Hello Mark,
MW While we're on the subject, how about Folder | Maintenance | Check
MW Integrity/Repair? That's cleared up some stuff for me before.
tryed it. All folders: 'nothing to do'. I think I will try with a fresh
installation when I have a moment of time
--
Rgds, Wilfried
Hello Alexander,
A If I were you, I'd rather make a backup with the internal backup utility,
A completely remove TB, and then do a fresh re-install, restoring the backup.
Made a backup copy, uninstalled the bat completely including registry key's,
removed folder and did fresh install of
Hello,
Some question just came up. After the fresh install TB it was not an
unregistered version. does this means that the registry was NOT cleaned with
the uninstall ?? (so another bug ?)
If this is true then I should again try again ?
--
Rgds, Wilfried
http://www.mestdagh.biz
Using
Hello Mark,
MW remember NT 4.0 very well, but maybe it's worth trying to restore this
MW file from the CAB files?
I did but is same result.
MW Also, regarding the beta version you installed... was that a version 2
MW or 1.6x?
It was a 1.6x beta. And then I recall the first AV started
11-Sep-2003 20:14, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could it be the amount of mail I have ? My The bat folder is 200 MB. Maybe
not ever tested with great amount of mail ?
Since purge+compress has proven now and then to be a cure for many
problems, have you tried that? (purge+compress all
Hello Alexander,
A Since purge+compress has proven now and then to be a cure for many
A problems, have you tried that? (purge+compress all folders, I mean).
Just tryed it, but in most folders it say 'nothing to do' as I have setup all
my folders to cleanup on exit. Result is still same...
Hello,
We not get result :(
Is there files I can safely delete ? i could start with that !
If that does not help, I could install a second the bat on this machine, see
if it works normal, then start copying the mail folders one by one (without
conficuration files).. then start copying
11-Sep-2003 20:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
seems a good method to me.. not ?
If I were you, I'd rather make a backup with the internal backup utility,
completely remove TB, and then do a fresh re-install, restoring the backup.
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de)
One of
Hello Alexander,
A If I were you, I'd rather make a backup with the internal backup utility,
A completely remove TB, and then do a fresh re-install, restoring the backup.
Ok thanks. It is a pretty that I dont know exact meaning and content of some
files. I see there is data and index and
Wilfried-
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 11:44:57 AM, you wrote:
WM Just tryed it, but in most folders it say 'nothing to do' as I have setup all
WM my folders to cleanup on exit. Result is still same...
While we're on the subject, how about Folder | Maintenance | Check
Integrity/Repair?
Hello Alexander,
A If I were you, I'd rather make a backup with the internal backup utility,
A completely remove TB, and then do a fresh re-install, restoring the backup.
while I agree completely with your advice there is something to concider:
suppose (probably) it works then, nobody will
Alexander-
Thursday, September 11, 2003, 12:21:03 PM, you wrote:
A If I were you, I'd rather make a backup with the internal backup utility,
A completely remove TB, and then do a fresh re-install, restoring the backup.
Ditto. The internal backup will *probably* save all the registry
setting,
Hello,
I have not mutch luck on the 2 other mailing list. The tech seems dead, the
beta is only some talk around anti virus and so :( so I try here. I will try
to explain clear, but my english is not so well :(
After upgrading to v2, I have AV when I hit account - properties. In fact I
Wilfried-
Hmmm. An access violation in Ntdll.dll sounds pretty serious. I don't
remember NT 4.0 very well, but maybe it's worth trying to restore this
file from the CAB files?
The /Users Depot/ area in the registry should correspond with the
account information you see in the accounts pane. I
11-Sep-2003 00:01, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. An access violation in Ntdll.dll sounds pretty serious. I don't
remember NT 4.0 very well, but maybe it's worth trying to restore this
file from the CAB files?
...and don't forget to install ServicePack6a again. :)
--
Best regards
Hello Thomas,
On Friday, February 7, 2003 at 6:10:12 AM you [TF] wrote (at least in
part):
I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
TF Yes please. The dialogue gives you the address as well as the module
Friday, February 7, 2003, 2:09:48 AM, Peter scribbled:
PP Thomas, be honest: even _with_ this information we can only wildly
PP guess. The only being _probably_ able to hunt it down (if the module
PP is thebat.exe) are the guys at RITLabs.
PP But w/o these information even they will not be able
Hello telepro,
On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100
(which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro
postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of
Access Violation in x ?:
t Hello,
t I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation
Hello Spike,
On or about Thursday, February 06, 2003 at 06:22:02GMT +0100
(which was 12:22 AM in the tropics where I live) telepro
postulated, ruminated and made these points on the subject of
Access Violation in x ?:
When I was a kid, I used to pray every night for a new bicycle
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:22:02 AM, telepro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
t I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ;
t it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and
t the program continues...
t Have you got these little errors, if yes
Hello Mike Alexander,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 00:25:21 + GMT your local time,
which was Friday, February 7, 2003, 7:25:21 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Mike Alexander wrote:
Hi Spike,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:18:27 PM, you wrote:
S This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb)
Hello Miguel A. Urech,
On Thu, 6 Feb 2003 13:53:34 +0100 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, February 6, 2003, 7:53:34 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Miguel A. Urech wrote:
Hello Spike,
NO! to bloat mail ;-)
He probably can can save half the space in that file by removing the
quotation at
Hello jwayne,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 4:41:10 PM, you wrote:
On Thursday, February 6, 2003, 12:22:02 AM, telepro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I get access violations frequently when starting up TB and have for quite a
while. As you said, it doesn't affect the operation of the program (other
Hello Spike,
Thursday, February 6, 2003, 1:18:27 PM, you wrote:
This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets
larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll
find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too!
Just happened (again) to me on
Hello telepro,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 04:37:44 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 10:37 +0700 GMT),
telepro wrote:
This usually happens when a mail folder (messages.tbb) gets
larger than 2GB. This exceeds the FAT32 file size limit. You'll
find that some mail folder can no longer accept new messages too!
Hello Thomas,
Are you sure teh AV was caused by TB?
Yes, absolutely !
What is the exact wording, which
you have left out?
I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
--
Best regards,
Christophe
Hello telepro,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 05:57:32 +0100 GMT (07/02/03, 11:57 +0700 GMT),
telepro wrote:
I don't remember, but a dialog box of the bat indicating : access
violation to the adress , the next time I have it,i note !
Yes please. The dialogue gives you the address as well
Hello,
I've sometimes (perhaps one time in a day) Access Violation in x ;
it does not disturb the good running of the programm, a simple OK and
the program continues...
Have you got these little errors, if yes, in which frequencies ?
Thanks,
Friendly,
Christophe
Hi Bat Users,
Since switching to the 1.62 version I get al lot of these:
,--- [ ]---
| Invalid HTML !
| Please forward this message to developers.
| Thanks.
| EAccessViolation Access violation at address 0040501B in module 'thebat.exe'. Read
|of address 0328E000
Hello Gerard,
Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 9:42:23 AM, you wrote:
G Since switching to the 1.62 version I get al lot of these:
G ,--- [ ]---
G | Invalid HTML !
G | Please forward this message to developers.
G | Thanks.
G | EAccessViolation Access violation at address 0040501B
Hello Gerard,
Wednesday, December 18, 2002, 8:42:23 AM, you wrote:
G Hi Bat Users,
G Since switching to the 1.62 version I get al lot of these:
G ,--- [ ]---
G | Invalid HTML !
G | Please forward this message to developers.
G | Thanks.
G | EAccessViolation Access violation
Hello myob,
On Wed, 18 Dec 2002 13:29:37 + GMT (18/12/02, 20:29 +0700 GMT),
myob wrote:
G But next time I select the msg it might display as it should. Has
G anyone else seen this problem.
I've had this too, and I think I reported it previously. Sometimes I
have to close TB! and restart
Hi Batpeople,
Just upgraded to XP and I've been getting an Access Violation Error
dialog box upon launching TB! It doesn't appear every time I launch
TB! but after 2 or 3 launches. Any ideas?
--
Cheers,
Sudip For PM:- mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sudip Pokhrel
Hello Sudip,
On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 00:10:16 +0545 GMT (18/07/02, 01:25 +0700 GMT),
Sudip Pokhrel wrote:
SPJust upgraded to XP and I've been getting an Access Violation Error
SPdialog box upon launching TB! It doesn't appear every time I launch
SPTB! but after 2 or 3 launches. Any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:
SP Just upgraded to XP and I've been getting an Access Violation
SP Error dialog box upon launching TB! It doesn't appear every time I
SP launch TB! but afte
On Thursday, May 2, 2002, 6:00:30 PM, Mark Knipfer wrote:
MK In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when
MK Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially:
MK The Bat!
MK (X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'.
MK Read of address
In TheBat! 1.60h compose window when I select Privacy | Encrypt when
Complete, TheBat! displays this error initially:
The Bat!
(X) Access violation at address 00431F43 in module 'thebat.exe'.
Read of address 0008.
OK
When I click 'Send the letter
Hello,
I just started using The Bat! (1.60c) and I haven't had any luck importing
my Outlook email into The Bat!. Each time I do, I get an Access Violation.
Has anyone successfully imported from Outlook 2000? I have 750MB of Email
that I need to import.
And on a curiosity note, anyone know
Hello Brien,
05. april 2002, 19:37:10, you wrote:
Has anyone successfully imported from Outlook 2000? I have 750MB of Email
that I need to import.
This was suggested on TBBETA:
,-
| chose import from Outlook, cancle, chose import from OE 4.x, cancle,
| go back to import OE 6.0 and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hi Kitty,
On 2:04:59 AM, Kitty Wrote
In regards To Access Violation in thebat.exe:
K Hi
K Strange problem. Have been using ver 1.54/10 for awhile. This is on
K a computer with Windows 2000. I left on the computer overnight with
K TB open, set
K
Hi A
On Saturday, November 03, 2001 at 21:54:20GMT -0500 (which was 8:54 PM where I live)
Allie C Martin wrote and made these points on the subject of Access Violation in
thebat.exe:
This may very well be a beta issue. Would you kindly confine problems
with beta versions to the beta list
thebat.exe at 00242C3F. Access
violation at address 00653E83. Read of address 0018.
What is happening is that everytime TB goes to get mail, it hangs on
the last message and then I get the above message. I closed down my
computer reopened and same problem. With that box up, I can still
write
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 3 Nov 2001 20:04:59 -0600, Kitty [K] graced us with these
comments:
...
K Strange problem. Have been using ver 1.54/10 for awhile. This is on
K a computer with Windows 2000. I left on the computer overnight with
K TB open, set to get mail
Hello TBUDL,
Twice today I have had error messages from TB! Once when trying to
do a mailto from within another programe, and once just now when I
tried to close TB!
The first error message I got was: access violation at address
00683B1E. Read of address . The second
On 5/7/2001 Ryan wrote
R Thanks to David van Zuijlekom, I have received Beta 13 and Beta 14 of
R the Bat.
R Beta 13 works great. Any message I want to delete works perfectly
R fine.
R Beta 14 will produce the access violation as I have previously stated,
R but will successfully delete
Monday, May 07, 2001, 7:49:09 PM, Fred van Veen wrote:
On 5/7/2001 Ryan wrote
R Thanks to David van Zuijlekom, I have received Beta 13 and Beta 14 of
R the Bat.
R Beta 13 works great. Any message I want to delete works perfectly
R fine.
R Beta 14 will produce the access violation as I have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Silviu,
On 07 May 2001 at 20:19:52 +0300 (which was 18:19 where I live)
Silviu Cojocaru wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
points:
SC I'm curious about one thing though, do people at RIT actually read
SC the stuff in this list ?
They
Hello!
As an answer for Your letter, I would like to write:
Beta 13 works great. Any message I want to delete works perfectly
fine.
Beta 14 will produce the access violation as I have previously stated,
but will successfully delete the message selected.
I wonder, why they're not available
Hello Fred,
Monday, May 07, 2001, 9:49:09 AM, you wrote:
FvV On 5/7/2001 Ryan wrote
R Thanks to David van Zuijlekom, I have received Beta 13 and Beta 14 of
R the Bat.
R Beta 13 works great. Any message I want to delete works perfectly
R fine.
R Beta 14 will produce the access violation as I
Monday, May 07, 2001, 11:29:18 AM, you wrote:
MDP -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MDP Hash: SHA1
MDP Hi Silviu,
MDP On 07 May 2001 at 20:19:52 +0300 (which was 18:19 where I live)
MDP Silviu Cojocaru wrote to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and made these
MDP points:
SC I'm curious about one thing
Thanks to David van Zuijlekom, I have received Beta 13 and Beta 14 of
the Bat.
Beta 13 works great. Any message I want to delete works perfectly
fine.
Beta 14 will produce the access violation as I have previously stated,
but will successfully delete the message selected.
Release 1.52c
OK Bat Fans, Here's a test.
Tell me what the following means what some possible causes might
be:
'Access Violation @ address BFF6BB07, Write of address 009DF750'
System:
Dell 8100
OS: Win Me
CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz
HD: 60 gig (49 free)
RAM: 384 meg
I've been getting
On Monday, March 19, 2001 at 21:06:09 -0500 Jan Rifkinson wrote:
I've been getting a # of error msgs on all kinds of programs
I'm trying to sort them out to see if there is a common
denominator.
Looks like your system have been messed up pretty badly. Your
hardware configuration is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On March 20, 2001, at 7:49:00 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
Since yours is a Dell machine, I bet many things have been preinstalled
for you, right? That makes it even harder to debug.
That is one reason I won't even look at an engineered System like Dell.
Hi Jan
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001 21:06:09 -0500GMT
(which was 20/03/2001, 3:06 +0100GMT for me),
you wrote:
JR System:
JR Dell 8100
JR OS: Win Me
JR CPU: Pentium 1.3 mgz
JR HD: 60 gig (49 free)
JR RAM: 384 meg
Now that's a beautifull system, but why on earth are you running
Windows ME
then the latest. If you (or anyone
else) has a notion of how/why TB! might be in conflict by the
error msg I supplied I'd appreciate your input.
I'm no expert, but I'm afraid the error msg doesn't say much. Access
violation could be caused by a bunch of things, and unless you have
memory.
On my machine I have a tool (FreeMem Pro) to free memory that is not
used. At start up I usually free everything there is (out of 128 MB
about 84 to 88 MB). If I during this process start TB! - which should
not be a problem apart from taking a few more seconds - it sometimes
gets an Access
start TB! - which should
DH not be a problem apart from taking a few more seconds - it sometimes
DH gets an Access Violation or just plain hangs/crashes.
*While* starting TB? I think you shouldn't do that - FreeMem Pro (do
you have an URL?) wouldn't be able to know whether it's anything that
TB
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas!
On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 6:46:06 PM you wrote:
*While* starting TB? I think you shouldn't do that - FreeMem Pro (do
you have an URL?) wouldn't be able to know whether it's anything that
TB needs to have in memory, so it will
Hello Ming-Li,
On Tuesday, March 20, 2001 09:27:14 [ -0800 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'TB! v1.51 - Access Violation':
Ming-Li If you want to use NTFS, reformatting your HD is a necessity.
Ming-Li Otherwise, it's not. Still, it's a good idea. [...] Another
Ming-Li point
Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but
I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME.
By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be
worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something
Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but
I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME.
By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be
worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something
Sorry about the lack of info regarding your "access violation" problem, but
I wanted to mention that The Bat! does work great in Windows ME.
By the way, if your computer is brand new (i.e. no new stuff), it might be
worthwhile to run your "DELL system restore CDs"... maybe something
Hi Stefano,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001 12:47:59 +0100GMT (21/02/2001, 19:47 +0800GMT),
Stefano Zamprogno wrote:
When does this message pop up: when he starts TB, or when he does
certain actions (like checking mail)?
SZ Exception EAccessViolation in module TheBat.exe at FFC0100A. Access
SZ Violation
Ciao Thomas,
Thursday, February 22, 2001, 9:52:33 AM, you wrote:
T When does this message pop up: when he starts TB, or when he does
T certain actions (like checking mail)?
When checking mail.
SZ Exception EAccessViolation in module TheBat.exe at FFC0100A. Access
SZ Violation at address
Hi Stefano,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:31:58 +0100GMT (22/02/2001, 17:31 +0800GMT),
Stefano Zamprogno wrote:
T When does this message pop up: when he starts TB, or when he does
T certain actions (like checking mail)?
SZ When checking mail.
Do you think he can look at the log (shft-crtl-A) and
Hi,
evaluting S/MIME functions got the following problem:
signing of msgs works fine, encryption doesn't work,
all I get is:
access violation at address 0050AB6A. Read of address
any hints? (all certs present, S/MIME activated (switches don't
matter), PGP not activated ...)
/pk
On Wednesday, Wednesday, January 10, 2001, you wrote:
signing of msgs works fine, encryption doesn't work,
all I get is:
access violation at address 0050AB6A. Read of address
I had that happen with one test but just now it did actually work.
any hints? (all certs present, S/MIME
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 1:22:57 AM, you wrote:
PK any hints? (all certs present, S/MIME activated (switches don't
PK matter), PGP not activated ...)
Were the certificates you are encrypting to properly exported with the
ability of encryption enabled?
--
Best regards,
o you have a file present in your mail directory
called SMIMERND.BIN ?
Nope. No such file anywhere on the drive with TB on it.
I'm missing this random seed file, The Bat! doesn't create it by
itself, maybe that's the reason for the access violation?
Good thought that's for sure. I just tri
present in your mail directory called SMIMERND.BIN?
I'm missing this random seed file, The Bat! doesn't create it by
itself (it should as stated by the developers), maybe the access
violation comes from here, either because it's not found or while
trying to create it?
Best regards,
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hello Peter,
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 8:02:33 AM, you wrote:
PK do you have a file present in your mail directory called SMIMERND.BIN?
PK I'm missing this random seed file, The Bat! doesn't create it by
PK itself (it should as stated by the developers),
Hello!
Wednesday, January 10, 2001, 7:02:33 PM, Peter Kaleve [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PK do you have a file present in your mail directory called SMIMERND.BIN?
No.
--
Yours sincerely,
Andrey G. Sergeev (AKA Andris) http://www.andris.msk.ru/
--
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05 November, 2000, 6:34 AM, I saw Gerd's comments made on
Sun, 5 Nov 2000 11:19:11 +0100, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
GE whenever I encrypt a message I get the following error:
GE "Access violation at address 00507BD2.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello A. Curtis Martin !
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 06:35:44 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was 05.11.2000, 12:35 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
GE whenever I encrypt a message I get the following error:
GE "Access violation at address 005
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 5 Nov 2000 14:35:13 +0100, Gerd Ewald wrote these
comments about 'Access Violation when encrypting with S/MIME':
GE I agree with you if it was a problem of the beta-version. I forgot
GE to write that this error occured with Version 1.47
101 - 176 of 176 matches
Mail list logo
