Friday, September 12, 2008, 11:19:39 AM, Privateofcourse ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
This version doesn't seem to. The kludges/headers:
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198
Thread-Index: AckT/hHhbq2zQW3MQrCb7evKSGep5Q==.
Hi Simon,
Friday, September 12, 2008, 3:51:15 PM, Privateofcourse ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
For discussion lists this is the best setting that I've found (+ save the
view mode as 'expanded' so you're not forever clicking little +es) ...
Are you aware that once a root message is highlighted
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 08:38:08 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 9:38 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P I have noticed that when replying to messages sent to me by people using
P Microsoft Office Outlook my replies aren't threaded. That is, the reply
P isn't 'attached' to the original replied
Hello Roelof,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:14:42 +0200 your time, you said:
P [...snip...] when replying to messages sent to me by people using
P Microsoft Office Outlook my replies aren't threaded. [...snip...]
That's because the replies sent to you don't contain a References or
an In-Reply-To
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 11:19:39 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 12:19 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P Yes, you're correct. I just checked and the emails and they don't contain
P those normal headers. However, they do contain Thread-Index:, which seems
P to be a Microsoft specific header that
Hello Roelof,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 13:18:47 +0200 your time, you said:
Might be a configuration issue, when my brother used Outlook 11, his
messages contained In-Reply-To, References and Thread-Index. These
days he's using MSO 12 and he's still using the same headers.
Some confusion here I
Hallo Simon,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 12:51:43 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 13:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
P So, this is my take on how this breaks threading:
P 1. (i) A new email with a new 'subject' is sent from an Outlook client.
P(ii) Outlook does not add a message-ID: header to the email.
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 12:51:43 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
I can of course thread by References and subject and received time
How? The Bat! only gives me the following 6 choices for threading:-
None
References (standard)
Subject
From
To
References +
Hello MFPA,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:05:03 +0100 your time, you said:
I can of course thread by References and subject and received time
How? The Bat! only gives me the following 6 choices for threading:-
Okay, more accurately, to get around it I meant this:
View Menu -
| Sort by:
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 3:51:15 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Privateofcourse
wrote:
Okay, more accurately, to get around it I meant this:
View Menu -
| Sort by:
- Received time
| View Threads by:
- References + Subject
Hi
On Friday 12 September 2008 at 2:53:22 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Roelof Otten wrote:
Ouch! Not only does Outlook 'forget' to insert the msg-id, but the
intermediate servers also forget about that, according to the relevant
RFCs that should be done.
Anyway there's nothing you can do
Hallo MFPA,
On Fri, 12 Sep 2008 20:10:04 +0100GMT (12-9-2008, 21:10 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
Ouch! Not only does Outlook 'forget' to insert the msg-id, but the
intermediate servers also forget about that, according to the relevant
RFCs that should be done.
Anyway there's nothing you
12 matches
Mail list logo
