We are sorry to tell you that because of [spam] we no longer accept
any mail from Yahoo! Groups.
Curious... I receive mail from four yahoo group mailing lists through
myrealbox with no problem.
I receive from five lists - less than five messages the last year were
spam. One of the
User Bernd Gauweiler failed ignore test.
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTech List:
Dear Roelof,
--- Roelof Otten / Dienstag, 30.07.2002, 18:10:24
Working with a Collect Account
Actually my current ISP allows for it, but that's a Dutch cable
provider, so it's not really a solution for you. ;-)
Why? Can you explain?
That might be the best solution. IIRC gmx
Hi, Sudip. On 7/22/02 at 8:18 p.m. you wrote:
I used ZA but after it started screwing things in TB!, I removed it.
After much searching and many trials, I've come to settle on Agnitum
Outpost Pro Firewall. Have no problem with it so far. There's also a
freeware version available.
Do you know
Dear Thomas,
--- Thomas F. / Mittwoch, 31.07.2002, 04:54:23
Working with a Collect Account
L You do not wat to use myrealbox if you have a yahoo account and
L are suscribed to the Groups mailing lists: this is an excerpt of
L their (myrealbox) FAQ:
Wasn't there a thread sometimes
Dear readers from 'TB!udl List',
Is there a simple and reliable way in moving all the Filters of one
Account to an other in 'one' shot?
Thanks and have a nice day :-)
--
best regards
Eddie
Powered by The Bat! v1.61 under Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195
PGP (public) is available:
Is there a simple and reliable way in moving all the Filters of one
Account to an other in 'one' shot?
Copy one rule after the other into Notepad - when finished, Select
All in Notepad and Copy, then go back to TB and paste the rules into
where you want them.
Note 1: You might lose
Hi Batpeople,
When's the release of much coveted version 2 planned? Any rumors
about the features that have already been incorporated?
--
Cheers,
Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sudip Pokhrel
Kathmandu-NP
PGP Key ID: 0xD93F5185
http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
Hi Avram,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 01:59:56 -0500 GMT (Jul 31, 12:44 my local time),
you [AS] wrote
AS Do you know which version of ZA you used
I don't specifically but I upgraded to the latest version (mid May I
think) and still had problems.
AS can you be a little more specific regarding what
Hi Sudip, Avram,
I use Zone Alarm Pro (as fas as I know the latest version) and do
_not_ have any problems that I am aware of. My OS is Windows XP
Professional and I am using McAfee Total Virus Defence with it (also
without _any_ problems).
What I do remember (you are also referring to that) is
Dear St,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 11:14:56 AM, you wrote:
Is there a simple and reliable way in moving all the Filters of one
Account to an other in 'one' shot?
just copy file named account.srx from one account to another. But! it
will eraze all filters in target account :-).
After you
Dear Greg,
Tuesday, July 30, 2002, 4:26:00 PM, you wrote:
GS 1) Has anyone tried editing thebat.exe file for the X-Mailer header of
GSThe Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) to replace with The_Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) to
GSprevent ISP blocking on the original header?
See my header.
GS 2) If yes, does it
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 5:00:14 AM, Sergey Uvarov wrote to Greg:
GS 1) Has anyone tried editing thebat.exe file for the X-Mailer header of
GSThe Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) to replace with The_Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) to
GSprevent ISP blocking on the original header?
SU See my header.
But I'd
Dear St,
--- St - Musaic.Net / Mittwoch, 31.07.2002, 11:14:56
Moving all Filters
Is there a simple and reliable way in moving all the Filters of one
Account to an other in 'one' shot?
Copy one rule after the other into Notepad - when finished, Select
All in Notepad and Copy,
Dear Art,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 12:57:41 PM, you wrote:
AM On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 5:00:14 AM, Sergey Uvarov wrote to Greg:
GS 1) Has anyone tried editing thebat.exe file for the X-Mailer header of
GSThe Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) to replace with The_Bat! (v1.62/Beta1) to
GSprevent
Hello Doyle,
On Tuesday, July 30, 2002 at 7:43:11 PM you wrote in
T1X93HDA9TNHGPN05PJNWR4Z76HED8.3d46d02f@VAIO">mid:T1X93HDA9TNHGPN05PJNWR4Z76HED8.3d46d02f@VAIO (at least in part):
7/30/2002 11:45:46 AM, Jan Rifkinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
Great statement. Absolutely. I think I have
Hello Art
Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 11:57:41 AM, in which you
wrote:
AM But I'd think you'd have to edit again after each version upgrade. True?
Yes. I followed this method - took a couple of minutes. It's got to
better than having yet another program running.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:
SP When's the release of much coveted version 2 planned? Any rumors
SP about the features that have already been incorporated?
About 2 years ago, v2's coming was hastily
Hello Sudip,
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002 at 11:28:25 AM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
SP When's the release of much coveted version 2 planned?
About 3/4th to one year ahead ... As a very rough estimation.
At least this is what I've heard rumoring.
--
Dear Peter,
--- Peter Palmreuther / Mittwoch, 31.07.2002, 14:14:27
Version Deux
About 3/4th to one year ahead ... As a very rough estimation. At
least this is what I've heard rumoring.
I can 'confirm' these 'rumors' ;-)
--
best regards
Eddie
Powered by The Bat! v1.60k under
Hi Bat Users,
Just wanted to let you all know that TB 1.61 runs fine with W2000 SP3.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The problem with doing nothing is that you never know when you're done.
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows 2000
ON Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 2:34:23 PM, you wrote:
About 3/4th to one year ahead ... As a very rough estimation. At
least this is what I've heard rumoring.
EC I can 'confirm' these 'rumors' ;-)
Are these official rumors?
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hello Gerard,
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002 at 2:43:40 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
G Are these official rumors?
If they were, and therefore came directly from RITLabs, they would not be
'rumors' :-)
At least there's only one possibility unless
Hallo Eddie,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:55:19 +0200GMT (31-7-02, 8:55 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
Actually my current ISP allows for it, but that's a Dutch cable
provider, so it's not really a solution for you. ;-)
EC Why? Can you explain?
This was about an ISP that allowed for any
Dear Roelof,
--- Roelof Otten / Mittwoch, 31.07.2002, 15:49:33
Working with a Collect Account
This was about an ISP [...]
Thank's
That's right, only thing faster is a smarthost that receives
everything.
I've now have it this way - work fine!
That's easy. ;-)
ON Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 3:13:15 PM, you wrote:
PP Hello Gerard,
PP On Wednesday, July 31, 2002 at 2:43:40 PM you wrote in
PP [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
G Are these official rumors?
PP If they were, and therefore came directly from RITLabs, they would
Hallo Eddie,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:53:22 +0200GMT (31-7-02, 15:53 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
EC BTW - do you still think I should work with the Hamster?
I'm not aware of me expressing that you should work with Hamster. I've
never worked with Hamster, though I once looked at it.
Dear Roelof,
--- Roelof Otten / Mittwoch, 31.07.2002, 17:00:25
Working with a Collect Account
AFAIK Hamster collects from several accounts, I thought that wasn't
what you wanted.
You're right, but according to the talk we have here I'm
reconsidering. Maybe it is still a good
Hello fellow Batters,
I am experiencing a problem with a message folder file which
contains over 2GB of mails (with attachments) which has become
corrupted somehow. I did the 'normal' thing when this happens
which may have been a serious mistake. I was able to see the
messages, but the filter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm playing with the Fixing Signatures regexp on the FAQ site, and I
tried to add another line so that it strips out Outlook added reply
formatting, as a lot of my contacts use it. Here is what it looks
like:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote...
%quotes='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)((\s*)?\n?-BEGIN PGP %-
SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?(.*?)(^(-*?\s*?--\s*\n|%-
_{40,}\s*\n|%-
\n-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE.*s?\n|%-
- \s*Orig.*?|%-
-
Hello Jonathan,
31. julij 2002, 18:13:51, you wrote:
JA And other permutations of that too. Why is it not working when listed
JA in this format?
This seems to work for me:
%QUOTES='%SETPATTREGEXP=(?is)%-
((\s*)?\n?-BEGIN PGP SIGNED.*?\n(Hash:.*?\n)?\s*)?%-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Jernej Simoni wrote...
This seems to work for me:
[snip]
Doesn't seem to match the - Original Message - Outlook uses,
at least not here anyway, I just copied and pasted it.
- --
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Jernej Simoni wrote...
JA Doesn't seem to match the - Original Message - Outlook uses,
JA at least not here anyway, I just copied and pasted it.
Hmm... That's strange. It works in some cases, but not every
Hello Erik,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 11:51:11 +0200 (MEST) GMT (31/07/02, 16:51 +0700 GMT),
Erik Janssen wrote:
EJ What I do remember (you are also referring to that) is some renaming
EJ of attachments (the file extentions). When I disabled the Mail-Safe
EJ settings everything worked fine at my
Hello David,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 07:29:25 +0100 GMT (31/07/02, 13:29 +0700 GMT),
David Elliott wrote:
DE User Bernd Gauweiler failed ignore test.
ROTFLOL!
You really *had* me laughing out loud on this one. But be fair, he
didn't know that Syafril is the list admin and the test related to a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Thomas F. wrote...
Pardon me for being ignorant, but was does this Mail-Safe function
in ZA do? What I can figure from the list, it changes attachment
names, so that they cannot be opened any more. May make sense for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Hexdump wrote...
Not sure, Depending on how TB stores the messages in the message
base you might be able to recover them by running the message base
through a program like uudecode or a similar program. Not certain
Hello Kurgan,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 00:53:05 -0500 GMT (31/07/02, 12:53 +0700 GMT),
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
KLc Must have been a glitch; I just looked and the link is still
KLc working. :) (Either that or the search engines simply hadn't
KLc refreshed yet.)
The search engine doesn't list
Hello Thomas,
On Thu, 1 Aug 2002 02:37:41 +0700 GMT (01/08/02, 02:37 +0700 GMT),
Thomas F. wrote:
TF The search engine doesn't list it; but I just became a member by
TF sending a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it worked. :-)
Nonsense. I sent a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and am
now a
Hello TBUDL,
Using TOOLS BACKUP Create an update to existing archive, and
entering an existing *.tbk filename, TB! asks if I want to replace the
existing file. I want to append rather than replace. Am I missing
something?
I couldn't find anything in Help, FAQ, or archives.
TIA
--
Regards,
Hello Thomas,
TF Pardon me for being ignorant, but was does this Mail-Safe function in
TF ZA do? What I can figure from the list, it changes attachment names,
TF so that they cannot be opened any more. May make sense for OE/OL
TF users, but then, how do *they* open attachments at all?
TF Is it
When using ZA, disabling Mail-Safe is essential to avoid the renaming of
executable attachments. I have never had a problem renaming them
so I could run an AV scan and then open them.
Elaine
Hello Erik
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, you wrote
What I do remember (you are also referring to
It is a optional feature of ZA and does not have to be used. It
changes the file extension to an easily-identified ZA file
extension and the attachment can be renamed and opened. Simply
unchecking the option eliminates the feature.
Elaine
Hello Thomas
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, you wrote
Hi Gerard,
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 1:42:43 PM, you [G] wrote:
G Hi Bat Users,
G Just wanted to let you all know that TB 1.61 runs fine with W2000 SP3.
Huh? I thought SP2 was the newest?! :S
--
Ben Kennish
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi, Elaine.
on 07/31/2002 at 04:24 PM you wrote:
When using ZA, disabling Mail-Safe is essential to avoid the renaming of
executable attachments. I have never had a problem renaming them
so I could run an AV scan and then open them.
If I understand you correctly, with ZA one must disable
Because I am using the free current version of ZA, it only offers
mail protection against VBS attachments and it has never
interfered with TheBat. When I was using Outlook Express, I used
the paid version of ZA-Pro and it offered protection against 45
additional mail attachments (.exe, .com,
ON Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 11:38:45 PM, you wrote:
BK Huh? I thought SP2 was the newest?! :S
Hi Ben,
Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 is out, available now to the company's major
customers, and to everybody else from Thursday.
--
Best regards,
Gerard
Hello Ben,
31. julij 2002, 23:38:45, you wrote:
BK Huh? I thought SP2 was the newest?! :S
Sp3 was just published :)
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www2.arnes.si/~sopjsimo/
ICQ: 26266467
[The Bat! v1.60d on Windows 2000 5.0.2195.Service Pack 3]
An exception TESTS a rule; it
Hallo Eddie,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 17:13:33 +0200GMT (31-7-02, 17:13 +0200GMT, where
I live), you wrote:
AFAIK Hamster collects from several accounts, I thought that wasn't
what you wanted.
EC You're right, but according to the talk we have here I'm
EC reconsidering. Maybe it is still a good
Hello Jernej,
Thursday, August 1, 2002, 12:16:08 AM, you wrote:
JS Hello Ben,
JS 31. julij 2002, 23:38:45, you wrote:
BK Huh? I thought SP2 was the newest?! :S
JS Sp3 was just published :)
Where can I download it?
--
Best regards,
Pietromailto:[EMAIL
Hello Gerard,
1. avgust 2002, 0:08:57, you wrote:
G Windows 2000 Service Pack 3 is out, available now to the company's major
G customers, and to everybody else from Thursday.
There was a download link this morning on a local computing site :)
--
Jernej Simoncic, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
@31 July 2002, 01:04 +0700 (19:04 UK time) Thomas F. [TF] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to David Elliott on
TBUDL:
DE User Bernd Gauweiler failed ignore test.
TF ROTFLOL!
TF Nevertheless, I think this thread has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paddy,
@31 July 2002, 13:05 -0700 (21:05 UK time) Paddy L [PL] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
PL Using TOOLS BACKUP Create an update to existing archive, and
PL entering an existing *.tbk filename, TB! asks if I
I just sent out an email with one person in the To: field and a list
of people in the cc: field. The list comprised all the people in one
AB group. In the contact field, I entered the nickname of the group,
which then appeared, in addition to the term list, as in
nicknamelist.
One of the cc:
If I am reading correctly, it is possible to use TB! as a mailserver? If
I decide to host my own mailserver instead of my ISP's...I can use TB!?
--
Pete
7:21:28 PM
Ask about eScan Content-Security
and Anti-Virus Software.
We will meet ALL of your
Hi Avram,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 16:50:28 -0500 GMT (Aug 01, 03:35 my local time),
you [AS] wrote
AS Isn't disabling the feature defeating the purpose of the firewall?
If you have an AV package with up to date definition and its set up to
scan incoming mail, this feature is absolutely redundant.
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 1:15:44 PM, you wrote:
S Any suggestions on how I can possibly recover the over 1.5GB of
S graphics attachments that I have not had time to extract and
S save? This is over FOUR MONTHS (2023 messages) of posts to a
S mailing list. I am running WIN2K SP2, and FAT32
TB! has suddenly stopped opening links. I can double click or right
click and pick open url, but nothing happens. This is happening in
this version and also in abacusbat, so whatever it is, it isn't a beta
issue. Any suggestions??
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
Try compressing the offending folder (after making a backup copy, of
course) to see if that helps. If you *do* manage to recover the
emails, you might consider reconfiguring your mail accounts to save
attachments in a separate folder, so at least they're not trashed if
the mail archive goes
JS Sp3 was just published :)
PM Where can I download it?
http://download.microsoft.com/download/win2000platform/SP/SP3/NT5/EN-US/w2ksp3.exe
HTH,
Dan
Current Ver: 1.61
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Milne [PM] wrote:
PM If I am reading correctly, it is possible to use TB! as a
PM mailserver? If I decide to host my own mailserver instead of my
PM ISP's...I can use TB!?
It isn't a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Dwight A Corrin [DAC] wrote:
DAC TB! has suddenly stopped opening links. I can double click or
DAC right click and pick open url, but nothing happens. This is
DAC happening in this version and
Replying to your message of Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 10:37:34 PM:
ACM It isn't a full-blown dedicated mailserver
Allie,
I'll tell you what I have and what I need. I have 4 machines networked here
at home. I currently am hosting my own website and want to host my own
mail server to pull mail
Hello Pete,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 19:22:16 -0600 GMT (01/08/02, 08:22 +0700 GMT),
Pete Milne wrote:
PM If I am reading correctly, it is possible to use TB! as a mailserver? If
PM I decide to host my own mailserver instead of my ISP's...I can use TB!?
No, TB is only an email client, not an
Hello Erik,
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 22:54:59 +0200 (MEST) GMT (01/08/02, 03:54 +0700 GMT),
Erik Janssen wrote:
TF Is it the job of this firewall to make attachments useless?
EJ According to the help-file of ZA it should do the following:
EJ (sorry for the gigantic message!)
We might have to move
Hello Joseph,
It was foretold that on Wednesday, July 31, 2002 at 19:01 GMT -0500,
Joseph N. [JN] would type:
JN It's clear why that is happening, but it shouldn't work like that. On
JN the original message, the actual cc: recipients would appear in the
JN headers for each recipient. I wanted
Hello Emaillists,
Thursday, August 1, 2002, 5:35:08 AM, you wrote:
JS Sp3 was just published :)
PM Where can I download it?
E http://download.microsoft.com/download/win2000platform/SP/SP3/NT5/EN-US/w2ksp3.exe
Is there a link for the italian version?
--
Best regards,
Pietro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Peter Milne [PM] wrote:
PM I'll tell you what I have and what I need. I have 4 machines
PM networked here at home. I currently am hosting my own website and
PM want to host my own mail server to
Hello Pete,
PM Would I have to have a mail server program installed to do what I want
PM instead of using TB!?
You could use TB and BatPost together to achieve your server.
I'm using BatPost right now to send this message, and it's not even
installed on my machine. I've got it
Replying to your message of Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 11:16:09 PM:
Allie,
Thank you for the clarification on the mail server.
--
Pete
www.milneweb.com
Wednesday, July 31, 2002
11:23:50 PM
This e-mail is brought to you by:
The Bat: Version 1.61
Windows 2000 build 2195
Hello Pietro
Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 11:25:17 PM, in which you
wrote:
PM Where can I download it?
Hope you've got broadband - it's c.125mb!
--
Regards
William
Flying with The Bat! 1.61 www.ritlabs.com/the_bat
Windows 2000 Pro 2195 Service Pack 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Thomas F. [TF] wrote:
TF We might have to move this to TBOT soon. But thanks for the info.
.
TF (Has ZoneLabs been bought by Microsoft, or why do they write such a
TF nonsense?)
moderator
Hello Jonathan,
Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 3:20:18 PM, you wrote:
On Wednesday, July 31, 2002, Hexdump wrote...
Not sure, Depending on how TB stores the messages in the message
base you might be able to recover them by running the message base
through a program like uudecode or a similar
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Kurgan [K] wrote:
K You could use TB and BatPost together to achieve your server. I'm
K using BatPost right now to send this message, and it's not even
K installed on my machine. I've got it
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 00:38, Hexdump wrote:
Another neat little trick is to change the extension of the
message.tbb file to .uue. Now you can open it using WinZip. (I'd
recommend trying this method first as it is incredibly simple if it
works.)
Never heard of doing that before, I'm assuming
Hello William,
Thursday, August 1, 2002, 7:27:39 AM, you wrote:
WM Hello Pietro
WM Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, July 31, 2002, 11:25:17 PM, in which
you wrote:
PM Where can I download it?
WM Hope you've got broadband - it's c.125mb!
I have isdn.
--
Best regards,
Hello Allie,
ACM Why not create an shortcut in the programs/startup menu? Is there no
ACM CLI parameter to 'start' it up? If not, you could install PowerPro on
ACM your friends server and then use a macro that is executed on the
ACM machines startup. It would fire up the batpost and then
Hello Jonathan,
Thursday, August 1, 2002, 1:48:00 AM, you wrote:
On Thu, 2002-08-01 at 00:38, Hexdump wrote:
Another neat little trick is to change the extension of the
message.tbb file to .uue. Now you can open it using WinZip. (I'd
recommend trying this method first as it is incredibly
Hello Kurgan,
Thursday, August 1, 2002, 2:01:22 AM, you wrote:
I must admit my ignorance for Windows NT. I'm learning as I go,
but so far there appears to be no way to add the program as a
service so it starts with the system. The server is set up so
there are 'desktops' for
80 matches
Mail list logo
