Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Jean, @28-Jan-2004, 10:50 +0100 (28-Jan 09:50 UK time) Jean Site [JS] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: is may indeed work, but make sure you switch the accounts to POP3 first and backup the messages you want to keep safe from any IMAP accounts. JS you switch the accounts to POP3

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread ken green
Jonathan Angliss wrote: I can give you hope Thank you for your post. I have come to a workable solution for now, while I anxiously await the stability and feature set that The Bat's potential hints at. -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread ken green
Paul Berger wrote: Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/ (I assume this is OK since all require registration keys) -- Ken Green Using The Bat! v1.62r on Windows 2000 5.0 Build 2195 Service Pack 4

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-28 Thread ETM
Anyone know where I can download v1.62r? I inadvertently kept 1.61 and discarded 1.62r http://www.thegoat.net/public/TheBat/ Also at http://www.ritlabs.com/the_bat/download.html Elaine Current version is 2.02.3 CE | Using TBUDL

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Marten Gallagher
On Tuesday, January 27, 2004 at 11:18:01 PM, you wrote: Well, I decided to take the plunge and upgrade my desktop to v2. [snip] I was feeling good about The Bat again. I'm now going to have to spend time trying to get back to 1.62r and see if I can recover some messages But you did a

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread ken green
Well, I decided to take the plunge and upgrade my desktop to v2. UPDATE: uninstalled TB (leaving message base directories intact), re-installed 1.62r, full restore... everything seems back to normal. Now... I would *LIKE* to use the v2 I paid for. What is the best way to upgrade to v2?

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Ken, @27-Jan-2004, 17:18 -0600 (27-Jan 23:18 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUDL: K My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to K Pop conversion?) Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing. The instructions for the upgrade were

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread ken green
Marten Gallagher wrote: But you did a backup and an EML export first didn't you.. so that's alright then ;-)) Backup yes. EML export no. Why EML export? Are you kidding? Create over 60,000 EML files? Full restore after reverting back to 1.62 seems to be OK. -- Ken Green Using The Bat!

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Ken, @27-Jan-2004, 17:35 -0600 (27-Jan 23:35 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to ken: ... snip K Would it help to set all accounts to POP and do another full K backup in 1.62? Then try to restore from that? This is the optimum route. ... snip K One more thing... I

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread ken green
Marck D Pearlstone wrote: K My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to Pop K conversion?) Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing. If there were no such thing, why is there a CONVERSION PROCESS during the upgrade? Are you talking about something else? The

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
Dear Ken, @27-Jan-2004, 18:14 -0600 (28-Jan 00:14 UK time) ken green [K] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck: K My main business account Inbox came back empty (from the IMAP to Pop K conversion?) Hang on a minute... I didn't think there was such a thing. K If there were no such thing, why

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread ken green
quoting Marck D Pearlstone: K If there were no such thing, why is there a CONVERSION PROCESS K during the upgrade? M Pass - I didn't know they'd been added. OK. We were coming from different places. M These instructions were an integral part of the beta cycle for v2. If a Bat user purchases

Re: upgrade: WARNING!

2004-01-27 Thread Jonathan Angliss
On Tuesday, January 27, 2004, ken green wrote... M These instructions were an integral part of the beta cycle for v2. If a Bat user purchases an upgrade to the Christmas Edition, THEY HAVE TO BE ON THE BETA LIST to get through the problems of installation? Not entirely the case. The issues