Peter Charles,
Ok, honor system, basically. That's ok, and probably easier for RITLabs to track.
--
Thanks,
David
Win][k sp4
TheBat 2.11
PM Hi David,
PM on Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:58:59 +0200GMT, you wrote:
DE On the TB web page, there is a list of prices, but there's no
DE info about what's
Hello David,
Sat, 14 Aug 2004 08:43:28 +0200 UTC David Earl wrote in message
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
DE Ok, honor system, basically. That's ok, and probably easier for
DE RITLabs to track.
It's impossible to track, which is why you call it an honor system.
--
Regards, Charles.
The Bat!
Hallo Ron,
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 16:55:32 -0400GMT (13-8-2004, 22:55 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RC does anyone have any help for my 'problems' of folders not emptying on exit?
Folders not emptying on exit can are most likely to be caused by not
checking the checkboxes for
On exit:
Remove
Dear Chris,
-- Freitag, 13. August 2004, 19:22:38:
EC Sure I can. Here it comes
Thanks for posting that, it made for very interesting reading. :-/
Which leads me to the following questions;
My pleasure :)
1. Why have the option to install more than one anti-spam plug-in?
Well
==Original message text===
From: Peter Meyns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: David Earl on TBUDL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Friday, August 13, 2004, 10:34:37 PM
Subject: TheBat Pricing
PM Hi David,
PM on Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:58:59 +0200GMT, you wrote:
DE On the TB web page, there is a
Hi tbudler,
I just did a search on google about the panda
antivirus plugin.
The only plugin I found is the 0.1 test version which seems to work
with the latest panda antivirus software.
Does someone
know if a more recent
Hi WilWilWil,
on Sat, 14 Aug 2004 12:40:20 +0200GMT, you wrote:
W Strange policy : imagine a student who has bought TB student at the beginning
W of the year, who just get his diploma ad the end of the year and has his studies
W ended... Will he get a personal use license and pay TB a second
Hello.
Can someone point out the advantages/disadvantages of using separate adress
books, or rather one adress book with several groups in it? If some people
could write how they're using the adress book(s) or groups it would give me
the right inspiration, maybe. :-)
Thanks
--
Best regards,
Hello Peter Meyns,
14-Aug-2004 14:15, you wrote:
| RandomSignature-Professional 3.2 - DEMO
| !!!You are using an illegal key! Please buy a LEGAL copy!!!
LOL!!!
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL'
On Saturday, August 14, 2004 it appears that Alexander
wrote the following in regards to Adress Book vs. Adress Book Groups:
ASK Can someone point out the advantages/disadvantages of using separate adress
ASK books, or rather one adress book with several groups in it?
Hi Alexander. I don't see
Hello:
I've been running BayesIt for a while and it works beautifully. My accuracy
right now is at 96.75%, so I guess I shouldn't complain. But out of a few hundred
messages I get a day, it misses about 10 that look like obvious spam but were marked
as not-spam. I checked the
Hallo Alexander,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:19:22 +0200GMT (14-8-2004, 14:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
ASK Can someone point out the advantages/disadvantages of using separate adress
ASK books, or rather one adress book with several groups in it? If some people
ASK could write how they're
On 8/14/2004 5:19 AM my time, Alexander wrote:
ASK Can someone point out the advantages/disadvantages of using separate adress
ASK books, or rather one adress book with several groups in it?
Hi Alexander,
I have a specific address group for contacts from my Church. One which
is separate
St:
Anyone having problems with Periodical (Mail) Checking that fails to
exactly so?
Thomas Fernandez:
No, I haven't. But I have noticed that I need to invoke check mail
for all in order to ensure that periodical mail check will occur.
I do, too. My problem is that I usually will have
St:
TB does not react to Windows Show Desktop try Windows+M
and see for yourself.
Allie Martin:
TB! disappears/minimizes here.
Andre Wichartz:
It depends on whether you have TB! set to show in the task bar.
I can confirm this. Options - Preferences - General, _check_
Do not
Alexander S. Kunz:
Options/Preferences/General - Display Connection centre - HIDE
Thanks - there is always something to learn!
--
St
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
From the TB help file:
For those who are familiar with programming, here's a handy hint:
The Bat! checks a file called TheBat.IPC which is located in the
same directory in which The Bat! executable (TheBat.exe) file is
located. Within this text file, each line represents one command
Some time around 08/06/2004 10:35:52, I think I heard Leif Gregory say:
Hello Barry,
Friday, August 6, 2004, 1:51:46 AM, you wrote:
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit059.rar
BW If I try to install this version it GPF's. Anyone else
BW experiencing this?
I don't get a GPF,
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 09:28:34 -0400 GMT [15:28 CEST] you wrote:
DJ BTW, I do not understand very well the regarding threshold
DJ parameter, can someone explain it please?
From advanced.ini:
; this number shows, how much heavier non-spam tokens than spam. It
makes some kind of guard
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
14-Aug-2004 16:17, you wrote:
exactly how do you send TB that IPC command
when TB fails to read the file that contains the request!?!
You don't send an IPC command, you use the command line which passes its
commands to the running TB instance. That is in the helpfile,
I have TB installed under Win XP. When I delete a message from the
Inbox it takes about 4 seconds for the deletion to occur. This does
not happend in any other mail folder except the Inbox. The number of
messages in the Inbox makes no difference, it always takes about 4
seconds for the deletion
Bill Woodward, [BW] wrote:
I have TB installed under Win XP. When I delete a message from the
Inbox it takes about 4 seconds for the deletion to occur. This does
not happend in any other mail folder except the Inbox. The number of
messages in the Inbox makes no difference, it always takes
Allie Martin, [AM] wrote:
Try moving the messages to a newly created folder.
That should the messages that are in the offending Inbox folder.
--
Allie Martin [List Moderator and fellow end-user]
The Bat! v2.13 Lucky Beta/5 on WinXP Pro (SP2)
. Oxymoron: Unachievable Accomplishments.
Some time around 08/14/2004 10:34:25, I think I heard Andre Wichartz say:
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 09:28:34 -0400 GMT [15:28 CEST] you wrote:
DJ BTW, I do not understand very well the regarding threshold
DJ parameter, can someone explain it please?
From advanced.ini:
; this number
Hello TBUDLers,
After losing half my msg base and my address book (Friday 13th? - no,
not really, it happened yesterday) I followed Roelof's advice on
creating fictitious accounts. I thought I was out of the woods, until
I discovered that nothing that I could do, would bring back my address
book.
St:
...exactly how do you send TB that IPC command when TB fails
to read the file that contains the request!?!
Alexander S. Kunz:
You don't send an IPC command, you use the command line which
passes its commands to the running TB instance. That is in the
helpfile, too.
Don't be too
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
14-Aug-2004 17:35, you wrote:
My point is this: For no reason, TB may at any time simply stop
looking for thebat.IPC - and thus TB won't know of the _future_
commands you send it (by the way of the command line).
Have you investigated why this is happening?
Hello St - Musaic.Net,
14-Aug-2004 16:04, you wrote:
Now, exactly how do you send TB that /EXIT command when TB fails
to read the file that contains the request!?! GREAT!
You can issue an thebat.exe /EXIT command and it will quit the
running instance of TB. You don't need the .IPC file
Alexander S. Kunz:
Have you investigated why this is happening? SysInternals
FileMon may be of help. Maybe your on-access virus scanner
blocks the file, something like that?
Funny that you ask - I am currently running FileMon here
(with an exclusive logging of thebat.IPC-accesses.
Hello DZ-Jay,
On 14 Aug 2004 at 11:30:32 -0400 GMT [17:30 CEST] you wrote:
DJ Yes, I am aware of its definition, but what I don't understand
DJ is what would be the effect of changing it to, say, 1.2 from 1.5
DJ (apart from the academic answer of making non-spam tokens a bit less
DJ heavier).
Sorry. I had assumed changing the subject would take care of that.
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 10:13:09 AM, you wrote:
AM Bill Woodward, [BW] wrote:
Thanks for any suggestions.
AM moderator
AM Note: This moderator's interjection is a note to all readers and not
AM just to the person being
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 12:27:41 PM, you wrote:
AW Hello DZ-Jay,
AW On 14 Aug 2004 at 11:30:32 -0400 GMT [17:30 CEST] you wrote:
DJ Yes, I am aware of its definition, but what I don't understand
DJ is what would be the effect of changing it to, say, 1.2 from 1.5
DJ (apart from the academic
[uncut reply with top posting to a moderator note by Bill Woodward]
...sometimes I just can't do anything but ROTFL and be glad that its not me
who is the list moderator... ;-)
--
Best regards,
Alexander
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using
This is a forwarded message
From: Jack S. LaRosa [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Allie Martin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 6:14:24 PM
Subject: Folder settings
===8==Original message text===
Hello Allie,
Wednesday, August 11, 2004, 7:55:42 AM, you wrote:
AM
Hello Peter,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:18:36 +0200 GMT
(14.08.2004, 18:18 +0200 GMT, where I live),
you wrote:
PO on Sat, 14 Aug 2004 17:23:04 +0200 (2004-08-14 17:23:04 in .nl) in the
PO message with reference
PO mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] you
PO [MM] wrote (at least in part):
MM Surely it is backed
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 1:55:04 PM, Maurice wrote:
PO This depends on settings you made on the first page of the backup
PO window. Is 'Address Books' checked? Are address books selected (use the
PO 'Choose...' button).
Maurice Like a fool, I've been accepting the default settings and never
Some time around 08/14/2004 12:34:07, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
Where do you do the setting???
In a file called ADVANCED.INI in the BayesIt working directory, or in the TB!
installation directory.
--
Powered by The Bat! v.2.12.00,
Hindered by MS Windows 2000 v.5.0 build 2195
Hello Plan9,
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 2:08:14 PM, you wrote:
P Nope. After I read Peter's reply I checked my backup settings. And
P guess what? I quickly changed the default address book and performed
P another backup.
P Is there someway to change the default permanently in the backup tool?
Some time around 08/14/2004 12:27:41, I think I heard Andre Wichartz say:
Assume a word orccurs equally often in spam and non-spam mails. If you
set the value to 1 the word will get a spam propability of 0.5. If you
set it to a higher value the word will get something lower than 0.5.
Words in
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 2:37:03 PM, you wrote:
DJ Some time around 08/14/2004 12:34:07, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
Where do you do the setting???
DJ In a file called ADVANCED.INI in the BayesIt working directory, or
DJ in the TB! installation directory.
Not found anywhere on
Hello All,
I have been following this thread since I have been having some
problems too. I was using the old version (0.4gm) until I upgraded to
the current version of TB.
The settings I used to use don't seem to work any more and I either
get everything filtered as junk or nothing is filtered
Some time around 08/14/2004 15:47:24, I think I heard MikeD say:
The settings I used to use don't seem to work any more and I either
get everything filtered as junk or nothing is filtered as junk. I
trained it with about 2000 spam and 2000 ham messages and still no
joy. I have tried low
Some time around 08/14/2004 14:54:38, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 2:37:03 PM, you wrote:
DJ Some time around 08/14/2004 12:34:07, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say:
Where do you do the setting???
DJ In a file called ADVANCED.INI in the BayesIt working
Hello rich,
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 5:15:38 PM, you wrote:
rg How, in your third line above, did you enter the 2 handles to begin
rg with? Did you use ANY keystroke(s) at all to indicate to TB! that it
rg had correctly guessed the correct email address by it's handle?
rg Once the TO: line had
Hello TBUDL,
on Thu, 12. Aug 2004 at 22:54:24 +0200 Alexander S. Kunz wrote:
Bayesfilter Bayesit!
I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt.
However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the
bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of
In the address book, you can put additional email addresses, one per
line, but is there a way to access the second, third email addresses
while creating a new message w/o having to click on the To: and have
the secondary address to to the BCC field?
--
Plan9 @ 2004-Aug-14 2:08:14 PM
Tools, Restore mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there someway to change the default permanently in the backup
tool?
I changed mine a while ago and the proper address books are still
checked.
--
Chris
Quoting when replying to this message is good for your karma.
Using
I know there is a keyboard shortcut F4 to quote selected text in a
reply, but I do not see there is one for quoting and replying to all.
Is there a way to add a keyboard shortcut or is there one?
thanks
crit
--
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ Ctz Consulting ]-=
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 7:35:40 PM, Chris wrote:
Is there someway to change the default permanently in the backup
tool?
Chris I changed mine a while ago and the proper address books are still
Chris checked.
You are correct. Seems to have taken a restart of TheBat! for my new
selection to
Hello DZ-Jay,
Saturday, August 14, 2004, 5:31:59 PM, you wrote:
DJ Some time around 08/14/2004 15:47:24, I think I heard MikeD say:
The settings I used to use don't seem to work any more and I either
get everything filtered as junk or nothing is filtered as junk. I
trained it with about 2000
Hello DZ-Jay,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 14:42:17 -0400 GMT (15/08/2004, 01:42 +0700 GMT),
DZ-Jay wrote:
Assume a word orccurs equally often in spam and non-spam mails. If you
set the value to 1 the word will get a spam propability of 0.5. If you
set it to a higher value the word will get something
Hello Critter,
On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:31:45 -0400 GMT (15/08/2004, 02:31 +0700 GMT),
Critter wrote:
C In the address book, you can put additional email addresses, one per
C line, but is there a way to access the second, third email addresses
C while creating a new message w/o having to click on
Hello dAniel hAhler,
15-Aug-2004 00:28, you wrote:
I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt.
However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the
bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of course).
But you cannot reflect real bucket
53 matches
Mail list logo
