Hello Miguel,
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 15:46:18 +0100 GMT (01/03/03, 21:46 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
No, the fact that I never thought about modigying the subject of an
incoming message, and that I don't understand the need to do so,
doesn't mean I'm against the feature. I may think that
Hello Thomas,
You seem to know a lot of work-arounds for someone who is against
adding a feature for TB to edit incoming messages directly. ;-)
Did I say I am against adding the feature?
Yes, maybe I know about those work-arounds because of other needs. I
use the export/edit/import somewhat
Hello Miguel,
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 11:11:21 +0100 GMT (01/03/03, 17:11 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
You seem to know a lot of work-arounds for someone who is against
adding a feature for TB to edit incoming messages directly. ;-)
Did I say I am against adding the feature?
I checked and
Hello Thomas,
Did I say I am against adding the feature?
I checked and you didn't really say that. Comments as in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] made me believe you were
against the feature;
No, the fact that I never thought about modigying the subject of an
incoming message, and that I don't
Hello James,
Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
Often? Ugh! =:-(
It certainly takes all kinds of people to make the world ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is
Hello James Senick,
On or about Friday, February 28, 2003 at 00:19:51GMT -0500 (which was
12:19 AM in the tropics where I live) James Senick posted:
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
JS Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
Easy enough for something that should not be easily
Hello Spike,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:33:24 -0500 GMT (28/02/03, 21:33 +0700 GMT),
Spike wrote:
The issue is the ability to modify something someone wrote in a way
they never intended. One should NOT be able to modify a message
without indicating PLAINLY that the original writer's message has
Hi Spike,
Friday, February 28, 2003, 4:33:24 PM, you wrote:
The issue is the ability to modify something someone wrote in a way
they never intended.
I would say that this is not always the case. In most cases I want to
modify incoming message the reason is that the message is already
modified
Hello Spike,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 09:33:24 [GMT -0500] (which was 9:33:24
AM in NY, USA) Spike wrote:
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
JS Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
Easy enough for something that should not be easily done!
Point taken. But you can't veto every
Friday, 2/28/2003, 7:43 AM
Hi James,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 00:19:51 [GMT -0500] (which was 9:19 PM where I live)
you wrote about: 'A way to modify _incoming_ mail'
JS The idea is very much alive here. I am still happy with TB as
JS is but fully expect this feature to be added at some point
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:50:16 -0800 GMT (28/02/03, 22:50 +0700 GMT),
Paul Wilson wrote:
I hope you are wrong about the feature being added. You will
never convince me of a legitimate reason to modify incoming
messages. E-Mail is frequently used as evidence in court cases.
But only
Friday, 2/28/2003, 8:24 AM
Hi Thomas,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 23:02:16 [GMT +0700] (which was 8:02 AM where I live)
you wrote about: 'A way to modify _incoming_ mail'
TF But only if sender's mid and receiver's mid show the same message,
TF isn't it? I can modify any message by exporting
Hello Paul,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 08:38:54 -0800 GMT (28/02/03, 23:38 +0700 GMT),
Paul Wilson wrote:
TF But only if sender's mid and receiver's mid show the same message,
TF isn't it? I can modify any message by
TF exporting/editing/importing it.
I don't have a problem with that as long as it
Hello James,
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
It should be fairly easy to do with PowerPro. I'll try it later or
during the weekend.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Hello Thomas,
I am not. I receive messages with non-sensical subjects. I would like
to edit those.
Another method. Redirect (Ctrl+E), change subject, send to Outbox and
move to original folder.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Oh no, I can't help myself...
I hope you are wrong about the feature being added. You will
never convince me of a legitimate reason to modify incoming
messages. E-Mail is frequently used as evidence in court cases.
TF But only if sender's mid and receiver's mid show the same message,
TF isn't
Hello Miguel,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 19:18:20 [GMT +0100] (which was 1:18:20
PM in NY, USA) Miguel A. Urech wrote:
Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
It should be fairly easy to do with PowerPro. I'll try it later or
during the weekend.
Allie was kind enough to write a
Hello Nick,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 18:32:14 [GMT +] (which was 1:32:14
PM in NY, USA) Nick Dutton wrote:
Surely an answer (if there is to be one) is to add, rather than modify?
If each stored message was given _extra_ fields: Subject(modified) and
Body(modified), these could then be
Hello all,
Friday, February 28, 2003, 7:09:47 PM, you wrote:
From what I have read about this, it seems to me that if people are
finding work-arounds, then mail is being altered already. It would seem
sensible to allow this to be done properly, i.e. from within the
programme.
--
Best
Hello Miguel,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:23:09 +0100 GMT (01/03/03, 01:23 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
I am not. I receive messages with non-sensical subjects. I would like
to edit those.
Another method. Redirect (Ctrl+E), change subject, send to Outbox and
move to original folder.
You
Hello there,
Does anybody know how to modify _incoming_ mail?
In particular I wish to process Subjects of received letters
removing some extra information like [this-list] or [that-list] etc.
Is there a way to do this automatically on message arrival?
--
Pavel Kuznetsov
Hallo Pavel,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:36:09 +0200GMT (27-2-03, 18:36 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PK Does anybody know how to modify _incoming_ mail?
You can't do that with TB, neither automatically nor manually.
--
Groetjes, Roelof
Current
Hi Pavel,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:36:09 +0200 Pavel Kuznetsov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Does anybody know how to modify _incoming_ mail?
In particular I wish to process Subjects of received letters
removing some extra information like [this-list] or [that-list] etc.
Is there a way to do this
Hello Peter,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:19:49 +0100 GMT (28/02/03, 01:19 +0700 GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
And: yes, there are good reasons why The Bat! does not allow to alter an
incoming message directly; and yes: I'm one of those guys that prefers
it's current behavior :-)
I am not. I
Hi Peter,
Thursday, February 27, 2003, 8:19:49 PM, you wrote:
there are good reasons why The Bat! does not allow to alter an
incoming message directly; and yes: I'm one of those guys that prefers
it's current behavior :-)
Why? Can you sort of summarize the reasons behind your opinion?
No
Hello Thomas,
I am not. I receive messages with non-sensical subjects. I would like
to edit those.
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
Current version is 1.62 |
Hello Miguel,
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 19:59:08 +0100 GMT (28/02/03, 01:59 +0700 GMT),
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
I am not. I receive messages with non-sensical subjects. I would like
to edit those.
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
I know this, but it is an old circular discussion Pit was
Hello Thomas,
On Fri, 28 Feb 2003, at 09:55:49 [GMT +0700] (which was 9:55:49
PM in NY, USA) Thomas Fernandez wrote:
Export - Edit - Import. That easy :)
Not easy enough for those who have to do it often.
I know this, but it is an old circular discussion Pit was referring
to: Should it be
28 matches
Mail list logo
