Hi
On Friday 31 March 2006 at 8:35:38 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Sean Rima wrote:
Yeah maybe I will put it through hamster or something and get it to
strip the reply-to :)
May be simpler just to use the %replyto macro in your message
templates.
--
Best regards,
MFPA
Hi
On Wednesday 29 March 2006 at 9:00:17 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
How much different do need it? You can change the domain part of your
msg-id by altering the reply-to address in your account settings.
Any idea how the numeric part to the left of the @ is generated?
Hallo MFPA,
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 19:25:16 +0100GMT (9-4-2006, 20:25 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
How much different do need it? You can change the domain part of your
msg-id by altering the reply-to address in your account settings.
M Any idea how the numeric part to the left of the @ is
Hi
On Sunday 9 April 2006 at 7:35:16 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
It's generated in two parts, the left part is a random number, the
right part is a timedate stamp in the format mmddhhmmss.
Why did I not see the date/time when I looked at those before?
--
Best
Hallo MFPA,
On Sun, 9 Apr 2006 21:26:31 +0100GMT (9-4-2006, 22:26 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
It's generated in two parts, the left part is a random number, the
right part is a timedate stamp in the format mmddhhmmss.
M Why did I not see the date/time when I looked at those before?
Hallo Thomas,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 14:54:08 +0700GMT (1-4-2006, 9:54 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TF Testing. I've set a Reply-To address in the reply template for TB
TF lists, so it won't affect PMs.
TF This didn't work. Now I have set the Reply-To address in the Account
TF Properties, as
Hello Roelof,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:08:09 +0200 GMT (01/04/2006, 15:08 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
RO In order to keep that setting from messing with your PMs, you can set
RO the reply-to in your account template with a macro to the correct
RO value.
Yes, but the account template will be
Hallo Thomas,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 15:18:21 +0700GMT (1-4-2006, 10:18 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TF Yes, but the account template will be overwritten by my many AB
TF templates. So I will have to add this to every AB template!
TF Annoying...
Yep, it would be really nice to be able to
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, April 1, 2006, 1:54:08 AM, you wrote:
This didn't work. Now I have set the Reply-To address in the Account
Properties, as you suggested.
Could someone please explain where this header info gets used, other
than for setting the message id. I'm assuming here that the
Hello Stuart,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 09:32:53 -0600 GMT (01/04/2006, 22:32 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
SC Could someone please explain where this header info gets used, other
SC than for setting the message id. I'm assuming here that the info in
SC this header need not be a real
Hello Thomas,
Saturday, April 1, 2006, 9:48:03 AM, you wrote:
TF This header info is used for threading. My messages still thread when
TF I just use my normal settings, so why do I want to use a different
TF domain in the mid, you may ask.
TF The practical reason is that it allows me to create a
Hello Stuart,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 10:13:54 -0600 GMT (01/04/2006, 23:13 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
TF The practical reason is that it allows me to create a Virtual Folder
TF in TB that shows the threads I am involved in (as long as everybody
TF uses an email client that threads properly, for
Hi Sean,
on Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:28:29 +0100GMT (29.03.2006, 21:28 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Is there anyway to either have TB! not to generate a message ID or
SR generate it slightly differently
You can create a default reply-to in account properties which will
be used for the MID.
Hello Peter,
Friday, March 31, 2006, 8:02:19 PM, you wrote:
Hi Sean,
on Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:28:29 +0100GMT (29.03.2006, 21:28 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Is there anyway to either have TB! not to generate a message ID or
SR generate it slightly differently
You can create a default
Hi Sean,
on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:07:43 +0100GMT (31.03.2006, 21:07 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Is there anyway to either have TB! not to generate a message ID or
SR generate it slightly differently
You can create a default reply-to in account properties which will
be used for the MID.
Hello Peter,
Friday, March 31, 2006, 8:32:49 PM, you wrote:
Hi Sean,
on Fri, 31 Mar 2006 20:07:43 +0100GMT (31.03.2006, 21:07 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
SR Is there anyway to either have TB! not to generate a message ID or
SR generate it slightly differently
You can create a default
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 at 20:35:38 +0100, Sean wrote:
Yeah maybe I will put it through hamster or something and get it to
strip the reply-to :)
X-Ray Mail Assistant (www.xrayapp.com) would be a good and simple tool for
this.
--
Robin
Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33
Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello Peter,
On Fri, 31 Mar 2006 21:02:19 +0200 GMT (01/04/2006, 02:02 +0700 GMT),
Peter Meyns wrote:
PM You can create a default reply-to in account properties which will
PM be used for the MID. That's how I achieved mine. But don't forget to
PM have this header field shown in the new message
Hello Thomas,
On Sat, 1 Apr 2006 09:27:54 +0700 GMT (01/04/2006, 09:27 +0700 GMT),
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
PM You can create a default reply-to in account properties which will
PM be used for the MID. That's how I achieved mine. But don't forget to
PM have this header field shown in the new
Hello tbudl,
Is there anyway to either have TB! not to generate a message ID or
generate it slightly differently
Sean
--
+---+
|VOIP= FreeWorldDial: 689482 VOIPBUSTER: thecivvie |
|GPG Key http://thecivvie.fastmail.fm/thecivvie.asc |
Hallo Sean,
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:28:29 +0100GMT (29-3-2006, 21:28 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
SR Is there anyway to either have TB! not to generate a message ID or
SR generate it slightly differently
TB can't forget it.
How much different do need it? You can change the domain part of
Hello Sean Rima everyone else,
on 29-Mrz-2006 at 21:28 you (Sean Rima) wrote:
not to generate a message ID
In order to break all threading, as MS Outlook does? :-O
--
Best regards,
Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de - ICQ 238153981)
Penetrating so many secrets, we cease to believe in the
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, March 29, 2006, 9:00:17 PM, you wrote:
Hallo Sean,
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 20:28:29 +0100GMT (29-3-2006, 21:28 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
SR Is there anyway to either have TB! not to generate a message ID or
SR generate it slightly differently
TB can't
Hello Alexander,
Wednesday, March 29, 2006, 9:17:58 PM, you wrote:
Hello Sean Rima everyone else,
on 29-Mrz-2006 at 21:28 you (Sean Rima) wrote:
not to generate a message ID
In order to break all threading, as MS Outlook does? :-O
True forgot that :)
Sean
--
24 matches
Mail list logo
