On 12 March 2012, 19:34, Paul Van Noord wrote:
Hi Geoff,
On 3/12/2012 Geoff Lane wrote:
GL I'm sorry that you feel frustrated. However, while I'm glad of all the
GL support that I can get when I need it, I don't take too kindly to
GL vendors putting me down -- and I suspect that there are
On Mon, 2012-03-12, Alto Speckhardt wrote:
Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field?
Just curious: Why would one bother?
Mostly esthetics.
The X-Priority: 3 (Normal) field is meaningless both due to its
non-standard nature and, by supposedly indicating Normal, adds
no value
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:54:04 -0700, Bill McQuillan wrote:
I have noticed that TB puts:
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
SNIP
Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field?
If you really hate this header you could try loading thebat.exe in a
HEX-editor and null out all 2 (Low), 4 (Normal) and
On Tue, 2012-03-13, Arjan de Groot wrote:
On Sun, 11 Mar 2012 12:54:04 -0700, Bill McQuillan wrote:
I have noticed that TB puts:
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
SNIP
Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field?
If you really hate this header you could try loading thebat.exe in a
Hi,
Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field?
Just curious: Why would one bother?
--
Mit freundlichem Gruß
Alto Speckhardt
mailto:a...@treadstone79.de
pgpkCyz8AKE7p.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Current version is 4.2.42 |
Hallo tbudl,
Op maandag 12 maart 2012, 1:33:19, schreef St - Musaic.Net:
Bill McQuillan:
Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field?
Marek Mikus (Czech support of The Bat!):
no
Do I find such an answer a bit arrogant and so what'ish
with regards to Bill's challenge?
It's
On 12 March 2012, 11:31, Roelof Otten wrote:
Marek Mikus (Czech support of The Bat!):
no
Do I find such an answer a bit arrogant and so what'ish
with regards to Bill's challenge?
It's possible that you find it such, but Marek explained that it's an
internal field and therefore it cannot
Hello all,
well, it is really frustrating to see, how thankful users are, if somebody
reply them on sunday's night...
Yes, i am working for reseller, but I have nothing from You or anybody in
this user2user forum and it is my leisure time I am spending here.
FWIW, I interpreted Marek's no as
Hello Geoff,
It's very easy to offend even when the language is your
native tongue, and even more so when it's someone else's.
Indeed I suspect that most of the problem stems from the fact that not
many (if any) representatives of RIT are really comfortable reading
and/or writing English.
On 12 March 2012, 13:13, Marek Mikus wrote:
well, it is really frustrating to see, how thankful users are, if somebody
reply them on sunday's night...
Yes, i am working for reseller, but I have nothing from You or anybody in
this user2user forum and it is my leisure time I am spending here.
Roelof:
I don't know what more you expect, but as moderator of this list
I strongly suggest that you keep from personal attacks.
It wasn't a personal attack - I don't know Marek. In my opinion a
personal attack can encounter if you know someone and desperately
disagree with him or her OR
3/12/2012 3:28 PM
Hi Geoff,
On 3/12/2012 Geoff Lane wrote:
GL I'm sorry that you feel frustrated. However, while I'm glad of all the
GL support that I can get when I need it, I don't take too kindly to
GL vendors putting me down -- and I suspect that there are others who
GL feel the same way.
TBUDLers,
Well, since my previous question went so well. ;-)
I have noticed that TB puts:
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
in every message that I send. This is non-standard and not what I
would like to see in my messages. So, in my message templates I
include the line:
%SetHeader(X-Priority,)%-
Hello all,
Sunday, March 11, 2012, Bill McQuillan wrote:
in every message that I send. This is non-standard and not what I
would like to see in my messages. So, in my message templates I
include the line:
such X-headers are generally used in all clients I know and defined as
Extension field,
Hello Marek,
Sunday, March 11, 2012, 10:27:39 PM, you wrote:
Sunday, March 11, 2012, Bill McQuillan wrote:
%SetHeader(X-Priority,)%-
This has no effect! It still shows up.
macro %SetHeader only works for headers, which are included in Preferences,
section Message Headers - Priority is
Bill McQuillan:
Has anybody found a trick to get rid of this ugly field?
Marek Mikus (Czech support of The Bat!):
no
Do I find such an answer a bit arrogant and so what'ish
with regards to Bill's challenge?
--
St - Musaic.Net mailto:listen2rea...@musaic.net
16 matches
Mail list logo
