/MAIL command line feature and PGP bug?

2001-01-25 Thread Gerry Doyon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello fellow Bat! users, I don't know if this has already been covered before, but, I discovered that when I send messages via the command line use of TB! that TB! doesn't ask for my PGP pass phrase. Now, I know that you obviously do NOT want to

Re: SOT: PGP bug squished (was Re: Gaping hole in NAI PGP)

2000-09-01 Thread tracer
Hello Deryk Lister, On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 17:28:43 +0100 GMT your local time, which was Saturday, August 26, 2000, 11:28:43 PM (GMT+0700) my local time, Deryk Lister wrote: It's all sorted now. The nai PGP servers (ie certserv.pgp.com) now filter out keys with bogus ADK packets, and there's a

Re: SOT: PGP bug squished (was Re: Gaping hole in NAI PGP)

2000-08-27 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Saturday, August 26, 2000, 10:18:54 PM, Thomas wrote: If it came free wih McAfee, I would try and ask them. I am sure they can direct you to the correct web page or whatever at pgp. I do suspect that the freeware version upgrade will do, though. ;-) Thanks,

SOT: PGP bug squished (was Re: Gaping hole in NAI PGP)

2000-08-26 Thread Deryk Lister
It's all sorted now. The nai PGP servers (ie certserv.pgp.com) now filter out keys with bogus ADK packets, and there's a new version 6.5.8 available from www.pgpi.com I'm sure anyone who's serious with PGP keeps it updated anyway, so it should be fine ;) -- Deryk Lister || ICQ 25869912 ||

Re: SOT: PGP bug squished (was Re: Gaping hole in NAI PGP)

2000-08-26 Thread Keith Russell
Hello, fellow Bat-lovers. On Saturday, August 26, 2000, 10:28:43 AM, Deryk wrote: It's all sorted now. The nai PGP servers (ie certserv.pgp.com) now filter out keys with bogus ADK packets, and there's a new version 6.5.8 available from www.pgpi.com I'm sure anyone who's serious with PGP

Re: SOT: PGP bug squished (was Re: Gaping hole in NAI PGP)

2000-08-26 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hallo Keith, On Sat, 26 Aug 2000 13:13:51 -0600 GMT (27/08/2000, 03:13 +0800 GMT), Keith Russell wrote: KR Okay, I have a question. I've used PGP Freeware forever, but recently KR bought McAfee VirusScan Deluxe for almost nothing, and PGP KR Personal Privacy 6.5.3 was included. [...] KR

Re[2]: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Sebastian Ahmadi
Hello Wolfgang, Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 1:35:47 PM, you wrote: WK The solution is not to put your PGP key in every message. WK That's an absolutely annoying overhead. Put it on your WK home page and add the URL to your signature. WK And please add an signature separator "-- "

Re[2]: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Sebastian Ahmadi
Hello Nick, Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 8:26:52 PM, you wrote: NA On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 3:01:02 PM, Sebastian Ahmadi wrote: The program keeps asking me if I want to import the keyset. Well, the first time I thought that would be okay, but it does that EVERY time I am decrypting a

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Thu, 27 Jan 2000 15:36:56 -0500, Sebastian Ahmadi wrote: ==8 Why is that an absolutely annoying overhead? PGP works best if everyone has easy access to your public key and that is the best way to do so. I don't think you have to wait more than a fraction of a second more for your

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 12:36:56 PM, Sebastian wrote: Why is that an absolutely annoying overhead? PGP works best if everyone has easy access to your public key and that is the best way to do so. No, it is not the best way to do so. Once they have it they don't need it again... and

Re[2]: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi, WK And please add an signature separator "-- " (dashdashenternewline) WK to your TBUDL template. Oh no, sorry, that should read dashdashblankenter of course :-( -- Regards, Wolfgang Co-moderator TBUDL / TBBETA discussion lists Using The Bat! 1.39 under Windows 98 4.10 Build A in

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Tom Plunket
Why is that an absolutely annoying overhead? PGP works best if everyone has easy access to your public key... AM Suppose everyone using PGP were to adopt your policy. 10 people like you AM would add an extra second to my download time and the time factor builds up. I agree with Allie and

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 13:52, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: PGP Bug?": I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, January 27, 2000, 2:04:08 PM, Alexander wrote: I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB doesn't support yet but the

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Allie Martin
On Fri, 28 Jan 2000 01:04:08 +0300, Alexander V. Kiselev wrote: I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard things that TB doesn't support yet

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 14:10, Steve Lamb wrote about "Re: PGP Bug?": I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard thin

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-27 Thread Alexander V. Kiselev
Hi there! On 27 Jan 00, at 17:57, Allie Martin wrote about "Re: PGP Bug?": I fully support the suggestion of Steve. BTW, AFAIK this is already on the wishlist (?). This technique has proved to be quite useful I'd say. It's one of the pretty useful and pretty standard thin

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-26 Thread Wolfgang Kynast
Hi Sebastian, SA I am using The BAT since version 1.38e. I installed PGP support (6.5) SA and am happy with it. There is just something that keeps bothering me, SA and it happens every time I decrypt an encrypted message (it contains SA the sender's public key at the end). The program keeps

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-26 Thread Steve Lamb
Wednesday, January 26, 2000, 10:35:47 AM, Wolfgang wrote: The solution is not to put your PGP key in every message. That's an absolutely annoying overhead. Put it on your home page and add the URL to your signature. Feh. "Finger for PGP key." :P -- Steve C. Lamb |

PGP Bug?

2000-01-25 Thread Sebastian Ahmadi
Hi BAT users. I am using The BAT since version 1.38e. I installed PGP support (6.5) and am happy with it. There is just something that keeps bothering me, and it happens every time I decrypt an encrypted message (it contains the sender's public key at the end). The program keeps asking me if I

Re: PGP Bug?

2000-01-25 Thread Nick Andriash
On Tuesday, January 25, 2000, 3:01:02 PM, Sebastian Ahmadi wrote: The program keeps asking me if I want to import the keyset. Well, the first time I thought that would be okay, but it does that EVERY time I am decrypting a mail. What's that all about? Does anyone have the same problem?