Friday, September 24, 2004 6:36 AM Terry wrote:
I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
I can't find a solution to the TB! some tasks are active problem.
I've tried setting IMAP servers to disconnect, entering /EXIT from the
command line, looking for the .IPC
Hallo Terry,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 06:36:16 -0400GMT (24-9-2004, 12:36 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
TF I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
TF I can't find a solution to the TB! some tasks are active problem.
There isn't, as long as there are any tasks
* Roelof Otten [EMAIL PROTECTED] [040924 05:55]:
There isn't, as long as there are any tasks active, TB won't close.
I also have been facing these problemince previous few versions.
Even aborting does not help. Due to this, I have almost stopped
using the bat and shifted to Eudora.
Shantanu
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 06:36:16 (GMT -0400),
Terry Frazier did scrawl:
I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
I can't find a solution to the TB! some tasks are active problem.
I've tried setting
Friday, September 24, 2004 you wrote:
---
I also have been facing these problemince previous few versions.
Even aborting does not help. Due to this, I have almost stopped
using the bat and shifted to Eudora.
Since I upgraded to version 3 I have not had this
Friday, September 24, 2004 8:00 AM Arthur wrote:
I never have. Mind you, I'm still working with a stone-age version of
TB!, but it will regularly hang on the connecting to server phase
(according to the CC). You can press 'Cancel' and 'Abort' all you want,
and no joy. I've just kind of learned
Friday, September 24, 2004 7:23 AM Roelof wrote:
TF I've been perusing the list archives for tbudl, tbtech, and tbbeta but
TF I can't find a solution to the TB! some tasks are active problem.
There isn't, as long as there are any tasks active, TB won't close.
When you're connecting to your
Hello Terry,
But I _cannot_ get TB! to shut down.
I have this problem, too. The only way I can shut TB! is to reboot.
It's inconceivable that such an action should be necessary under W2K
SP4, but there's no way to kill the task. I can't do it with Task
Manager and KILL -F at the command line
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP SDK 3.2.2
Comment:
iQA/AwUBQVQ3DTXl9OCFh1uzEQK4igCgpDVv3ywtxqZ2FJ0pOTlM3j/sU2sAoKKG
VkNSWck/HS2PzhOaZVpT09cG
=tNxA
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
Hello Sean!
On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK: What?
To be more precise: What - went wrong?
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy 'n' Concept
The Bat 3.0.0.17 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2
Chat info for ICQ, AIM, MSN,
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hello Sean!
On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK: What?
To be more precise: What - went wrong?
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:24:44 (GMT +0200),
Dierk Haasis ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hello Sean!
On Friday, September 24, 2004
Friday, September 24, 2004 9:18 AM Andrew wrote:
AFAICT, the problem is caused by a very bad interface between TB! and
NAV. (I'm using NAV 2002.) Before I configured NAV to scan incoming
e-mail, I *never* had this problem. However, blaming the problem on
NAV is too easy. It's TB! that I can't
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
Hello Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:30:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DH On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
DH OK: What?
DH To be more
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
Leif Gregory ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hello Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004,
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DH On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:50:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
Kevin Coates ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:10:31 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:00:30 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
Andrew-
You might want to look into NOD32 or another AV solution as a
replacement for Norton. I too have had my share of problems with the
TB/NAV combination - lng mail retrieval times, 100% CPU usage,
inability to kill tasks, and have not had this problem with NOD32. Of
course, I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Dierk,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean!
On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
OK: What?
To be more precise: What - went wrong?
I did a
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:40 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:20:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hello Dierk,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean!
On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 5:02:32 PM you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:17 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:57 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:28 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:30:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:31 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hello Dierk,
Friday, September 24, 2004,
Hi Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company
One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
messaging ;-)
Well, it's good to have The Bat! filters for this kind.
--
Kind regards,
Britt Malka
|\/|
| \__/ |
\/
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:40 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:17 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:41:57 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:42 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:31 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:41 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:42:28 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
Hello Sean!
On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:46 PM you wrote:
I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)
Ah, OK, so no rampant folder template. Sigh, I was looking forward to
Marck's instructions about them.
BTW, could one of the moderator's please temporarily unsubscribe
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 18:32:44 (GMT +0200),
Britt Malka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hi Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company
One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 13:00:40 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 12:50:40 (GMT -0400),
Arthur Warren ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 09:53:42 (GMT -0600),
Leif Gregory did scrawl:
Hello Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 9:50:30 AM, you wrote:
A On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:40:30 (GMT -0400),
A Arthur Warren ([EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 18:32:44 (GMT +0200),
Britt Malka did scrawl:
Hi Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company
One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 11:56:55 (GMT -0400),
Kevin Coates did scrawl:
Hi Dierk,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 17:24:44 +0200 (11:24 AM here), Dierk Haasis [DH]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DH On Friday, September 24, 2004 at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 19:04:16 (GMT +0200),
Dierk Haasis did scrawl:
Hello Sean!
On Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:46 PM you wrote:
I did a reply to all and not to the original author :)
Ah, OK, so no rampant folder
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Who set up the automated reply on my machine. Oh, wait. It's me. In that
case, I'm going to simply slink off into a corner and hide quietly.
Nothing is automatically sending anything anymore, and I'm ensuring that
I'm not replying to myself.
And I'm
Hello Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 6:20:13 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima did scrawl:
Hello Dierk,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 4:24:44 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean!
On
Hi Britt,
on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:32:44 +0200GMT, you wrote:
BM Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company
BM One should think a Microsoft user with this kind of automatic
BM messaging ;-)
He most probably is. I remember that only few users got
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 18:57:59 (GMT +0100),
Sean Rima ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hello Arthur,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 6:20:13 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 17:30:46 (GMT
On or about Friday, September 24, 2004 at 20:14:14 (GMT +0200),
Peter Meyns ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote something similar to:
Hi Britt,
on Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:32:44 +0200GMT, you wrote:
BM Friday, September 24, 2004 at 6:30:42 PM you wrote:
Herb Warren,
James W. Sewall Company
BM One should
I recently upgraded from TB! 1.62r to 3.0 hoping to get better IMAP
support. I did get that. Sadly, I also got a program that doesn't work
very well in other ways.
There seems to be a significant conflict between TB! v3.0 and Norton
AV 2003, such that if Norton is scanning e-mail TB! can't figure
Hello Andrew,
Friday, September 24, 2004, 7:17:18 PM, you wrote:
AA Well, actually, I don't want to buy another AV solution. NAV works
AA just fine with most e-mail clients. Seems kind of silly to buy another
AA product B due to product A's bugs. And, I don't know that my version
AA of TB! would
Hello Mark,
What is the version number of NAV you are using?
NAV 2002 (8.07.17C)
regards, Andy
[Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
on a made from scratch P4-2.4 GHz/512 MB RAM]
Hello Andrew,
Saturday, September 25, 2004, 12:49:11 AM, you wrote:
AA NAV 2002 (8.07.17C)
AA [Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
If I understand it well, you have always had this problem with TB! ?
I have started using Windows 2000 later than you, but I _never_ had to boot
it in
Hello Mark,
If I understand it well, you have always had this problem with TB! ?
Only since I configured NAV 2002 to scan incoming. (This info was also
in an earlier post. Please read the thread before posting!)
I have started using Windows 2000 later than you, but I _never_ had
to boot it
Hallo Andrew,
On Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:18:09 +0200GMT (24-9-2004, 15:18 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
AA regards, Andy
AA [Using The Bat! 1.62r under Windows 2000 Pro SP4
AA on a made from scratch P4-2.4 GHz/512 MB RAM]
AA
AA
56 matches
Mail list logo
