Hello Thomas,
On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 you wrote:
TF> Hello Jack,
TF> On Wed, 11 May 2016 16:07:29 -0500 GMT (12-May-16, 04:07 +0700 GMT),
TF> Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
>> I realize it's probably too late now but just for future reference, if I
>> wasn't
>> paying attention and accidentally dele
Hello Jack,
On Wed, 11 May 2016 16:07:29 -0500 GMT (12-May-16, 04:07 +0700 GMT),
Jack S. LaRosa wrote:
> I realize it's probably too late now but just for future reference, if I
> wasn't
> paying attention and accidentally deleted a message I was in the middle of
> composing, is it irretrievably
Hello TBUDL'ers,
I realize it's probably too late now but just for future reference, if I wasn't
paying attention and accidentally deleted a message I was in the middle of
composing, is it irretrievably gone? It's not in the trash and a search of files
contained in C:\Program Files (x86)\The Bat!
I just noticed that I received the "Re: Moving off" message by Dierk on
Septwember 4, but _never_ received the original "Moving off" message by Jan
Rifkinson. I received it on TBUDL though. For the record, I seem to have
received just fine all the other messages from TBTECH immediately before
and a
ON Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 7:14:16 AM, you wrote:
SP> Couple of months ago, I came across an article that propounded about a
SP> web service that allowed for a reliable way to confirm mail delivery.
SP> I don't know what kind of technology is involved or what modus
SP> operandi the service use
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wednesday, October 09, 2002
7:40:16 PM
RE: "Lost message"
Greetings Sudip,
On Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 1:14:16 AM, you wrote:
SP> Couple of months ago, I came across an article that propounded about a
SP> web service that allowe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard,
@9-Oct-2002, 07:33 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP>> Then the only explanation is a difference in configuration ...
...
RW> No, addresses fine and messages normal text. It's my
RW> misunders
Hello Dierk,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at07:53:33[GMT +0200](which was 06:53 where I live)
you wrote:
DH> I am not sure the messages have been lost. From your other messages I
DH> deduce (perhaps wrongly) that you use the wrong method to test wether
DH> a message has been sent/delivered.
I'll agree wi
Hello Marck,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at02:18:50[GMT +0100](which was 02:18 where I live)
you wrote:
MDP> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
RW>> ... The messages from TB! still remain missing. after years of
RW>> never losing a message I have 3 in the space of 24 hours. A bit
RW>> worrying, especial
Hello Dierk,
On Wed, 9 Oct 2002 at07:51:57[GMT +0200](which was 06:51 where I live)
you wrote:
>> Why should that be when all other mails, certainly to this
>> particular person, all go into the Inbox without any fuss whether
>> they are replies or new mails?
DH> Because one of your filters mis
Hello Richard!
On Tuesday, October 8, 2002 at 10:58:24 PM you wrote:
> This has happened again with another 2 messages, showing in the log as
> sent about 12 hours ago now. I copied the text across to Ameol, my
> other e-mail programme and had instant sending and replying too. The
> messages fro
Hello Richard!
On Wednesday, October 9, 2002 at 12:48:53 AM you wrote:
> Why should that be when all other mails, certainly to this
> particular person, all go into the Inbox without any fuss whether
> they are replies or new mails?
Because one of your filters misbehaves.
Take it again step by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard,
@8-Oct-2002, 21:58 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
RW> ... The messages from TB! still remain missing. after years of
RW> never losing a message I have 3 in the space of 24 hours. A bit
RW> worryin
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at07:57:44[GMT -0500](which was 13:57 where I live)
you wrote:
SM> I tried a test message and it went through perfectly ok, so it's not
SM> that, unless there's a bug in how TB! does it.
I've just spoken to one of the recipients of my supposed undelivered
mail
Hello Scott,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at07:42:37[GMT -0500](which was 13:42 where I live)
you wrote:
SM> Is it possible that you had a line with only a single space on it, and
SM> TB! didn't "fix" it to conform to RFC standards? Failing to fix might
SM> have had that result with certain anti-spam ser
ON Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:42:37 PM, you wrote:
SM> Is it possible that you had a line with only a single space on it, and
SM> TB! didn't "fix" it to conform to RFC standards? Failing to fix might
SM> have had that result with certain anti-spam servers.
Hi Scott,
It was in a msg I was try
Hi Scott, do I know you??
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 7:42:37 AM, you wrote:
SM> Is it possible that you had a line with only a single space on it, and
SM> TB! didn't "fix" it to conform to RFC standards? Failing to fix might
SM> have had that result with certain anti-spam servers.
I tried a
Hi, Gerard!
Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:48:20 AM, you wrote:
G> I have had this happen. I sent and email and it was moved to the inbox
G> but never was sent. I know this because I use a SMTP server and it just
G> didn't get there.
G> I found that if I removed about 2 lines from the bottom the m
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at09:53:35[GMT +0100](which was 09:53 where I live)
you wrote:
RW>> Some queue, it's still missing 8 hours lateer :-(
MDP> Have you checked your account log in TB to make sure the message was
MDP> actually sent?
Too late, it's gone from the log. I've never looked
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Richard,
@8-Oct-2002, 08:16 Richard Wakeford [RW] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MT>> Sometimes mailservers just get clogged, and have loads of work.
MT>> Maybe that email was stuck in aque, and the second one you sent
MT>> was
Hallo Richard,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 08:16:03 +0100GMT (8-10-02, 9:16 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
RW> Some queue, it's still missing 8 hours lateer :-(
It's happened to me that messages that reached my ISP only reached
me hours and even a day and a half later. They were having a
collapsing
ON Tuesday, October 8, 2002, 2:52:11 AM, you wrote:
RW> Never had this before.
RW> I sent a message about three hours ago and there's absolutely no sign
RW> of it anywhere even though it's in the sent folder. I've now sent it
RW> with another programme ((Ameol) and it went instantly and has now
Hello Michael,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002 at03:20:06[GMT +0100](which was 03:20 where I live)
you wrote:
MT> Sometimes mailservers just get clogged, and have loads of work. Maybe
MT> that email was stuck in aque, and the second one you sent was
MT> re-routed thru other servers to miss the clog
Some
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, October 08, 2002, Sudip Pokhrel wrote...
SM>> If you want to be sure that it got there, request a receipt. Some
SM>> software and users don't send receipts, so even that is no
SM>> guarantee.
> Couple of months ago, I came across an arti
Hi Scott,
On Monday, October 7, 2002 19:58 your local time, (Tuesday, 06:43 my
local time), you [SM] wrote:
SM> If you want to be sure that it got there, request a receipt. Some
SM> software and users don't send receipts, so even that is no
SM> guarantee.
Couple of months ago, I came across an
Hello Ladies and Gents,
On Tue, 8 Oct 2002, at 02:04:09 [GMT +0100] (which was 02:04 in my
TimeZone) you wrote:
RW> OK, it's just that it's never happened before and, as I'm new to TB, I
RW> was just wondering if I'd done something wrong but, as it's a one off,
RW> it seems not.
The Interent i
Hi Richard!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 8:04:09 PM, you wrote:
RW> On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:58:54[GMT -0500](which was 01:58 where I live)
RW> you wrote:
RW> OK, it's just that it's never happened before and, as I'm new to TB, I
RW> was just
Hello Scott,
On Mon, 7 Oct 2002 at19:58:54[GMT -0500](which was 01:58 where I live)
you wrote:
SM> Email is not guaranteed to get there. If you want to be sure that it
SM> got there, request a receipt. Some software and users don't send
SM> receipts, so even that is no guarantee.
OK, i
Hi Richard!
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Monday, October 7, 2002, 7:52:11 PM, you wrote:
RW> I sent a message about three hours ago and there's absolutely no sign
RW> of it anywhere even though it's in the sent folder. I've now sent it
RW> with another programme ((Ame
Never had this before.
I sent a message about three hours ago and there's absolutely no sign
of it anywhere even though it's in the sent folder. I've now sent it
with another programme ((Ameol) and it went instantly and has now also
just arrived here too as I'm typing this!
Strange.
--
Best re
30 matches
Mail list logo
