-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Miguel,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
These should give you a fairly good idea of my setup. Feel free to ask
questions about it but, if you do, please do so on list.
,- [ http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL
Hello Greg,
Are these common folders?
No, I hardly use common folders. See http://www.rancho-k.com/For_Greg.png
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using
Hello Richard,
I was just wondering if you could elucidate how you go about ignoring
threads which you are not interested in?
:-) See http://www.rancho-k.com/
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:
Quoting MAU [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Richard,
I was just wondering if you could elucidate how you go about ignoring
threads which you are not interested in?
:-) See http://www.rancho-k.com/
That looks very good. How much of the moving into the appropriate folder is done
manually and
Quoting MAU [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hello Doug,
That looks very good. How much of the moving into the appropriate folder is
done
manually and how much automaticall?
Most is done 'automagically' using filters (sorting rules).
I MUST clean up my inbox, which is well over 3000 messages.
Hi Stuart
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 1:42 PM, shemming wrote:
When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?
That's the same question I had. As I have SpamAssassin on the mail
server, most of my spam gets caught and filtered that way, but I was
hoping that this would catch the one or two
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SC but I think it may be since Beta 40.
If it /is/ TB! version related then it's broken in b45 too.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SC I have been using Bayesit for some time now and it had been working
SC just fine. In the last little while it has quit working altogether. I
SC don't know if it is just here, but I think it may be since Beta 40.
I've upgraded to b45, let's see if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MAU kindly provided links to some old messages that he thought might
be of interest. The links took the form
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter
that string in the search box on the archive page you get no messages!
I have looked for the
Dear Stuart,
@23-Jan-2004, 09:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SH] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
SH MAU kindly provided links to some old messages that he thought might
SH be of interest. The links took the form
SH mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter
SH that string in the search box on
Hello Kevin,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 5:18:14 AM, you wrote:
BBTE I choose one machine as master (my home desktop). When I
BBTE retrieve mail there, I remove it from the server. When I
BBTE retrieve mail using the notebook or from the office, I leave
BBTE mail on the server until I dump it from
Hello Marck,
Perhaps MAU would be able to supply you with references to the
mail-archive messages? That would be quite a bit of extra work for
him though. Or you can fire up TB and use the mid URLs.
That's what I did in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El
At 7:55 AM on 1/23/2004, Gerrit Kiers typed ...
G Kevin,
G Bill's solution does not solve instances when you send mail from the
G notebook. I use the following set-up to cover for that.
Thanks, Kevin! You not only mentioned a step that I omitted (BCCs to
myself of messages that I want to store
Hi Rich,
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 12:31 AM, rich wrote:
GC Will The Bat! run [under Linux]
VN Not directly, but maybe under Wine.
M3 I have gotten it to run under Wine with Mandrake 9.1. But I did
M3 not do extensive testing.
Are any of youse guys using TB! under Linux (via WINE)? How
Hi Stuart
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 1:42 PM, shemming wrote:
When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?
It didn't start working well for me until I had about 1,000 messages
in **both** spam and ham for it to work from. I also had to crank the
threshold *way* down to get reasonable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
MDP Or you can fire up TB and use the mid URLs.
But I don't have the messages (I've already tried that).
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available from
Hello Marck,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 1:19:12 PM, you wrote:
MDP Dear Stuart,
MDP @23-Jan-2004, 09:17 [EMAIL PROTECTED] [SH] in
MDP mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
SH MAU kindly provided links to some old messages that he thought might
SH be of interest. The links took the form
SH
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 3:39:22 AM, you wrote:
SH Hash: SHA1
SC but I think it may be since Beta 40.
SH If it /is/ TB! version related then it's broken in b45 too.
Is any one having problems with Bayesit all of a sudden, in beta
40/45.
--
Stuart
Dear Jean,
@23-Jan-2004, 15:04 +0100 (23-Jan 14:04 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
... snip
SH mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]. However, if you enter
SH that string in the search box on the archive page you get no messages!
MDP These links are for use within TB only.
...
Hello ken,
Thursday, January 22, 2004, 9:15:55 PM, you wrote:
kg AbacusBat! - Uninstall
kg This will remove AbacausBat! Continue?
I'd never even hear of AbacusBat until now. Just looking at the
website for it, it appears to be some law related program that
incorporates TB.
,-- [ From
ON Thursday, January 22, 2004, 6:45:05 PM, you wrote:
kg This isn't the problem I'm experiencing. I can select the message all
kg day long and no attachment is shown (even though it *is* confirmed as
kg being there).
Hi ken,
Can you explain what you mean by The attachment is not shown even
Hello Terry,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 10:58:14 AM, you wrote:
T That's the same question I had. As I have SpamAssassin on the mail
T server, most of my spam gets caught and filtered that way, but I was
T hoping that this would catch the one or two that slip by every week.
If SpamAssassin on
ken green wrote:
kg If that is the case, the error messages I received didn't even
kg hint at that explanation. No message about protecting anything.
kg Just what I posted. Why something as simple and basic as an
kg uninstall has to be so esoteric and cryptic is just bad usability.
kg Come on...
Steve Mulhall wrote:
SM Does anyone have any ideas as to why all of a sudden (with no
SM warning and no obvious reason why) whenever I open any messages
SM (from any folder/account) they all appear in some strange font
SM (quite hard to read it is too)?
Have you checked your font settings in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Gerrit,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:55:46 +0100 (7:55 AM here), Gerrit Kiers [GK]
wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
GK Bill's solution does not solve instances when you send mail from the
GK notebook. I use the following set-up to cover for that.
Thank
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:04:48 -0500 (8:04 AM here), Bill Blinn
Technology Editor [BBTE] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BBTE Thanks, Kevin! You not only mentioned a step that I omitted
BBTE (BCCs to myself of messages that I want to store on
At 11:45 AM on 1/23/2004, Kevin Coates typed ...
K Hehehe .. actually you can thank Gerrit but the suggestions given here
K are most helpful.
This is another clear example of why I should never attempt to
communicate in the hours before noon. Or the hours after noon, for
that part. Thanks for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Bill,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 08:04:48 -0500 (8:04 AM here), Bill Blinn
Technology Editor [BBTE] wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
BBTE Thanks, Kevin! You not only mentioned a step that I omitted
BBTE (BCCs to myself of messages that I want to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I was just wondering if you could elucidate how you go about ignoring
threads which you are not interested in?
:-) See http://www.rancho-k.com/
Oh heck, I've just got sucked into
Hello ken,
On Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:48:38 -0600 GMT (23/01/2004, 00:48 +0700 GMT),
ken green wrote:
Decrease the value. If TB finds a within the set number of
characters, it will assume that everything before it is part of the
quoted name.
Within the set number of characters... ?? From the
Hello Steve,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 09:22:38 +1100 GMT (23/01/2004, 05:22 +0700 GMT),
Steve Mullarkey wrote:
Thanks Thomas. I forgot to put the word 'Documentation' in my msg as
well as in the Subject line.
Maybe I didn't read the subject line carefully enough.
I can see that your suggestion
Hello Richard,
Looks as though some long evenings are coming up as I've just got to
give it a go! I don't know whether to thank you or not for leading me
down that path! ;-)
Have a nice weekend ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.01.3
Winamp OFF:
Leif Gregory wrote:
If you're just trying to upgrade TB, then I would just install the
version you want over the top of it. However, just FYI we're in
version 2 now and there is an upgrade cost involved. There are no more
betas being developed for the 1.x versions.
Sorry I wasn't clear. I
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
I originally had an issue with an imap setting on one of my accounts
that I couldn't get unstuck, and ended up reinstalling... so sometimes
it is worth it.
By reinstalling do you mean a complete installation process (including
the import and/or creation of new
Hi ken
Friday, January 23, 2004, 1:31:51 AM, you wrote:
kg But at least it's evidence that I'm not insane (and I need evidence
kg sometimes... ;)
lol
Cheers,
--
Vishal
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL information:
Hello Philip,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 9:58:11 AM, you wrote:
PS However, at the moment, I'm only aware of one free filter plugin for
PS spam - bayesit - so this very nice feature of The Bat! goes unused as
PS yet. Hopefully you can now see why the plugin architecture is so
PS valuable, though.
Hi Philip,
On Friday, January 23, 2004 at 3:58 PM, Philip wrote:
Friday, January 23, 2004, 10:58:14 AM, you wrote:
T That's the same question I had. As I have SpamAssassin on the mail
T server, most of my spam gets caught and filtered that way, but I was
T hoping that this would catch the one
Hello ken,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 11:02:26 AM, you wrote:
kg Is it true that I can simply install newer exe files on top of
kg older ones to upgrade? Not across major releases, though, right?
Yes, you can install 2.x over 1.x... There were some issues with IMAP
accounts (someone else can
Hi ken,
on Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:02:26 -0600GMT (23.01.04, 19:02 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
kg Is it true that I can simply install newer exe files on top of older
kg ones to upgrade? Not across major releases, though, right?
Absolutely correct. It is always recommended
CDWOS wrote:
C I use Easy2Sync to get my desktop and laptop to keep each other up
C to date across a peer to peer network. I believe as long as you can
C connect the two machines to each other Easy2Sync will work.
moderator
Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
Leif-
Friday, January 23, 2004, 7:20:41 AM, you wrote:
kg AbacusBat! - Uninstall
kg This will remove AbacausBat! Continue?
LG ,-- [ From http://www.esqwiredconsulting.com/update.htm ]
LG | New Integrated Email AbacusBat is an integrated custom version of the
I'm always wary of integrated
Hello Mark,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 12:35:29 PM, you wrote:
MW I also wouldn't hold out much hope for a mixture of the Abacus
MW stuff and a new non-Abacus version of TB working together. Since
MW it's all integrated, a better solution would probably be to
MW upgrade the whole Abacus package
Mark Wieder wrote:
I'm always wary of integrated custom versions of *anything*.
As am I. But I have not ever *HEARD* of AbacusBat, and certainly did
not install it intentionally. To my knowledge, I have only even had
regular ol' The Bat!, starting with 1.x some time ago.
My guess is that
On Friday, January 23, 2004 at 4:27:33 PM, ken green wrote in the
message uninstalling The Bat!
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a way to do a fresh install of v2? (I only paid for an
upgrade, so this may not be possible)
Yes, you can. Just use the licence key they sent you for the fresh
Chris wrote:
Yes, you can. Just use the licence key they sent you for the fresh
install; it will work.
OK, thanks. I thought it was an upgrade license only kinda deal. I
will try a fresh install with CE and see how that goes.
Except.
I'm still using 1.62r on my desktop. Will that
Just wanted to take a quick moment and publicly thank all of you who
have been participating in this thread.
Without this forum, I don't know where I'd be with The Bat!
--
Ken Green
Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4
Gerard wrote:
Can you explain what you mean by The attachment is not shown even though
it *is* confirmed as being there
How is it confirmed as being there without you seeing it?
It is not displayed through The Bat's interface. The list view does not
show an attachment present, and the left
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello MAU,
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Looks as though some long evenings are coming up as I've just got to
give it a go! I don't know whether to thank you or not for leading me
down that path! ;-)
Have a nice weekend
Hello All!
Visit this site http://en.barin.com.ua/ for more info.
--
Life is stranger than fiction.
-
Listening by STP now: Silence...
-
Fixer mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Friday, January 23, 2004, 7:12:31 PM, you wrote:
SM Hi all,
SM Does anyone have any ideas as to why all of a sudden (with no warning
SM and no obvious reason why) whenever I open any messages (from any
SM folder/account) they all appear in some strange font (quite hard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M3 I also had to crank the
M3 threshold *way* down to get reasonable results.
How do I do that?
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available from
Allie Martin wrote:
Hmmm. This is probably not the thing to do. For two reasons, it will
create problems when converting to IMAP and it's probably overdoing
things when there's a problem with one or two message bases. Why not
just delete the errant ones and restore from backup.
This is what
Allie Martin wrote:
If I were converting from IMAP to POP, I'd export all my IMAP mail to
UNIX files or copy/move them to local folders. I'd then create fresh
POP accounts, create new folders and then import each exported folders
messages to the corresponding POP folders.
Is there a reason
ken green wrote:
Are there advantages/disadvantages to any of the three formats?
I think I answered my own question here...
EML and MSG format exports and imports a group of individual messages.
Exporting a Unix-mail*box* gives me one file - the whole folder of
selected messages.
Nice. This
Ken Green, [KG] wrote:
KG Is there a reason why you would use the Unix file export rather than
KG MSG files or EML? I don't know the difference (except that different
KG mail clients only import/export one or two formats).
When you export to UNIX file, all messages are contained within a single
OK, this issue was brought up before (see thread: Re:What is that
number? 10-17 Oct 2003) but there wasn't a good answer.
What exactly are the number with the *angle* brackets in the total
messages column? Note that this is NOT a number in parentheses,
indicating the total number of messages
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 3:17:30 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
sec Clearly I'm not getting it right (again). Anyone able to off this hard
sec of thinking lad a hand?
Just click on the URL in the quote box for each message in the archives.
,- [
Allie
My email was buried in an old thread, so you might not have seen my
question, but in relation to the look you showed in
http://www.ac-martin.com/pics/tb.png:
On Sun 18 January 2004, 1:00:56 +1000, Allie Martin wrote:
Mau, [M] wrote:
M Yes, it looks nice. Which set is it so I don't have
58 matches
Mail list logo
