Hello Jonathan,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:36:54 -0500 GMT (10/09/2003, 11:36 +0700 GMT),
Jonathan Angliss wrote:
Is there a common thread as to who is sending them, or is it a bunch
of people? Is there a common thread amongst them?
I can see at least one example right away of a thread breaker on
Hi Jeffrey
Monday, September 8, 2003, 1:30:46 PM, you wrote:
JAS I notice that many of the threads in this group end up broken. This
JAS seems especially obvious when The Bat! is threading based upon
JAS reference (Alt-1). I would have thought that since the bulk of us are
JAS using The Bat!,
Hi Vishal,
On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:19:54 -0400 you wrote:
V Yes, same problem here. And no it shouldn't be a fastmail problem as you
V mentioned elsewhere since I don't use it.
Good to hear that someone else is seeing it with The Bat!. I think
that Thomas' point was that it was our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, September 09, 2003, Vishal wrote...
Yes they are. However, the problem isn't confined to myrealbox. And
I think it's unlikely that everyone's providers suddenly went
haywire.
Is there a common thread as to who is sending them, or is
Hello Jeffrey,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:30:46 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 00:30 +0700 GMT),
Jeffrey A. Shumway wrote:
I notice that many of the threads in this group end up broken.
Not here.
This seems especially obvious when The Bat! is threading based upon
reference (Alt-1).
That's what I'm
Hello Jeffrey,
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:07:02 -0400 GMT (09/09/2003, 01:07 +0700 GMT),
Jeffrey A. Shumway wrote:
Would it make a difference if I selected a different domain with the
same provider? I am a Fastmail.fm user, but I liked the eml.cc
domain. Is it Fastmail's fault of the actual top
08-Sep-2003 19:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
irregularly. Threads were broken, because messages 2 or 3 days old
hadn't been delivered; I received the reply to the reply before the
previous two messages.
That happens quite often here on one specific mailing list I'm on, and its
no problem. If
7 matches
Mail list logo
