Re[2]: One time encryption

2008-09-18 Thread Dan Lester
Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 4:15:40 PM, you wrote: Hi On Wednesday 17 September 2008 at 8:13:23 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Lester wrote: When they write the check they cross out the phone number on it Phone number? On a cheque? Most US banks put it on by default. In the past,

Re: Re[2]: Two TheBat processes

2008-09-18 Thread Leonard Berkowitz
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:07 PM, Dan Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Wednesday, September 17, 2008, 1:15:26 PM, you wrote: Recently, I have noticed two TheBat processes at the bottom of the screen. If I try to close either one, the other will be closed as well. I sometimes get that, usually

Re[4]: Two TheBat processes

2008-09-18 Thread Dan Lester
Thursday, September 18, 2008, 6:58:38 AM, you wrote: Do you think this is a Vista problem or an issue with TheBat!? With whom did you raise it? I use Vista Basic Business (or whatever it is called). When I upgraded to Vista, Home Premium was not possible for me. I forget the reason. I don't

Re: One time encryption

2008-09-18 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 18 September 2008 at 1:46:19 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Lester wrote: Phone number? On a cheque? Most US banks put it on by default. Fair enough. We don't get that in the UK. My phone number is private and not the bank's or the payee's business unless I decide

Re: Two TheBat processes

2008-09-18 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 18 September 2008 at 2:36:03 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Lester wrote: I don't think it is Vista related, since others have reported it here too. But can't swear what OS they're on. Maybe if others have it on non-Vista OS they could report it. As per my signature:-

Re[2]: One time encryption

2008-09-18 Thread Dan Lester
My last msg in this thread, comments below as required. Thursday, September 18, 2008, 7:36:43 AM, you wrote: Most US banks put it on by default. Fair enough. We don't get that in the UK. My phone number is private and not the bank's or the payee's business unless I decide otherwise. Of

Re[2]: Two TheBat processes

2008-09-18 Thread Dan Lester
Thursday, September 18, 2008, 7:53:32 AM, you wrote: Hi On Thursday 18 September 2008 at 2:36:03 PM, in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Dan Lester wrote: I don't think it is Vista related, since others have reported it here too. But can't swear what OS they're on. Maybe if others have it on

Re[3]: Two TheBat processes

2008-09-18 Thread Dan Lester
Thursday, September 18, 2008, 8:20:17 AM, you wrote: The processes pane of my task manager currently shows just one instance of thebat.exe. The applications pane has two The Bat! entries (plus one Edit Mail Message). I now see the two applications as well, despite there being only one

Re[4]: Two TheBat processes

2008-09-18 Thread Dan Lester
Thursday, September 18, 2008, 8:27:24 AM, you wrote: Replying to my own message, but noted one added possible clue for developers. Clicking on the real button does what is expected, restoring minimized window, or minimizing the window, etc. Clicking on the greyed out or false button does

Re: Auto filtering of incoming mail

2008-09-18 Thread Jon Polish
On Monday, September 15, 2008, 4:48:48 AM, Stefan Tanurkov wrote: ST Hello Jon, JP I sent the files as instructed, but have not heard back. Did you JP receive them? ST Yes I did. Please excuse me for answering so late - I had to ST resolve some local problems last week... Any updates? I

Re: One time encryption

2008-09-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Jernej, On Wed, 17 Sep 2008 22:19:08 +0200 GMT (18/09/2008, 03:19 +0700 GMT), Jernej Simončič wrote: True. But the eavesdropper needs to have physical access to the appropriate cable at least once, while email can be hacked remotely. JS Which is much easier to get than you imagine -

Re: One time encryption

2008-09-18 Thread Gene Brown
On Thursday, September 18, 2008, 12:37:05 PM, you wrote: Yes, anything is possible for a dedicated criminal or legal agency. My point was the physical access, which means somebody has to be there. With hacking on the internet, the criminal can be anywhere in the world. Sure, but is it worth

Re: Re[4]: Two TheBat processes

2008-09-18 Thread Leonard Berkowitz
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Dan Lester [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thursday, September 18, 2008, 6:58:38 AM, you wrote: Do you think this is a Vista problem or an issue with TheBat!? With whom did you raise it? I use Vista Basic Business (or whatever it is called). When I upgraded to

Re: One time encryption

2008-09-18 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Gene, On Thu, 18 Sep 2008 16:31:07 -0400 GMT (19/09/2008, 03:31 +0700 GMT), Gene Brown wrote: Yes, anything is possible for a dedicated criminal or legal agency. My point was the physical access, which means somebody has to be there. With hacking on the internet, the criminal can be

Tbot-subscribe: question (OT)

2008-09-18 Thread Luc
Good evening list, Yesterday i sent a request to subscribe to the Tbot list... haven't heard back ... is it still active? -- Best regards, Luc Using the best e-mail client: The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600), version

Re: One time encryption

2008-09-18 Thread Gene Brown
On Thursday, September 18, 2008, 8:45:11 PM, you wrote: Stealing credit card information is a million-dollar business. However, even in that business they try to be efficient. It is much more efficient to steal this information while being online than having to physically go to tap every fax