Hello all, Saturday, June 13, 2009, Arjan de Groot wrote: > I have re-examined the help file but I still fail to see the > relevance of the %HDR macro's. Lots of regular RFC headers have a > "-" in them (Like Message-ID and In-Reply-To) and a macro that > can't handle it seems to be a bit superfluous. What's more, > refering to them in the Header Definition Window is IMHO plain > misleading because it leads users into the wrong direction.
You can not change Message-ID and there is no need to change In-Reply-To header which includes Message-ID of replied message. I don't know what You really want, but developers will not remove any macro in future versions regarding to backward compatibility. > The function of the %ADDHeader macro is clear to me now. But I > think the name is a bit misleading (ADDTOHeader should have been > more apt) and I consider the double "Value" I encountered to be a > bug. no, ADDHEADER adds value to header, while SETHEADER changes header, there is no bug here. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 4.2.4 under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 3 with MyMacros,XMP,AnotherMacros, AntispamSniper v 3.2.0.6 Notebook Toshiba, Core2 Duo 1.83 GHz, 4 GB RAM ________________________________________________ Current version is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
