Richard,
Sunday, February 11, 2007, 8:51:24 PM, you wrote:
RW I'm planning on buying a Mac in the not too distant future too and there
RW are just two Windows programmes that I couldn't do without which are my
RW Diary programme and TB!. I plan on using Parallels to be able to run
RW them both.
Chris,
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 12:51:32 AM, you wrote:
CW Try exporting to a Unix mailbox.
I'm starting the process of exporting folders, and it looks like I'll
have to do them one by one. However, I'm stumped on the format. When I
select export to unix, it doesn't select the file
Sunday, February 11, 2007, 12:37:02 PM, you wrote:
W The name of a file doesn't change the contents of the
W file. In this case, an extension isn't necessary. On the
W OSX side, the import process wants the files to be in a
W single directory, and the files are read in a separate
W file selector
Chris,
I'll give that a try. I'm going to the Apple store shortly (on a
pre-buying visit, and will ask them to check from their end.
--
Rick
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 12:51:32 AM, you wrote:
CW Richard H. Stoddard @ 2007-2-02 5:39:44 AM Exporting to Apple
CW mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED
My preference is obviously to stick to TB! as well, but other family
members want to make the switch. If the import doesn't work, I can
obviously set them up to run in parallel, but would prefer to not have
to use Windows if I don't have to so they don't have to worry as much
about AV apps,
Elaine,
Saturday, February 3, 2007, 9:13:51 AM, you wrote:
E Using an export to Unix you can import the unix
E mail into AppleMail if you decide to go that
E route. I have decided to use AppleMail only as a
E backup mail program and removed the mail I had
E transferred there.
Thanks for the
Greetings,
My and daughter wife have finally convinced me to buy them a new Apple
computer. I know we can run TB! on it using third-party software, but
is there a way to export mailboxes and the address books so they can
be imported into Apple's mail program? (Life would be so much easier
if TB!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Greetings,
I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and
all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was
there when I installed the latest version, since I also use K-9, which
catches almost all spam. I
Roelof,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 8:35:28 AM, you wrote:
RO The BayesIt plug-in is no longer included. It can be downloaded
RO separately from:
RO http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.msi
Thanks. I guess I should read release notes more thoroughly. I don't
depend on BayesIt
Alexander,
Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:30:17 PM, you wrote:
ASK Are you sure it is a false positive, ie. a legitimate message being
ASK falsely classified as spam?
Definitely - I check the log daily, and once in awhile something gets
tagged. It happens so rarely it isn't a problem, especially
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thomas,
Monday, November 27, 2006, 6:53:54 PM, you wrote:
TF In the past, users (including myself) reported that not everything
TF would be restored (some settings and the addressbook were
TF missing), I don't know about the current version.
I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I want to use nicknames (handles) in my default templates for new
messages. I've tried (in account properties) to edit the default
template by replacing %TOFNAME with either %TONICKNAME or %TOHANDLE.
However, in both cases I get a blank space and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Marck,
MDP You want the AB macro set to do this with, since the Handle is an
MDP attribute of the Address book entry rather than a function of the
MDP addressee. %ABtoHandle does the job admirably.
Works like a charm - thanks. But I don't suppose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Marck,
Friday, November 10, 2006, 8:44:25 PM, you wrote:
MDP It is at this stage I usually bail out and hit one of the lesser
MDP used AB fields - like %ABtoBusPager or something or %ABtoPrefix.
MDP I don't use TB to address real mail so I never
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Thanks to all who've replied. One of these will likely work for me.
The main reason I want this to work is that for some people I want a
more formal address but an informal salutation. I'll test these
possibilities after a few more cups of coffee.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Perry,
Tuesday, October 31, 2006, 7:20:19 PM, you wrote:
PN I think I'll hold off on submitting the wish until others have had
PN a chance to weigh in though.
I support it wholeheartedly. I have two main accounts and my wife has
one, and we do
Saturday, October 28, 2006, 5:41:02 AM, you wrote:
M Out of curiosity, was this previously on by default? I notice it is
M enabled on some (mainly older) accounts but disabled on others,
M including newly-created.
It was enabled on my older accounts but not the newer ones. To be
honest, I don't
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
When I receive a PGP/GPG-signed message, there is the icon in the
upper right which can be clicked to verify the signature. Most such
messages then begin with the following:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
However, I've noticed some have the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Chris,
Friday, October 27, 2006, 5:00:32 AM, you wrote:
CW Richard H. Stoddard @ 2006-10-26 9:53:51 AM
CW PGP-signed messages mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
However, I've noticed some have the icon, presumably indicating it's
been signed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mica,
Friday, October 27, 2006, 12:00:52 AM, you wrote:
MM Shortly said and simplest, Bat still cannot handle properly such
MM type of PGP/GPG signature, and it is already a very long time
MM present and not fixed problem, so I suppose it is
Roelof,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 2:29:42 PM, you wrote:
RO Over here TB keeps the log trimmed down to 10 MB, as I instructed.
RO I don't have 'verbose log' checked, because TB gives less
RO information about the triggered filters when you've got that
RO enabled (sounds silly, but it's true).
I
Roelof,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 4:05:50 PM, you wrote:
RO Just to be sure. We're talking about the account.log file here and not
RO about the pop.log and the smtp.log files, are we? The latter too can't
RO be set to a specific size, as they're merely intended for debugging
RO purposes.
I was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Peter,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 5:14:41 PM, you wrote:
PM No. Just turn off pop logging in account properties -- transport.
PM As Roelof said, it is meant for debugging and should only be
PM enabled when there's a problem with receiving mails.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mica,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 8:19:52 PM, you wrote:
MM This is what exists as a standard behavior of this sort of
MM logging, and is nothing...illegal, or an omission in the
MM design.
I understand it's not illegal or a flaw; I guess I was
Mica,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 10:08:22 PM, you wrote:
MM setpref (and here you choose wanted hashes -- see the table below)
MM ...and then when you are finished, you type in this...
MM save
MM ...hit [enter] button and your key preferences are updated.
MM The list of abbreviations for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mica,
Sunday, October 22, 2006, 7:11:57 PM, you wrote:
MM There is just one thing you have to do and this is to set the
default
MM algorithm in your gpg.conf file. You just add this line in there...
MM digest-algo SHA256
MM ...and it will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mica,
Monday, October 23, 2006, 12:43:42 AM, you wrote:
MM Oh, you will. (-: Besides, it's easier, and safer, if you put into
an
MM encrypted container both the Mail and TheBat folder (if you are only
MM user of the Bat/machine), since this way if
Awhile ago I noticed that the log file for my main account has been
getting rather large - 300MB at the moment. I don't need to log every
single action indefinitely, so I went to account properties|options
and checked verbose log, and then set the maximum size to 1MB.
However, even after
Peter,
Wednesday, October 18, 2006, 1:07:43 AM, you wrote:
PM Have a look at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4171 and say if
PM this is the behavior you mean. For the time being, I seem to have been
PM the only victim of this quirk - *if* it's the same...
PM ,- [ OpenPGP Error ]
PM |
Mica,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 7:01:06 PM, you wrote:
MM Richard, whatever might be the case, and your DSA key certainly is not
MM the reason, you should anyway make a new -- but an RSA -- key, of at
MM least some honest 3072 bits, since DSA keys are not safe as they were
MM once (upon a time)
Mica,
Monday, October 16, 2006, 10:08:22 PM, you wrote:
MM More specific and expert answers you'll most probably get on the
MM other, PGP, more specialized, list, as for GnuPG alone, while the
MM matters of Bat's and GnuPG's integration have better chance to be solved
MM here. I guess. Even only
Paul,
Sunday, October 15, 2006, 7:28:19 PM, you wrote:
PM I'm sure someone here will be able to help me. I'm trying to find a
PM reply to a message that I originally sent. I've searched extensively
PM but I can only find the original message. IS there anyway to find
PM replies to a message when
I have been trying to make The Bat! and GnuPG work together. I
installed the latest version along with WinPT, and once in awhile it
would work, but usually not. I am now having problems with PGP as
well. In both cases, when I try to sign or encrypt using the tray app
I get error messages that
Alexander,
Saturday, October 14, 2006, 9:37:24 PM, you wrote:
ASK In TB's main mindow, go to the Tools menu and choose OpenPGP /
ASK Select OpenPGP version. In the window that opens, GnuPG should be
ASK available. If its greyed out, you must add the path to the gpg
ASK executables to the PATH
Mica,
Saturday, October 14, 2006, 11:25:54 PM, you wrote:
MM If your GnuPG otherwise works, even if just once it was working well
MM (for instance you hit Ctrl+Shift+S in TB editor and it offers the
MM combo with the list of your keys), then it means that it's properly
MM installed, both with
Scott,
Sunday, October 15, 2006, 8:00:23 AM, you wrote:
SF Did you sign your own key? If not try that.
Yes, I did sign it earlier. It's gotta be something else.
--
Thanks,
Rick
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas,
Monday, October 9, 2006, 8:12:05 PM, you wrote:
TF Hello Richard,
TF Are the old messages read or unread? There is a setting somewhere
that
TF only read messages are deleted, but that can be switched.
Some are read, some are unread. It
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Peter,
Monday, October 9, 2006, 8:00:43 PM, you wrote:
PF I have the same problem. For IMAP folders, this does not work at
PF all.
FYI, I'm not using IMAP.
- --
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: PGP 8.1
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, October 10, 2006, 2:41:40 AM, you wrote:
M Are you purging via folder maintenance or automatically via the
M on exit settings on the folder properties/additional tab?
I use both: maintenance runs every morning before the backup, but I
also
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm having problems with purging folders. I've set several folders
with either a maximum number of messages or a maximum retention
period. Most of the time this does not work, meaning they aren't
purged when the conditions are met. I just recently set
I know - forgot the cutline. I realized it as I was sending. Sorry.
--
Rick
Current version is 3.85.03 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Alexander,
Monday, September 25, 2006, 8:43:15 PM, you wrote:
ASK Sounds like you don't trust your computer very much! :-)
Just a habit - not many crashes on this computer, but over the years
it's happened enough that I do assume it can again.
ASK Check the file dates - do they differ by 10
Chris,
Sunday, September 24, 2006, 8:56:40 PM, you wrote:
CW Every time you save your draft message or it is auto-saved, a new copy
CW of the message is created in the Outbox. Perhaps this is causing the
CW multiple copies of the attachment. Do these copies go away after
CW sending?
I am having a problem with TB! storing multiple copies of attachments
I'm sending. I just send a photo to a friend, and discovered that TB!
had stored 704 copies of it in my attachment directory. This isn't the
first time multiple copies have been stored, but usually it's only
been a few extra.
Sunday, September 24, 2006, 8:29:21 AM, you wrote:
RHS I am having a problem with TB! storing multiple copies of attachments
RHS I'm sending. I just send a photo to a friend, and discovered that TB!
RHS had stored 704 copies of it in my attachment directory. This isn't the
RHS first time multiple
Tom,
Friday, September 8, 2006, 6:29:44 PM, you wrote:
T Any tips from a working environment on how to best organise files with
T attachments using TB?
I store attachments in external directories as a rule. Sometimes I'll
copy or move an attachment to a different directory depending on its
Perry,
Sunday, August 13, 2006, 5:04:01 PM, you wrote:
PN Can you tell me what to change to cause this event to trigger
PN automatically every night as it should? I'll reiterate that if I
PN manually cause this scheduled event to execute immediately, it does
PN everything just exactly as
I have tried twice to chance my address; both times the website
indicates that a confirmation e-mail has been sent to my new address,
but I have not received neither. I'm also no longer receiving any
posts.
Is there a problem, or am I doing something wrong?
--
Thanks,
Rick
Vitalie,
Thursday, June 1, 2006, 11:03:12 PM, you wrote:
vv LOL. i bet that mgr/admin is a graduate of some military high. :)
No, we just work for the government. There's some logic in locking
down that many desktops; no telling what people would install if they
were able to. But I was hoping
Thomas,
Sunday, May 28, 2006, 10:16:12 PM, you wrote:
TF I only once had Voyager not working, and that was in an internet cafe,
TF which disallowed running own programs on their machines, even from the
TF USB stick. Clicking on the .exe file caused a warning, and the program
TF wouldn't run.
TF
I'm seriously considering upgrading to TB! Pro so I can take advantage
of Voyager. I have one question, however (or at least one at the
moment).
I would be using it periodically on systems that are locked down,
i.e., I can use a flash drive on them, but cannot install unauthorized
software. Does
Peter,
Saturday, May 20, 2006, 5:27:58 AM, you wrote:
PK is there a place describing the changes to this final release?
PO https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/changelog_page.php
The latest release is supposed to be version 3.80.6, yet the first one
listed is v. 3.81.01. Is that a beta?
--
Rick
For a number of folders I have set the properties to purge messages
either above a certain number or older than a set number of days.
Several folders (including TBUDL) are not purging properly. For
example, I may have set a limit of 180 days, but I find messages older
than a year still there (and
Peter,
Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 9:24:47 PM, you wrote:
PM They will only be purged when you run Folder maintenance or check
PM to Remove old messages in Folder -- Properties -- Additional.
I have run folder maintenance, checked remove old messages when
exiting, exited and restarted, and there
Roelof,
Thursday, May 4, 2006, 1:36:59 AM, you wrote:
RO Are they unread?
RO What's your setting at:
RO Account - Properties - Mail management - Deletion - Purge unread
messages
Some of the messages are unread, some read. I set the properties to
purge unread messages as you suggested, but it
Peter,
Wednesday, May 3, 2006, 9:24:47 PM, you wrote:
PM Hi Richard,
PM They will only be purged when you run Folder maintenance or check to
PM Remove old messages in Folder -- Properties -- Additional.
Something strange seems to be happening. I've set account and folder
properties as
Miroslav,
Sunday, March 19, 2006, 2:19:36 PM, you wrote:
MF you can add the scheduler as button.
MF Customize ? Available Items ? Message Controller | Scheduler
Got it. I don't know how I missed that, but I did. Thanks!
--
Rick
Current
Why isn't it possible to add the scheduler to the configuration
toolbar? I know it's not that difficult to access it under tools on
the main toolbar, but that can be said about any of the other features
that are customizable.
--
Thanks,
Rick
Paul,
Tuesday, March 14, 2006, 9:33:31 PM, you wrote:
PM I notice that some of my folders have little green ticks next to
PM them, whereas others do not. I'm sure someone will be able to tell
PM me exactly what they mean!?
It appears to indicate that there are subfolders with unread mail in
at
Wednesday, February 15, 2006, 4:26:12 PM, you wrote:
vv Tuesday, February 14, 2006, 5:28:50 PM, you wrote:
I was just reading PCWorld's review of BitDefender, and am wondering
how well the AV and anti-spam apps work with TB!. Is there a plugin
for the AV?
vv actually, the correct saying is
I was just reading PCWorld's review of BitDefender, and am wondering
how well the AV and anti-spam apps work with TB!. Is there a plugin
for the AV? I'm currently using Avast Professional and have generally
been satisfied with it. I'm not prone to switching just based on one
review, but am
Roelof,
Tuesday, January 3, 2006, 9:59:41 PM, you wrote:
RO On Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:52:53 +GMT (3-1-2006, 17:52 +0100, where I
RO live), you wrote:
RO You can disable TB's X-Mailer header, that will stop it:
RO Options - Preferences - Use X-Mailer header...
FYI, I've had mine turned off
Roelof,
Wednesday, January 4, 2006, 11:07:05 PM, you wrote:
RO Please include a signature delimiter in your messages. This consists
RO of a dashdashspacereturn, i.e.,
Guess I need to stop replying to e-mail until I've had that second cup
of coffee...
--
I downloaded 3.62.09, but was unable to install it. I received an
error message saying it wasn't a valid Windows installer package.
Anyone else having this problem or is it just me?
--
Thanks,
Rick
Tuesday, November 1, 2005, 10:13:26 PM, you wrote:
ST Hello All,
ST 3.62.09 is now available
Greetings,
I have not received a single post for four days now - has the list
gone inactive temporarily or am I having problems?
--
Thanks,
Rick
Current version is 3.60.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
Greetings,
I sent this to the PGP list a few days ago, but received no response.
I'm hoping someone here can give me some advice.
I'm using PGP8.1 with The Bat! v.3.60 (on Windows XP). I've had not
had any problems until now. Now when I attempt to sign using the
PGPtray current window options,
I just downloaded and installed the latest release (v.3.60.07), and it
is behaving erratically. I have five accounts, and it has occasionally
misdirected mail to the wrong inbox, or it has delivered it twice on a
single mail check. I've never seen this behavior before. Is it just me
or are others
Stuart,
Sunday, July 10, 2005, 7:28:50 PM, you wrote:
SC Do you have your threads expanded or collapsed. Mine is expanded
SC automatically and moves to the next message in the thread.
Mine are collapsed. Expanding them does seem to make a difference, but
it doesn't seem to move
Chris,
Sunday, July 10, 2005, 8:31:28 AM, you wrote:
C Mine doesn't do that. I thread by References and sort by Created
C ascending (newest at top). What about you?
Same. However, expanding the thread does cause it to at least stay
within the thread.
--
Chris,
Saturday, July 9, 2005, 7:16:45 AM, you wrote:
C I have the following settings:
C * SmartSpace navigation is turned on
C * Messages are marked as read when I SmartSpace navigate off of them
C * Otherwise, messages are only marked as read when I open the message
C in another window
I
Arjan,
Saturday, May 28, 2005, 7:27:32 AM, you wrote:
AdG Rule of thumb: all versions with two or more dots are Beta
AdG versions.
Shouldn't the rule of thumb be that versions on the main product
page are release versions and those on the Beta site are Beta versions
regardless of the numbering?
Jon,
Thursday, May 19, 2005, 5:27:37 PM, you wrote:
JP I am using v3.5 (but not right now). In 3.0.1.33 I have
JP different sounds set up to indicate the arrival of mail in my
JP accounts. This does not appear to work correctly in 3.5. When mail
JP arrives, all the sounds are the same as the one
Mary,
Thursday, May 12, 2005, 11:58:59 PM, you wrote:
MB Each account has a separate Attachments folder. I've just looked in my
MB TB! directory--the path is The Bat!/MAIL/m.bull/Attach, and they are
MB all accessible, a separate file to each attachment, arranged
MB numerically/alphabetically.
Ive been waiting for message-base encryption to be implemented, but
have been thinking of an interim solution using PGPDisk. Would it slow
down TB! downloads, etc., to move the message folders to an encrypted
disk? Obviously the encrypted disk would need to be opened before
opening TB!, but can
Allie,
Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 6:08:57 PM, you wrote:
AM There have been subscribers to this list who used TB! with their mail
AM on an encrypted PGP Virtual Disk. They had no operational problems.
Thanks. I'll give it a try.
--
Current
Mica,
Tuesday, May 3, 2005, 8:03:22 PM, you wrote:
MM Since TB installation also dwells on this disk, it is not possible to
MM start even TB, if the PGP disk is not unlocked. Beautiful!
I think I'll settle for just moving the message folders, since I
should be able to do that without a
Mica,
Thursday, February 24, 2005, 9:16:11 PM, you wrote:
MM OK, actually you would have to train a bit your friends then, and to
MM tell them (if they already do not do so) to use only (nick)names you use
MM in your FROM and REPLY-TO fields.
For some reason I was assuming it would be more
Mica,
Monday, February 21, 2005, 5:39:50 PM, you wrote:
MM Okay then, less problems to solve. Tell me, do you have some friends, or
MM business partners who do not address you properly, namely not using your
MM full name (or a screen/nick name defined by yourself) in TO (or CC)
MM field, but
Mica,
Sunday, February 20, 2005, 3:28:46 AM, you wrote:
MM Will be my pleasure to lead you gently to the core of this beauty,
MM unknown before, and to see your eyes admiring it. (-:
I'm prepared to go that route, but how do I do it? I already have a
number of addresses white-listed (such as
Mica,
Monday, February 21, 2005, 12:41:17 AM, you wrote:
MM Okay. Tell me first do you as well have your address on some of web
MM sites of yours, and if you do, in what form you have it exposed there?
MM Namely, what exactly mailto:; code/form you use?
No, I don't have it on any public web
I'm trying to filter out the remaining junk mail that gets by BayesIt
(and K9), the most prevalent of which are messages that have my e-mail
address but a name other than mine. (I've already filtered out mail that
doesn't have my e-mail address in the recipient field.) I tried to
read the
Alexander,
Tuesday, November 30, 2004, 9:58:20 PM, you wrote:
ASK Except for the nigeria connection scam mails of which I get at least two a
ASK day on three accounts ATM. K9 repeatedly misses those. *sigh*
They usually get past k9 and BayesIt here also, but frankly I don't
mind. Some of them
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW what then? Is
Raymund,
Monday, November 29, 2004, 1:11:23 AM, you wrote:
RTT Well, it should. K9 has to analyse the mail and I suppose it will
RTT store the mail for a time on the hard disk. That that is where Avast
RTT can fetch it. But that would harm the mail delivery only if K9 sends
RTT the mail from
Andre,
Sunday, November 28, 2004, 7:45:00 PM, you wrote:
AW That's strange. The plugin works on messages as they come in from the
AW mailserver. Whether that mailserver is your actual mailserver or k9
AW shouldn't make a difference at all. You mean the plugin catches it? And
AW what then? Is
Greetings:
I'm trying out K9 since BayesIt has dropped from an accuracy rate of
97% to less than 33% over the last few months. However, it causes a
problem for my AV plugin (Avast), which heretofore would flag viruses
and automatically move them to the quarantine folder. Now when when
one comes
I have just upgraded to v.3 and BayesIt 0.6.01. Twice now the
connection center has hung up when downloading mail; it shows a
message received 100% but just hangs there, with the message not
showing up in the inbox. If I abort the task and start over, it's
already been deleted by the server and is
Mary,
Monday, September 6, 2004, 6:46:12 PM, you wrote:
MB This problem is being addressed by many through using BayesFilter
MB rather than BayesIT.
I'm going to try BayesFilter. I installed it and trained it with a
selection of SPAM and non-SPAM. (And deleted - at least for now -
BayesIt)
Greetings:
I've received nothing for the past two days, which makes me think that
maybe my provider has blocked this address for some reason. (They've
blocked other lists' providers before.) My apologies for just checking
to see if this goes through.
--
Rick
Greg,
Sunday, July 4, 2004, 8:06:09 PM, you wrote:
GS Hello Thomas,
GS Sunday, July 4, 2004, 9:28:48 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
aacu Yes but I also have all the email that I delteted back again. It's an
aacu aumenting system not a synchronising system.
TF Yes, it is. I think only IMAP does
admin,
Friday, July 2, 2004, 12:50:40 AM, you wrote:
aacu I really need some practical advice on this whole
aacu business of synchronising two copies of The Bat!
It may not be what you need, but I just use the backup tool. When I am
going to travel, I just backup the main computer and then
Maggie,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 6:18:08 PM, you wrote:
M Aha! OK. Just for the heck of it, I tried Fn+0 (zero) where the
M asterisk is on the numeric keypad and none of the combinations worked
M with that. But thank you for your explanation. :)
Surprise, surprise - I tried Fn+0 with CtrlAlt
Maggie,
Friday, June 25, 2004, 7:42:51 PM, you wrote:
M OK. I hadn't tried doing Ctrl+Shift+Fn+0 -
Ctrl+Alt+Fn+0, not Shift, at least not on mine..
M If I hold Ctrl+Shift+Fn then tap the 0, it rather seems to work like a
M toggle here on the Toshiba. But trying to get all the fingers in
M
Greetings:
I just sent an e-mail with two attachments to a group of friends. I
use a separate directory for storing incoming attachments, and I just
saw that it contained 18 copies of one attachment (the number of
recipients) and 38 of the other. (The files themselves remain in the
original
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:13:08 AM, you wrote:
aacu I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
aacu down things, crashing the Bat etc.
I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
95% of the spam, which I hope will increase eventually, but even
Marck,
Friday, April 30, 2004, 7:36:14 AM, you wrote:
MDP Dear Richard,
MDP @30-Apr-2004, 06:57 +0500 (30-Apr 02:57 UK time) Richard H. Stoddard
MDP [RHS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Clive:
RHS Looks like a TB! problem.
RHS
RHS Current
Are your addressees different at home and work? It might be coincidence
that your 'home' recipients are simply ignoring the request for a
receipt.
Good question, actually. But a server receipt confirmation is not
something under the control of the recipient. However, I do have
completely
You certainly live in planet Earth then :)
Tashkent, Uzbekistan actually. Not quite the end of the earth, but
getting close.
Current version is 2.10.01 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Clive,
Thursday, April 29, 2004, 11:01:05 AM, you wrote:
CT Are your addressees different at home and work? It might be coincidence
CT that your 'home' recipients are simply ignoring the request for a
CT receipt.
I tested this by sending an e-mail to someone at work whose server
always
I sometimes ask for receipt and reading confirmations on messages,
since where I live delivery is never 100% guaranteed. Yet I've never
received one. I have to use Outlook at the office, and usually receive
receipts when requested, but never from home with TB!. (v.2.10.1) Is
anyone else having
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
