-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
kg Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] ?
Missed point error in line 1.
I know how to get hold of support; I wanted RitLabs to know that
their website had a duff address on it.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.04.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided
TheBat-users,
I use server outbox/sent.
If I compose a mail and it is set to autosave every n minutes, I get a
number of local versions with the draft icon.
If I send the mail they are drafts of, the draft mails aren't deleted
from my local folder. They should.
FolderPurge+Compress does
Tuesday, February 24, 2004, William Moore wrote:
4.) Consider using NOD32 - without any plug-in - (www.eset.com) which
doesn't cause this problem.
It did for me with an infamous message TBOT back in January.
--
Urban
The French Revolution was accomplished before it happened and catapulted
Hello tbudl
Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 11:09:38 AM,
in which you wrote:
4.) Consider using NOD32 - without any plug-in - (www.eset.com) which
doesn't cause this problem.
U It did for me with an infamous message TBOT back in January.
I *always* delete the
Hello Peter,
Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 3:41:25 PM, you wrote:
PO Up to the 2.04.04 release BayesIt 0.4gm worked quite fine here, with a
PO score level of 40.
PO Starting with 2.04.04, BayesIt 0.4gm SE hardly catches spam anymore. It
PO has been trained with something like 3000 spam messages,
Alexander A. Gomanyuk, [AAG] wrote:
AAG Wow! Cool features! :))) Just read on thebat forum about IMAP
AAG realization problem... Now i'm in depression... :)))
AAG By the way, would You clarify, why, even after registration and
AAG logging in a can't post new message there ?
Where is 'there'? I
Hello Peter,
On 24 Feb 2004 at 21:41:25 +0100 GMT [21:41 CET] you wrote:
PO Hello Andre Wichartz,
PO on Tue, 24 Feb 2004 18:44:26 +0100 (2004-02-24 18:44:26 in .nl) in the
PO message with reference
PO mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
PO [AW] wrote (at least in part):
DW This is what I've been doing,
Hi,
Maybe some of you have the same problem: Some of the main Canadian ISPs (namely Bell)
block all SMTP-Servers except their own. So I cannot send email over my
email-provider's or domain provider's SMTP. As Bell's SMTP-Server accepts any FROM
name, I could use it as relay and just put my
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 8:28 AM, you wrote:
CGS I can get arround this by putting my address at Bell into the
CGS X-Sender field manually. What I'd like to know is how I can have it
CGS put there automatically. I tried %SETHEADER(X-Sender, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
CGS but when typin a
Searching for:
rgchickensoup
PC searched using that method, found 18 messages
rg chicken soup
PC searched using this method found 17 messages...
dh To confuse even more, sometimes I see less messages in the result
dh list than are counted as result in the statusline. If I press
dh
Search for:
rgchickensoup
PC searched using that method, found 18 messages
rg chicken soup
PC searched using this method found 17 messages...
rg Brings up more questions than it answered for me!
PC the answer is simple:) keep the searches to one word;0) I've never
PC really tried a
Hi Carsten,
Maybe some of you have the same problem: Some of the main
Canadian ISPs (namely Bell) block all SMTP-Servers except their own.
So I cannot send email over my email-provider's or domain provider's
SMTP.
snipped
Have you tried using TLS? Some ISPs only block port 25 but
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The wrong version number is showing in the tail of messages on TBUDL;
it says 2.04.04 rather than 2.04.7.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.04.4 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm SE
PGP Key available from
Hello Marten,
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 20:14:15 + GMT (25/02/2004, 03:14 +0700 GMT),
Marten Gallagher wrote:
or Account / Dispatch Mail on Server
That was defintiely not there just now! It only appeared as an option
when you sent this reply. How did you do that?
Let me make a case for the
Hello Martin,
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 15:47:27 -0600 GMT (25/02/2004, 04:47 +0700 GMT),
Martin Schneider wrote:
The reason for the error message was that the mail contained no real
mail data as it was created by the mailprovider (e.g. sender, subject
and recipient was missing). And The Bat didn't
Hi guys,
I am getting an error when starting up TB. The following screenshot
shows you what I am getting.
http://www.totalpc.org/thebat.jpg
When I click the OK button, the error disappears and TB loads
normally.
I downgraded to 1.62, and the error disappears. Reinstall 2.04.7 and
the error
Hi Alexander,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 9:27:37 AM, you wrote:
dcn My problem is this; I am running the latest version of TB! 2 and I still
dcn can't send html messages. Whenever I create a new message and choose either of
dcn the html format options all is fine until I press send.
AL
Hello John,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:46:31 -0600 GMT (25/02/2004, 23:46 +0700 GMT),
John Galvin wrote:
I am getting an error when starting up TB. The following screenshot
shows you what I am getting.
http://www.totalpc.org/thebat.jpg
When I click the OK button, the error disappears and TB
Hallo Thomas,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 23:41:17 +0700GMT (25-2-04, 17:41 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TF That's a new one. I believe From is mandatory (I am reporting from
TF memory, didn't check RFC2822), but subject is optional. A recipient of
TF some kind must be present, otherwise you
Tuesday, February 24, 2004, Doug Weller wrote:
I can't get it to kick in.
Do you get any error message, such as the /very/ helpful It seems like
something is present in your registry, but it's not enough or corrupted
that it gives me at startup.
Not a big problem to me, but it would be nice if
Tuesday, February 24, 2004, Stefan Tanurkov wrote:
the new build 2.04.7
Oh no, not another build...
You are far too supportive for us poor modem users. Why don't you just
start saying that every new release contains surprise new features
like some other software companies I have heard of.
:-)
Hallo Carsten,
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 08:28:06 -0500GMT (25-2-04, 14:28 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
CGS I can get arround this by putting my address at Bell into
CGS the X-Sender field manually. What I'd like to know is how I can
CGS have it put there automatically. I tried
Hello ken,
on Monday, February 23, 2004, 10:23:53 PM, ken green wrote:
I am in no way saying that The Bat is all bad or that Stefan or
RitLabs are terrible or anything like that. In fact, I continue to
complain about TB's performance because I do plan on using TheBat well
into the future.
Hello John Galvin,
Wednesday 25 February 2004, 17:46:31, you wrote:
JG I am getting an error when starting up TB. The following screenshot
JG shows you what I am getting.
JG http://www.totalpc.org/thebat.jpg
JG When I click the OK button, the error disappears and TB loads
JG normally.
JG I
Hello ken,
on Tuesday, February 24, 2004, 1:26:48 AM, ken green wrote:
Come on, this isn't about my needs changing beyond what The Bat has to
offer. This is about The Bat promising on functionality and hitting
90% - and I'm complaining about that 10%
Yes, and that is good. If noone would
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 10:56 AM, you wrote:
rg HEY! That's GREAT! You've volunteered to write informix queries for my
rg email searches then!!
been 10 years since I've written any Informix reports, I like to keep
things simple these days, although using TB is making my life complex
Hello tbudl
Thank you for your email dated Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:31:08 PM,
in which you wrote:
M In software development it is normal
M that in some special circumstances the software may fail.
Ain't that the truth. And with some software the circumstances don't
have to all that
Hello,
I have been plodding on telling BayesIT what is Junk and what is not,
about half and half, but BayesIT refuses to do anything on its own. I
understand that this started with 2.04.04. I am about to upgrade to
2.04.07 but from what I've read that only fixes a search problem.
Can
Hello Terry,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 9:57:03 AM, you wrote:
Have you tried using TLS? Some ISPs only block port 25 but
don't block TLS on port 465.
Can you elaborate? I'm running my own mail server, but need to
have it send through my ISP's SMTP server rather than directly.
Would what
Stuart-
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 1:11:16 AM, you wrote:
SH I know how to get hold of support; I wanted RitLabs to know that
SH their website had a duff address on it.
...so why not just email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let them know?
--
-Mark Wieder
Using The Bat! v1.63 Beta/7 on Windows
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t 2) TB releases are less worthy of upgrading to than other software updates.
Why would you think that?
The posts since my last message show a small part of the reason.
P.S. You're not dirty pixels bill are you? :-0
--
kaishaku.reply-to = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stuart-
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 1:11:16 AM, you wrote:
SH I know how to get hold of support; I wanted RitLabs to know that
SH their website had a duff address on it.
...so why not just email [EMAIL PROTECTED] and let them know?
That has stopped working
Dave Gorman, [DG] wrote:
DG Can you elaborate? I'm running my own mail server, but need to
DG have it send through my ISP's SMTP server rather than directly.
Which mail server are you running?
Usually, you can configure the server to send mail via a smarthost. It
may involve using a particular
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 1:29:30 PM, you wrote:
DG Can you elaborate? I'm running my own mail server, but need to
DG have it send through my ISP's SMTP server rather than directly.
Which mail server are you running?
MDaemon
Usually, you can configure the server to send
Hi Doug,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 7:00:37 PM, you wrote:
I have been plodding on telling BayesIT what is Junk and what is not,
about half and half, but BayesIT refuses to do anything on its own. I
understand that this started with 2.04.04. I am about to upgrade to
2.04.07 but
Dave Gorman, [DG] wrote:
DG I was just wondering if TLS would be a way I could use MDaemon to
DG deliver directly instead of using the smarthost setting to deliver
DG through my ISP.
With direct delivery, MDaemon would have to interact with a lot of
different servers, some of which support TLS
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 1:50:10 PM, you wrote:
With direct delivery, MDaemon would have to interact with a lot of
different servers, some of which support TLS and others that don't.
Makes sense.
MDaemon seems to use StartTLS for deliveries if the receiving server
Hi Dave,
...snipped...
DG Would what you are suggesting be a possible workaround for me?
AM This is one workaround, yes.
I was just wondering if TLS would be a way I could use MDaemon to
deliver directly instead of using the smarthost setting to
deliver through my ISP. Usually my ISP does
At this point I need to make sure that you (and everyone else) know
that I am NOT attacking in seeking the answers to this question.
Though my fictitious example may be lame, the question (I think)
deserves a definitive answer (not necessarily by you, of course). I
only seek the truth!
rg
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 3:50 PM, you wrote:
rg At this point I need to make sure that you (and everyone else) know
rg that I am NOT attacking in seeking the answers to this question.
rg Though my fictitious example may be lame, the question (I think)
rg deserves a definitive answer
Hi,
I've been using TB! for a couple of years now, using POP. I have a
pretty extensive collection of filter/folder combinations set up in
my POP accounts. A change of employment and recent developments in
TB! have led me to try out IMAP. I set up a new IMAP account in TB!,
and things
Hello Paul,
on Wed, 25. Feb 2004 at 16:17:06 -0500 you wrote:
18 messages using chickensoup
17 using chicken soup.
[snip]
CORRECTION: The 12/19/03 dispatch featuring Chicken-Vegetable
^^^
I guess that the other 17 hits have chicken with a
This is the root question then! What is the difference between the 2
versions (with vs w/o spaces around the ) of the search syntax?
ok, I did a test again for you, same results ( wow!)
18 messages using chickensoup
17 using chicken soup.
I just did some quick experimenting with this and
rg Seriously, 2 words does not a complex search make. If I need to
rg *RELIABLY* find the email where I invited JANIS to the DANCE (only
rg want emails where BOTH those words exist):
PC personally, I'd probably do the search differently. Either just on
PC JANIS, or use the FROM:, put my name in,
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:29 PM, you wrote:
rg Right, but there's still the fact that we cannot assign search term W
rg to being ONLY in the field X AND search term Y restricted to the field
rg Z.
you are correct, I never really thought about that. The advanced
search mode, is a
Hi Paul
On 25 Feb 2004 16:17:06 (my local time 22:17:06), Paul Cartwright
wrote:
PC 18 messages using chickensoup
PC 17 using chicken soup.
PC here is the extra message using chickensoup,verbatim, I have no idea
PC what the difference is. The other 17 emails were the same for both
PC
I had been using 2.04.7 without any major problems until today.
I installed a trial copy of Netlimiter (http://www.netlimiter.com/).
Suddenly TB would crash immediately after opening. So I uninstalled
Netlimiter. Still crashing.
I did a system restore back to yesterday evening when everything
Hello Paul,
Subject: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
Thanks for changing the subject :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.04.7
Current version is 2.04.04 | 'Using
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:37 PM, you wrote:
R I ran some tests here I came up with this:
R * searching for 'chickensoup' will search for messages that will have
R both 'chicken' and 'soup' in it
R * searching for 'chicken soup' will search for messages that will
R have both
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The wrong version number is showing in the tail of messages on TBUDL;
it says 2.04.04 rather than 2.04.7
Yeah, it sure is funny to see signatures that have:
Running The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1, Build 2600
Then immediately beneath that:
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 5:44 PM, you wrote:
M Hello Paul,
Subject: SEARCH, the ultimate question- WAS:Re: Crash on Search in 2.04.4
M Thanks for changing the subject :-)
I remember a potato subject, not too long ago, that went totally off the
deep end;) I like it when subjects
Hello TBUDL,
I want to search with the Message Finder for mails containing
([^/]++.|) (without ) in the body, but this is not possible without
using regular expressions and escaping nearly every character.
I then get 38 results, which appears to be right.
With plain ([^/]++.|) I get 1858 results
RO You've got to prepare that for TB:
RO Options - Preferences - Messages - Message header - Edit items - Add
RO Now enter 'X-Sender' both at display and as RFC header and check
RO 'this field is an address field'
Thanks a lot, works very well!
Carsten
T Have you tried using TLS? Some ISPs only block port 25 but don't block
T TLS on port 465.
What exactly is this TLS? Never heard of it.
Is the practise of blocking other SMTP servers common among North American ISPs?
What's the sense of it? Sympatico says it's to protect their customers,
Hello TBUDL,
received the announcement from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that TB 2.04.4 is
there. huh?
It's bad in three ways:
- the recent build is 2.04.7 (or later)
- it's HTML-only
- it's bad HTML (that Firefox displays correct, though)
To the last point:
the mail's title is put using a weird
I just upgraded to 2.04.7 from CE. My view modes no longer work. I'm stuck in
my Subject Received mode and can't change to any other mode! Not from the
menu, not with the Shift-Alt hot keys, and regardless of folder.
Anybody know what gives?
jon
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Options, Preferences, Protection, Anti-spam. Add. Select the Bayesit plug-in. I
then get an Error window saying It seems that something is present in your
registry, but it is not enough or corrupted!
Huh?? This has to be in the running for the worst error message award...
jon
--
[EMAIL
Hello Carsten,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 6:09:45 PM, Carsten Guthardt-Schulz wrote:
CGS What exactly is this TLS?
Transport Layer Security
Google is your friend! See http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2246.html.
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build
Hello Thomas,
On 25 Feb 2004 at 23:41:17 +0700 GMT [17:41 CET] you wrote:
TF TB prouds itself for RFC-compliance. I have never received a mail
TF without a From header, so I cannot confirm this is the culprit.
I get quite a few spams with nothing of pretty much everything. Take
this one as an
Hello rich,
rg What do ALT-0 ALT-1 do?
It toggles between non-threaded view and thread by references.
--
Cheers,
Andre
L'homme est né libre,
et partout il est dans les fers.
Current version is 2.04.04 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
dAniel hAhler wrote:
received the announcement from [EMAIL PROTECTED] that TB 2.04.4 is
there. huh?
Interesting...
RitLab's announcement scored a 6.5 with SpamAssassin:
Spam detection software, running on the system , has identified this
incoming email as possible spam. The original message
Hello jwayne,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 6:19:17 PM, jwayne wrote:
j I'm stuck in
j my Subject Received mode and can't change to any other mode!
In the main window what is selected under View | Global View Mode?
If it is something other than No View Mode, then you have a global
view
On Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:59:33 -0600, Greg Strong wrote:
| I am no expert on View Modes (VM), but I'll give it a shot.
| As I understand it you have 3 places where you can apply VM.
| 1 Main Window
| 2 View Folder FolderName of AcctName
| 3 Browse Ticker Messages
I actually found out 2 more
John Rakestraw, [JR] wrote:
JR A change of employment and recent developments in TB! have
JR led me to try out IMAP. I set up a new IMAP account in TB!, and
JR things are working pretty well, except
JR The filters are not working as expected. I understand that
JR automatic filtering of
Hello Arjan,
Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 7:09:42 PM, Arjan de Groot wrote:
... snip
| 3 Browse Ticker Messages
... snip
AdG 6 Browse Ticker Messages
6 = 3
--
Best Regards,
Greg Strong
Using The Bat! v2.04.7 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Hello TBUDL,
Should the view modes selected be the same without regard to how you
look at them?
View Modes in Option | Preferences | Messages | VM | select VM | click
Used by ... are not the same as when in Main window Folder Properties
| column settings | Use view mode VMname or when in Main
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:14:03 -0600, Greg Strong wrote:
|3 Browse Ticker Messages
... snip
6 Browse Ticker Messages
6 = 3
Oh shoot!
(Next step: why does KPF block incoming mail from local
network?)
Arjan
--
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
Dear Ken,
@25-Feb-2004, 17:05 -0600 (25-Feb 23:05 UK time) ken green [K] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
The wrong version number is showing in the tail of messages on TBUDL;
it says 2.04.04 rather than 2.04.7
... snip
K Perhaps the list server isn't part of the secret announcement
K recipient
On Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 8:00:24 PM, Greg Strong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
GS Wednesday, February 25, 2004, 6:19:17 PM, jwayne wrote:
j I'm stuck in
j my Subject Received mode and can't change to any other mode!
GS In the main window what is selected under View | Global View Mode?
Yep,
Hello all,
We do not have a list rule that addresses the use of mail/spam
blocking software (like Mail Inspector) on the lists, and I don't
believe we're going to create one. This is primarily a hope to inform,
and to have this available in the list archives so that people might
see it and
70 matches
Mail list logo
