Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-28 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jonathan On 27 June 2002 at 15:00:35 -0500 (which was 21:00 where I live) Jonathan Angliss wrote personally I don't think that they would have noticed, banks being that inefficient. Depends on the duration of the outage... I normally spot

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-28 Thread Jonathan Angliss
Hi David, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:18:11 +0100, you wrote: I have to deal with the IT infrastructure of the banks so i know how bad they are. Lucky you ;) ps do you know that your mail is going through a server (66.137.233.209)that is on a black list at http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/ Erm...

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-28 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Salutation Marck On 27 June 2002 at 22:36:01 +0100 (which was 22:36 where I live) Marck D Pearlstone graced us with these comments I would have answered this myself earlier but I do have to speak to my family sometime. :) DE personally I don't

Re[2]: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-28 Thread Chris Weaven
Hi Januk, Now I know who to come to with template help :-) I made a couple of minor changes to your template below; JA You wrote on %QINLUDE=Date, at %QINCLUDE=Time (%ODATE=, %- JA d, at h:nn am/pm where I live): and got; %OFROMFNAME %OFROMLNAME wrote on %QINCLUDE=Date, at

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-28 Thread Thomas F
Hello Chris, On Fri, 28 Jun 2002 08:23:05 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 14:23 +0700 GMT), Chris Weaven wrote: CW 1. 20:58 GMT -0700 (Friday, June 28, 2002 at 04:58 doesn't add up. CW It appears to be missing the summer daylight saver bit, the adding CW and removing of an hour during the different time

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-28 Thread Peter Fjelsten
John [J], On 28-06-2002 09:00, you wrote in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: John, I know how to change the local time (%otimelong) to display no seconds, but how do I do that with the RegExp time? J Just change the appropriate macro in the expression. Is this waht you mean? I know. I wasn't able to,

GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi, This is my first post. Just migrated to The Bat! from Pocomail. How do I create a GMT time stamp in the Reply prefix that I see people using in this list. Preferably, where can I cut paste the macro from :) While I'm at it, can anyone reccommend a good HTML editor

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @27 June 2002, 15:00:31 +0545 (10:15 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Also, I can't load the FAQ pages at Silverstone. [IE 5.0, Opera 6.03 (default)] ^ There's your

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Mike Apsey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Sudip, Thursday, June 27, 2002, 5:15:31 AM, you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]: SP While I'm at it, can anyone reccommend a good HTML editor (with as SP smaller a foorprint as possible) that I can use to create an SP occassional HTML messages. Two

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello Sudip, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:00:31 +0545 GMT (27/06/02, 16:15 +0700 GMT), Sudip Pokhrel wrote: SPThis is my first post. Just migrated to The Bat! from Pocomail. Welcome to the list. :-) SPHow do I create a GMT time stamp in the Reply prefix that I see SPpeople using

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread John Phillips
Hello Thomas You wrote On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, at 17:29:39 [GMT +0700] (20:29:39 Thursday, 27 June 2002 where I live):- At the end of the second line, you see +0700 GMT hardcoded. Replace that with you own time zone (+0545 GMT). This regular expression, by the way, was created a few years

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Peter Fjelsten
John [J], On 27-06-2002 13:08, you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: J This one may be better, no hard coding:- J You wrote J %SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*?((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\s*?(.*))%REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS J On%SUBPATT=2, at %SUBPATT=3

Re[2]: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Marck, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 11:11:34 +0100 GMT (6/27/02, 15:56 NST), you [MDP] wrote: MDP There's your problem. Follow the Flat version links on the MDP first page, which you will be able to read. What first page are you referring to? I went to your home page and the link there doesn't work

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Tim Musson
Hey Sudip, My MUA believes you used The Bat! (v1.60q) Personal to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] on Thursday, June 27, 2002 at 9:46:03 AM. MDP There's your problem. Follow the Flat version links on the MDP first page, which you will be able to read. SP What first page are you

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @27 June 2002, 19:31:03 +0545 (14:46 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: MDP There's your problem. Follow the Flat version links on the MDP first page, which you will be able to

Re[2]: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Tim, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 09:59:20 -0400 GMT (6/27/02, 19:44 NST), you [TM] wrote: TM I would hazard a guess it is the FAQ link at the bottom of each msg TM from this list... Already tried that Tim.. it simply redirects me to the Silverstones FAQ page-the one that is not working (for me)

Re[2]: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Sudip Pokhrel
Hi Marck, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 15:51:47 +0100 GMT (6/27/02, 20:36 NST), you [MDP] wrote: MDP The FAQ works fine for me on Opera 6.02 as long as it identifies MDP itself as Opera. If you have it set to identify as IE then you'll see MDP nothing because it isn't IE. Yeah I had the Browser

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Peter, Thursday, June 27, 2002 at 14:29 GMT +0200, was when inspiration required Peter Fjelsten [PF] to write: PF John, I know how to change the local time (%otimelong) to display no PF seconds, but how do I do that with the RegExp time? A small change to the version Jon posted will do

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello John, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:08:39 +1000 GMT (27/06/02, 18:08 +0700 GMT), John Phillips wrote: JP You wrote On Thu, 27 Jun 2002, at 17:29:39 [GMT +0700] (20:29:39 Thursday, 27 June 2002 where I live):-

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Januk [J], On 27-06-2002 19:05, you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]: J A small change to the version Jon posted will do the trick: Thanks. -- greeting Best regards /greeting author Peter Fjelsten /author thebat version 1.60q /thebat version os Windows XP 5.1.2600 /os

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello Sudip, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 21:24:36 +0545 GMT (27/06/02, 22:39 +0700 GMT), Sudip Pokhrel wrote: SP Yeah I had the Browser Identification set as IE, I changed it to SP Opera, nevertheless it's still not working (sigh) It may have to do with your connection. Right now, I cannot connect to

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas On 27 June 2002 at 00:24:19 +0700 (which was 18:24 where I live) Thomas F might have written I cannot connect to the FAQ at all (Cannot find server - DNS error) It is OK now. There was a connection down between BT and the ISP. - --

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Greetings David On 27 June 2002 at 19:23:55 +0100 (which was 19:23 where I live) David Elliott wrote On 27 June 2002 at 00:24:19 +0700 (which was 18:24 where I live) Thomas F might have written I cannot connect to the FAQ at all (Cannot find

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello David, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 19:23:55 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 01:23 +0700 GMT), David Elliott wrote: DE It is OK now. There was a connection down between BT and the ISP. Thanks. I can connect now and get the familiar blank page when IE says done. This time, the last lines were: TR

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, David Elliott wrote... Just checked out Priam. It has been up and running all the time so it does look like a connection problem between BT and Scotland. Almost as good as last week with BT cutting the power at Stanstead Abbots in Hertfordshire and cutting of

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Julian Beach (Lists)
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, 7:37:28 PM, Thomas F wrote: Thanks. I can connect now and get the familiar blank page when IE says done. This time, the last lines were: TR id='text37' style='display:none'TD VALIGN=TOP WIDTH='34'nbsp;/TD TD VALIGN=TOP WIDTH='30'INPUT TYPE='Button' VA You see,

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello David, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:23:51 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 02:23 +0700 GMT), David Elliott wrote: DE Just checked out Priam. It has been up and running all the time so it does DE look like a connection problem between BT and Scotland. DE Almost as good as last week with BT cutting the

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello David On 27 June 2002 at 20:23:51 +0100 (which was 20:23 where I live) David Elliott might have written whoops should have been off list. - -- BFN, ___ David

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Thomas On 27 June 2002 at 01:37:28 +0700 (which was 19:37 where I live) Thomas F emanated these words of wisdom Thanks. I can connect now and get the familiar blank page when IE says done. This time, the last lines were: TR id='text37'

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Sudip, @27 June 2002, 21:24:36 +0545 (16:39 UK time) Sudip Pokhrel in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: MDP The FAQ works fine for me on Opera 6.02 as long as it identifies MDP itself as Opera. If you have it

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread David Elliott
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jonathan On 27 June 2002 at 14:29:37 -0500 (which was 20:29 where I live) Jonathan Angliss thoughtfully wrote the following lol... why am I not surprised? Bet Bank of Ireland were a little upset about that one. personally I don't think that

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote... Mozilla looks like a much better choice, although IE is still a long way ahead of the bunch technically. It's just a shame there are so many security holes in it. How so? I mean how is IE more advanced technically? I've recently

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, David Elliott wrote... personally I don't think that they would have noticed, banks being that inefficient. Depends on the duration of the outage... I normally spot an outage of about 30 seconds or more where I work... and if I'm not at home, a small program

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello Julian, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:39:36 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 02:39 +0700 GMT), Julian Beach (Lists) wrote: JBL I don't know if this is connected, but there are reports about a BT JBL HTTP server problem causing difficulties for DSL users trying to JBL access websites and send email in some

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello Jonathan, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 14:56:14 -0500 GMT (28/06/02, 02:56 +0700 GMT), Jonathan Angliss wrote: JA How so? I mean how is IE more advanced technically? I've recently JA switched to Netscape (which is just Mozilla in disguise) because there JA are a whole load of features that IE

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello David, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:42:13 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 02:42 +0700 GMT), David Elliott wrote: DE Humm, What is the URL ? The same as you menton below. DE If it is http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBFAQ.html then I can get it DE fine. I have also checked the page on the server and it

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, Thomas F wrote... I switched from Metscape to IE when IE5 and NS6 came out. IE5 was superior, but NS6 was a huge memory hug. Has the memory thingy improved with version 7? Version 7 is in pre-release state at the moment, but I've not had a single issue with it,

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello David, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 20:53:08 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 02:53 +0700 GMT), David Elliott wrote: lol... why am I not surprised? Bet Bank of Ireland were a little upset about that one. DE personally I don't think that they would have noticed, banks being that DE inefficient. Bruhaha! I

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Jonathan Angliss [JA] wrote: JA How so? I mean how is IE more advanced technically? I've recently JA switched to Netscape (which is just Mozilla in disguise) because JA there are a whole load of

Re[2]: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Joseph N.
JA Version 7 is in pre-release state at the moment, but I've not had a JA single issue with it, and apart from it taking about 3 seconds longer JA to load than IE, it's a lot smoother, and I've not seen any issues. Unless one needs the features that Netscape adds to the Mozilla suite, e.g.,

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Thursday, June 27, 2002, Joseph N. wrote... JA Version 7 is in pre-release state at the moment, but I've not had JA a single issue with it, and apart from it taking about 3 seconds JA longer to load than IE, it's a lot smoother, and I've not seen JA any issues. Unless one needs the features

Re[2]: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Chris Weaven
Original message received from Januk Aggarwal on 27/06/02 Hi, JA You wrote %- JA %SETPATTREGEXP=(?m-s)Date\:\s*((.*?[\d]{4})\s*?([\d]{0,2}\:[\d]{0,2})\:[\d]{0,2}\s*?(.*))%- JA %REGEXPBLINDMATCH=%HEADERS%- JA on %SUBPATT=2, at %SUBPATT=3 [GMT%SUBPATT=4] (%OTIMELONG %ODATE %- JA where I live):-

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Thomas, @27 June 2002, 03:08:42 +0700 (21:08 UK time) Thomas F in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to David Elliott on TBUDL: DE personally I don't think that they would have noticed, banks DE being that inefficient. Bruhaha! I

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jonathan, @27 June 2002, 14:56:14 -0500 (20:56 UK time) Jonathan Angliss in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck D Pearlstone: How so? I mean how is IE more advanced technically? Internally - the DOM implementation is the

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Chris, On Thursday, June 27, 2002 at 21:57 GMT +0100, an infinite number of monkeys posting as Chris Weaven [CW] typed: CW 1. How do I call this from the quick templates rather than pasting it CW directly into the reply/forward template? To start, I apologize to the moderators if this is

Re: GMT Time Stamp

2002-06-27 Thread Thomas F
Hello Marck, On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:36:01 +0100 GMT (28/06/02, 04:36 +0700 GMT), Marck D Pearlstone wrote: MDP Erm ... no, David was talking of a PSP (Payment Service Provider) EFT MDP conduit to the bank - the other side of the fence. I have no idea what this is, and had better shut up then.