Hello Gerd Ewald,
Responding to your article on Wednesday, August 30, 2000 at 07:47:45 GMT
+0200 (which was 30/08/2000 12:47 GMT +0700 my Local Time) :
I just upload to ftp://ftp.dutaint.co.id/the_bat/util-option/TB-office-macro.txt
On those text describe the macro, but still in German :-(
On Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 9:46:20 PM, you wrote:
JA Remember the main rule page is connected by OR functions to the
JA alternate sets.
JA Main Rule String OR Alternate Set 1 OR Alternate Set 2 OR ...
Aha - I see. I'm afraid I didn't get that impression from either the
help files or the
On Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 2:18:53 PM, Peter wrote:
YC I have one problem with Turkish character (ISO-8859-9). I could
YC read the messages with written in Turkish character, But i
YC couldnt write messages with Turkish characters.
There is indeed no choice for ISO-8859-9 in the message
On Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 9:52:16 PM, you wrote:
JA One has to check Regular Expressions when one is using regular
JA expressions. Check out the help file, it does deal with regular
JA expressions fairly well.
It has a nice summary of RE's, I agree. The confusion, for me, comes
from mixing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 30 August 2000 at 06:21:47 GMT -0700 (which was 14:21 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "RE checkbox in 'options'?":
JA One has to check Regular Expressions when one is using regular
JA
On Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 10:12:14 PM, you wrote:
ML I think you misunderstood what's said in the help file. Apostrophes
ML (or single quotes as used in the help) are used when you want TB to
ML treat those special characters *literally*. In your example, TB
ML would try to search for
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:21:47 AM, ztrader wrote:
It has a nice summary of RE's, I agree. The confusion, for me,
comes from mixing RE chrs with other concepts. For example, the [
] and | chrs are RE chrs as well. Since these are used in 'signal
strings', and so are RE's, I wondered
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:37:23 AM, you wrote:
MDP They are mutually exclusive :-). Either you use special characters for
MDP simple logic or you use regular expressions (which do everything the
MDP specials do and *then* some) for more complex pattern matching.
A reworded version of
Hello Thomas Fernandez,
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 13:35:46 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 12:35:46 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 03:09:12 +0200GMT (29/08/2000, 09:09 +0800GMT),
Vladimir Mincev wrote:
VM BTW
Hello Vladimir Mincev,
On Tue, 29 Aug 2000 03:09:12 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, August 29, 2000, 8:09:12 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Vladimir Mincev wrote:
Hello diggity,
d I have NAV2000 and have set it up according to the help files and I
d can tell you it does scan
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:47:51 AM, ztrader wrote:
From the help file:
The text containing special characters mentioned above, must be
embraced in single quotes, like this:
'["New" generation mailing list]'
Are you suggesting that would mean that they were looking for the
string:
Hello Ming-Li,
On 30 August 2000, you wrote and made these points on the subject of
"turkish character":
ML I used it to add Traditional Chinese encoding to TB. All I did was
ML to create a new encoding and choose the right "font script", and
ML didn't touch the two translation tables, which
hallo TBUDL!
did someone of you successfully connect to a LDAP server and managed
his aadressbook there, maybe even one on a linux-box running on the
LAN like i try to do?
PAT
--
vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html
PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55 BD1F 5142
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 7:58:36 AM, Assad wrote:
ML I used it to add Traditional Chinese encoding to TB. All I did
ML was to create a new encoding and choose the right "font
ML script", and didn't touch the two translation tables, which
ML couldn't accommodate Chinese encoding anyway
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 7:45:32 AM, you wrote:
Are you suggesting that would mean that they were looking for the
string:
["New" generation mailing list] (including the ""[]'s)?
ML Yes, otherwise there's no way to search for a string with quotation
ML marks or square brackets,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 07:21:38 -0700, ztrader wrote:
snip
z An interface thought... If the RE box is checked, the 'rules' and
z 'alternatives' tabs are replaced by a single RE tab. This might be
z more clear and avoid confusion between the two. Also would give a
z larger area for complex RE's to be
Hello Gerd,
Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 7:47:45 AM, you wrote:
GE Done, new file is sent to you ! It includes a rough explanation how to implement
the macro in word. I only have experience with word97, don't know whether this work
with word2k.
Can you send me also, please?
--
Best regards,
Someone with access to the TBUDL and TBBETA membership lists (using
the From: address [EMAIL PROTECTED], passing through a relay which
claims to be cyberpass.net) seems to believe I might be interested in
buying a CD packed full of what is clearly pirated commercial
software, for $15. Ho
Hello John,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 at 13:34:18 [GMT +0100], you wrote:
JS Someone with access to the TBUDL and TBBETA membership lists
JS (using the From: address [EMAIL PROTECTED], passing
JS through a relay which claims to be cyberpass.net) seems to believe
JS I might be interested in
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000 at 4:25 PM or thereabouts, Leif
Gregory wrote the following about Someone spamming us:
JS Someone with access to the TBUDL and TBBETA membership lists
JS (using the From: address [EMAIL PROTECTED], passing
JS through a relay which claims to be cyberpass.net)
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 2:48:03 PM, you wrote:
CM FWIW, I received two copies of this spam, as well ... presumably one
CM for each of my subscriptions (TBBETA and TBUDL).
I have not received this spam (yet :-). Perhaps it is from the beta
list?
LG We'll check the subscribers list, but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi ztrader,
On 31 August 2000 at 16:09:12 GMT -0700 (which was 00:09 where I live)
ztrader wrote and made these points on the subject of "Someone
spamming us":
CM FWIW, I received two copies of this spam, as well ... presumably
CM one for
On August 30, 2000, at 4:51:32 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
It would be advisable for all subscribers to modify your default
template to exclude that "mailto:xxx" at the end for list posting for
that very reason.
Marck, are you referring to a "MailTo:" that some people include in their
Hello ztrader,
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 16:09:12 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, August 31, 2000, 6:09:12 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
ztrader wrote:
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 2:48:03 PM, you wrote:
CM FWIW, I received two copies of this spam, as well ... presumably one
CM for
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 5:27:51 PM, you wrote:
MDP Strange as that may seem, yes. It's supposed to make it clear to the
MDP recipient which address they have used to subscribe to the list so
MDP that when they want to leave they know which address to send the
MDP .UNSUB
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 4:51:32 PM, you wrote:
MDP They are already being removed by the archive except where they appear
MDP in the body of the message - as yours does. It would be advisable for
MDP all subscribers to modify your default template to exclude that
MDP "mailto:xxx"
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000, 6:31:06 PM, ztrader wrote:
Any way to get rid of this? I just removed my mailto, but forgot
to look at the end :-). A nice idea, but does spread the address.
It's not necessary to get rid of it. If you look at messages in the
archive, the line at the bottom is:
Can someone explain how the command "Purge All Folders" differs from
"Compress All Folders"? I know what compressing the Folders does, but not
sure about the Purge command.
Nick
N.J. Andriash [ TB! v1.46 Beta 3 | PGP 6.5.8 | Win 98 v4.10 ]
Vancouver, B.C. Canada | PGP Key ID:
Hello Nick,
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000 at 21:37:36 GMT -0700 (which was 9:37 PM
where I live) witnesses say Nick Andriash typed:
Can someone explain how the command "Purge All Folders" differs from
"Compress All Folders"? I know what compressing the Folders does, but not
sure about
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:37:36 -0700, Nick Andriash wrote:
NA Can someone explain how the command "Purge All Folders" differs from
NA "Compress All Folders"? I know what compressing the Folders does,
NA but not sure about the Purge command.
Purging will delete the old messages as you define in
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000 21:57:57 -0700, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA What I'm not sure about is which messages are removed when you have
JA "Maximum number of messages" selected...
The oldest messages are deleted first.
--
-=A. Curtis Martin=-
Using TB! v1.46 Beta/3 «» Win2k Pro SP1
Moderator
Hello Allie,
On Wednesday, August 30, 2000 at 00:01:50 GMT -0500 (which was 10:01 PM
where I live) witnesses say A . Curtis Martin typed:
Purging is usually done automatically upon exiting TB! but if you're one
who closes TB! once a month :-), then you will find the purge option
useful.
32 matches
Mail list logo
