-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marck,
Only encrypted signed messages will result in a decrypted version.
Ah, so it does. I was keying CTRL-SHIFT-D for signed messages,
instead of CTRL-SHIFT-C.
If it were decrypted in-line then you really would lose that
opportunity since
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'm just starting to get my head around using PGP with The Bat! but
I'm not entirely sure I have this set up correctly. I've installed
PGP 6.5.8ckt and The Bat! seems to work with it reasonably.
However, every time I ask for a signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Graeme,
@2-Jan-2003, 01:40 Graeme J Hosking [GJH] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
GJH However, every time I ask for a signature to be verified, or a
GJH message to be decrypted, I get a duplicate of the message with
GJH (PGP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hi Marck,
MDP The reason is that the decryption is intended to be temporary - for
MDP viewing purposes only. I employ Read message filters to delete
MDP decrypted messages automatically after reading. I also employ
MDP special macros to enforce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Toby,
@2-Jan-2003, 13:06 +1100 (02:06 UK time) Toby Tremayne [TT] in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
MDP ... I also employ special macros to enforce encryption and to
MDP remove the Decrypted from the subject when replying.
TT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: MD5
Hi Marck,
ta muchly - I'll enjoy playing with these!
Thursday, January 2, 2003, 1:12:08 PM, you wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: 2.6
iQCVAwUAPhOke0YhrxxXvPlFAQH/rQP+N83Y5QXrEM4790xagUzDv/shoSPNpdow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mike,
10-Nov-2002, 10:04 -0700 (17:04 UK time) Mike [M] in
mid:1932793500.20021110100409;telusplanet.net said:
M OK I read all the stuff about PGP installed it etc.
Which version have you installed?
M Figured out how to manually attach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@26 July 2002, 17:15 -0500 (23:15 UK time) Jonathan Angliss [JA] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL:
JA ... Now repeat the process, but before sending, stick it in the
JA draft folder, reopen, and send, and it doesn't sign it...
On Fri, 2002-07-26 at 19:30, Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
JA ... Now repeat the process, but before sending, stick it in the
JA draft folder, reopen, and send, and it doesn't sign it... any idea
JA why?
Yes. The SignComplete and UsePGP flag settings reset to the
account default values when
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@27 July 2002, 20:14 -0500 (02:14 UK time) Jonathan Angliss in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to The Bat User
List:
Yes. The SignComplete and UsePGP flag settings reset to the
account default values when reopening a
Hello Clif,
Friday, February 01, 2002, 2:48:49 AM, you wrote:
I think I've been Edited. grin
Awww don't worry about the women... as the HGTG says... along with the
rest of earth they're Mostly Harmless.
And Carren's odd characters just confirm that... well... she's an odd
character :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jim,
On 01 February 2002 at 04:03:52 -0500 (which was 09:03 where I live)
Jim wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
hehehehe (boy am I in trouble!)
moderator
My left hand is reaching for the trout as the thread veers into the OT
gully.
Let's
Carren,
Thanks for letting me know I wasn't alone in having this problem. I
didn't reply for a couple of days to see if anyone had anything
further to add, but apparently not.
The ironic thing is that breaking their PGP plug-in and having to use
the PGP clipboard tools was the very reason I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 1 February 2002 at 4:28 p.m. Clif wrote:
CO Thanks for letting me know I wasn't alone in having this problem.
CO I didn't reply for a couple of days to see if anyone had anything
CO further to add, but apparently not.
CO The ironic
Hey, hey! Did I imply I would defile myself to return to the use of
the spyware laden bloatware with its soiled diaper colored icons? Nay,
never! I just find it ironic that the thing that irritated me about
The Other Client and caused me to switch to TB! is now an irritation
(nothing more). I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Carren,
On 01 February 2002 at 17:16:00 +1300 (which was 04:16 where I live)
Carren Stuart wrote in msgid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Besides, the PGP tray and hotkeys really are just as quick to use as
the plugin in my humble opinion!
Yes, and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 1 February 2002 at 5:30 p.m. Clif wrote:
CO The editor however runnilng for cover!
Wow! You're in big trouble now! I'm with Melissa (of course!)
TB!'s editor is perfect! :-)
But I too will refrain from giving you the *editor*
I played around a bit, but also couldn't find a common denominator.
Sometimes adding a single linefeed after makes it go away; sometimes,
before the first line; sometimes both; or not.
Like you and Carren point out, it's more of an intellectual curiosity
to me at this point. In my case, I just
I think I've been Edited. grin
Thursday, January 31, 2002, 10:27:53 PM, Carren Stuart wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday, 1 February 2002 at 5:30 p.m. Clif wrote:
CO The editor however runnilng for cover!
Wow! You're in big trouble now! I'm with
Greetings, all.
I am using the 6.5.x PGP plug-in with TB! 1.53. Not always, but
frequently when I select Privacy/OpenPGP/Sign entire text it adds a
bunch of odd characters after the last line of my text and before the
PGP signature.
Is this a known bug? Or have I misconfigured something?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, 29 January 2002 at 8:27 a.m. Clif wrote:
CO Greetings, all.
CO I am using the 6.5.x PGP plug-in with TB! 1.53. Not always, but
CO frequently when I select Privacy/OpenPGP/Sign entire text it adds
CO a bunch of odd characters after the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Nick,
Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 5:35:33 AM, you wrote:
In any case , after i have installed the 1.47b2 version, S/MIME still
give me the above message
NA Stefano, are you wanting to use PGP, or S/MIME? The two are both
NA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Stefano,
Tuesday, September 19, 2000, 9:41:52 AM, you wrote:
Oops, sorry for S/MIME attachment !
- --
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WEB : http://www.zamprogno.com - http://www.zamprogno.it
ICQ : 3813299
Using The Bat! 1.47
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On September 19, 2000, at 12:41:52 AM, Stefano Zamprogno Wrote:
Is this a registered version ?
What i have to do to make TB show my version ? (it only show 6.5)
Thanks !
I used a Hex Editor on the DLL... If you also have 6.5.8 installed on your
This message: 19/09/2000 22:00 GMT.
Hello Nick,
A reminder of what Nick ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
19 September 2000 at 09:01:14 GMT -0700
NA If you want to
NA download Desktop Security Suite 6.5.8 for free, go here:
What's the difference between all the different version there? I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On September 19, 2000, at 2:00:58 PM, Tony Boom Wrote:
What's the difference between all the different version there? I see two
the same but one was just over 1Mb the other 10Mb.
The 1 MB file you see there is obviously an incomplete archive. The
Hello Bat lovers,
I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. No valid signing certificates. Cannot sign the message using S/MIME
When I uncheck S/MIME option everything goes ok.
I think I didn't see this option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Vladimir,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 11:49:59 AM, you wrote:
The same here !
VM I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
VM 1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
VM 2. No valid signing
Hello all,
Monday, September 18, 2000, Vladimir Mincev wrote:
I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. No valid signing certificates. Cannot sign the message using S/MIME
When I uncheck S/MIME option
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciao Marek,
Monday, September 18, 2000, 2:31:43 PM, you wrote:
I tried to sign one message (by checking sign when completed) but it says:
1. No signing certificate for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2. No valid signing certificates. Cannot sign the message
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hi,
We can setup a macro for "sign when completed". But can we say in
the template with WHICH key we want sign, assuming there are many
signing keys in the keyring ?
Thanks,
Cameleon
http://cameleon.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version:
Hello all,
Thursday, September 07, 2000, Cameleon wrote:
We can setup a macro for "sign when completed". But can we say in
the template with WHICH key we want sign, assuming there are many
signing keys in the keyring ?
no. You can write wish :-)
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Using the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thursday, September 07, 2000, 8:16:18 AM, Marek wrote:
Hello all,
Thursday, September 07, 2000, Cameleon wrote:
We can setup a macro for "sign when completed". But can we say in
the template with WHICH key we want sign, assuming there
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
*/Reply
Sunday, May 28, 2000, 2:05:08 AM, you wrote:
NA -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
NA Hash: SHA1
NA On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 4:52:37 PM, Christian Dysthe wrote:
CD U.why is that? Isn't PGP..eh..PGP? I mean isn't a 1024 key
just
Hello phil,
On Sun, 28 May 2000 11:28:16 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Monday, May 29, 2000, 1:28:16 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
phil wrote:
Greetings Nick!
I look at it this way
If they say they aren't--they ARE.
If they say it isn't--it IS.
If they say they don't--they DO.
If
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 8:38:53 PM, Gary wrote:
p Technically if you want to get down and say that, then I've always
p heard that the older the version of pgp (ie. 2.x) are harder to
p crack than the newer windows versions. I can't remember
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Servus Nick,
Am 28.05.2000 so gegen 08:06 meintest Du:
Personally, I believe Open Source Software has the "potential" to
be more secure, but there is also value in security through
obscurity. :o)
But you remember the discussion on PGP-Users about my
Greetings Nick!
On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 23:06:07 GMT -0700 (which was 11:06 PM
where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
p Technically if you want to get down and say that, then I've always
p heard that the older the version of pgp (ie. 2.x) are harder to
p crack than the newer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sunday, May 28, 2000, 1:24:27 AM, Johannes M. Posel wrote:
JMP But you remember the discussion on PGP-Users about my governments
JMP claims against PGP in favour of OpenPGP and a possible NAI/NSA
JMP "friendship"? While with Open Source, you can
Greetings Nick!
On Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 10:10:20 GMT -0700 (which was 10:10 AM
where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
NA U... I don't think you can "dismiss such claims" based solely on the
NA Open Source Code. Remember, one point of the argument _for_ obscurity, is
NA that
Greetings Nick!
On Sunday, May 28, 2000 at 10:18:02 GMT -0700 (which was 10:18 AM
where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
p Although I've spent plenty of time on securityfocus.com I disagree,
p security through obscurity is not very effective. Look at all the
p shareware programs that
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Sun, 28 May 2000 00:33:44 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, May 28, 2000, 2:33:44 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
NA Personally, I believe Open Source Software has the "potential" to be more
NA secure, but there is also value in security through
Hello Tom Plunket,
On Sun, 28 May 2000 00:33:44 -0700 GMT your local time,
which was Sunday, May 28, 2000, 2:33:44 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Tom Plunket wrote:
http://www.scramdisk.clara.net/pgpfaq.html#SubDSSSubliminal
So who checked the MS double key system (g)??
Interesting reading...
Hello Nick,
Saturday, May 27, 2000, 12:15:17 AM, you wrote:
NA I have two Accounts Christian, and would like to do the same thing, but
NA I've not figured out how, unless someone else has come up with a way. It
NA would be a nice implementation though.
NA Instead, TB! simply PGP clear-signs
On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 5:13 PM or thereabouts, Christian Dysthe
wrote the following about PGP signing question.:
Christian You are right though, in these multi mail account times
Christian when even your average ISP gives you a few aliases this
Christian functionality would be very helpful
Hello Nick,
Saturday, May 27, 2000, 5:25:22 PM, you wrote:
NA Hopefully, PGP will be better implemented in Version 2.0, but until then,
NA it's my feeling that the external PGP implementation, as opposed to the
NA internal, would better accommodate the security concerns of TB! Users.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 4:52:37 PM, Christian Dysthe wrote:
CD U.why is that? Isn't PGP..eh..PGP? I mean isn't a 1024 key just as
CD secure implemented in The Bat! as used from an external application? I am
CD not expert, maybe I have
On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 3:24:42 PM, Chuck Mattsen wrote:
I'm sure there are reasons of which I'm simply unaware, but why cannot
one simply have their multiple addresses on *one* key? Why the need
for multiple keys?
Although PGP allows for more than one User name or E-Mail address for use
Greetings Nick!
On Saturday, May 27, 2000 at 18:05:08 GMT -0700 (which was 6:05 PM
where you think I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
NA The latest freeware version of PGP is 6.5.3, and PGP Desktop Security 7.0
NA has already been released, although the freeware version has not. There is
NA no
Hi Phil,
On Saturday, May 27, 2000, 10:20:43 PM, you wrote in part about "PGP
signing question.":
p Technically if you want to get down and say that, then I've always
p heard that the older the version of pgp (ie. 2.x) are harder to
p crack than the newer windows versions. I can'
Hello TBUDL,
I have different PGP keys for different mail accounts. Is it way to
have The Bat! sign with a specified key based on which account mail
is sent from?
--
Best regards,
Christian Dysthe
http://christian.dysthe.tripod.com
ICQ: 3945810
PGP Public Key:
51 matches
Mail list logo
