote:
Real men always have the last word.. Yes, dear! :-)
exactly.
so, be a RealMan™ when this FemaleLogic® animal tells ya you CANNOT do
any transfers with an expired certificate. :)
...or don't fear the expenses of the divorce, considering the benefits
of
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
Ritlabs is of the opinion that that it is in your best interest if
they deny you the option of accepting an expired certificate.
They have a strong paternalistic streak.
and further on with psychology, it means they're completely ruled by
their wives at home?
--
Jim Brown wrote:
I can see RitLabs Point... BUT after 30+ years of Eng and support
experience I'd have to second the suggestion that Alerting a User
is Imperative... Denying a (knowledgeable) user after the Alert is
excessive and Not in the best interest of the user OR product :(
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
vv AFAIR, Max commented on this already. if your user is qualified indeed,
vv he/she'd put something like stunnel.
Does Max want to call each
sysad and remind him to please update his cert, as otherwise TB!-users
are unable to do their mailing?
why don't you
Eugene Gladchenko wrote:
GMM We approaching v4 (current version is 3.99.7). So assume that v4 is
nearby.
Why do you think there can't be 100 after 99? ;)
was discussed here already.
more likely, as how numbers work (you noticed the dots, didn't you?),
it'll tend to .99(9) than to .100 ;)
Cricket wrote:
There is a good idea imbedded in there ...
If cam is available and option is selected, have a quick pic taken/attached
to email when you hit send. Those 3 A.M. emails are surely going to scare
someone. :-)
i thought we discuss ideas, not details.
the need for dialogs like
Marek Mikus wrote:
anybody is interested in wish to display contact's photo to MailTicker? :-)
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6368
aha. sure. and the picture should be taken at the moment when the
message was sent (or queued for sending).
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Marek Mikus wrote:
I am talking about images added to AddressBook or stored in IMAGES folder,
same image displayed in Message Header Pane.
oh, sure. and the message header pane should display fresh images too.
of course, falling back to what you said in case the contact didn't care
to have
Vili wrote:
I think, it was not the FAT/NTFS change. It was the fact that when you
reformatted the drive, you inherently defragmented the drive.
obviously, you're too busy enjoying conventional hard drives in an usb
enclosure, so, at the moment, you simply can't figure out that not all
usb
Vili wrote:
A second factor that really improved my speed was defragmenting my
Voyager drive. I never thought to do this and **wow** was it
fragmented!
and? so what? was the drive formatted with NTFS or FAT? unlike FAT,
fragmented NTFS files do take extra structures to be
Vili wrote:
- if you are pissed off of me because I did not accept the invitation
to your professional network, I am sorry, I just dont have the time
for any extra online activity beside the 4 kids, my job and my
business.
waitaminute. you have 4 kids, and you dare calling *me*
Rick Grunwald wrote:
http://www.forum-clio.com/index.php/topic,449.0.PHOTOS_Clio_unique_au_monde_com_de_Serge_33.html
Nice car ... yours? :))
nope.
Gleason's, as far as i can tell.
i prefer more practical approaches.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Gleason Pace wrote:
What sells software and how is that different from what long term
users want?
fitness for a particular purpose. as simple as that.
and not necessarily different from what long-term users want.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Vilius Šumskas wrote:
argh. wasn't it you who tried to brainwash Sierra against that
prove-to-be-over-16 quiz in its Leisure Suit Larry game, back in those
CGA days?
AHAHAHA. Good one :) You made my day.
Leisure Suit Larry rocked!
errata. IIRC, it's proof-to-be-18+, not over 16;
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Do you have a website so we can read this dialog? Should be fun. ;-)
what for? wanna pass the link to your friends, or what?
here it is:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tbbeta@thebat.dutaint.com/msg84624.html
vv after all… have a nice weekend to you too!
Same to
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
I don't play games, so I don't know what this is about.
by the way, you'd better do.
it's a far less harmful way to explore the wisdoms of life, than to mess
up with security/encryption and sensitive data.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
vv errata. IIRC, it's proof-to-be-18+, not over 16; cuz that kid got
vv famous for heavily objecting against the question how old is your mom?
vv with the answer 36 or more as the correct one. same argumentation
vv style was presented: guys, who the hell are you to ask
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
Now it seems if I try to halt the connection or do anything with
that account it just freezes TB! and it has to be restarted. Every
time I restart the queue is frozen immediately.
I have access through the webmail interface, but this seems to be
the ultimate
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
vv ah, that one. wasn't quite a dialog. just a story. it was in some paper
vv magazine years ago, not sure if it is on the web now.
I see. Too bad that we will have to close the OT thread now. I smell
fish coming. ;-)
what fish? one missed sale (a refund to an
George M. Menegakis wrote:
We approaching v4 (current version is 3.99.7). So assume that v4 is nearby. So
the question is, when the first betas are expected? And any tease about new
expected features?
good point.
and before starting to brainstorm new features, please have a look at this:
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
vv treat it as an exam question: what is the difference between security
vv and encryption?
I don't take exam questions from you, but it has already been answered
in the meantime anyway. ;-)
vv if you answer correctly, you qualify for such decisions. ;)
It's not up
Gary wrote:
v treat it as an exam question: what is the difference between security
v and encryption?
A. I can log into any POP server that I am a registered user using the
standard port 110. I must authenticate to get into the server to get my
mail.
B. I can log into any POPS server that
Gary wrote:
To put it another way, if I can connect to a server via POP or IMAP, after I
authenticate, why will it not let me connect securely, when I can connect
normally. It should be my choice, since I can connect anyway. Does that not
makes sense?
no, it doesn't make sense. since you
Gary,
you failed the security-related exam. don't worry. there's yet another
one, on marketing.
given that TheBat! is called a SECURE e-mail client, and the previous
exam gave you an insight on the difference between security and encryption.
what, to your opinion, are the right marketing
vitalie vrabie wrote:
by the way, where are you from?
i think of moving to that country, if true are your claims that
ignorance on essential things does still qualify to make a living on it...
addendum (to make my point clear, so it won't look as an offense,
because it's actually not):
i'm
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
You have really insulted the intelligence of the TB users. If some are
stupid enough to click YES, that is *their* problem. Why on earth
would you forbid *me* to accept an expired certificate, if I so
choose?
treat it as an exam question: what is the difference
Paul Van Noord wrote:
Also, using an external hard drive is 2-3 times safer regarding lost
data during a power failure simply because of performance.
and because of the filesystem too. still nobody mentioned that.
and because of the compressed attribute if on NTFS: it first writes
as-is,
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
as a future improvement, please consider configurations with two or more
monitors. it would be very handy to have them on ALL monitors.
How can I use more than two monitors in Windows Vista?
it doesn't matter from the development of application software point
Doug Higby wrote:
Even though my lists settings say to receive a copy of my own
messages, they don't appear in the thread.
same for me, by the way.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Current beta is 3.99.06 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Perry Nelson wrote:
vv same for me, by the way.
Both you and Doug are using a Gmail account for your subscription to the
list, and that explains the dilemma. That's why I use my Comcast account
for this list rather than my customary Gmail account.
argh. it's that dupekilling feature of
Vili wrote:
Ok, now I get it. Turn down your coffee input or cut back on the sugar
:))) You are hyperactive for a while now :))
yikes. didn't intend to outperform ya, Vil'.
--
Signed,
Vitalie.
Current beta is 3.99.06 | 'Using
Gary wrote:
decisions if I want to accept a cert or not. Jumping through hoops to get to
an IMAP server, after you used Stunnel a few 1000 times, is just a pain -
unnecessary I might add. It is just easier to use another client.
...or another server.
after all, will you trust servers with
Rick Grunwald wrote:
You must be a journalist to take out 1 sentence and forgot to quote
all related stuff to earn some cheap popularity Let me quote those
sentences you forgot to mention that I wrote in the same mail: I did
not want to trash USB sticks. They good for something. Also,
Maxim Masiutin wrote:
Are there any unresolved large font usage problems left?
yes. please make the AV-related message boxes as large as possible.
maybe halfscreen or even larger. so even the developers could see them
too, not only the users.
as a future improvement, please consider
Vili wrote:
it'll be like in movies...
What was this?
Is there any reason why you are so pissed off nowadays? All of us has
bad days...
wuzzup, Vil'? don't ya like those inch-tall letters stating SYSTEM
FAILURE on all monitors, and blinking synchronized with that buzz-buzz-buzz?
Vili wrote:
I wrote a long answer. But I deleted it. Why? I dont want to argue. I
used stick with optimized for performance and use my HDD. Huge
difference. I DID try it. You didnt. End of story for me.
completely wrong. tried both and both work okay. of course, assuming you
don't
Vili wrote:
No. I completely understand. And that is my WHOLE point: you have
great experience with Voyager if you use a HDD, and not running from a
USB stick. If you can. A _completely different_ experience. That is
what I tried to say. (Even if you optimize the stick to speed.)
Are
Vili wrote:
you have the exact same reasons with your 'usb-enclosed' HDD.
...maybe even worse, given that write-back for USB flashdrives isn't
quite as optimistic as with HDDs (including those 'usb-enclosed').
:)) I dont know this stuff, all I am seeing is that with a USB stick,
it
Vili wrote:
I dont know... I dont _totally_ agree... Even in WinXP, you can
optimize a stick for performance, but if writing is delayed and for
some reason you have got a power failure... Or I just dont trust MS to
let them manage delayed writing :))
you have the exact same
Rick Grunwald wrote:
This is repeatable and happens whether you have the list open or not
When searching deleted messages upon clicking in the search box, the bat
crashes
and there's also a dialog that says thebat.exe failed the signature
verification...
any clues on who might corrupt the
Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
yes, there's a whole lot of potential documentflow-related applications
that may perfectly fit onto email-based transport, that go far beyond
the imagination of any single individual.
Outlook 2007, when installed as a part of the 2007 Office Suite, shows
.pps
Ian A. White wrote:
HS It would be nice to have a RSS option in The Bat!.
Ok, I'm going to jump in here.
I have to say that from my point of view, I would like to have The
Bat! have all its current features work properly BEFORE anything else
is added.
will you really feel okay with
1 - 100 of 196 matches
Mail list logo
