Hello Alexander,
On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote:
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots
of thinking (pathetic fallacy?)
ASK K9 does the same thinking and its blazingly fast
OK - sold. Thanks for the advice, K9's installed and doing a pretty
good job as
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:11:08 +0200, Robin Anson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What version of Popfile are you using? I have been using it for some
years now, and have never noticed it slowing - what is it that you see
happening?
PopFile itself is achingly slow. :-}
--
Gruesse / Greetings,
Alexander
Hello Robin,
On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote:
RA What version of Popfile are you using?
I'm on the latest - v0.22.2.
RA I have been using it for some years now, and have never noticed it
RA slowing - what is it that you see happening?
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:57:53 +0200, Nick Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots
of thinking (pathetic fallacy?)
K9 does the same thinking and its blazingly fast during mail retrieval
(hardly noticable there's anything in-between TB
Hi
On Wednesday 20 April 2005 at 7:54:21 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Philip Storry
wrote:
Because of those blank emails, I added the Bayes Filter Plugin as a
second plugin. You can find that here: http://www.lkcc.org/achim
It's good, and I chose it because unlike BayesIt (as far as I
Thursday, April 21, 2005, MFPA wrote:
RBL lookups?
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html
--
Urban
It would be terrible if the Red Cross Bloodmobile got into an accident.
No, wait. That would be good because if anyone needed it, the blood
would be right there
Hi
On Thursday 21 April 2005 at 2:56:10 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Urban wrote:
RBL lookups?
http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html
Thanks
--
Best regards,
MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack
Hello Alexander,
On 21 April 2005 at 10:38:07 GMT +0200 (which was 10:38:07 where I
live), Alexander S. Kunz wrote and made these valuable points on the
subject of Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?:
On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:57:53 +0200, Nick Dutton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's slow
Hello,
I'm going through one of my irregular explorations of anti-SPAM
technology, as popfile just seems to grind slower and slower. Although
it must be said that it's almost perfect in terms of accuracy.
One of the things that I really like about popfile is that I can get
TB to delete spam from
Hello Nick Dutton
On Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 10:58:37 AM +0400 GMT
You wrote:
ND Hello,
ND I'm going through one of my irregular explorations of anti-SPAM
ND technology, as popfile just seems to grind slower and slower. Although
ND it must be said that it's almost perfect in terms of
Hello Nick,
Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 3:58:37 PM, you wrote:
ND Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by
ND bayesit, I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
As far as I can tell, TB doesn't mark the message at all - which I
personally find quite
Hello Nick Dutton everyone else,
on 20-Apr-2005 at 16:58 you (Nick Dutton) wrote:
Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit,
I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so?
Exactly.
If you're only using PopFile for spam filtering, may I suggest to have a
On Thu 21 April 2005, 0:58:37 +1000, Nick Dutton wrote:
I'm going through one of my irregular explorations of anti-SPAM
technology, as popfile just seems to grind slower and slower. Although
it must be said that it's almost perfect in terms of accuracy.
What version of Popfile are you using? I
13 matches
Mail list logo
