Re[2]: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Dick Hoogendoorn
Hello Peter, On Friday, June 10, 2005 at 23:56:22 GMT +0200 (which was 23:56:22 where I live), Peter Palmreuther wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of spamalot: Hello Dick, On Friday, June 10, 2005 at 10:44:52 PM Dick [DH] wrote: *erm* Maybe I'm dense and therefore don't

Anyway to *hack* threads view from To: NAME To: Address?

2005-06-11 Thread Victor B. Gonzalez
Hello, Is it possible to sort threads by TO: ADDRESS and NOT TO: NAME? Anyway to hack such a feature? Any work-around just in case? -- Best regards, Victor B. Gonzalez Using The Bat! v3.5.25 Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

Re: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Dick, Saturday, June 11, 2005, 9:54:51 AM, you wrote: DH So, the (sometimes complicated) email client modifications you have DH to do with most of the anti-spam tools (AFIK not with Spampal, that has DH something similar), is not required with this new program. So, if I would install it

Re[2]: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Dick Hoogendoorn
Hello Mark, On Saturday, June 11, 2005 at 11:25:20 GMT +0200 (which was 11:25:20 where I live), Mark Partous wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of spamalot: Hello Dick, Saturday, June 11, 2005, 9:54:51 AM, you wrote: DH So, the (sometimes complicated) email client

Re: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Philip, On 10-06-2005 19:51, you [PS] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: PS I find it odd that you think because a few people have problems the PS system is flawed. SpamPal gives you more tools for combatting spam than any of the plugins. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter

Re: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Peter, On 10-06-2005 23:56, you [PP] wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: PP 1) calculate spam probability by using a word database 2) calculate PP a fuzzy hash and compare it against a central database PP ??? If so: 1) some/many of us use in form of BayesIT or Bayes PP Filter Plugin plus

Re: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Peter Palmreuther
Hello Dick, On Saturday, June 11, 2005 at 9:54:51 AM Dick [DH] wrote: [SpamExperts] So what's the 'brand new' about it? And what's worth 25.000 ¤ copying SA? DH It's not based on SA but Spambayes (this SpamExpert program DH is also written in Python). I didn't intend to say it's SA-based,

Re[2]: multiple mail clients (was: spamalot)

2005-06-11 Thread Philip Storry
Hello Mark, Friday, June 10, 2005, 7:19:54 PM, you wrote: MP Except for the very first time I haven't tried the plugins. They may be MP efficient for those that use one mailer only, but for me it's far easier to MP let all of them share the same K9 base, instead of training a plugin for each MP

Re: multiple mail clients (was: spamalot)

2005-06-11 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Philip, Saturday, June 11, 2005, 2:17:52 PM, you wrote: PS Why are you running multiple mail clients? PS In both cases, it was just for evaluation purposes. To see if there's PS something that they do (or do better) which can drag me away from The PS Bat!, really. So I ran them alongside

MailTicker only active on non-virtual folders?

2005-06-11 Thread Martin Schuster
Hello tbudl, I just wondered why my mailticker doesn't open anymore since I switched to the 3.5.x versions. I have one folder unread that collects all unread mails from all relevant folders, and I used to have that folder watched by MailTicker only. Worked fine. Not anymore. Only when I switch

Re[3]: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread ritlabs . list
G K9 running here. Gets almost all SPAM. Yes, K9 is so awesome that I donated. I can see the attraction of an all-under-one-roof solution, but I continue to use K9. The plugins seem such a fiddle. I would recommend it to anyone using POP3. K9, with good/bad databases of about 40,000 words each:

Hungarian manual

2005-06-11 Thread Vili
I don't know if there is Hungarian users here, but it wont hurt: Following v1.62, the Hungarian PDF manual for TB! v2.12 is ready. (v3.0.1.33 is on its was as is v3.5.25) Users may download it from www.thebat.hu , 311 pages (so think before hit the Print button :) I hope it is

Very strange problem on character set in header subjet on TB 3.5.25- Réponse à l?annonce

2005-06-11 Thread WilWilWil
Hello, Since I use TB (2.12, and after, TB 3.01) I had no problem when I paste the french text below copy from winword in the header subject : Réponse à l’annonce I will have to downgrade my TB to 3.01.33 because in TB 3.5 and 3.5.25, the quote character ’ is

Re: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Mark Partous
Hello Dick, Saturday, June 11, 2005, 12:06:00 PM, you wrote: DH I think, if you want to have it running before K9, you have to add DH the K9 program to the list of Intercepted e-Mail applications. In that DH case it will intercept all K9 POP3 calls and process the email before DH passing them

Re: Very strange problem on character set in header subjet on TB 3.5.25- Réponse à l’annonce

2005-06-11 Thread Chris
WilWilWil @ 2005-Jun-11 4:40:55 PM Very strange problem on character set in header subjet on TB 3.5.25- Réponse à l?annonce mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I will have to downgrade my TB to 3.01.33 because in TB 3.5 and 3.5.25, the quote character ’ is replace by a bad character when I send the

[The Bat!] Simple regex in macro help please

2005-06-11 Thread admin
Why will this macro with regex not work on the message example given below it? %SUBJ= %SUBJ=subscribe %SETPATTREGEXP=submitted by\s*?^(.*?) \((.*?)\) Email: %SUBPATT=1 Name: %SUBPATT=2 quote Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by Miss Helen X ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) on

Re: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Maurice McAdam
Dear Mark, On Saturday, June 11, 2005, 6:52:03 PM, which was 8:46:43 PM where I am, you wrote: G K9 running here. Gets almost all SPAM. rlmc Yes, K9 is so awesome that I donated. I can see the attraction of an rlmc all-under-one-roof solution, but I continue to use K9. The plugins rlmc seem

Re[2]: Very strange problem on character set in header subjet on TB 3.5.25- Réponse à l?annonce

2005-06-11 Thread WilWilWil
C This probably shows my ignorance of French, but do you have to use the C curled ’? Could you instead use the straight '? C This is not the right solution; that would involve proper Unicode C support in both The Bat! and the recipient's client. I can't choose straight or curved '. I just use

Re: Hungarian manual

2005-06-11 Thread John Phillips
Hi Vili, On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, at 21:14:06 [GMT+0200] (which was Sun, 5:14:06 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Following v1.62, the Hungarian PDF manual for TB! v2.12 is ready. (v3.0.1.33 is on its was as is v3.5.25) Users may download it from www.thebat.hu , 311 pages (so think

Re: Very strange problem on character set in header subjet on TB 3.5.25- Réponse à l?annonce

2005-06-11 Thread Chris
WilWilWil @ 2005-Jun-11 5:19:47 PM Very strange problem on character set in header subjet on TB 3.5.25- Réponse à l?annonce mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't choose straight or curved '. I just use the AZERTY keyboard and use the ' on the key 4 (without shift key pushed) when I write my text in

Re: [The Bat!] Simple regex in macro help please

2005-06-11 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo admin, On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 22:09:02 +0100GMT (11-6-2005, 23:09 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MG Why will this macro with regex not work on the message example given below it? Because you omitted something, you've set the regexp you want to use, but you didn't tell TB on what it should

Re[2]: [The Bat!] Simple regex in macro help please

2005-06-11 Thread Marten Gallagher
MG %SUBJ= MG %SUBJ=subscribe MG %SETPATTREGEXP=submitted by\s*?^(.*?) \((.*?)\) %RegExpBlindMatch='%Text'%- MG Email: %SUBPATT=1 MG Name: %SUBPATT=2 So insert %RegExpBlindMatch='%Text'%- where I did it and it'll work. Oh... silly me... ...but it is my First ever attempt at a regex macro!

Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.

2005-06-11 Thread John Phillips
Hi Marck, On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, at 00:26:03 [GMT+0100] (which was 9:26:03 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: No, but there's one missing on the %FROM= line Should that go on the end of the line? And why? Note the %- I have in the macro on the %CC line. Why doesn't it work? (See original

archiving emails in pdf

2005-06-11 Thread SD
Hi, Is there any way to export emails in format that preserves/has some look-n-feel with embedded attachements. I would like archives my all mails in single pdf file. Any suggestions, SD -- Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL'

Further to that regex/macro query

2005-06-11 Thread admin
Now the RegEx to extract the name and email address. %FROMNAME= %FROM= %SUBJ= %SUBJ=subscribe %SETPATTREGEXP=submitted by\s*?^(.*?) \((.*?)\) %RegExpBlindMatch='%Text'%- Email: %SUBPATT='2' Name: %SUBPATT='1' Source: Web Page Enquiry %FROM=%SUBPATT='2' Now what I want to do is set the resulting

Only five message go from a queue at a time

2005-06-11 Thread admin
If I generate a number of messages that sit in the outbox queue and then send them, only five of them go, until the next auto send and receive and then another five go and so on. Is this a preference setting or something? -- Marten Gallagher Annery Kiln Web Design www.annerykiln.co.uk Using

Re: [The Bat!] Simple regex in macro help please

2005-06-11 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi Marten Gallagher, On Saturday, June 11, 2005, you wrote: I can't find anywhere where it says what the %- and the #- things do at the end of lines... They get rid of new lines (at least %- does, not sure about #-). For example, in a template, put ===8 ==8

Re[2]: Hungarian manual

2005-06-11 Thread Vili
JP Is there an English manual anywhere? I have read on this or the beta list, that they are working on the English 3.5 manual. But the English FAQ also have a PDF version, that I saw. -- Vili Current version is 3.5.25 | 'Using TBUDL'

Re: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Jan Rifkinson
On Saturday, June 11, 2005 it appears that Dick Hoogendoorn wrote the following in regards to spamalot: DH [snip] you need to train this DH program by moving a Spam message from the Ham List to the Spam DH List... [/snip] Hi Dick. Doesn't identifying email as ham or spam do this essentially or

Re[2]: spamalot

2005-06-11 Thread Dick Hoogendoorn
Hello Jan, On Sunday, June 12, 2005 at 19:52:08 GMT -0400 (which was 1:52:08 where I live), Jan Rifkinson wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of spamalot: On Saturday, June 11, 2005 it appears that Dick Hoogendoorn wrote the following in regards to spamalot: DH [snip] you need

Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.

2005-06-11 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear John, @11-Jun-2005, 09:48 +1000 (11-Jun 00:48 UK time) John Phillips [JP] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: No, but there's one missing on the %FROM= line JP Should that go on the end of the line? Yes. JP And why? Because it stops that line from adding a line feed at its end. Any

Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.

2005-06-11 Thread Robin Anson
John Phillips On Sat 11 June 2005, 09:48:59 +1000, you wrote: Should that go on the end of the line? And why? Yes, because the the way TB! macros work is that they are in the template that is inserted in to the body of your message. The output of the first three macros appears in the header

Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.

2005-06-11 Thread John Phillips
Hi Robin, On Sun, 12 Jun 2005, at 11:33:59 [GMT+1000] (which was 11:33:59 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Does that make (any sort of) sense? Err... sort off! g -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 I can please

Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.

2005-06-11 Thread Chris
John Phillips @ 2005-Jun-11 10:54:13 PM Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc. mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Does that make (any sort of) sense? Err... sort off! g Let me try then. Macro are simply fancy ways of substituting text (for the most part). For example, if you created a template

Re: Only five message go from a queue at a time

2005-06-11 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello admin, On Sat, 11 Jun 2005 23:54:11 +0100 GMT (12/06/2005, 05:54 +0700 GMT), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: aacu If I generate a number of messages that sit in the outbox aacu queue and then send them, only aacu five of them go, until the next auto send and receive and aacu then another five go

Signature Oddity... [Was Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.]

2005-06-11 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi John Phillips, On Saturday, June 11, 2005, you wrote: I can please only one person per day. Today is not your day. Tomorrow I noticed this at the bottom of your signature. I think there is either a mistake here, or in your signature file. I think the full quote is something like: I can

Re: Signature Oddity... [Was Re: Getting rid of blkank lines in new posts, etc.]

2005-06-11 Thread John Phillips
Hi Jonathan, On Sat, 11 Jun 2005, at 23:44:04 [GMT-0500] (which was Sun, 14:44:04 Australian Eastern Time) you wrote: Are you using a cookie file? Just a downloaded cookie file - too lazy to edit! g -- John Phillips, Sydney, Australia Using The Bat! v3.5.25 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600