Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Allie! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:59:50 PM, you wrote: AM> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:49:35 +0400, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >>> >> http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif >> This link will never work;-) You link to ftp site via http protocol... AM> Actually it did

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Alexander! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:49:35 PM, you wrote: AVK> Hi there! AVK> On 14 Apr 00, at 19:26, Patrick Erler wrote AVK> about "Re[2]: strange feature request": >> >> http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif AVK> This link

Re: strange feature request

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 23:49:35 +0400, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: >> >> http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif > This link will never work;-) You link to ftp site via http protocol... Actually it did work for me. It showed a capture of a poupup window screaming "File not fou

Re: strange feature request

Hi there! On 14 Apr 00, at 11:32, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: strange feature request": > > it is absolute legitime to expand a program > > No, it is not. The one constant of the software world is that specialized > programs will always function better in the

Re: strange feature request

Hi there! On 14 Apr 00, at 19:26, Patrick Erler wrote about "Re[2]: strange feature request": > >> http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif This link will never work;-) You link to ftp site via http protocol... > >> as we see you are not able to s

Re: strange feature request

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:35:02 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: >> The problem is that the people reading have to be asumed lazy, stupid >> etc etc and if you make it any way complicated, they go elswhere... > Bully for them. If we stuck to standards then they'd have nowhere to go > and they'd have t

Re: strange feature request

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 11:32:11 -0700, Steve Lamb wrote: > No, it is not. The one constant of the software world is that > specialized programs will always function better in their assigned roll > than the same component of a generalized program. Too many programmers > forget that and as a res

Re: strange feature request

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:26:24 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote: AM>> The link really should have been: AM>> ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta/tb142b17.zip AM>> Don't let the typo detract from the fundamental point I'm AM>> supporting. :) > but isn't this the killer argument for a f

Re[2]: another feature request

hallo Steve! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 8:55:21 PM, you wrote: SL> Friday, April 14, 2000, 11:51:19 AM, Patrick wrote: >> hallo TBUDL! >> aehm. could we have a *plonk* hotkey? >> just kidding, really. just couldn't resist %} SL> CNTL-SHIFT-F i knew you would write this PAT -- vca

Re: another feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 11:51:19 AM, Patrick wrote: > hallo TBUDL! > aehm. could we have a *plonk* hotkey? > just kidding, really. just couldn't resist %} CNTL-SHIFT-F -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main con

another feature request

hallo TBUDL! aehm. could we have a *plonk* hotkey? just kidding, really. just couldn't resist %} PAT -- vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55 BD1F 5142 3D5F 72BF --

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 11:24:04 AM, tracer wrote: > The problem is that the people reading have to be asumed lazy, stupid > etc etc and if you make it any way complicated, they go elswhere... Bully for them. If we stuck to standards then they'd have nowhere to go and they'd have to, OH MY G

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 11:19:24 AM, Thomas wrote: > However, it is correct that clicking on a link like > ftp://ftp.somewhere.com/file.exe is something my mother could master. I only > don't know whether her mailer (AOL) highlights this like TB... Which is why my link is a fully qualified UR

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 11:15:05 AM, Thomas wrote: > He overstated to make his point. However, I don't know of a single > customer in my non-computer-related business who would agree to your > line of reasoning. If the customer wants an attachment, he gets it. > It's incredible what customers want

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:56:42 AM, Patrick wrote: > and another: why do you use the bat? with all these tasks it can manage > which is better left to other clients. an adress book - why doesn't > it access a PIM? Funny, mine only holds email addresses for expansion, nothing more. My /PALM/

Re: strange feature request

Hello Steve Lamb, On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:17:54 -0700 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, April 15, 2000, 12:17:54 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: > Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:05:42 AM, Patrick wrote: >> we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach >> the

Re: strange feature request

Hallo Steve, On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:17:54 -0700 GMT (15.04.2000, 01:17 +0800 GMT), Steve Lamb wrote: >> as we see you are not able to send a simple attachement, we decided >> to give the 3.500.000 $ order to you competitor. SL> I don't know of a single business that would do that based on o

Re: strange feature request

Hallo Allie, On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 12:10:35 -0500 GMT (15.04.2000, 01:10 +0800 GMT), Allie Martin wrote: AM> I select my geocities ftp server space link by double-clicking on AM> an icon. The file on the server appear in one window. I then navigate to AM> the desired file in the other wind

Re: strange feature request

Hello Steve Lamb, On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:11:29 -0700 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, April 15, 2000, 12:11:29 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Steve Lamb wrote: > Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:59:13 AM, Patrick wrote: >> ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag >> '

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Steve! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 7:32:34 PM, you wrote: SL> Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:24:59 AM, Patrick wrote: >> when i send an attachement i'm joe user as everyone else. and as joe user i >> asked for a feature. you wouldn't implement it because you think that your >> way of doing thin

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:24:59 AM, Patrick wrote: > when i send an attachement i'm joe user as everyone else. and as joe user i > asked for a feature. you wouldn't implement it because you think that your > way of doing things should be my way too. so do. Incorrect. I don't add features th

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Allie! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 7:18:00 PM, you wrote: AM> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:05:42 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote: >> dear mister erler! >> we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach >> them to the msg but we should click on the words above. all we got is >> th

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Steve! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 7:11:29 PM, you wrote: SL> Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:59:13 AM, Patrick wrote: >> ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag >> 'n droping the attachement on to the message, ok? SL> Why? If you're the one creating the attach

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 10:05:42 AM, Patrick wrote: > we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach > them to the msg but we should click on the words above. all we got is > this: > http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif Then don't screw up the URL. Click

Re: strange feature request

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 19:05:42 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote: > dear mister erler! > we still waiting for your offer. you said its better to not attach > them to the msg but we should click on the words above. all we got is > this: > http://ftp.dresden-online.com/~perler/files/shot.gif > as we see

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:59:13 AM, Patrick wrote: > ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag > 'n droping the attachement on to the message, ok? Why? If you're the one creating the attachment it is a simple matter of placing it somewhere accessible and making th

Re: strange feature request

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:59:13 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote: SL>> Click here: > :) > ok, so lets have a plugin which makes this as simply for /me/ as drag > 'n droping the attachement on to the message, ok? There are many ftp programs out there

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Allie! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 6:49:33 PM, you wrote: AM> On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:38:07 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote: SL>>> FTP. Better. >> ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to >> fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration >> please

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Steve! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 6:48:28 PM, you wrote: SL> Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:38:07 AM, Patrick wrote: >> ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to >> fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration >> please. SL> Sure. SL> Click her

Re: strange feature request

On Fri, 14 Apr 2000 18:38:07 +0200, Patrick Erler wrote: SL>> FTP. Better. > ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to > fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration > please. ftp://ftp.ritlabs.com/pub/the_bat/beta/TB142b17.zip D

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:38:07 AM, Patrick wrote: > ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to > fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configuration > please. Sure. Click here: That simple enough? --

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Steve! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 6:27:06 PM, you wrote: SL> Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:12:32 AM, Patrick wrote: >> gif = png; >> better? SL> FTP. Better. ok. so please explain a 40 year old woman in simple words, how to fetch a file from a ftp-server. standard windows-nt configurati

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 9:12:32 AM, Patrick wrote: > gif = png; > better? FTP. Better. -- Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. ---+-

Re[2]: strange feature request

hallo Steve! on Friday, April 14, 2000, 5:50:10 PM, you wrote: SL> Friday, April 14, 2000, 8:21:13 AM, Patrick wrote: >> more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small >> scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale, >> autmoatic gif-compression... >> opi

Re: strange feature request

Friday, April 14, 2000, 8:21:13 AM, Patrick wrote: > more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small > scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale, > autmoatic gif-compression... > opinions? Stop sending them in a format which is unsuited to the task.

Re: strange feature request

Hello all, Friday, April 14, 2000, Patrick Erler wrote: > hallo TBUDL! > more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small > scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale, > autmoatic gif-compression... > opinions? wait for v2.x and script support :-) --

strange feature request

hallo TBUDL! more and more i send scanned attachements via email, how about a small scan-plugin, nothing complicated, twain-interface, greyscale, autmoatic gif-compression... opinions? PAT -- vcard/LDAP/PGP: http://dresden-online.com/~perler/identity.html PGP fingerprint: DAC6 2FDA 1ED7 AD55

Re[2]: Feature Request

Hello tracer, Saturday, January 01, 2000, 8:53:04 PM, you wrote: Jim>> For example: I get a message back from a supplier with a subject Jim>> like "Quote 13-57555" I would like it to change it to something Jim>> like "Quote 13-57555 Client Name NF 5000" t> would the quote 13-57555 be u

Re: Feature Request

Hello Jim, On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 12:35:58 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, January 02, 2000, 1:35:58 AM (GMT+0700) my local time, Jim wrote: Jim> Hello , Jim> Where do I send a feature request to. I have a real need to be able Jim> to edit the subject line that is display

Re[2]: Feature Request

Hello Syafril, Saturday, January 01, 2000, 1:03:12 PM, you wrote: SH> On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 12:35:58 -0600 GMT your local time, which was SH> Sunday, January 02, 2000, 01:35:58 [GMT+0700] my local time, Jim told SH> to the list, and this is my reply : J>> Where do I send a

Re: Feature Request

Hi Jim, On 01 January 2000 at 12:35:58 GMT -0600 (which was 18:35 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: J> Where do I send a feature request to. You might use the Help / Feedback / Suggestions option for this purpose. J> I have a real need to be able t

Re: Feature Request

On Sat, 1 Jan 2000 12:35:58 -0600 GMT your local time, which was Sunday, January 02, 2000, 01:35:58 [GMT+0700] my local time, Jim told to the list, and this is my reply : J> Where do I send a feature request to. I have a real need to be able J> to edit the subject line that is dis

Feature Request

Hello , Where do I send a feature request to. I have a real need to be able to edit the subject line that is displayed in the message lists. For example: I get a message back from a supplier with a subject like "Quote 13-57555" I would like it to change it to something li

Re: feature request : moving mail-folders by drag-n-drop

Hi, all, On 23/09/1999, at 00:53, lowlevel (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) took a mike and sang on a blues tempo: l> Greetings, l> lowlevel Just press ALT, then drag as you wish. -- Best regards, Claude. mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Thought

Re[2]: feature request : moving mail-folders by drag-n-drop

Hija Steve, Thursday, September 23, 1999, 1:00:41 AM, you seem to have written: SL> Wednesday, September 22, 1999, 3:53:42 PM, lowlevel wrote: >> I would like to move a mail-folder(-tree!) by simply dragging it to >> the right place, instead of having to re-create them (all). This >> is ver

Re: feature request : moving mail-folders by drag-n-drop

Wednesday, September 22, 1999, 3:53:42 PM, lowlevel wrote: > I would like to move a mail-folder(-tree!) by simply dragging it to > the right place, instead of having to re-create them (all). This > is very cubersome.. ALT/CNTL LMB-drags are what you're looking for. -- Steve C

feature request : moving mail-folders by drag-n-drop

Hello TBUDL, I would like to move a mail-folder(-tree!) by simply dragging it to the right place, instead of having to re-create them (all). This is very cubersome.. Greetings, lowlevel -- -- View

feature request : better handling of wrapping

Hello TBUDL, I would like to see some better handling of how the bat does wrapping. Currently, if I paste in some text with a lot of paragraphs consisting of long lines (which are perfectly wrapped in my other editors), then the bat lists them as just long lines. I have to manually sele

<    1   2   3