Hi Jonathan
Wednesday, September 10, 2003, 12:36:54 AM, you wrote:
JA Is there a common thread as to who is sending them, or is it a bunch
JA of people?
A bunch of people.
JA Is there a common thread amongst them?
Yes, several. One was the Zonealarm thread that I started, but the problem
Hello Jonathan,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:36:54 -0500 GMT (10/09/2003, 11:36 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Is there a common thread as to who is sending them, or is it a bunch
of people? Is there a common thread amongst them?
I can see at least one example right away of a thread breaker on
Hi Jeffrey
Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:30:46 PM, you wrote:
JAS I notice that many of the threads in this group end up broken. This
JAS seems especially obvious when The Bat! is threading based upon
JAS reference (Alt-1). I would have thought that since the bulk of us are
JAS using The Bat!,
Hi Vishal,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:19:54 -0400 you wrote:
V Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you
V mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it.
Good to hear that someone else is seeing it with The Bat!. I think
that Thomas' point was that it was our
Hi Jeffrey
Tuesday, September 9, 2003, 1:19:34 PM, you wrote:
JAS Hi Vishal,
JAS On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:19:54 -0400 you wrote:
V Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you
V mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it.
JAS Good to hear that someone else is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 09, 2003, Vishal wrote...
Yes they are. However, the problem isn't confined to myrealbox. And
I think it's unlikely that everyone's providers suddenly went
haywire.
Is there a common thread as to who is sending them, or is
Hello TBUDL,
I notice that many of the threads in this group end up broken. This
seems especially obvious when The Bat! is threading based upon
reference (Alt-1). I would have thought that since the bulk of us are
using The Bat!, we would be able to maintain a consistent thread.
Are the treads
Hello Jeffrey,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:30:46 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 00:30 +0700 GMT),
Jeffrey A. Shumway wrote:
I notice that many of the threads in this group end up broken.
Not here.
This seems especially obvious when The Bat! is threading based upon
reference (Alt-1).
That's what I'm
Hello Thomas,
Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:46:36 PM, you wrote:
TF I see yours has the TLD .cc.
Would it make a difference if I selected a different domain with the
same provider? I am a Fastmail.fm user, but I liked the eml.cc
domain. Is it Fastmail's fault of the actual top level domain?
Hello Jeffrey,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:07:02 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 01:07 +0700 GMT),
Jeffrey A. Shumway wrote:
Would it make a difference if I selected a different domain with the
same provider? I am a Fastmail.fm user, but I liked the eml.cc
domain. Is it Fastmail's fault of the actual top
08-Sep-2003 19:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
irregularly. Threads were broken, because messages 2 or 3 days old
hadn't been delivered; I received the reply to the reply before the
previous two messages.
That happens quite often here on one specific mailing list I'm on, and its
no problem. If
11 matches
Mail list logo
