Hello Tony.
Just a test, nothing I send seems to be getting to TBBETA when sent from
the Mac?
--
Tony.
M
pgpqmGWA4GrjK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
--On Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:57 pm +0100 Tony Boom
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a test, nothing I send seems to be getting to TBBETA when sent from
the Mac?
Oooops, a spelling mistake in the From: address. See if this one works?
--
Tony
iMac
Hello Tony.
Just a test, nothing I send seems to be getting to TBBETA when sent from
the Mac?
You know the answer to that then, don't you?
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.1, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70,
--On Tuesday, June 21, 2005 3:10 pm +0100 Stuart Hemming
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You know the answer to that then, don't you?
Yes, learn how to spell my name correctly :)
--
Tony
iMac
Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA'
Oooops, a spelling mistake in the From: address. See if this one works?
It does.
--
Stuart Hemming
Using The Bat! v3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2
Aided by BayesIt! 0.8.1, MyGate v1.0, rss2pop3 v1.2, SpamPal v1.70,
MyMacros 1.11a.
The one thing that unites all human beings,
Hi Allie,
On 20/06/2005 04:24 PM -0500, you wrote:
Things have definitely changed in this area since I'm not seeing
messages loading just fine when message counts, flagging, moving
operations have otherwise frozen. Earlier, I again, just experienced
my TBBETA folder new message count being
Thought I'd better try 3.5.30.
First five messages I clicked on? See attached.
--
Tony.
M
nml.png
Description: PNG image
pgpfCXSvPCjcm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current beta is 3.5.30 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 3:21:55 AM [GMT -0500], Tony Boom wrote:
Thought I'd better try 3.5.30.
First five messages I clicked on? See attached.
Using it with a FastMail account here and it's working pretty well.
--
-= Allie Martin =-
The Bat! v3.5.30
System Specs:
Hello Allie.
--On 20 June 2005 05:41 -0500 you wrote about Re: NML?:
Using it with a FastMail account here
Yes, me too.
and it's working pretty well.
Not here, couldn't load a message at all, gave up after the first 5 and
went back to a client that loaded them instantly. In fact I had over
On Monday, June 20, 2005, at 08:59 AM, Tony Boom wrote:
Not here, couldn't load a message at all, gave up after the first 5 and
went back to a client that loaded them instantly. In fact I had over 500
unread messages when I came home and the Berry didn't even flicker.
The gremlins just got me
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, June 20, 2005 1:49 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Step 1
- I opened my Inbox and their were 15 messages there. I moved 2 of
them and nothing happened.
Step 2
I selected the task at the top and hit the 'Delete Task' button. All
tasks disappeared and the connection
Hello Gary.
--On 20 June 2005 14:20 -0500 you wrote about Re: Re[2]: NML?:
:) It is absolutely unusable to me.
Glad you said that too, people don't believe me.
I will not go through these gyrations
in order to read email.
Me neither, have you tried Mulberry? :)
--
Tony.
M
Hi Tony,
--On Monday, June 20, 2005 8:52 PM +0100 you wrote in part:
:) It is absolutely unusable to me.
Glad you said that too, people don't believe me.
I will not go through these gyrations in order to read email.
Me neither, have you tried Mulberry? :)
:rofl: (really hard)...
Hello Tony!
On Monday, June 20, 2005, 2:52 PM, you wrote:
:) It is absolutely unusable to me.
Glad you said that too, people don't believe me.
Yes, we do.
I will not go through these gyrations
in order to read email.
Me neither, have you tried Mulberry? :)
From TB!'s handy View Source
On Monday, June 20, 2005, 3:02:10 PM, Mary Bull wrote:
Hello Tony!
On Monday, June 20, 2005, 2:52 PM, you wrote:
:) It is absolutely unusable to me.
Glad you said that too, people don't believe me.
Yes, we do.
I will not go through these gyrations
in order to read email.
Me neither,
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 2:20:33 PM [GMT -0500], Gary wrote:
:) It is absolutely unusable to me. I will not go through these gyrations
in order to read email.
For me, the 'gyrations' have now become occasional. I can now use TB! at
work. I've used it without problems 2 days in a row. A
Hi Allie,
On Monday, 20 June 2005 at 10:23 PM you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) worte:
I think this may have to do with my mailboxes not being particularly
large YET!. :)
This is the point. As long as the amount of messages per folder isn't higher
than - let's say - 200, one has no problems.
But
Allie,
On 20-06-2005 22:23, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM I think this may have to do with my mailboxes not being particularly
AM large YET!. :)
Define large, please
--
greeting Best regards /greeting
author Peter Fjelsten /author
thebat version 3.5.21 Pro /thebat
Hello Dwight!
On Monday, June 20, 2005, 3:22 PM, you wrote:
Gary I will not go through these gyrations in order to read email.
Tony Me neither, have you tried Mulberry? :)
this is just so different from my own experience since starting with
IMAP at about 3.5.25 or so. I feel like my
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, June 20, 2005 3:23 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
:) It is absolutely unusable to me. I will not go through these gyrations
in order to read email.
For me, the 'gyrations' have now become occasional. I can now use TB! at
work. I've used it without problems 2 days in a
On Monday, June 20, 2005, 3:39:10 PM, Manuel Breitfeld wrote:
9Val, you did the right step in reserving one connection for message
downloading.
got a question. just starting out with IMAP, I haven't fiddled with
finetuning yet. the only things I have ticked are to compress when
changing
Hello Dwight,
On Monday, 20 June 2005 at 10:52 PM you ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I was wondering about multiple connections. I know there were some
discussions about this a while back, but I was ignoring IMAP mail then
since I didn't have it. Any suggestions?
Just look in the connection
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 3:43:44 PM [GMT -0500], Mary Bull wrote:
I think it truly must depend on people's mix of: OS, other
applications, and configurations of the e-mail client. Which does say
to me that RitLabs has a mammoth job on its hands to reach all its
goals with IMAP, and that it
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 3:39:10 PM [GMT -0500], Manuel Breitfeld
wrote:
This is the point. As long as the amount of messages per folder isn't
higher than - let's say - 200, one has no problems. But as soon as it
gets larger, TB! is updating and updating its counters and bases and
seems to
Hello Allie!
On Monday, June 20, 2005, 4:20 PM, you wrote:
Mulberry handles these heavy use situations far better. That's all.
TB! needs to do this as well.
Thanks for explaining this so clearly. :)
--
Best regards,
Mary
The Bat 3.5.30 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 3:43:03 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
Define large, please
I don't know if there's a threshold like a light switch that makes TB!
suddenly start misbehaving.
One things for sure, it will work a lot better with folders containing
less that say 1000 messages
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 3:46:43 PM [GMT -0500], Gary wrote:
LOL... probably Also, what seems to trigger this (at least for me) is
the addition of any new mail arriving while reading existing new email in
the INBOX.
Right. I think this is the critical difference between our usage
Hi Allie,
--On Monday, June 20, 2005 4:30 PM -0500 you wrote in part:
Right. I think this is the critical difference between our usage
pattern, as I mentioned in a reply to M. Bull.
I think you put it perfectly (as usual) :)
--
Gary
Have you had your Haldol today?
Allie,
On 20-06-2005 23:29, you [AM] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
AM Again these are arbitrary examples. I don't have a specific
AM threshold and doubt that every users threshold is the same.
Don't worry - it was just to get a ballpark figure... :-)
I only have 4000 messages in my most
On Monday, June 20, 2005 at 4:43:18 PM [GMT -0500], Peter Fjelsten
wrote:
Don't worry - it was just to get a ballpark figure... :-)
Ok.
I only have 4000 messages in my most active (Exchange) account.
That should be easy for TB! to handle.
I currently have 7500 messages in my account.
I
30 matches
Mail list logo
