Re: Searching the Body in VFs
Hello Greg, The one thing I've learned about software is you have to be open to change. Of course, but not about twice a day ;-) I don't use IMAP for any serious email presently, but I can see a demand for it ... I don't use IMAP at all and I don't think I will, just like I don't use HTML for my messages. But I understand some (many?) people want it and that is all there is to it. If enough people want it it should be given to them, without any need of explaining why they want (need?) it. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.10.03 Current beta is 2.11 Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Searching the Body in VFs
Hello MAU, Sunday, May 16, 2004, 5:19:51 AM, MAU wrote: The one thing I've learned about software is you have to be open to change. M Of course, but not about twice a day ;-) Actually I was looking for some old messages which should have been in the VA mail base. So the thought was to possibly upgrade to SF files and give it a go after checking the old message base. I didn't convert all of VA's messages to TB when I switched, so hence the desire to look. IIRC Melissa Reese suggested something called Mailbag. To be honest it is like looking for a needle in a hay stack. The functionality of the application would be based upon the search capability in conjunction with how the messages are imported. At least I would think. I don't use IMAP for any serious email presently, but I can see a demand for it ... M I don't use IMAP at all and I don't think I will, just like I don't use M HTML for my messages. But I understand some (many?) people want it and M that is all there is to it. If enough people want it it should be given M to them, without any need of explaining why they want (need?) it. Well I somewhat disagree with you here. To what degree do people want (i.e. demand) helps determine present priority. Don't you think the why is an indication of future demand (i.e. want), and hence present AND future priority? -- Best Regards, Greg Strong Using The Bat! v2.11 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 The question in life is not whether you will have problems, but how you deal with them. Current beta is 2.11 Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Searching the Body in VFs
Hello Greg, IIRC Melissa Reese suggested something called Mailbag. It's Mailbag Assistant (http://www.fookes.com/mailbag/). I don't know if it will read VA message bases. Other than that it is quite simple to use, no more difficult than a fork and a knife :) Don't you think the why is an indication of future demand (i.e. want), and hence present AND future priority? I may agree, but I just let Ritlabs run their business. Just like I let Ford and the butcher around the corner run theirs. If I don't like the way the butcher cuts the stakes, I look for another one. -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v2.10.03 Current beta is 2.11 Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
Re: Searching the Body in VFs
On Friday, May 14, 2004, MAU wrote... Took me a bit to work out what you meant, but you're correct. Believe me, I wasn't drunk when I wrote it ;-) I was just looking in the wrong place, I had skimmed a bit of the mail that explained you were creating the original virtual folder from the search dialog. Their is a Message Source option however, though not the same. No, it isn't. I've tried searching for the same string using Text and later with Message Source and the results aren't the same. You'd think that it'd come pretty close, bearing in mind the Text is in the message source, or at least should be... Though you'd probably get unusual behaviour with HTML only mails... Text could be very good. -- Jonathan Angliss ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Using The Bat! v2.11 Beta/5 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1 Hell is full. The damned are now in Tech Support. pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature Current beta is 2.11 Beta/5 | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link first - http://www.ritlabs.com/en/partners/testers/
