Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 01:15:38 +0200, Marek Mikus wrote: What wonders me is why there are three different macro's (two of which don't seem to work properly) that arguably serve the same purpose. Typical known redundancy :-) %HDRheader returns current message header %HDRheader=text and %ADDHEADER

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Sat, 2009-06-13, Arjan de Groot wrote: I have re-examined the help file but I still fail to see the relevance of the %HDR macro's. Lots of regular RFC headers have a - in them (Like Message-ID and In-Reply-To) and a macro that can't handle it seems to be a bit superfluous. My guess is

Re: Recipient receives red x instead of image

2009-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Regina, On Mon, 1 Jun 2009 11:05:58 -0500 GMT (01/Jun/09, 23:05 +0700 GMT), Regina King wrote: Who do you mean by recipients? People you send messages to, or you (and others) receiving messages? RK Recipients, meaning people I send messages to. Thanks They will

Re: HTML formatting problem

2009-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Lawrence, On Wed, 3 Jun 2009 10:09:29 -0500 GMT (03/Jun/09, 22:09 +0700 GMT), Lawrence Johnson wrote: LJ The monthly newsletter I receive from my township has some formatting LJ problem's in TB! I verified that the HTML displays perfectly in a real LJ browser. I also imported the email

Re: Quick Template: No wordwrap

2009-06-13 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello simbabque, On Sat, 6 Jun 2009 16:30:10 +0200 GMT (06/Jun/09, 21:30 +0700 GMT), simbabque wrote: s Another question about the quick templates: s I need a line of words, beginning with Tags: and followed by a list s of tags for a photo upload to flickr. The line must not wrap or break s

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Sat, 13 Jun 2009 09:07:42 -0700, Bill McQuillan wrote: My guess is that the %HDR macros were the first attempt to allow this capabiity, but when it was discovered that the parser couldn't handle an embedded - the %ADDHEADER and %SETHEADER macros were created which used a quoted string for the

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, June 13, 2009, Arjan de Groot wrote: I have re-examined the help file but I still fail to see the relevance of the %HDR macro's. Lots of regular RFC headers have a - in them (Like Message-ID and In-Reply-To) and a macro that can't handle it seems to be a bit superfluous.

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Saturday, June 13, 2009, Arjan de Groot wrote: My guess is that the %HDR macros were the first attempt to allow this capabiity, but when it was discovered that the parser couldn't handle an embedded - the %ADDHEADER and %SETHEADER macros were created which used a quoted string for the

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On zaterdag 13 juni 2009, 9:54:10 PM Marek Mikus wrote, You can not change Message-ID and there is no need to change In-Reply-To header which includes Message-ID of replied message. Let's not go nit-picking over which headers need changing or not. (X-Rogue is a header that doesn't need adding

Re: Problem with %HDR macro

2009-06-13 Thread Arjan de Groot
On Saturday June 13 2009, 9:57:51 PM Marek Mikus wrote, it is known that %HDR macro doesn't allow special chars and this note is included in help. I've been wondering about that. What is meant by special characters? Does there exist A Definition Of special characters? I don't know. Personally