On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, 7:19:53 PM, David Marlow wrote:
When in workstation with tcp/ip mode and sharing the names and
matters common folders AbacusBat! a.k.a (The Bat!), will lose folder
information.
I'm a little lost on your description of the setup and on what you are
losing. Do you
Hello Ralf,
On Mon, 6 Aug 2001, at 12:02:46 [GMT +0200] you wrote:
RB The bug description:
RBAfter clicking Cancel in connection center after sending mail
RBdirectly from the message editor, I'm unable to send out any mail
RBduring this session. Trying to send out mail later
Hello Devid,
On Tuesday, May 15, 2001 at 9:34:55 PM you wrote:
DV The bug description:
DV When opening the Account Log twice or more, and closing it
DV again, you get an access violation error.
confirmed over here. additionally I can say: you get an access
violation for EVERY account
Hi Peter,
On Wed, 16 May 2001 11:23:45 +0200GMT (16/05/2001, 17:23 +0800GMT),
Peter Palmreuther wrote:
DV The bug description:
DV When opening the Account Log twice or more, and closing it
DV again, you get an access violation error.
PP confirmed over here.
Not confirmed. Regardless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Devid,
Tuesday, May 15, 2001, 3:34:55 PM, you wrote:
DV Steps to reproduce the bug:
DV * minimise The Bat! (to the tray or not, it doesn't matter)
DV * put your focus on something from The Bat!, like a new mail
DV message
On Wednesday, May 16, 2001 19:41:01 David Elliott wrote:
DV The bug description:
DV When opening the Account Log twice or more, and closing it
DV again, you get an access violation error.
PP confirmed over here.
Not confirmed. Regardless of how often I hit shft-crtl-A, only one
Hello Devid,
On Wed, 16 May 2001 19:07:06 +0200 GMT (17/05/2001, 01:07 +0800 GMT),
Devid Verfaillie wrote:
DV The bug description:
DV When opening the Account Log twice or more, and closing it
DV again, you get an access violation error.
Not confirmed.
DV Are you sure TB! is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:37:30 +0200, Markus wrote these words of wisdom:
MG I'm using The Bat! Version 1.52 Beta/3
MG under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5
MG and would like to report a bug
MG The bug description:
MG The Bat! crashes
Hello Markus,
On Friday, April 06, 2001 12:37:30 [ +0200 GMT], you wrote the
following in regards to 'The Bat! - bug report - crash when creating
new folders in the save attachment dialog':
Markus I'm using The Bat! Version 1.52 Beta/3
Markus under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5
Hi,
On Friday, April 06, 2001, 3:10:39 PM, Jan Rifkinson wrote:
I experienced a somewhat similar situation under WinME which I know is
a different OS. However, I'd like to point out that when I disabled
the CPU slow down/hibernate/auto-close down/nap ;-) features, the
problems went away.
Hallo Marck,
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:04:03 + GMT (23/03/2001, 04:04 +0800 GMT),
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
MDP This is an *urgent* problem.
You are aware that they are probably in Hanover:
TheBat auf der CeBIT: Stand Rainbow Technology Halle 23 Stand C55
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
On 22 March 2001 at 06:14:04 +0800 (which was 22:14 where I live)
Thomas wrote to Marck D. Pearlstone on TBUDL and made these points:
MDP This is an *urgent* problem.
T You are aware that they are probably in Hanover:
T TheBat auf
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, at 15:48:25 (your local time), you wrote:
MDP The bug description:
MDP When using a system-wide hotkey or the mouse to access the ticker
MDP to view messages, the ticker ignores input while the 'N new
MDP messages' text is touching the LHS
Hello Lija,
(L == "Lija") [EMAIL PROTECTED] coined:
MDP messages' text is touching the LHS of the ticker.
L Pardon Me For Jumping In, what is LHS?---
Left Hand Side? :)
--
...
Brian Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP-KeyID:
Hello Andrej others on TBUDL following this thread,
Sunday, January 07, 2001, you stated regarding :
A Other problem, many people writes their messages in MS WORD, then
A copies to The Bat!, each paragraph in this case turns to one long line
Even Notepad will do that. In TB! of course, one
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 6 Jan 2001 12:27:57 +0500, Andrej wrote these words of wisdom:
A The bug description:
There's no bug.
A Other problem, many people writes their messages in MS WORD, then
A copies to The Bat!, each paragraph in this case turns to one long
Hello!
Sunday, January 07, 2001, 12:58:16 PM, Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Other problem, many people writes their messages in MS WORD, then
A copies to The Bat!, each paragraph in this case turns to one long line
AGSAA Taken from the readme.txt shipped with the version 1.49 of The Bat!:
Hello Andrej,
Saturday, January 06, 2001, 8:27:57 AM, you wrote:
Other problem, many people writes their messages in MS WORD, then
copies to The Bat!, each paragraph in this case turns to one long line
This can be avoided. Either use Alt+L to format the paragraph or
(better if you have
On Friday, January 05, 2001, 11:27:57 PM, Andrej wrote:
rfc 1939 (POP3)
Responses in the POP3 consist of a status indicator and a keyword possibly
followed by additional information. All responses are terminated by a
CRLF pair. Responses may be up to 512 characters long, including the
Hello!
Saturday, January 06, 2001, 10:27:57 AM, Andrej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Other problem, many people writes their messages in MS WORD, then
A copies to The Bat!, each paragraph in this case turns to one long line
Taken from the readme.txt shipped with the version 1.49 of The Bat!:
On 04-01-2001 at 21:46:48GMT + (which was 21:46 where I live)
Adam wrote regarding the subject of "The Bat! - bug report"
Hello Adam,
Adam In this instance this seems to be quite a major security flaw, as I
Adam often start in the wrong account, and then use options/active account
Adam to
Hello!
Friday, January 05, 2001, 12:46:48 AM, Adam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A I'm using The Bat! Version 1.48f
A Serial Number 4E83F57A
A under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
A and would like to report a bug
A The bug description:
A I have cc'd this to the list, as it
Hello Adam,
On Thu, 4 Jan 2001 at 21:46:48 GMT + (which was 1:46 PM
where I live) witnesses say Adam typed:
snip
I have an account which I just use for a mailing list, as the list
sets the reply to to the sender and the list address, I have set the
reply to in the accounts properties
On Wednesday, December 20, 2000, 9:09:45 AM, David wrote:
Is there a way to uninstall the language pack without uninstalling
TB itself? If there is, I did not find it. I renamed TheBat.LNG
whereafter TB was only able to show up in English, but that had no
effect on my problem.
Sorry, I
On Wednesday, December 20, 2000, 3:42:38 AM, David wrote:
I already updated to the beta driver I found on www.3dfx.com by
now (This was the only one being offered for Vodoo Banshee on
Windows 2000.) Still, the problem persists.
Just took a good look at your screen capture and found there're
Hallo David,
On Wed, 20 Dec 2000 18:09:45 +0100 GMT (21/12/2000, 01:09 +0800 GMT),
David Buntenbroich wrote:
Since you're using a German version of TB, could you try to
uninstall the language pack and see if the problem disappear in a
English only version. I vaguely remember some other
On Saturday, December 16, 2000, 2:41:45 AM, David wrote:
Is there anyone else with a Vodoo Banshee on Windows 2000 having
this problem?
BTW, AFAIK there is one other person on the German TB list who had the
problems I described.
You mean he/she also uses a Vodoo Banshee card? Just to make
On Friday, December 15, 2000, 9:36:46 AM, David wrote:
This looks like a display driver problem. Have you tried to
update your display driver?
It looks like, doesn't it? The only problem is: it does neither
happen anywhere else in TB nor in any other program.
It's tough, indeed. I
On Friday, December 15, 2000, 12:43:15 AM, David wrote:
The message dispatcher appears scrambled. Clicking with the
mouse leaves traces. This is happening since version 1.48.
Screenshot: http://www.buntenbroich.de/tb/dispatch.png
This looks like a display driver problem. Have
Hello all,
Friday, December 15, 2000, David Buntenbroich wrote:
The bug description:
The message dispatcher appears scrambled. Clicking with the
mouse leaves traces. This is happening since version 1.48.
Screenshot: http://www.buntenbroich.de/tb/dispatch.png
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000 14:26:26 +0100, Marek Mikus thoughtfully wrote
the following:
[...]
MM not confirmed.
MM BTW use TBBETA for bugreports instead TBUDL please.
It's perfectly admissible to make bug reports on TBUDL provided that the
bug concerns
Hello Ming-Li,
Sorry for breaking the thread but until now I was in digest mode.
Friday, 15 Dec 2000 04:56:44 -0800, you wrote:
This looks like a display driver problem. Have you tried to update
your display driver?
It looks like, doesn't it? The only problem is: it does neither happen
On 15-12-2000 at 14:26, Marek Mikus kindly wrote:
Friday, December 15, 2000, David Buntenbroich wrote:
The bug description:
The message dispatcher appears scrambled. Clicking with the
mouse leaves traces. This is happening since version 1.48.
Screenshot:
On Wednesday, December 13, 2000, 2:45:01 PM, Krzysztof wrote:
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Create a filter that works against messages with attachment and
associates it to a color group. After you receive such message
highlight it and try to delete the attachment. The
On November 20, 2000, at 2:21:06 PM, A. Curtis Martin Wrote:
ACM This has been my exact experience as well. Do you use the auto-format
ACM mode Nick? It tends to happen to me in that mode.
Yes I do Allie... always have. I have been using auto-format for so I
don't really want to be without it.
Hello John + list,
On Samstag, 18. November 2000 at 09:07:44 you wrote:
[disappearing message after arrival of new one]
I have had this for a while, and not sure that it is exclusive to the
Halloween edition - in addition, my threading is set to None.
This bug has been existing for several
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 19, 2000, at 10:24:21 AM, Tobias Wrede Wrote:
I have had this for a while, and not sure that it is exclusive to the
Halloween edition - in addition, my threading is set to None.
TW This bug has been existing for several versions
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000, at 19:24:21 [GMT +0100], Tobias Wrede wrote:
TW This bug has been existing for several versions already.
TW IIRC it only happens if there are no unread messages in the
folder
TW and the currently displayed message is last in
Hello Nick,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 at 11:23:08 GMT -0800 (which was 11:23 AM
where I live) witnesses say Nick Andriash typed:
Another annoying bug that has been with us for many versions which may be
somewhat related to the above, is when you create a new message, then have
to backspace out
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On November 19, 2000, at 12:09:36 PM, Januk Aggarwal Wrote:
JA I can't reproduce this bug. Can you give detailed instructions
JA please? (Perhaps we should move this to TBBETA since we're both using
JA Beta versions...)
No, I think it's OK to
Hello Nick,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 at 13:10:47 GMT -0800 (which was 1:10 PM
where I live) witnesses say Nick Andriash typed:
No, I think it's OK to discuss it here on TBUDL, because it has existed
for many versions, including the Halloween Edition. The instructions to
see this bug in action
On November 19, 2000, at 1:36:44 PM, A. Curtis Martin Wrote:
ACM I can't reproduce the problem the way you instructed. :=(
Hmmm? You are right Allie. I cannot reproduce it every time with new
messages. For a while this morning, I was able to replicate the bug every
time, using both replies as
Hello Nick,
On Sun, 19 Nov 2000 at 14:08:14 GMT -0800 (which was 2:08 PM
where I live) witnesses say Nick Andriash typed:
No Januk, I can't reproduce it now either, but only moments before I was.
Believe me, the bug exists...
I believe you, that is why I'm interested in helping you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When I saw Nick's message about "The Bat! - bug report ",
I felt like making these comments:
[..]
NA No Januk, I can't reproduce it now either, but only moments before I was.
NA Believe me, the bug exists... it's just intermittent, and difficult to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Thomas Fernandez !
On Sat, 18 Nov 2000 15:28:16 +0800 GMT your local time,
which was 18.11.2000, 08:28 (GMT+0100) where I live, you wrote:
I do not confirm this. Message come in all the time, and I never see a
blank screen where I was
Hallo Mike,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 16:59:47 -0500 GMT (18/11/2000, 05:59 +0800 GMT),
Mike Yetto wrote:
MY The bug description:
MY If a message is received while reading a prior message the one
MY being read is cleared.
MY Steps to reproduce the bug:
MY Open a message with message list
Hello A,
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 at 17:37:15 GMT -0500 (which was 3:37 PM
where I live) witnesses say A . Curtis Martin typed:
Enter a quick search string and hit the 'find next' shortcut
(CTRLENTER), you will be simply moved to the next message in the
list.
Confirmed. See the sig for
On Friday, October 27, 2000, 3:37:15 PM, A. wrote:
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.47 Halloween Edition Serial Number
CCA4F9B8 under Windows NT 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 1
Same configuration.
The bug description:
The 'find next' option for the quick search facility is broken.
On Fri, 27 Oct 2000 at 23:24:11 GMT -0700 (which was 11:24 PM
where I live) witnesses say Januk Aggarwal typed:
Enter a quick search string and hit the 'find next' shortcut
(CTRLENTER), you will be simply moved to the next message in the
list.
Confirmed. See the sig for system
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 28 Oct 2000 02:51:51 -0700, Januk Aggarwal wrote these
comments about 'The Bat! - bug report':
Confirmed. See the sig for system details.
JA Er, I recant this confirmation. It seems I put my brain on hold
JA while performing this test.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
This is the sig and subsequent TB! PGP failure which occurred yesterday.
On 17-Sep-2000 Tony Boom wrote:
Hello Marck,
A reminder of what Marck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
17 September 2000 at 03:01:08 GMT +0100
MDP The bug
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, September 18, 2000, Jerry Cook wrote to RIT Research Labs about
The Bat! - bug report (VCard Export):
JC When I try to export a VCard file from my address book, the card
JC is always exported relating to the first contact in the particular
JC
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On September 16, 2000, at 7:01:08 PM, Marck D. Pearlstone Wrote:
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Receive a signed message containing TAB characters and try to get
the signature to pass verification - it won't.
Confirmed! ;o)
Nick
N.J.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
This message: 17/09/2000 11:15 GMT.
Hello Marck,
A reminder of what Marck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
17 September 2000 at 03:01:08 GMT +0100
MDP The bug description:
MDP If a signed PGP message contains TAB characters, TB converts
Hello Tony,
On Sunday, September 17, 2000 at 11:18:59 GMT +0100 (which was 3:18 AM
where I live) witnesses say Tony Boom typed:
I assume from the layout of your report that you used tabs in it
as an example. If so I can't confirm your bug.
I just imported
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tony,
This is the sig and subsequent TB! PGP failure which occurred yesterday.
On 17-Sep-2000 Tony Boom wrote:
Hello Marck,
A reminder of what Marck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) typed on:
17 September 2000 at 03:01:08 GMT +0100
MDP The bug
Hello Marck,
Monday, July 31, 2000, 11:47:21, you wrote:
MDP Hello The Bat! developers,
MDP I'm using The Bat! Version 1.45 S/MIME
MDP Serial Number 14F4B4B2
MDP under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998
MDP and would like to report a bug
MDP The bug description:
MDP When the internal
Hello Tom,
On Montag, 17. Juli 2000 at 19:06:02 you wrote:
TW When I klick on the "Send queued mail" button and the above error
TW occurs it is not possible to send afterwards. To be precise, when
TW klicking that button again the dialogue "nothing to send" appears.
Perhaps this is
TW When I klick on the "Send queued mail" button and the above error
TW occurs it is not possible to send afterwards. To be precise, when
TW klicking that button again the dialogue "nothing to send" appears.
Perhaps this is because those messages are marked to go out already
when the
Hallo Steve,
Am Donnerstag, 13. Juli 2000 um 18:51:08 hast Du geschrieben:
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.44
under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5
SP 6a here.
Create a new filter. Try to use the mouse to enter the text box for the
string to search on. Will not work.
Hi Tobias,
try to tab into the drop down boxes next to it. Will not work.
confirmed. But you can enter that drop down boxes with the arrow
keys. But then again I cannot scroll in the list. :-(
Try space bar.
Definitly its a strange usage of tabkey and arrowkeys.
Agreed. To be fair,
Friday, July 14, 2000, 2:16:42 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
Agreed. To be fair, though, its current arrangement isn't illogical
per se. Yet the school of using Tab to move around fields and Arrows
to move within a drop-down list has won out in today's Windows
programming.
Bite your tongue! I was
Hi Steve,
Friday, July 14, 2000, 8:17:32 AM, you wrote:
Friday, July 14, 2000, 2:16:42 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
Agreed. To be fair, though, its current arrangement isn't illogical
per se. Yet the school of using Tab to move around fields and Arrows
to move within a drop-down list has won out in
Friday, July 14, 2000, 2:16:42 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
Agreed. To be fair, though, its current arrangement isn't illogical
per se. Yet the school of using Tab to move around fields and Arrows
to move within a drop-down list has won out in today's Windows
programming.
Bite your tongue!
Friday, July 14, 2000, 8:55:50 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
TB is treating the whole filter string area as a field, and use
arrow keys to move within it. After realizing it, I've come to like
it better. Tabbing/Shift-Tabbing is a sequential movement; you can
only move back and forth. The filter string
Tom Plunket wrote:
I would say for nearly as long as there's been data entry too. I used
IBM S/36 for a while, and I don't know if that predates PCs or not
(386 was top-of-line when I was on S/36),
Yes, definitely the /3x series predates the PC.
but I got the impression that IBM has had
Hello Steve and Bat Buddies...
SL Create a new filter. Try to use the mouse to enter the text box for the
SL string to search on. Will not work.
Not confirmed. Works here.
SL From that field (must be tabbed into) try to tab into the drop down boxes
SL next to it. Will not work.
Thursday, July 13, 2000, 11:48:57 AM, Jason wrote:
SL Create a new filter. Try to use the mouse to enter the text box for the
SL string to search on. Will not work.
Not confirmed. Works here.
[The Bat! v1.45 Beta/7, Win98]
Might be a WinNT specific problem.
--
NA I don't see why we have to Ming-Li. We are not even sure if there is a
NA bug, and even if there was, how are we to know if it's attributable to
NA the Beta. I mean, everyone is using the latest Beta...
Who exactly is "everyone"? I, for one, do not keep up with the latest
and greatest. My
Hi Nick,
Create a template where you want to send two attachments
together in the same message. Use the %ATTACHFILE macro to
point to each file, one at a time, so that your Template
clearly shows both attachments as being sent. If you set it
up where you send yourself a test
On Monday, July 03, 2000, 1:55:20 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
ML Sorry, can't confirm here. I set it up exactly as you described,
ML and went on to do several tests. All messages generated had two
ML attachments in them.
Although based primarily on what you did Ming-Li, I did it just a little
On Monday, July 03, 2000, 1:55:20 AM, Ming-Li wrote:
ML BTW, do you think we should move this thread to the TBBETA list?
I don't see why we have to Ming-Li. We are not even sure if there is a
bug, and even if there was, how are we to know if it's attributable to
the Beta. I mean, everyone is
Hi Nick,
However, now I am faced with a new dilemma. When a request
comes in for my PGP Keys, the reply is automatic and both my
keys are sent. :o) However, with every ensuing request, TB!
somehow doubles the order! In other words, two copies of my
Keys will be sent with the next request,
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000 14:16:57 -0700, Ming-Li wrote:
ML Then I sent myself a request message. It works--the reply
ML message was sent automatically. To be sure, I sent another one.
ML This time I got two auto-reply message back! Why? Because the
ML first auto-reply message had the subject "Re:
Hello Nick,
On Mon, 3 Jul 2000 at 11:07:16 [GMT -0700], you wrote:
ML BTW, do you think we should move this thread to the TBBETA list?
NA I don't see why we have to Ming-Li. We are not even sure if there
NA is a bug, and even if there was, how are we to know if it's
NA attributable to the
Hi Steve,
On 22 May 2000 at 07:45:51 GMT -0700 (which was 15:45 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "The Bat! - bug report - Message Truncated after =00":
the sequence "=00". At this sequence the message get truncated by
the mail server (Zero Byte
On Tue, May 23, 2000 at 09:30:18AM +0100, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
the sequence "=00". At this sequence the message get truncated by
the mail server (Zero Byte means often "end of Text").
Uhm, in what context.
In the context of 'C' and 'C++' programming where a nul
Hi Steve,
On 23 May 2000 at 02:03:14 GMT -0700 (which was 10:03 where I
live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject
of "The Bat! - bug report - Message Truncated after =00":
In the context of 'C' and 'C++' programming where a nul character
(Ascii Zero) denotes the
Sunday, May 21, 2000, 3:37:39 PM, Dirk wrote:
Sometime the messages generated by the Bat! (quoted printable
coding) contain the sequence "=00". At this sequence the message
get truncated by the mail server (Zero Byte means often "end of
Text").
Uhm, in what context. Last I
Jay, dia duit!
On 24/03/2000 you may or may not have meant to post the following to TBUDL:
Steps to reproduce the bug:
Click on a message in the message list, hit Ctrl-R, voilá a
reply.
Double click on a message, hit Ctrl-R, voilá a
reply.
Click on a message
On Thursday 16 March 2000 Justin D. Paine wrote:
of course.. but RBL requires that a spammer actually exploits a server
before it is blacklisted.. for inclusion in ORBS, a server just has to
be open to relaying.. Makes no matter if it's ever been used for spam,
the mere fact that "it could
Hello!
Thursday, March 16, 2000, 5:07, Justin D. Paine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JDP Well, if you use a server that allows relaying, it's only a matter
JDP of time before it shows up on ORBS, and then a lot of mail servers
JDP will begin rejecting all connections from it anyhow.
I am
Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
Monday, March 13, 2000, Markus Gloede wrote to Bat List about
The Bat! - bug report:
MG and click OK nothing happens. :(
That's what I thout at first also. But next time I checked mail I've
got selected messages in my inbox forwarded (I have
Hello,
Monday, March 13, 2000, You wrote:
Hello The Bat! developers,
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.41
Serial Number 4A849B39
under Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5
and would like to report a bug
The bug description:
Multiple forward is not working anymore.
On Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:01:17 +0100, Jast wrote:
Steps to reproduce the bug: - change the name of an address book
group by clicking on the name and changing it there directly
- close TB - restart TB - the name should be the same now as
before the change
Confirmable?
Wednesday, February 16, 2000, 3:58:31 PM, Soth wrote:
other things) and don't have the luxury of dealing with many
computer-literate people. Frankly, trying to get them to install and
understand an ftp client (God forbid I try to explain command-line ftp)
is too painful.
Everyone has a
On Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:37:18 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
Is that really a fair comparison?
Well Yes. An email attachment is encoded into 7bit data.
Right there you inrease the size of the file by 1/8th. So an 8Mg
file becomes 9Mb. Of course, they don't use all of the 7bit
Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 10:28:31 AM, Allie wrote:
About receiving mail... I've not seen TB fault on this, but I've
sometimes got the impression that throughput is poor with large
mails. Receiving a mail of, say, 8 MB seems to take significantly
longer than ftping a file that size. I
On Mon, Feb 14, 2000 at 10:58:22AM -0500, Soth wrote:
So, can anybody suggest a solid email client that intuitively handles
multiple POP accounts, has excellent filtering features, a reasonable
interface, and that doesn't kick the bucket when it comes to a big
email?
PMMail2000.
--
Monday, February 14, 2000, 9:07:18 AM, Soth wrote:
*grin* Thank you. I love the interface. ;-) Now to put it under some
of the same grueling tests that I've put TB! through... (ie/ 32000 +
stored messages, see how it handles my joke list traffic, etc...)
Well, it handled my workload
On Monday, February 14, 2000, 8:20:58 AM, Steve Lamb wrote:
So, can anybody suggest a solid email client that intuitively handles
multiple POP accounts, has excellent filtering features, a reasonable
interface, and that doesn't kick the bucket when it comes to a big
email?
PMMail2000.
Monday, February 14, 2000, 11:54:00 AM, Nick wrote:
Perhaps I didn't give it long enough, but when I realised that it couldn't
thread messages... or if it could, I certainly didn't find a way... I
dumped it and found TB... and have been here ever since. :o)
It does not thread.
--
Hi there!
On 14 Feb 00, at 11:54, Nick Andriash wrote
about "Re: The Bat! - bug report":
PMMail2000.
I tried that Program a while back, and a few things I found I didn't like.
For one, I just couldn't get PMMail to thread messages. It would group the
messages of the sa
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 08:20:58 -0800, Steve Lamb wrote:
So, can anybody suggest a solid email client that intuitively
handles multiple POP accounts, has excellent filtering features, a
reasonable interface, and that doesn't kick the bucket when it
comes to a big email?
PMMail2000.
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:58:22 -0500, Soth wrote:
Well, I'm back with my favourite pet peeve. And since I'm in a bad
mood, I'll be blunt. Although TB! is, without question, my favourite
email client, it SUCKS in a big-huge way when it comes to handling big
email attachments. Yes, I am
Hello Allie Martin,
On Mon, 14 Feb 2000 18:55:06 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Tuesday, February 15, 2000, 6:55:06 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie Martin wrote:
Yes, I'm a bad, bad boy for sending email that big. Who cares.
Fix the problem. Why should TB! use in excess of 192
Hello Soth,
On Monday, February 14, 2000 at 10:58:22 GMT -0500 (which was 15/02/2000
22:58 GMT +0700 my Local Time) you told to the list:
S Well, I'm back with my favourite pet peeve. And since I'm in a bad
S mood, I'll be blunt. Although TB! is, without question, my favourite
S email
Hi Oleg,
Monday, January 24, 2000, 7:57:09 AM, you wrote:
OZ Hello, the Bat! list recipients,
OZ Sunday, January 23, 2000, Mark Aston wrote to RIT Research Labs about
OZ The Bat! - bug report:
MA "Server reports error. The response is -ERR Could not open Inbox for
MA
MA Connection
Hallo Mark,
On Sun, 23 Jan 2000 10:11:21 + GMT (23.01.2000, 18:11 +0800 GMT),
Mark Aston wrote:
MA I use a dial-up account, if I am already connected TB! collects all
MA my accounts no problem, if however I initiate dial-up from TB! I get
MA the following
MA "Server reports error.
Hi Thomas,
Sunday, January 23, 2000, 11:10:02 AM, you wrote:
TF If so, do you manually connect with the same DUN file? - I mean
TF Account/Properties/Network/Dial Up Networking Connection. I have a
TF pop-down list showing all the DUN connections I have installed on my
TF PC. I usually use only
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
