Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

2009-08-28 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Thu, 2009-08-27, Thomas Fernandez wrote: Hello MFPA, On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:09:37 +0100 GMT (28/Aug/09, 2:09 AM +0700 GMT), MFPA wrote: If you prefer to the Windows standard then (no, I'm not going to say use the Windows editor g) you can hit the End key. It will place the cursor

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

2009-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Bill, On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:25:01 -0700 GMT (28/Aug/09, 13:25 PM +0700 GMT), Bill McQuillan wrote: I didn't even know that, but it will make Bill happy. :-) BM It might if v2.11 had such an option! :-) Ah, forgot about your version number. Sorry. BM Regardless, there are many other

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

2009-08-28 Thread MFPA
Hi On Friday 28 August 2009 at 7:25:01 AM, in mid:469231774.20090827232...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote: Regardless, there are many other reasons I prefer the Windows editor. And for the issue of not wrapping the final output when I send, when I am finished editing and proofing a

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

2009-08-28 Thread MFPA
Hi On Thursday 27 August 2009 at 8:53:46 PM, in mid:369449679.20090827215...@nosuchdomain.com, Peter Meyns wrote: This is a good one for April fools! :D Not sure I understand how it would be good for April Fools, since that setting really exists and has that functionality. -- Best

Re: Why won't the developers add an option for allowing a single carriage return for MicroEd? (with auto-format enabled)

2009-08-28 Thread Bill McQuillan
On Fri, 2009-08-28, MFPA wrote: Hi On Friday 28 August 2009 at 7:25:01 AM, in mid:469231774.20090827232...@pobox.com, Bill McQuillan wrote: Regardless, there are many other reasons I prefer the Windows editor. And for the issue of not wrapping the final output when I send, when I am

TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Susanne
Hi, I've noticed this ever since I upgraded to version 4 and it's not a constant problem, but often enough that it's really annoying. When I switch from one message to the next, or from one folder to another, or hit delete (or pretty much any command), it can take up to 10 seconds before TB

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Friday, August 28, 2009, 19:28:48, Susanne wrote: Could it be a software conflict, and if it is, how do I track it down without uninstalling everything else? I suggest you first look at disk activity while TB is switching between messages, and also try compressing the message base through

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Susanne
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 10:42:36 AM,jernej.listso...@ena.si wrote: I suggest you first look at disk activity while TB is switching between messages, and also try compressing the message base through Folder - Maintainance Centre. I do this every time I close TB. Also, how many

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Jernej Simončič
On Friday, August 28, 2009, 20:46:01, Susanne wrote: Many, about 100.000. This might be a problem, especially if you use any kind of threading. I noticed that TB gets significantly slower (from almost instantly to over 2 seconds) when switching to folders that contain more than ~15.000

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Jens Franik
Guten Tag Susanne, am Freitag, 28. August 2009 um 19:28 schrieben Sie: it can take up to 10 seconds before TB responds. I have The Bat! inside a virtualBox Machine and i see this more than detailed - it happens, if the Folder has more than some tousands of eMails stored, if you try the same in

PGP encrypted and signed message cannot be decrypted in TB! if you don't have sender's public key to check signature

2009-08-28 Thread MFPA
Hi Can anybody confirm that a PGP encrypted and signed message cannot be decrypted in TB! if you don't have the sender's public key to check the signature? Also, if somebody pastes their key into a message body and then clearsigns the message, TB! will not import the key to your keyring if

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Susanne
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 12:01:27 PM,jernej.listso...@ena.si wrote: This might be a problem, especially if you use any kind of threading. I noticed that TB gets significantly slower (from almost instantly to over 2 seconds) when switching to folders that contain more than ~15.000

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread MFPA
Hi On Saturday 29 August 2009 at 1:37:20 AM, in mid:146451243.20090828173...@gmail.com, Susanne wrote: What makes me wonder is why TB doesn't show up as a running program in the Task Manager anymore. Shows up twice in mine. You want to borrow one? -- Best regards MFPA

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Susanne
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 5:46:56 PM,expires2...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: Shows up twice in mine. You want to borrow one? Sure! Send it on over! *g* I've ruthlessly thrown out a bunch of mail that I'll most likely never miss (am an email pack rat, apparently) and things seem a bit speedier. Or

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Jim Kyle
Test for On--- On Friday, August 28, 2009, at 7:59:55 PM, Susanne wrote: I've ruthlessly thrown out a bunch of mail that I'll most likely never miss (am an email pack rat, apparently) and things seem a bit speedier. FWIW, when you get that (not responding) tag in the Task Manager, it means

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello Susanne, On Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:59:55 -0700 GMT (29/Aug/09, 7:59 AM +0700 GMT), Susanne wrote: S Is there actually a limit to how many messages TB S can hold without getting slowed down? It's not the number of messages but the size, if I am not mistaken. Also I had the same problem with

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Susanne
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 7:47:05 PM,j...@jimkyle.com wrote: but it's also possible that your hard disk is preparing for forced retirement in the not too distant future! I sure hope not, since this is a fairly new computer, but if it happens, I'll have daily back-ups. Since it's

Re: TB lagging?

2009-08-28 Thread Susanne
Hi, Friday, August 28, 2009, 8:11:03 PM,thomas.gm...@gmx.net wrote: So, you can exclude the mail folder from the on-access scan. I'll check into that and see if my free AVG has advanced settings for that! Oh, and the limit for messages.tbb is 2 GB. TB! will send you a warning when you