Hello Wolffe!
On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 6:51 PM, you wrote:
MB>> ... three pages on OE "stationery," ...
W> A perfect example of bloat! Mary, how big was this email?
W, I realize you are reading this thread some time after it was
written, and I am coming to your reply hours behind that. B
Hello Wolffe!
On Saturday, February 08, 2003, 6:45 PM, you wrote:
JH ... and I think you missed the space after the two dashes?
I addressed this problem because it took me two months to understand
what people were telling me about how to do it. I did not "get" their
language.
So I thought m
Hello Paul Wilson,
On or about Saturday, February 08, 2003 at 00:33:14GMT -0800
(which was 3:33 AM in the tropics where I live) Paul interjected:
DH>> The last version of TB! to exclude html creation may well
DH>> become a classic.
PW> And most likely the only one used in this house. If I wanted
On Friday, February 07, 2003 Mary Bull stated:
MB> ... Also, are you going to educate everyone to use
MB> html tastefully? Once when I was still having to use Outlook Express,
MB> a newbie on another list sent me a grateful reply privately, three
MB> pages on OE "stationery," shocking pink backgr
On Friday, February 07, 2003 Mary Bull stated:
JH>>> same here :-) and I think you missed the space after the two dashes?
MB> The way to be sure one gets this space in, is:
MB> 1) Hit the enter or return key after one's last line of text.
MB> 2) Type --
MB> 3) Hit the space bar (that will put th
On Friday, February 07, 2003 Kenneth S. Rhee stated:
KSR> Here is my first message using the html editor.
In the infamous words of the housewife upon seeing a mouse ..
EK
That hurt my eyes big time .. GIMME ASCII! :-)
Later
\\'olffe
_
On Saturday, February 8, 2003, 12:15:03 AM,
Tim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> I am really happy about it. I am not one of those "purists".
MB>> One does not have to be a purist to have difficulty reading html
MB>> messages in an e-mail client. :)
> True. But that's the fault of the person wr
Hello Douglas,
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 at 05:23:49[GMT -0600](which was 11:23 where I
live) you wrote:
> Not exactly. What happens is: All messages containing the string
> in the first 25 lines will be de-selected for downloading by
> the Mail Dispatcher. That is, if you want, you can let them be
>
On Friday, February 7, 2003, 12:32 PM, you wrote:
RW> I have my background as light grey so your message looks like a lot of
RW> white rectangles with different coloured text. Another reason against
RW> it :-)
I must have missed that. I tried changing the colors, but it only
changed the EDITOR
On Friday, February 7, 2003, 11:17 AM, you wrote:
>> Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT.
>> I'm sure it will be greeted with delight or scorn depending on your
>> preference.
JA> It's also very beta, and being worked on ;) So unless you love cutting
JA> edge code, I'd sugges
Hello Richard,
Saturday, February 8, 2003, 2:46 AM, you continued this thread on
html, TB! & my suggestion:
>> That is not true. Here's how I do it (it's very simple):
>> 1).- The Mail Dispatcher will pull down as many lines as you set it
>> for (I download 25).
>> 2).- Selective Download wil
Hello Douglas,
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003 at 00:13:25[GMT -0600](which was 06:13 where I
live) you wrote:
> That is not true. Here's how I do it (it's very simple):
> 1).- The Mail Dispatcher will pull down as many lines as you set it
> for (I download 25).
> 2).- Selective Download will look for the
Saturday, 2/8/2003, 12:31 AM
Hi Douglas,
On Sat, 08 Feb 2003, at 00:13:25 [GMT -0600] (which was 10:13 PM where I live)
you wrote about: 'Looks like html makes to the BAT'
DH> The last version of TB! to exclude html creation may well become a classic.
And most likely the only one
Hello Tim,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 5:15 PM, you too wrote regarding html mail:
T> Why not just view the plain text version if you don't like the HTML
T> version? The formatting junk at the beginning is annoying, but
T> bearable.
MB>> I greet it with a groan of dread. And I am not smiling.
Hello Richard,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 11:32 AM, you wrote in relation to the
new TB! html editor & html mail in general:
RW> I know people like it but I wish there was an option to strip all HTML
RW> mail instead of having to delete it manually. I know this has been
RW> discussed recently and
Hi Spike,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 3:03:07 PM, you wrote:
KSR>> Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT.
KSR>> I'm sure it will be greeted with delight or scorn depending
KSR>> on your preference.
S> SCORN!
I match your scorn and add a contempt ;-)
--
Best regards,
Mike
Hello Kenneth!
On Friday, February 07, 2003, 6:12 PM, you wrote, in response to my
reply accepting your apology to me for the html message you had sent
to tbudl:
MB>> I do not ever want to see neon-bright colors ... on my screen.
MB>> ... It gives me a headache. ...
K> Just FYI,
K> The text mes
Hello Mary,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 7:04:34 PM, you wrote:
MB> I do not ever want to see neon-bright colors and motion (of course,
MB> you didn't put motion, but that is possible, as I understand it, with
MB> html) on my screen.
MB> It gives me a headache. I do appreciate your sparing me this
Hello Kenneth!
On Friday, February 07, 2003, 5:26 PM, you wrote:
< snip >
MB>> I cannot change an html message on my machine for easier reading,
MB>> as I can a plain text message.
MB>> I am 75 years old, and my vision is not what it was at 20. ...
K> I am sorry. ...
Thank you. Apology accep
Hello Tim!
On Friday, February 07, 2003, 5:15 PM, you wrote:
MB>> I truly dislike this! [The pink html message sent by Kenneth S.
MB>> Rhee to tbudl today.] I had to put your message [replying to
MB>> Kenneth] into the Reply text editor in order to read it.
I appreciate your reply, Tim, but I th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
~john [j] wrote:'
j> How do I join the BetaBat list ?
You can use the following URL:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?body=subscribe
- --
-=] allie_M [=- {List Moderator}
MUA: TB! v1.63 Beta/6 ___ OS:
How do I join the BetaBat list ?
I have the the latest beta version and I noticed that several of my
folders are missing... I switch back to the original version and they
are there.
--
Best Regards,
~John
- - - Kenneth S. Rhee wrote - - -
> Friday, February 7, 2003, 5:51:59 PM, you wrote:
MB>>
Hello Mary,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 5:51:59 PM, you wrote:
MB> I truly dislike this! I had to put your message into the Reply text
MB> editor in order to read it.
MB> The colors are garish--on my screen--and hurt my eyes. The type is
MB> only half as large as the Courier New that I have set up
On Saturday, 8 February 2003, Mary Bull wrote:
MB> I truly dislike this! I had to put your message into the Reply text
MB> editor in order to read it.
Why not just view the plain text version if you don't like the HTML
version? The formatting junk at the beginning is annoying, but
bearable.
MB>
On Saturday, 8 February 2003, Kenneth S. Rhee wrote:
KSR> Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT.
This is great news. I was just starting to look for an alternative
mailer that would let me create HTML mail. Any idea how long before
general release?
--
Tim
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Usin
Hello Kenneth!
On Friday, February 07, 2003, 10:54 AM, you wrote:
K> span {BACKGROUND-COLOR:#FF ; }
K> span.0 {FONT-FAMILY:'arial' ; FONT-SIZE:12 ; COLOR:#00 ; }
K> span.1 {FONT-FAMILY:'arial' ; FONT-SIZE:12 ; COLOR:#FF ; }
K> span.2 {FONT-FAMILY:'courier new' ; FONT-SIZE:12 ; COLOR:#
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Julian Beach (Lists) [JB] wrote:'
>> Here is my first message using the html editor.
JB> Don't the list rules prohibit the posting of HTML messages. :-)
Indeed it does.
An HTML editor is curr
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@7-Feb-2003, 18:26 +0100 (17:26 UK time) Peter Meyns [PM] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
KSR>> Hello Jurgen,
PM> I want to second Julian. Leave The Bat!'s newly learnt features
PM> to TBBETA and keep TBUDL HTML-free. :-)
Hello Csaba,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 1:53:07 PM, you wrote:
CK> I am sorry if I sounded mean. I still think that it does not
CK> mean if BAT is capable of doing this then
CK> it has to be done.
You are perfectly OK not to use the new feature if that doesn't suit you, but that
doesn't give yo
Hello Csaba Kiss,
On or about Friday, February 07, 2003 at 19:10:48GMT +0100 (which
was 1:10 PM in the tropics where I live) Csaba Kiss inquired:
S>> On or about Friday, February 07, 2003 at 11:54:54GMT -0500
S>> (which was 11:54 AM in the tropics where I live) Kenneth S.
S>> Rhee blithered:
CK>
Hello Kenneth,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 at 11:54:54[GMT -0500](which was 16:54 where I
live) you wrote:
> One thing I like it is it's not obtrusive, and I can turn it on or off at will.
I know people like it but I wish there was an option to strip all HTML
mail instead of having to delete it manually.
Hi Kenneth,
on Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:54:54 -0500GMT (07.02.03, 17:54 +0100GMT here),
you wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] :
KSR> Hello Jurgen,
I want to second Julian. Leave The Bat!'s newly learnt features to
TBBETA and keep TBUDL HTML-free. :-)
--
Cheers
Peter
If you ate pasta
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, February 07, 2003, Spike wrote...
KSR>> span.0 {FONT-FAMILY:'arial' ; FONT-SIZE:12 ; COLOR:#00 ; }
KSR>> One thing I like it is it's not obtrusive, and I can turn it on
KSR>> or off at will.
> Unobtrusive?? How can I remove the above
Hello Spike,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 12:20:02 PM, you wrote:
S> Unobtrusive?? How can I remove the above gibberish from showing
S> up in my text window??
S> Back to the drawing board!
It showed up in my BAT fine w/o any problem.
Normally, I don't send a html-based e-mail, but I wanted to te
Hello Kenneth S. Rhee,
On or about Friday, February 07, 2003 at 11:54:54GMT -0500 (which
was 11:54 AM in the tropics where I live) Kenneth S. Rhee
blithered:
KSR> span {BACKGROUND-COLOR:#FF ; }
KSR> span.0 {FONT-FAMILY:'arial' ; FONT-SIZE:12 ; COLOR:#00 ; }
KSR> span.1 {FONT-FAMILY:'arial
Hello Julian,
On Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:09:29 + GMT (08/02/03, 00:09 +0700 GMT),
Julian Beach (Lists) wrote:
> Whilst there are arguments both ways on whether or not TB should allow
> the writing of HTML messages, I value the HTML-free nature of this
> list!
ACK.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator
On Friday, February 7, 2003, 4:54:54 PM, Kenneth S. Rhee wrote:
> Here is my first message using the html editor.
Don't the list rules prohibit the posting of HTML messages. :-)
Whilst there are arguments both ways on whether or not TB should allow
the writing of HTML messages, I value the HTML-
Hello Jurgen,
Friday, February 7, 2003, 11:49:05 AM, you wrote:
One thing I like it is it's not obtrusive, and I can turn it on or off at will.
Here is my first message using the html editor.
Could use a few more features like bullets, etc.
JH> Hello Csaba,
JH> Friday, February 7, 2003, 5:3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, February 07, 2003, Kenneth S. Rhee wrote...
> Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT.
> I'm sure it will be greeted with delight or scorn depending on your
> preference.
It's also very beta, and being worked on ;) So unles
Hello Kenneth S. Rhee,
On or about Friday, February 07, 2003 at 09:26:17GMT -0500 (which
was 9:26 AM in the tropics where I live) Kenneth S. Rhee
confirmed:
KSR> Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT.
KSR> I'm sure it will be greeted with delight or scorn depending
KSR> on your
Looks like html editing has finally made it to the BAT.
I'm sure it will be greeted with delight or scorn depending on your preference.
--
Best regards,
Kenneth mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current version is 1.62 | "Usin
41 matches
Mail list logo
