Hello Chris,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 22:48:36 -0400 GMT (08/08/2006, 09:48 +0700 GMT),
Chris W. wrote:
How did you do that? My account filters are just not triggered. Or do
you have continue with other filters checked in the account filters?
CW My common filters have Continue processing other
Hallo Thomas,
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 22:43:19 +0700GMT (6-8-2006, 17:43 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF 3.) Run the common filters first, and only if continue is checked,
TF also run the account filters. (This seems to be the case.)
This is what happens. A message is compared with the common filters
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:50:16 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 15:50 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF 3.) Run the common filters first, and only if continue is checked,
TF also run the account filters. (This seems to be the case.)
RO This is what happens. A message is compared with the
Hallo Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:05:46 +0700GMT (7-8-2006, 14:05 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF One more thing I want to achieve: Mark the original message as read
TF (but not the copy). I haven't an idea yet how to achieve that.
I haven't tested that, but what about first copying it and
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 14:26:50 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 19:26 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF One more thing I want to achieve: Mark the original message as read
TF (but not the copy). I haven't an idea yet how to achieve that.
RO I haven't tested that, but what about first copying
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:53:29 +0700GMT Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF I can copy using mark copy as read. That is not what I want. I want
TF mark original as read. Seems to be difficult.
why not move the copy to the place of the original and the original to
the place of the copy and
Hello Feli,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:00:36 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 20:00 +0700 GMT),
Feli Wilcke wrote:
TF I can copy using mark copy as read. That is not what I want. I want
TF mark original as read. Seems to be difficult.
FW why not move the copy to the place of the original and the original to
Hallo Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 20:13:49 +0700GMT (7-8-2006, 15:13 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF If I move (instead of copy) to folders in account X, how do I copy
TF back to account A/B/C?
With a second action in the same filter.
1st action: move to whatever
2nd action: copy to account of
Hello Roelof,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 15:46:14 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 20:46 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF If I move (instead of copy) to folders in account X, how do I copy
TF back to account A/B/C?
RO With a second action in the same filter.
RO 1st action: move to whatever
RO 2nd action: copy
Hello Thomas,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 21:02:11 +0700GMT Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF How do you copy to account origin? The common filters do not
TF discriminate, the are shared between accounts A, B, and C.
subfilter for each account? (I did not test it)
--
Regards,
Feli
The Bat! 3.81.14 Beta on
Hello Feli,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 16:43:08 +0200 GMT (07/08/2006, 21:43 +0700 GMT),
Feli Wilcke wrote:
TF How do you copy to account origin? The common filters do not
TF discriminate, the are shared between accounts A, B, and C.
FW subfilter for each account? (I did not test it)
The account
Hello Stuart,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 10:45:32 -0500 GMT (07/08/2006, 22:45 +0700 GMT),
Stuart Cuddy wrote:
I can copy using mark copy as read. That is not what I want. I want
mark original as read. Seems to be difficult.
SC I have not been following too close so pardon me if I am getting this
Dear Ariane,
@7-Aug-2006, 16:07 +0200 (07-Aug 15:07 here) Ariane Furer [AF] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Thomas:
AF I receive so many e-mail, stop your answer.
You have been moderated for top-posting. I feel I should at least
explain to you where you are - you seem to be experiencing
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
TF The only way I can think of is adding a subfilter to all (over
TF 100) common filters. That isn't practical.
It's good you're leaning away from a solution that involves common
subfilters, since it probably wouldn't work:
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
--
Thomas Fernandez @ 2006-8-07 8:05:46 AM
Filter: Add Block? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I would have thought that when the common filters are finsihed, a
new session with the account filters is started. It's a matter of
design, and obviously the developers decided otherwise.
The way I have things
Hello Chris,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 19:48:45 -0400 GMT (08/08/2006, 06:48 +0700 GMT),
Chris W. wrote:
I would have thought that when the common filters are finsihed, a
new session with the account filters is started. It's a matter of
design, and obviously the developers decided otherwise.
CW The
Hello George,
On Mon, 7 Aug 2006 11:24:34 -0700 GMT (08/08/2006, 01:24 +0700 GMT),
George Mitchell wrote:
GM It's good you're leaning away from a solution that involves common
GM subfilters, since it probably wouldn't work:
GM https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4021
Good that you mention
Thomas Fernandez @ 2006-8-07 10:00:07 PM
Filter: Add Block? mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The way I have things setup, that would render most of my common
filters useless. I have a number of common filters that set user
parameters that account filters then use to do various things, like
sort to
Hallo Thomas,
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 16:31:31 +0700GMT (6-8-2006, 11:31 , where I live),
you wrote:
TF I'm still having some problems with my filtering system: When common
TF filters are triggered, account-level filters are ignored.
Well, that makes sense, doesn't it? After all when a message
Hello Roelof,
On Sun, 6 Aug 2006 12:25:27 +0200 GMT (06/08/2006, 17:25 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF I'm still having some problems with my filtering system: When common
TF filters are triggered, account-level filters are ignored.
RO Well, that makes sense, doesn't it?
This entirely
20 matches
Mail list logo
