On Wed 16-Jul-03 5:15pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
> Well I'll have to back and look at your settings to see if I can set
> something up to track. It would be interesting.
For a reference here's the command to compress my main mail store with
7z and zip (redirection for 4nt):
7zn u -ms=off -
Hello Bill,
Wednesday, July 16, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
> As you can see, 7z doesn't come close to zip in speed. On my
> relatively slow machine (with nearly 100 gig free disk space), I'm
> considering switching back to zip with the -1 option for TB backups.
Well I'll have to back and look a
On Tue 15-Jul-03 10:35pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
> What is the size of the source files you are backing up, and how long is
> it taking?
The "used" space is about 75 meg. Compressed is about 15 meg. There
are 827 files. On my 800 mhz P-III it updates in about 80 seconds.
The builtin TB back
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
> :: And now display the results in my editor
What is the size of the source files you are backing up, and how long is
it taking?
I have been using 7-Zip for 6 months manually with the GUI. Now with
investigating the command line capabili
On Tue 15-Jul-03 7:07pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
> Tuesday, July 15, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
>> So don't specify a new archive and p0q0 is equivalent to p1q1.
> NO, not when you consider what my INTENT on the backup was. See
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
My test the other day must have been wrong
Hello Bill,
Tuesday, July 15, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
> So don't specify a new archive and p0q0 is equivalent to p1q1.
NO, not when you consider what my INTENT on the backup was. See
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,- [ Quote: ]
| I wanted to address the possibilities with the INTENT of keeping my
On Tue 15-Jul-03 1:08am -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
> Monday, July 14, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
>>> 7za u -ms=off x:\TBArchives\tbMail7z.7z -up0q0r2x1y2z1w2
>>> "AppsBase\MAIL\*" -r
>> Why use 7za? From the manual, "7zn.exe and 7zan.exe are optimized
>> versions of 7z.exe and 7za.exe for execut
Hello Greg,
> Since this is going OT see my reply off list. :-)
Not really OT. TB is probably the kulu ngile MUA in the world :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Current version is 1.62r | "Using TB
Hello Urban,
Monday, July 14, 2003, Urban Urban wrote:
>> So if your interested in incorporating the use of 7-Zip into your
>> backup procedures of TB, the batch file I created is below.
> Thanks, worked like a charm.
You are welcome.
--
Best regards,
Greg Strong
TB! v1.
Hello Bill,
Monday, July 14, 2003, Bill McCarthy wrote:
>> 7za u -ms=off x:\TBArchives\tbMail7z.7z -up0q0r2x1y2z1w2
>> "AppsBase\MAIL\*" -r
> Why use 7za? From the manual, "7zn.exe and 7zan.exe are optimized
> versions of 7z.exe and 7za.exe for execution on Windows NT/2000/XP."
> Aren't you run
Sunday, July 13, 2003, Greg Strong wrote:
> So if your interested in incorporating the use of 7-Zip into your
> backup procedures of TB, the batch file I created is below.
Thanks, worked like a charm.
--
Urban
Current version is 1.62r | "Using T
On Sun 13-Jul-03 5:59pm -0400, Greg Strong wrote:
> 7za u -ms=off x:\TBArchives\tbMail7z.7z -up0q0r2x1y2z1w2 "AppsBase\MAIL\*" -r
Why use 7za? From the manual, "7zn.exe and 7zan.exe are optimized
versions of 7z.exe and 7za.exe for execution on Windows NT/2000/XP."
Aren't you running XP?
Also, w
Hello MAU,
Monday, July 14, 2003, MAU wrote:
>> BTW some day I'm going to have to ship you some beer in Spain. Any
>> special brands/types.
> The probably kulu ngile one in the world will do ;-)
Since this is going OT see my reply off list. :-)
--
Best regards,
Greg Strong
Hello Greg,
> Monday, July 14, 2003, MAU MAU wrote:
Only one MAU should do ;-)
> I'm satisfied with what I got.
You also were satisfied with VA, weren't you? ;-)
Now seriously. That is exactly why I don't want to give you reasons to
use Second Copy 2000. I decided to do this months ago, I sugg
Hello MAU,
Monday, July 14, 2003, MAU MAU wrote:
>>> You've never tried Second Copy 2000, have you?
>> No. What benefit is there to it?
> Ha! You will have to decide for yourself if there is any benefit for
> you. There is for me, but YMMV :)
I hear you! What can I say? I'm satisfied with what
Hello Greg,
>> You've never tried Second Copy 2000, have you?
>
> No. What benefit is there to it?
Ha! You will have to decide for yourself if there is any benefit for
you. There is for me, but YMMV :)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
_
Hello MAU,
Monday, July 14, 2003, MAU MAU wrote:
> You've never tried Second Copy 2000, have you?
No. What benefit is there to it? Like I said up to now I just relied on
ghosting the partition to a 2nd HD on the PC. It was quick, painless,
and I already owned Ghost. The only problem was if I eve
Hello Greg,
> In the past Allie has posted a batch program to completely backup TB
> registry, program, and mail base files with WinRAR.
You've never tried Second Copy 2000, have you?
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
__
Hello All,
In the past Allie has posted a batch program to completely backup TB
registry, program, and mail base files with WinRAR. I never forgot the
message. Since I have a HD to ghost images too, I never really
investigated further because I felt this was sufficient backup. The only
problem is
19 matches
Mail list logo
